On Tue, 9 Sep 2014 21:45:49 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hello,
Let's keep it short: I think herds don't serve any special purpose
nowadays. Their existence is mostly resulting in lack of consistency
and inconveniences.
In particular:
1. We have two different tags in
On 17/09/14 14:09, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
On Wed, 17 Sep 2014, Luca Barbato wrote:
The bc utility is part of the posix tools and it might be used to build
linux among the other stuff.
Luca,
bc is not in the system set and is a dependency of the kernel or any
other package that
On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 06:25:28 -0400
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 4:58 AM, Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Right now, CC'ing a single alias is inconvenient, but under your
proposal, you might need to CC a dozen or more people instead of
that alias.
On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 18:31:03 +0600
Vladimir Romanov bluebo...@gmail.com wrote:
Em. I don't agree. I prefer Emacs and don't like Vim. But if i must
choose between Vim and Nano, i prefer Nano
But vi is POSIX.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Dnia 2014-09-23, o godz. 16:52:56
Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
Modified: ChangeLog perl-module.eclass
Log:
Remove support for EAPI 1, 2, 3 in perl-module.eclass (no packages left
in the tree)
This could have used some kind of heads-up.
On 27 September 2014 20:40, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 18:31:03 +0600
Vladimir Romanov bluebo...@gmail.com wrote:
Em. I don't agree. I prefer Emacs and don't like Vim. But if i must
choose between Vim and Nano, i prefer Nano
But vi is POSIX.
vi
On 09/27/2014 08:51 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 06:25:28 -0400
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 4:58 AM, Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Right now, CC'ing a single alias is inconvenient, but under your
proposal, you might need to CC a
On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 09:11:57 -0400
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Is there some policy that says that a project cannot be a maintainer?
I guess you missed an interesting discussion on #gentoo-dev today.
jer
Kent Fredric:
On 28 September 2014 00:22, Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com
wrote:
I agree. It's time to replace nano with Vim.
http://i.imgur.com/qRNTQGi.png
We need a moderated development mailing list.
Am Samstag, 27. September 2014, 15:08:57 schrieb Michał Górny:
Dnia 2014-09-23, o godz. 16:52:56
Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
Modified: ChangeLog perl-module.eclass
Log:
Remove support for EAPI 1, 2, 3 in perl-module.eclass (no packages
# Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org (27 Sep 2014)
# Masked for removal in 30 days; see e.g. bug 446376
# Please upgrade to stable Perl 5.18
=dev-lang/perl-5.16.3
=virtual/perl-ExtUtils-Install-1.580.0-r1
=virtual/perl-File-Temp-0.220.0-r3
=virtual/perl-I18N-LangTags-0.380.0
On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 06:25:28 -0400
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 4:58 AM, Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Right now, CC'ing a single alias is inconvenient, but under your
proposal, you might need to CC a dozen or more people instead of
that alias.
On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 09:11:57 -0400
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Is there some policy that says that a project cannot be a maintainer?
Is there some policy that says that a herd cannot be a herd?
Am Samstag, 27. September 2014, 23:41:04 schrieb Tom Wijsman:
On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 09:11:57 -0400
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Is there some policy that says that a project cannot be a maintainer?
Is there some policy that says that a herd cannot be a herd?
Only for sufficiently
On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 13:22:45 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 12:47:14 +0200
Luca Barbato lu_z...@gentoo.org wrote:
Because I'd expect a stage3 to be posix compliant
I agree. It's time to replace nano with Vim.
Vim is not fully POSIX
On 09/27/14 17:35, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 06:25:28 -0400
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 4:58 AM, Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Right now, CC'ing a single alias is inconvenient, but under your
proposal, you might need to CC a dozen or more
Dnia 2014-09-28, o godz. 00:13:15
Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 17:54:48 -0400
Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org wrote:
The hardened project has two herds: hardened and hardened-kernel, the
former for toolchain related stuff and the latter for the
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
The question becomes does every herd want to become a (sub)project?.
So, there was some discussion on -dev, apparently some discussion I
wasn't a part of, and some that I was (such is the nature of IRC).
I think it would
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
What is really needed here is a vote by the Council on whether to add bc
back to the stage3. If the people do insist, another vote regarding
adding or changing an editor to stage3 could be done as well.
The call for agenda
On Sun, 28 Sep 2014, Tom Wijsman wrote:
Yes, if you do create a one-on-one mapping then it becomes possible.
The question becomes does every herd want to become a
(sub)project?.
Another example: The Emacs project maintains two herds emacs and
xemacs, for GNU Emacs and XEmacs related
All,
I would like to suggest a couple of changes to the
commit message format section of the Gentoo git Workflow page on the
wiki.
The first bullet, which states that all lines have a max length of 70-75
characters is not quite correct. The brief explanation (the first line)
is supposed to be 50
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 04:52:56PM +0200, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Modified: ChangeLog perl-module.eclass
Log:
Remove support for EAPI 1, 2, 3 in perl-module.eclass (no packages left
in the tree)
This could have used some kind of heads-up. Now I'm getting a lot
On 09/27/14 18:46, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
What is really needed here is a vote by the Council on whether to add bc
back to the stage3. If the people do insist, another vote regarding
adding or changing an editor to stage3 could
On Sat, 27 Sep 2014, William Hubbs wrote:
I would like to suggest a couple of changes to the commit message
format section of the Gentoo git Workflow page on the wiki.
The first bullet, which states that all lines have a max length of
70-75 characters is not quite correct. The brief
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 7:39 PM, Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org wrote:
And now for something completely different ... drum roll ... Really! We
have to have a council vote on whether bc goes into stage3? If this does go
to the council, then I want a pre-vote vote: should we bounce the
25 matches
Mail list logo
