On Thu, 2020-01-30 at 06:18 +0100, David Haller wrote:
> Michal, ...
>
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2020, Michal Górny wrote:
> > # Michal Górny (2020-01-29)
> > # Abandoned in 2009. Python 2 only. No blockers left.
> > # Removal in 30 days. Bug #706218.
> > dev-python/epydoc
>
> ... I think you're getti
[2020-01-27 12:41:26+0100] Ulrich Mueller:
> So, the question is, should we allow ebuilds
> # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License, v2 or later
> in the repository, or should we even encourage it for new ebuilds?
>
> I have somewhat mixed feelings about this. One the one h
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 6:20 AM Haelwenn (lanodan) Monnier
wrote:
>
> [2020-01-27 12:41:26+0100] Ulrich Mueller:
> > So, the question is, should we allow ebuilds
> > # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License, v2 or later
> > in the repository, or should we even encourage it f
I'm a bit worried if we should really go down that path.
Not because I have issues with GPL2+ (I'm usually happy with
everything that makes licensing more flexible), but because I'm worried
we're creating a legal minefield.
Think about this: You may ask me if you can relicense all the ebuilds
I'v
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 8:39 AM Hanno Böck wrote:
>
> *If* Gentoo decides to go this relicensing way I'd recommend to only do
> that if it's coordinated with organizations that have deep legal
> knowledge of these issues (e.g. like software freedom conservancy) and
> if some lawyers that know this
# Michał Górny (2020-01-31)
# Last release in 2009. No tests. Python 2 only. No reverse
# dependencies.
# Removal in 30 days. Bug #707550.
app-mobilephone/lightblue
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hello,
The Python team no longer wishes to maintain the following package:
dev-python/pybluez
It has no tests, and it'd be better for it to have a dedicated
maintainer with working bluez and possible a use case for one of its
reverse dependencies:
app-mobilephone/ganyremote
app-mobilephone/wamm
