Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] app-admin/kube-bench: convert to go-module go.sum

2020-02-11 Thread Sam Jorna (wraeth)
On Monday, 10 February 2020 7:55:01 AM AEDT Michał Górny wrote: > On Sun, 2020-02-09 at 20:38 +, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: > > Hrm, pardon my ignorance, but do 'we' really need to review 232 lines of > > Manifest?! > > Pardon mine but do 'we' really need to read your useless comments

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ebuild Generators

2020-02-11 Thread Gerion Entrup
Am Dienstag, 11. Februar 2020, 16:18:44 CET schrieb Tom Gillespie: > For historical curiosity there was also > https://github.com/domenkozar/g-pypi at one point (similar to > https://github.com/rafaelmartins/g-octave). Having used g-octave, the > primary issue is as Michał says, there are a lot of

[gentoo-dev] packages up for grabs

2020-02-11 Thread Tim Harder
Note that some of the packages in this list might have other maintainers, but I'm sure they wouldn't mind co-maintainers. dev-util/pkgcheck sys-apps/pkgcore dev-python/snakeoil dev-python/pychroot app-arch/vimball

Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we allow "GPL, v2 or later" for ebuilds?

2020-02-11 Thread Haelwenn (lanodan) Monnier
[2020-02-11 10:52:57-0500] Rich Freeman: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 10:05 AM Haelwenn (lanodan) Monnier > wrote: > > > > Maybe it could for now be a simple agreement on putting your code to > > the Gentoo Foundation under the GPL-2+ but it would be published under > > the GPL-{2,3,…}? > > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last-rites: net-misc/wicd

2020-02-11 Thread Mart Raudsepp
Ühel kenal päeval, E, 10.02.2020 kell 00:43, kirjutas Stefan Strogin: > Upd. > The port to Python 3 is not finished in the upstream. > Particularly it is still using pygtk, it seems no work in porting to > gtk+3 has been done yet. Just to be clear of misunderstanding here: A port away from

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: uid/gid for octoprint

2020-02-11 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 2020-02-11 at 13:18 +0300, Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov wrote: > В письме от вторник, 11 февраля 2020 г. 13:15:48 MSK пользователь Michał > Górny > написал: > > On Tue, 2020-02-11 at 13:06 +0300, Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov wrote: > > > Hi all! > > > > > > I'd like to reserve uid/gid 34 (3D

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: uid/gid for octoprint

2020-02-11 Thread Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov
В письме от вторник, 11 февраля 2020 г. 13:52:46 MSK пользователь Michał Górny написал: > On Tue, 2020-02-11 at 13:18 +0300, Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov wrote: > > В письме от вторник, 11 февраля 2020 г. 13:15:48 MSK пользователь Michał > > Górny> > > написал: > > > On Tue, 2020-02-11 at 13:06

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: uid/gid for octoprint

2020-02-11 Thread Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov
Ok. So it can be 340 for both uid an gid (its free) В письме от вторник, 11 февраля 2020 г. 14:17:48 MSK пользователь Michał Górny написал: > On Tue, 2020-02-11 at 14:15 +0300, Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov wrote: > > В письме от вторник, 11 февраля 2020 г. 13:52:46 MSK пользователь Michał > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: uid/gid for octoprint

2020-02-11 Thread Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov
В письме от вторник, 11 февраля 2020 г. 13:15:48 MSK пользователь Michał Górny написал: > On Tue, 2020-02-11 at 13:06 +0300, Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov wrote: > > Hi all! > > > > I'd like to reserve uid/gid 34 (3D printing) for www-apps/octoprint (cups > > analog for 3d printing) > > What is the

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: uid/gid for octoprint

2020-02-11 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2020, Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov wrote: > Ok. What is you're suggestion? If you really need that kind of mnemonics, how about 368 (68 being the ASCII code for "D")? Ulrich signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: uid/gid for octoprint

2020-02-11 Thread Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov
В письме от вторник, 11 февраля 2020 г. 13:15:48 MSK пользователь Michał Górny написал: > On Tue, 2020-02-11 at 13:06 +0300, Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov wrote: > > Hi all! > > > > I'd like to reserve uid/gid 34 (3D printing) for www-apps/octoprint (cups > > analog for 3d printing) > > What is the

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: uid/gid for octoprint

2020-02-11 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 2020-02-11 at 13:06 +0300, Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov wrote: > Hi all! > > I'd like to reserve uid/gid 34 (3D printing) for www-apps/octoprint (cups > analog for 3d printing) What is the rationale for taking UID/GID from the low range? -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: uid/gid for octoprint

