Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Herd likely up for grabs: kernel-misc

On 20 Jan 2016 19:48, Duncan wrote: > Mike Frysinger posted on Wed, 20 Jan 2016 13:40:04 -0500 as excerpted: > > if base-system@ isn't going to maintain it, we'll punt it from the herd > > Umm, you mean project, right? Because the whole discussion here is part > of getting rid of herds. =:^)

Re: [gentoo-dev] Herd up for grabs: xbox

On 18 Jan 2016 10:38, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 17:47:54 +0100 Michał Górny wrote: > > media-tv/kodi: > > media-tv/xbmc: > > you can add video herd for these two if vapier is ok with that i think sounds fine -mike signature.asc Description:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Herd likely up for grabs: kernel-misc

On 18 Jan 2016 00:57, Joshua Kinard wrote: > On 01/17/2016 14:57, Michał Górny wrote: > > Hello, everyone. > > > > The current maintainers of kernel-misc herd so far haven't replied to > > our queries. If we don't get any reply in a week, we will be disbanding > > it and looking for new

Re: [gentoo-dev] Herd likely up for grabs: kernel-misc

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On 18 Jan 2016 00:57, Joshua Kinard wrote: >> On 01/17/2016 14:57, Michał Górny wrote: >> > sys-apps/kexec-tools : >> >> Better suited for base-system, maybe? >> >> > sys-fs/jfsutils : >> >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Herd likely up for grabs: net-fs

On 17 Jan 2016 21:03, Michał Górny wrote: > net-fs/autofs: dlan@ > net-fs/curlftpfs : slyfox@ > net-fs/davfs2: proxy-maintainers, gokt...@binghamton.edu > net-fs/libnfs: > net-fs/ncpfs : > net-fs/netatalk :

Re: [gentoo-dev] Herd up for grabs: net-dialup

On 17 Jan 2016 21:57, Lars Wendler wrote: > I am going to take the following packages: > > net-dialup/mingetty > net-dialup/ppp > net-dialup/rp-pppoe > > I think that I might not be the perfect maintainer for these packages > (especially for ppp) so if anyone else wants to maintain these, feel >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Herd likely up for grabs: kernel-misc

On 20 Jan 2016 12:39, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On 18 Jan 2016 00:57, Joshua Kinard wrote: > >> On 01/17/2016 14:57, Michał Górny wrote: > >> > sys-apps/kexec-tools : > >> > >> Better suited for base-system, maybe?

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Dinner@FOSDEM 2016

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi! There are now 10 attendees. Are there other candidates? If yes, please suscribe at [1], because I will contact the restaurant friday. Kind regards, Xavier Miller. Le 13/01/16 10:19, Xavier Miller a écrit : > Hi! > > The FOSDEM 2016 is very

[gentoo-dev] Re: Herd likely up for grabs: kernel-misc

Mike Frysinger posted on Wed, 20 Jan 2016 13:40:04 -0500 as excerpted: > if base-system@ isn't going to maintain it, we'll punt it from the herd > -mike Umm, you mean project, right? Because the whole discussion here is part of getting rid of herds. =:^) -- Duncan - List replies preferred.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Herd likely up for grabs: kernel-misc

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > Mike Frysinger posted on Wed, 20 Jan 2016 13:40:04 -0500 as excerpted: > >> if base-system@ isn't going to maintain it, we'll punt it from the herd >> -mike > > Umm, you mean project, right? Because the whole discussion here

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 13/15] cmake-utils.eclass: ban helper functions in EAPI 6 and later

https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/6ff6dedb44fff4289764dc5eb960e1c6 Gentoo-bug: 514384 --- eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 12 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) diff --git a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass index 960b34b..507d27d 100644 ---

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 00/15] EAPI 6 support for cmake-utils.eclas

To follow is a series of patches to enable EAPI 6 support in cmake-utils.eclass and some other general cleanups. Michael Palimaka (14): cmake-utils.eclass: reorder a bit cmake-utils.eclass: declare some variables local cmake-utils.eclass: use a proper if statement cmake-utils.eclass:

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 01/15] cmake-utils.eclass: reorder a bit

--- eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 17 + 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass index fd53b3a..cc4c06b 100644 --- a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass +++ b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass @@ -112,6 +112,15 @@

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 02/15] cmake-utils.eclass: declare some variables local

Prevents them from spanning multilibs. Gentoo-bug: 513170 --- eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass index cc4c06b..f361bc7 100644 --- a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass +++

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 09/15] cmake-utils.eclass: move $S modifications to src_prepare in EAPI 6 and later

This is the correct phase for source modifications, and additionally avoids a multilib race condition. Gentoo-bug: 513170 --- eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 44 +++- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 08/15] cmake-utils.eclass: namespace some private functions

--- eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 66 +++ 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass index e8b24bd..df33fd9 100644 --- a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass +++ b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 07/15] cmake-utils.eclass: replace replace comment_add_subdirectory with a namespaced version

--- eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 15 +-- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass index 1de863f..e8b24bd 100644 --- a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass +++ b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass @@ -250,11 +250,11 @@

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 15/15] cmake-utils.eclass: update copyright year

--- eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass index 70b70e2..9e8e71e 100644 --- a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass +++ b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -# Copyright 1999-2015 Gentoo

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 14/15] cmake-utils.eclass: enable EAPI 6

--- eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass index 507d27d..70b70e2 100644 --- a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass +++ b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ _CMAKE_UTILS_ECLASS=1 # Should

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 10/15] cmake-utils.eclass: ban non-array usage of mycmakeargs in EAPI 6 and later

--- eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 6 +- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass index 22c8718..e6d77ef 100644 --- a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass +++ b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass @@ -583,7 +583,11 @@

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 03/15] cmake-utils.eclass: check exit codes of executed commands

From: Nikoli Gentoo-bug: 544966 --- eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass index f361bc7..fb80b13 100644 --- a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass +++

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 05/15] cmake-utils.eclass: remove duplicate CMAKE_REMOVE_MODULES

--- eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass index b2e13a1..28caed2 100644 --- a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass +++ b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass @@ -64,7 +64,6 @@ _CMAKE_UTILS_ECLASS=1 # @DESCRIPTION: # Do we

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 06/15] cmake-utils.eclass: ban WANT_CMAKE in EAPI 6 and later

It is basically unused across the tree and complicates the eclass. If it were needed, it might be better to write custom ebuild phase functions instead. --- eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass index

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 04/15] cmake-utils.eclass: use a proper if statement

--- eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass index fb80b13..b2e13a1 100644 --- a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass +++ b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass @@ -428,12 +428,12 @@

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 12/15] cmake-utils.eclass: require two arguments for cmake-utils_use_find_package in EAPI 6 and later

This will allow us to remove the capitalisation variants code later. --- eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 10 -- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass index 51da1c0..960b34b 100644 --- a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass +++

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 11/15] cmake-utils.eclass: use default_src_prepare in EAPI 6 and later

--- eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 15 +-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass index e6d77ef..51da1c0 100644 --- a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass +++ b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass @@ -438,13 +438,16 @@

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFD] Adopt-a-package, proxy-maintenance, and other musings

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/18/2016 09:44 PM, NP-Hardass wrote: > With all of the unclaimed herds and unclaimed packages within them, > I started to wonder what will happen after the GLEP 67 transition > finally comes to fruition. This left me with some concerns and I

[gentoo-dev] Re: News item: Upgrading Apache from 2.2 to 2.4

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > After what feels like ages, we're just about ready to stabilize > apache-2.4. Since this is a major upgrade that in many cases require > configuration changes, we wanted to do a news item. After some > discussion with Lars