Mostly everything is configurable, and revertable as user - granted.
I'd like to see a announcement and an optional discussion on this list
if base profile gets changed [0] - current case bug 449364 [1].
I'm not opposed to the specific change, or base system changes in
general, but I don't like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/28/2013 06:54 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Because it would require us to change a whole load more than just
the targets variable.
This is sort of the same for PHP. We need to know the major and minor
version based on the flag value. We
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Michael Weber x...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'd like to see a announcement and an optional discussion on this list
if base profile gets changed [0] - current case bug 449364 [1].
I think that makes a lot of sense as a guideline. To me, it's a bit
weird to change a USE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dnia 2013-07-31, o godz. 09:38:20
Ole Markus With olemar...@olemarkus.org napisał(a):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/28/2013 06:54 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Because it would require us to change a whole load more
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:21:20AM +0200, Michael Weber wrote
Mostly everything is configurable, and revertable as user - granted.
I'd like to see a announcement and an optional discussion on this list
if base profile gets changed [0] - current case bug 449364 [1].
I'm not opposed to the
Hi list,
I'd like to propose a new eclass db-use-r1 [1].
While working on the dev-libs/Ice package I found it to fail with sys-
libs/db:6.0 (see [2]) and I have found no way to use current db-use.eclass to
make Ice compile against an older sys-libs/db slot if db:6.0 is installed.
So I'd like
On 07/31/2013 11:53 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:
Hold on a minute. There is a *MAJOR* difference between gpm the USE
flag, and sys-libs/gpm the mouse server.
[...]
If there was a move afoot to remove sys-libs/gpm from the install ISO,
I would be part of the crowd up in arms about this.
It does
On Tue, 30 Jul 2013 09:04:56 -0700
Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org wrote:
I committed it last night before your email.
# Keep it sorted. Please do not add anything without prior
discussion # on
gentoo-dev.
n32
n64
o32
This is not a valid format for a .desc file. You should use:
flag -
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:21:20AM +0200, Michael Weber wrote
Mostly everything is configurable, and revertable as user - granted.
I'd like to see a announcement and an optional discussion on this list
if base profile
Walter Dnes posted on Wed, 31 Jul 2013 05:53:50 -0400 as excerpted:
Hold on a minute. There is a *MAJOR* difference between gpm the USE
flag, and sys-libs/gpm the mouse server. I'm one of those weird guys
who starts USE with -*.
aolMe too./aol
And I do not have gpm the USE flag enabled.
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 3:38 AM, Ole Markus With
olemar...@olemarkus.org wrote:
I don't really care what the separator is. The reason I chose dash for
separation major/minor version was simply to distinguish between the
value and variable part of USE_EXPAND. Just seemed natural at the time.
I
Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org writes:
Also, drive space would be dead wrong. A drive[1] is a device which
holds a storage medium (often a disk, as in, you know, a disk drive).
Solid-state drive is even more confusing than solid-state disk (and
both are common parlance).
In the interest of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 30/07/13 10:53 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:40 AM, viv...@gmail.com
viv...@gmail.com wrote:
does storage space make everyone happy?
rich0 is confused and looks over at the storage space he keeps
his bicycles in...
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:12 AM, Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jul 2013 09:04:56 -0700
Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org wrote:
I committed it last night before your email.
# Keep it sorted. Please do not add anything without prior
discussion # on
gentoo-dev.
n32
n64
I would like to know if there is any kind of DB to check for packages
providing files under a directory. Does any exist?
Thanks
El mar, 30-07-2013 a las 11:42 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió:
On 29/07/13 23:57, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Hello
As discussed at:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478476
Upstream is dropping static libs from udev and, then, sys-apps/udev is
currently reverting that commit
On 07/31/2013 12:03 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
I would like to know if there is any kind of DB to check for packages
providing files under a directory. Does any exist?
portageq owners / /path/to/directory
--
Thanks,
Zac
El mié, 31-07-2013 a las 12:11 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
On 07/31/2013 12:03 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
I would like to know if there is any kind of DB to check for packages
providing files under a directory. Does any exist?
portageq owners / /path/to/directory
But, doesn't it force me to
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
El mié, 31-07-2013 a las 12:11 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
On 07/31/2013 12:03 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
I would like to know if there is any kind of DB to check for packages
providing files under a directory. Does any exist?
El mié, 31-07-2013 a las 15:19 -0400, Mike Gilbert escribió:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
El mié, 31-07-2013 a las 12:11 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
On 07/31/2013 12:03 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
I would like to know if there is any kind of DB to check
As both a member of base-system, and the lvm2 maintainer, I'm going to
go and look at fixing them, because I'd prefer to keep them available as
static builds.
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 09:07:39PM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El mar, 30-07-2013 a las 11:42 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió:
On
El mié, 31-07-2013 a las 19:42 +, Robin H. Johnson escribió:
As both a member of base-system, and the lvm2 maintainer, I'm going to
go and look at fixing them, because I'd prefer to keep them available as
static builds.
But, what is requiring it?
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:58:37PM +0200, Michael Weber wrote
On 07/31/2013 11:53 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:
Hold on a minute. There is a *MAJOR* difference between gpm the USE
flag, and sys-libs/gpm the mouse server.
[...]
If there was a move afoot to remove sys-libs/gpm from the install
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:58:37PM +0200, Michael Weber wrote
On 07/31/2013 11:53 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:
Hold on a minute. There is a *MAJOR* difference between gpm the USE
flag, and sys-libs/gpm the mouse server.
[...]
If there was a move afoot to remove sys-libs/gpm from the install
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 07:42:26PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
As both a member of base-system, and the lvm2 maintainer, I'm going to
go and look at fixing them, because I'd prefer to keep them available as
static builds.
Robin,
I'm curious what the use case for keeping them as static
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:03 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 07:42:26PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
As both a member of base-system, and the lvm2 maintainer, I'm going to
go and look at fixing them, because I'd prefer to keep them available as
static
On 01/08/13 04:03, William Hubbs wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 07:42:26PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
As both a member of base-system, and the lvm2 maintainer, I'm going to
go and look at fixing them, because I'd prefer to keep them available as
static builds.
Robin,
I'm curious what
On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 22:12 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
Honestly, I don't think maintainers should be asked to justify
features unless they're actually causing some kind of conflict.
If Robin wants to support USE=static for lvm2, he can do so. If it
somehow caused problems with other
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 04:22:29AM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
On 01/08/13 04:03, William Hubbs wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 07:42:26PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
As both a member of base-system, and the lvm2 maintainer, I'm going to
go and look at fixing them, because I'd prefer to
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:32:56PM -0400, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 22:12 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
Honestly, I don't think maintainers should be asked to justify
features unless they're actually causing some kind of conflict.
If Robin wants to support USE=static
30 matches
Mail list logo
