Re: [gentoo-dev] CFLAGS=-fno-common related breakage is incoming

2020-05-04 Thread Joonas Niilola
On 5/2/20 2:14 PM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > With Toralf's help we now have rough estimate of broken packages. It's about > 450 yet unfixed ones: > https://bugs.gentoo.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=705764_resolved=1 > > gcc-10 will be released soon. Maybe in a week. > > Please look at the

[gentoo-dev] Opennebula ebuild

2020-05-04 Thread Samuel Bernardo
Hi, I start to thanks all your advices from previous emails related to ebuild development. I send you this email to let off steam about the big mess to have latest OpenNebula version available in my Gentoo overlay[1]. This was the problems I had to deal with: - patch many source files with sed

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Ideas for gentoostats implementation

2020-05-04 Thread Andrey Utkin
Since it is going to be opt-in and optional anyway, we seem to be fine with having just partial data. I assume we have logs of distfiles downloads from Gentoo infrastructure, and can negotiate access to relevant logs of our mirrors. That constitutes partial data correlated with users'

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Ideas for gentoostats implementation

2020-05-04 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
On 2020-04-26 15:46, Kent Fredric wrote: > On Sun, 26 Apr 2020 14:38:54 +0200 > Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > >> Let's assume we will get reports that app-misc/foo is only installed 20 >> times. If you are going to judge based on this data, "Obviously, nobody >> is using that package, it's stuck

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Ideas for gentoostats implementation

2020-05-04 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
On 2020-05-05 00:57, Andrey Utkin wrote: > I assume we have logs of distfiles downloads from Gentoo infrastructure, and > can negotiate access to relevant logs of our mirrors. That constitutes partial > data correlated with users' installation activity, as good as it gets. Even if we would have

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Ideas for gentoostats implementation

2020-05-04 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 5:48 PM Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > > On 2020-04-26 15:46, Kent Fredric wrote: > > On Sun, 26 Apr 2020 14:38:54 +0200 > > Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > > > >> Let's assume we will get reports that app-misc/foo is only installed 20 > >> times. If you are going to judge based