I would prefer PPC and for that matter arm (which are no longer security supported) going the Non-stable route. This would prevent the need for stabilization and everything but @system we can instruct the users to use ~ppc.
This would also allow for security to not drop it from security supported arches and just follow a more relaxed policy for non-stable packages. For those not familiar, we (security) only need to have the package in tree and the vulnerable packages dropped, which is easily accomplished by the maintainer with no need for arches to get involved. Yury German (BlueKnight) On 5/14/17 8:03 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > On 5/14/17 6:38 AM, Michael Weber wrote: >> On 05/08/2017 09:13 PM, David Seifert wrote: >>> If all of this ends in one big bikeshedding fest again, I will start >>> dekeywording packages. Fortunately for me, I won't get any complaints >>> (because the arch teams are dead). >> formal complaint, powerpc team is alive, and I'm lead. >> > > I defer to the ppc lead's decision on this. While I am okay with > dekeywording everything *but* @system for ppc, I prefer keeping ppc > keywords. >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
