-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
# Matti Bickel m...@gentoo.org (21 Nov 2013)
# Outdated, beta and abandoned upstream, removal on 20131220
dev-php/PEAR-File_PDF
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
On 2013.11.21 15:21, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Thu, 21 Nov 2013, hasufell wrote:
For the time being, it will be listed as a top-level project.
(There were some ideas that Licenses could be a subproject of
another TLP, but so far this hasn't worked out.)
It should be a subproject of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/20/2013 03:22 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
Hello all,
The licenses team exists since some time with an e-mail alias
only, and we think it's about time to upgrade to a project.
http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Licenses
This is a small
On Thu, 21 Nov 2013, hasufell wrote:
For the time being, it will be listed as a top-level project.
(There were some ideas that Licenses could be a subproject of
another TLP, but so far this hasn't worked out.)
It should be a subproject of QA.
Indeed, that's one of the two TLPs that were
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
After talking to zmedico privately, and raising the issue and
discussing it with people in bug #481578[0], I implemented the
behaviour described in a comment[1] on said bug.
I sent this to zmedico almost two months ago, but it doesn't look like
Alexander Berntsen posted on Thu, 21 Nov 2013 10:21:02 +0100 as excerpted:
After talking to zmedico privately, and raising the issue and discussing
it with people in bug #481578[0], I implemented the behaviour described
in a comment[1] on said bug.
I sent this to zmedico almost two months
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 21/11/13 12:19, Duncan wrote:
I'm with zmedico in comment #11, and *STRONGLY* oppose this change
as you're proposing. Current autounmask is **NOT** useless.
How is it not? Consider comment 6[0] and 10[1].
FWIW, I have a very specific
Alexander Berntsen posted on Thu, 21 Nov 2013 13:03:36 +0100 as excerpted:
On 21/11/13 12:19, Duncan wrote:
I'm with zmedico in comment #11, and *STRONGLY* oppose this change as
you're proposing. Current autounmask is **NOT** useless.
How is it not? Consider comment 6[0] and 10[1].
I read
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 21/11/13 14:34, Duncan wrote:
I read comment 10, and am objecting based on it
You have fundamentally misunderstood everything in it. Please reread it.
1) Because the dependency calculations take time, I normally use
--ask so I don't have to
On 11/21/13 03:21, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
After talking to zmedico privately, and raising the issue and
discussing it with people in bug #481578[0], I implemented the
behaviour described in a comment[1] on said bug.
I sent this to zmedico almost two months ago, but it doesn't look like
El jue, 21-11-2013 a las 10:21 +0100, Alexander Berntsen escribió:
I sent this to zmedico almost two months ago, but it doesn't look like
he's coming back any time soon, so I'm sending it here and ask someone
to review and commit it (a role zmedico has typically played for me,
as well as being
Alexander Berntsen posted on Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:23:50 +0100 as excerpted:
4) You're saying emerge --ask foo would write the config
No. Please read comment 10[0].
Quoting one example from comment 10:
emerge --ask foo
would also do what is currently done by: emerge --ask --autounmask-write
12 matches
Mail list logo
