[gentoo-dev] Last rites: media-sound/kaudiocreator

2020-01-12 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
# Andreas Sturmlechner (2020-01-12) # Unmaintained upstream and redundant. Use media-sound/audex instead. # Removal in 30 days. media-sound/kaudiocreator signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: kde-misc/plasma-redshift-control

2020-01-12 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
# Andreas Sturmlechner (2020-01-12) # Unmaintained upstream and redundant. Use Night Color functionality built # into Plasma 5.17 instead, without needing x11-misc/redshift. # Removal in 30 days. kde-misc/plasma-redshift-control signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-util/kdevelop-clang-tidy

2020-01-12 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
# Andreas Sturmlechner (2020-01-12) # Merged into dev-util/kdevelop months ago, unusable standalone # Removal in 10 days. dev-util/kdevelop-clang-tidy signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-python/ordereddict

2020-01-12 Thread Michał Górny
# Michał Górny (2020-01-12) # Backport to Python 2.4 - 2.6. Not needed by anything. # Removal in 30 days. Bug #705256. dev-python/ordereddict -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-libs/libcxxrt

2020-01-12 Thread Michał Górny
# Michał Górny (2020-01-12) # libcxxrt is no longer maintained upstream. It used to be needed to # maintain ABI in Gentoo/FreeBSD but that is no longer supported. Plus, # FreeBSD maintains their own fork anyway. sys-libs/libcxxabi (from # LLVM upstream) is the suggested replacement (but it's

[gentoo-dev] Lexicographical bash comparison mistakes: things to fix

2020-01-12 Thread Sergei Trofimovich
A few ebuilds use bash '[[ ${foo} < ${bar} ]]' comparison to compare numbers and package versions. In bash '<' is for lexicographical string comparison (see man bash 'CONDITIONAL EXPRESSIONS' section). It's almost never what you want: $ [[ 1.2.3 < 1.2.3 ]] && echo yes || echo no no # ok

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2020-01-12 23:59 UTC

2020-01-12 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2020-01-12 23:59 UTC. Removals: app-i18n/man-pages-da 20200108-17:41 ulm d14e33ef313 app-laptop/nvidiabl 20200112-17:35 zlogene da980880462 dev-db

Re: [gentoo-dev] unsanctioned python 2.7 crusade

2020-01-12 Thread Joshua Kinard
On 12/5/2019 09:24, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 8:59 AM Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: >> >> It's quite another to mask random packages that have USE flags to >> optionally support whatever python 2.7 library. If you're going to >> last rites these, talk with the maintainer first, and

Re: [gentoo-dev] unsanctioned python 2.7 crusade

2020-01-12 Thread Joshua Kinard
On 1/12/2020 19:21, William Hubbs wrote: > On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 12:17:36AM +0100, David Seifert wrote: >> On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 17:55 -0500, Joshua Kinard wrote: >>> On 1/12/2020 17:46, David Seifert wrote: On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 17:43 -0500, Joshua Kinard wrote: > On 1/12/2020 17:32,

Re: [gentoo-dev] unsanctioned python 2.7 crusade

2020-01-12 Thread David Seifert
On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 17:07 -0500, Joshua Kinard wrote: > On 12/5/2019 09:24, Rich Freeman wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 8:59 AM Jason A. Donenfeld > > wrote: > > > It's quite another to mask random packages that have USE flags to > > > optionally support whatever python 2.7 library. If

Re: [gentoo-dev] unsanctioned python 2.7 crusade

2020-01-12 Thread David Seifert
On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 17:43 -0500, Joshua Kinard wrote: > On 1/12/2020 17:32, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: > > On Sonntag, 12. Januar 2020 23:07:24 CET Joshua Kinard wrote: > > > It might be worthwhile to treat the removal of Python-2.7 from > > > the tree in > > > the same manner as an EAPI

Re: [gentoo-dev] unsanctioned python 2.7 crusade

2020-01-12 Thread David Seifert
On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 17:55 -0500, Joshua Kinard wrote: > On 1/12/2020 17:46, David Seifert wrote: > > On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 17:43 -0500, Joshua Kinard wrote: > > > On 1/12/2020 17:32, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: > > > > On Sonntag, 12. Januar 2020 23:07:24 CET Joshua Kinard wrote: > > > > > It

