On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 13:04 -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 06/11/13 12:56 PM, yac wrote:
On Wed, 06 Nov 2013 16:48:54 +0100 Alexis Ballier
aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 10:15 -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
However, it's been a long-standing general practise that
Thomas D. posted on Thu, 07 Nov 2013 02:00:29 +0100 as excerpted:
Duncan wrote:
Meanwhile, another question for Thomas. Is this certificate stapling
the same thing google chrome is now doing for the google site, that
enabled it to detect the (I think it was) Iranian and/or Chinese CA
Dear Denis,
Denis M. g...@politeia.in writes:
Please review this, and if you agree that it'd be a good idea come
with any suggestions to make it happen as well as with any other
thoughts/sys-specs/instances we should be looking for.
Thanks for the offering. Though not a member, AT teams
On 11/07/2013 12:53 PM, hero...@gentoo.org wrote:
Dear Denis,
Hi Benda,
Denis M. g...@politeia.in writes:
Please review this, and if you agree that it'd be a good idea come
with any suggestions to make it happen as well as with any other
thoughts/sys-specs/instances we should be looking
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Denis M. g...@politeia.in wrote:
Almost every Gentoo dev that does software testings of some sorts could
benefit from these build farms (although I'd refrain from using that
term ;) ..).
Don't let me put a damper on your plans as-is, but I'd be interested
if
Rackspace (where I work) currently has a developer discount program. I
think we also host some open source stuff for various projects. Right
now you can try to use http://developer.rackspace.com/ but if we want to
make this more official I can ask around. Let me know if we want this
as a more
Alexis Ballier wrote:
its kind of common sense IMHO
Unfortunately what makes sense to people is never common. :\
there shouldn't be any time limit
..
in short: if a package requires version X then the ebuild should
require version X; it can be forgotten but it's a bug.
+1
//Peter
On 11/07/2013 02:48 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
Rackspace (where I work) currently has a developer discount program. I
think we also host some open source stuff for various projects. Right
now you can try to use http://developer.rackspace.com/ but if we want to
make this more official I can ask
On 11/07/2013 12:26 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 11/07/2013 02:48 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
Rackspace (where I work) currently has a developer discount program. I
think we also host some open source stuff for various projects. Right
now you can try to use http://developer.rackspace.com/ but
On 11/07/2013 08:59 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
On 11/07/2013 12:26 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 11/07/2013 02:48 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
Rackspace (where I work) currently has a developer discount program. I
think we also host some open source stuff for various projects. Right
now you can
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Denis M. g...@politeia.in wrote:
On 11/07/2013 08:59 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
iirc, we give $200 if infra for developer accounts for a couple of
months. If a deal is struck it would likely be more and forever or
something.
I've been running my VM for Ago for
On 11/07/2013 09:18 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Denis M. g...@politeia.in wrote:
On 11/07/2013 08:59 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
iirc, we give $200 if infra for developer accounts for a couple of
months. If a deal is struck it would likely be more and forever or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/11/13 09:20 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Denis M. g...@politeia.in wrote:
Almost every Gentoo dev that does software testings of some sorts
could benefit from these build farms (although I'd refrain from
using
On 11/07/2013 03:07 PM, Denis M. wrote:
On 11/07/2013 09:18 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Denis M. g...@politeia.in wrote:
On 11/07/2013 08:59 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
iirc, we give $200 if infra for developer accounts for a couple of
months. If a deal is struck it
Le jeudi 07 novembre 2013 à 10:44 +0100, Alexis Ballier a écrit :
in short: if a package requires version X then the ebuild should require
version X; it can be forgotten but it's a bug.
That _is_ our policy. Ebuilds should - at the very least - mirror what
upstream's build script requires.
So,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07.11.2013 21:18, Rich Freeman wrote:
Seriously, though, I'd love to see these needs better supported.
I think we need to start by defining what the needs actually are
(less redundancy, more consistency, etc). Then we figure out how
to best
For some context of this please see
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/88222
v8-3.20.17.7 fixes a memory corruption vulnerability, see
http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/2013/10/stable-channel-update.html
However, we still have v8-3.19 and even 3.18 in portage - this is
17 matches
Mail list logo
