On Wed, 2019-10-23 at 17:04 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 01:18:02AM -0400, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> > On 10/21/2019 19:36, Matt Turner wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 9:42 AM Richard Yao wrote:
> > > > Also, another idea is to use a cheap hash function (e.g. fletcher)
According bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/696556 I must update MaraDNS
version. But I saw new GLEP81, therefore need request UID/GID and
change PR (sorry for hurry). MaraDNS already in uid-gid.txt (99/99),
but duende (66/99) not. And duende has hardcoded /etc/maradns/logger
path to chroot for child
Add a check that detects Python modules that were not compiled after
installation. To limit false positives, this is only done on modules
installed to site-packages.
Early testing of this check made it possible to detect a bug
in python_optimize.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
# @DEAD
# This eclass is dead and all its consumers have been removed from
# the tree.
# Please use perl-module.eclass if you need phase functions, and
# perl-functions.eclass if you don't.
# In overlays, perl-app.eclass usage can be replaced by
# perl-module.eclass without further changes.
# Bug
Make sure to append NUL to every path in sys.path, rather than using
it as a separator between output entries. This fixes a bug when
the last path entry was silently discarded, and the function stopped
working with PyPy as a result.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
eclass/python-utils-r1.eclass
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 02:39:05PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> I would like to allocate uid/gid 274 for dnsmasq_exporter [1].
>
> Thanks,
>
> William
>
> [1] https://github.com/google/dnsmasq_exporter
No one has responded, so I'm moving forward with this.
Thanks,
William
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 01:18:02AM -0400, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> On 10/21/2019 19:36, Matt Turner wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 9:42 AM Richard Yao wrote:
> >> Also, another idea is to use a cheap hash function (e.g. fletcher) and
> >> just have the mirrors do the hashing behind the scenes.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 12:06:24PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 01:18:02AM -0400, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> > On 10/21/2019 19:36, Matt Turner wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 9:42 AM Richard Yao wrote:
> > >> Also, another idea is to use a cheap hash function (e.g.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 01:18:02AM -0400, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> On 10/21/2019 19:36, Matt Turner wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 9:42 AM Richard Yao wrote:
> >> Also, another idea is to use a cheap hash function (e.g. fletcher) and
> >> just have the mirrors do the hashing behind the scenes.
> On Oct 23, 2019, at 7:48 PM, Richard Yao wrote:
>
> On 10/22/19 2:51 AM, Jaco Kroon wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
>>> On 2019/10/21 18:42, Richard Yao wrote:
>>>
>>> If we consider the access frequency, it might actually not be that
>>> bad. Consider a simple example with 500 files and two
On 10/22/19 2:51 AM, Jaco Kroon wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
> On 2019/10/21 18:42, Richard Yao wrote:
>>
>> If we consider the access frequency, it might actually not be that
>> bad. Consider a simple example with 500 files and two directory
>> buckets. If we have 250 in each, then the size of the
11 matches
Mail list logo
