Re: [gentoo-dev] Deleting old news items

On Wed, 3 Jan 2018 12:23:33 +0100 Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > Do we necessarily need to do even that? A package manager could have a > feature to mask based on other heuristics without changing the format, > e.g all messages from before X, presumably with a switch to show

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deleting old news items

On 01/03/2018 03:13 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 01/03/2018 02:45 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> On Wed, 3 Jan 2018 12:23:33 +0100 >> Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: >>> Do we necessarily need to do even that? A package manager could have a >>> feature to mask based on other

[gentoo-dev] Re: Deleting old news items

On 01/03/2018 11:13 AM, Alec Warner wrote: > Problem: > > New stages have numerous news items listed that are likely not relevant, > but are shown due to limitations in the filtering in NEWS items. E.g. on > a recent stage3: > > nspawntest / # eselect news list > News items: >   [1]   N 

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deleting old news items

W dniu wto, 02.01.2018 o godzinie 19∶13 -0500, użytkownik Alec Warner napisał: > Problem: > > New stages have numerous news items listed that are likely not relevant, > but are shown due to limitations in the filtering in NEWS items. E.g. on a > recent stage3: > > nspawntest / # eselect news

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deleting old news items

On 01/03/2018 05:53 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > W dniu wto, 02.01.2018 o godzinie 19∶13 -0500, użytkownik Alec Warner > napisał: >> Problem: >> >> New stages have numerous news items listed that are likely not relevant, >> but are shown due to limitations in the filtering in NEWS items. E.g. on a >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deleting old news items

> On Tue, 2 Jan 2018, Alec Warner wrote: > Problem: > New stages have numerous news items listed that are likely not > relevant, but are shown due to limitations in the filtering in NEWS > items. E.g. on a recent stage3: > [...] We could add an "Expires:" header to the news item format, and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deleting old news items

On 01/03/2018 06:07 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Tue, 2 Jan 2018, Alec Warner wrote: >> Problem: >> New stages have numerous news items listed that are likely not >> relevant, but are shown due to limitations in the filtering in NEWS >> items. E.g. on a recent stage3: >> [...] > We could

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deleting old news items

On 01/03/2018 12:07 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Tue, 2 Jan 2018, Alec Warner wrote: > >> Problem: >> New stages have numerous news items listed that are likely not >> relevant, but are shown due to limitations in the filtering in NEWS >> items. E.g. on a recent stage3: > >> [...] > > We

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deleting old news items

On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 6:07 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > On Tue, 2 Jan 2018, Alec Warner wrote: > > > Problem: > > New stages have numerous news items listed that are likely not > > relevant, but are shown due to limitations in the filtering in NEWS > > items. E.g. on a

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] preserve-libs.eclass: Split off preserve_old_lib from eutils.

Split off functions preserve_old_lib and preserve_old_lib_notify from eutils.eclass into a dedicated preserve-libs.eclass. These functions are rarely used and are independent of the rest of eutils, therefore moving them into their own eclass will help clarifying eclass inheritance in ebuilds. For

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/2] eutils.eclass: Inline remaining uses of _eutils_eprefix_init.

Inline the remaining two uses of the function. This shortens the code, and also allows to declare the variables as local. --- eclass/eutils.eclass | 12 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/eutils.eclass b/eclass/eutils.eclass index

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deleting old news items

On 01/03/2018 02:45 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Wed, 3 Jan 2018 12:23:33 +0100 > Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: >> Do we necessarily need to do even that? A package manager could have a >> feature to mask based on other heuristics without changing the format, >> e.g all

[gentoo-dev]

[gentoo-dev]

[gentoo-dev]