Re: [gentoo-dev] unsanctioned python 2.7 crusade

2020-01-12 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
On Montag, 13. Januar 2020 01:44:55 CET Joshua Kinard wrote: > I am working now to remove the remaining py2 packages > from my systems and then rebuild the python packages to only handle py3. Here's a suggestion: Skim through the packages on your system that are py27- only and look them up

Re: [gentoo-dev] unsanctioned python 2.7 crusade

2020-01-12 Thread Joshua Kinard
On 1/12/2020 17:17, David Seifert wrote: > On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 17:07 -0500, Joshua Kinard wrote: >> On 12/5/2019 09:24, Rich Freeman wrote: >>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 8:59 AM Jason A. Donenfeld >>> wrote: It's quite another to mask random packages that have USE flags to optionally

Re: [gentoo-dev] unsanctioned python 2.7 crusade

2020-01-12 Thread William Hubbs
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 12:17:36AM +0100, David Seifert wrote: > On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 17:55 -0500, Joshua Kinard wrote: > > On 1/12/2020 17:46, David Seifert wrote: > > > On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 17:43 -0500, Joshua Kinard wrote: > > > > On 1/12/2020 17:32, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: > > > > > On

Re: [gentoo-dev] unsanctioned python 2.7 crusade

2020-01-12 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 17:07 -0500, Joshua Kinard wrote: > I'm late to the party as usual. Seems upstream plans a final 2.7.18 > security update in April of 2020, then they will consider the 2.7 branch > EOL. They say most of these updates were done in 2019, and so are still > technically

Re: [gentoo-dev] unsanctioned python 2.7 crusade

2020-01-12 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
On Sonntag, 12. Januar 2020 23:07:24 CET Joshua Kinard wrote: > It might be worthwhile to treat the removal of Python-2.7 from the tree in > the same manner as an EAPI deprecation and removal, given how ingrained it > is due to its longevity. That will minimize the whiplash-effect of emerge >

Re: [gentoo-dev] unsanctioned python 2.7 crusade

2020-01-12 Thread Joshua Kinard
On 1/12/2020 17:32, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: > On Sonntag, 12. Januar 2020 23:07:24 CET Joshua Kinard wrote: >> It might be worthwhile to treat the removal of Python-2.7 from the tree in >> the same manner as an EAPI deprecation and removal, given how ingrained it >> is due to its longevity.

Re: [gentoo-dev] unsanctioned python 2.7 crusade

2020-01-12 Thread Joshua Kinard
On 1/12/2020 17:46, David Seifert wrote: > On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 17:43 -0500, Joshua Kinard wrote: >> On 1/12/2020 17:32, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: >>> On Sonntag, 12. Januar 2020 23:07:24 CET Joshua Kinard wrote: It might be worthwhile to treat the removal of Python-2.7 from the tree

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-python/transmissionrpc

2020-01-12 Thread Mike Gilbert
# Mike Gilbert (2020-01-12) # No upstream activity since 2014, no reverse deps. # Remove in 30 days. dev-python/transmissionrpc

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: games-board/cgoban2

2020-01-12 Thread Ulrich Mueller
# Ulrich Müller (2020-01-12) # Runtime errors. Last upstream release in 2003. No license. # Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug #703548. games-board/cgoban2 signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: media-video/kamerka, media-libs/qimageblitz

2020-01-12 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
# Andreas Sturmlechner (2020-01-12) # Unmaintained upstream and redundant. Use kde-apps/kamera instead. # Only revdep of ancient media-libs/qimageblitz. Removal in 30 days. media-video/kamerka media-libs/qimageblitz signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: media-plugins/vdr-mailbox

2020-01-12 Thread Joerg Bornkessel
upstream has give up this project, upstream is not interressted on any patches to fix this If you really would like to stay on this plugin, add a comment in this bug wrt bug 704004 pmasked for removal ~12 Feb 2020 -- Joerg Bornkessel GnuPG Key: 0x93EB5F4DAA5832A1 Fingerprint: 0E0A A1EE 1DF4

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-cpp/gtkglextmm, sci-misc/repsnapper

2020-01-12 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
# Andreas Sturmlechner (2020-01-12) # Ancient, blocks x11-libs/gtkglext cleanup, open bug #649066 # Masked for removal in 30 days. dev-cpp/gtkglextmm sci-misc/repsnapper signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.