2020-02-11 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 2020-02-11 at 14:15 +0300, Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov wrote: > В письме от вторник, 11 февраля 2020 г. 13:52:46 MSK пользователь Michał > Górny > написал: > > On Tue, 2020-02-11 at 13:18 +0300, Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov wrote: > > > В письме от вторник, 11 февраля 2020 г. 13:15:48 MSK

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: uid/gid for octoprint

2020-02-11 Thread Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov
В письме от вторник, 11 февраля 2020 г. 14:27:08 MSK пользователь Ulrich Mueller написал: > > On Tue, 11 Feb 2020, Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov wrote: > > Ok. What is you're suggestion? > > If you really need that kind of mnemonics, how about 368 (68 being the > ASCII code for "D")? > > Ulrich

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] app-admin/kube-bench: convert to go-module go.sum

2020-02-11 Thread Michael 'veremitz' Everitt
On 09/02/20 21:16, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: > On 09/02/20 20:59, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: >> On 09/02/20 20:57, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: >>> On 09/02/20 20:55, Michał Górny wrote: On Sun, 2020-02-09 at 20:38 +, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: > Hrm, pardon

[gentoo-dev] RFC: uid/gid for octoprint

2020-02-11 Thread Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov
Hi all! I'd like to reserve uid/gid 34 (3D printing) for www-apps/octoprint (cups analog for 3d printing) -- Best regards, Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Inconsistent use of || preferences for www-client/elinks, links, lynx, w3m, and w3mmee

2020-02-11 Thread Francesco Riosa
Il giorno lun 10 feb 2020 alle ore 08:20 Michał Górny ha scritto: > On Sun, 2020-02-09 at 22:51 -0800, Zac Medico wrote: > > In that case, I suppose we'll have to apply consistency manually? Can we > > all agree on a global order of preference for the relevant packages? > > That would be my

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-im/coccinella

2020-02-11 Thread David Seifert
# David Seifert (2020-02-11) # Unmaintained, EAPI 4, last release over 9 years ago, ebuild has QA # issues, no revdeps. Removal in 30 days. Bug #558354. net-im/coccinella signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-vim/cream

2020-02-11 Thread David Seifert
# David Seifert (2020-02-11) # Unmaintained, EAPI 4, last release over 9 years ago, no revdeps. # Removal in 30 days. app-vim/cream signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Inconsistent use of || preferences for www-client/elinks, links, lynx, w3m, and w3mmee

2020-02-11 Thread Joonas Niilola
On 2/11/20 12:32 PM, Francesco Riosa wrote: > > > Il giorno lun 10 feb 2020 alle ore 08:20 Michał Górny > mailto:mgo...@gentoo.org>> ha scritto: > > On Sun, 2020-02-09 at 22:51 -0800, Zac Medico wrote: > > In that case, I suppose we'll have to apply consistency > manually? Can we >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we allow "GPL, v2 or later" for ebuilds?

2020-02-11 Thread Haelwenn (lanodan) Monnier
[2020-01-30 08:19:08-0500] Rich Freeman: > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 6:20 AM Haelwenn (lanodan) Monnier > wrote: > > [2020-01-27 12:41:26+0100] Ulrich Mueller: > > > So, the question is, should we allow ebuilds > > > # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License, v2 or > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ebuild Generators

2020-02-11 Thread Tom Gillespie
For historical curiosity there was also https://github.com/domenkozar/g-pypi at one point (similar to https://github.com/rafaelmartins/g-octave). Having used g-octave, the primary issue is as Michał says, there are a lot of corner cases that the generation doesn't handle correctly which lead to

[gentoo-dev] Review request for dev-lang/clojure

2020-02-11 Thread Tom Gillespie
Hi all, I have submitted a pull request (https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/14224) that allows dev-lang/clojure-1.9.0 and 1.10.0 to build. Two related bugs are https://bugs.gentoo.org/670680 and https://bugs.gentoo.org/684536. I have also attached the changes as patches below. Given that

Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we allow "GPL, v2 or later" for ebuilds?

2020-02-11 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 10:05 AM Haelwenn (lanodan) Monnier wrote: > > Maybe it could for now be a simple agreement on putting your code to > the Gentoo Foundation under the GPL-2+ but it would be published under > the GPL-{2,3,…}? > Well, if we were going to get people to start signing things I

[gentoo-dev] Last-rites: sci-calculators/gonvert

2020-02-11 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
# Andreas Sturmlechner (2020-02-11) # Upstream "unable to port away from" dev-python/pygtk, bug #708156 # Masked for removal in 30 days. sci-calculators/gonvert

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ebuild Generators

2020-02-11 Thread Benda Xu
Tom Gillespie writes: > For historical curiosity there was also > https://github.com/domenkozar/g-pypi at one point (similar to > https://github.com/rafaelmartins/g-octave). Having used g-octave, the > primary issue is as Michał says, there are a lot of corner cases that > the generation doesn't