[gentoo-dev] Last rites: acct-group/octoprint, acct-user/octoprint, www-apps/octoprint

2020-05-11 Thread Michał Górny
# Michał Górny (2020-05-11) # Causes downgrades of multiple Python packages. Not touched since # initial commit, waiting for a bump to the final release. Maintainer # unresponsive. Upstream recommends installing in a virtualenv. # Removal in 30 days. Bug #710406. acct-group/octoprint

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Enable FEATURES=parallel-install by default (bug 715110)

2020-05-11 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Sun, 10 May 2020 21:32:25 -0700 Zac Medico wrote: > The feature enables finer grained locks for install operations, and > everyone agrees that it's safe to enable by default. > > Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/715110 > Signed-off-by: Zac Medico > --- > cnf/make.globals | 2 +- > 1 file

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Default BINPKG_COMPRESSION to zstd (bug 715108)

2020-05-11 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Sun, 10 May 2020 19:29:34 -0700 Zac Medico wrote: > This includes a _compat_upgrade.binpkg_compression script that the > ebuild can call in pkg_preinst in order to maintain a > backward-compatible bzip2 default when appropriate, ensuring that > binary package consumers are not caught off

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-boot/plymouth-openrc-plugin

2020-05-11 Thread aidecoe
# Amadeusz Żołnowski (2020-05-11) # Masked for removal in 30 days. Unmaintained upstream. sys-boot/plymouth-openrc-plugin signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] remove EGO_VENDOR support from go-module.eclass

2020-05-11 Thread Andreas K . Hüttel
> This patch makes migrating mandatory by forcing ebuilds to die if they > have EGO_VENDOR set and are using go-module.eclass. You can't commit this as long as there is a single such ebuild in the tree. -- Andreas K. Hüttel dilfri...@gentoo.org Gentoo Linux developer (council, qa,

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-python/llvmlite update to 0.32

2020-05-11 Thread Aisha Tammy
On 5/11/20 2:35 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > W dniu nie, 10.05.2020 o godzinie 14∶54 -0400, użytkownik Aisha Tammy > napisał: >> On 5/10/20 2:11 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >>> W dniu nie, 10.05.2020 o godzinie 07∶21 -0400, użytkownik Aisha >>> Tammy >>> napisał: On 5/10/20 2:02 AM, Michał Górny

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] remove EGO_VENDOR support from go-module.eclass

2020-05-11 Thread William Hubbs
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 09:51:45AM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 5:16 PM William Hubbs wrote: > > > > All, > > > > now that go 1.14.2 is stable, I want to remove the EGO_VENDOR support from > > go-module.eclass. > > > > This was kept when the EGO_SUM support was added on 4

[gentoo-dev] last rites: dev-go/go-protobuf

2020-05-11 Thread William Hubbs
# William Hubbs (2020-05-11) # No reverse dependencies, upstream has superseeded this with the # ggoogle.golang.org/protobuf module. # Removal in 30 days. Bug #722542. dev-go/go-protobuf Thanks, William signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] remove EGO_VENDOR support from go-module.eclass

2020-05-11 Thread William Hubbs
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 01:45:45AM +0300, Andreas K. Hüttel wrote: > > This patch makes migrating mandatory by forcing ebuilds to die if they > > have EGO_VENDOR set and are using go-module.eclass. > > You can't commit this as long as there is a single such ebuild in the tree. Sure, and I'm

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Enable FEATURES=parallel-install by default (bug 715110)

2020-05-11 Thread Michał Górny
W dniu nie, 10.05.2020 o godzinie 21∶32 -0700, użytkownik Zac Medico napisał: > The feature enables finer grained locks for install operations, and > everyone agrees that it's safe to enable by default. Who's 'everyone' and where's their analysis of the problem? The manpage doesn't really help

Re: [gentoo-dev] unverifiable GPG keys for @gentoo.org members

2020-05-11 Thread Michał Górny
W dniu pon, 11.05.2020 o godzinie 20∶20 -0400, użytkownik Aisha Tammy napisał: > Hi devs@, > Seems like for some reason the gentoo.org does not publish the > gpg public keys of the senders, even though it is signed correctly. Why do you claim that? How did you verify it? Why are you jumping

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] remove EGO_VENDOR support from go-module.eclass

2020-05-11 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 4:00 PM William Hubbs wrote: > > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 01:45:45AM +0300, Andreas K. Hüttel wrote: > > > This patch makes migrating mandatory by forcing ebuilds to die if they > > > have EGO_VENDOR set and are using go-module.eclass. > > > > You can't commit this as long

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: net-im/prosody

2020-05-11 Thread Haelwenn (lanodan) Monnier
[2020-05-11 12:39:05+0200] Tobias Klausmann: > Hi! > > As per subject. I am not running any Jabber infrastructure > anymore. > > Package is in decent shape. Lua 5.2 compatibility is not there, > but I don't see 5.2 happening soon anyway. The rest of the bugs > are nice-to-haves and cosmetic

Re: [gentoo-dev] unverifiable GPG keys for @gentoo.org members

2020-05-11 Thread Aisha Tammy
On 5/11/20 8:20 PM, Aisha Tammy wrote: > Hi devs@, > Seems like for some reason the gentoo.org does not publish the > gpg public keys of the senders, even though it is signed correctly. > Sorry, I meant **mail signing**, not commit signing. Just saw that wording was confusing. > Just wanted

[gentoo-dev] unverifiable GPG keys for @gentoo.org members

2020-05-11 Thread Aisha Tammy
Hi devs@, Seems like for some reason the gentoo.org does not publish the gpg public keys of the senders, even though it is signed correctly. Just wanted to know why the devs are required to use gpg keys, glep63 [1] but even when the server has the public keys, they aren't published properly.

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: LXDE

2020-05-11 Thread Joonas Niilola
Hey all, since LXDE has no project members, and no one joined for a long time or picked up the packages, let's properly reassign them. Here are packages that were dropped to maintainer-needed: lxde-base/lxde-icon-theme lxde-base/lxtask lxde-base/lxappearance-obconf lxde-base/lxrandr

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-python/llvmlite update to 0.32

2020-05-11 Thread Michał Górny
W dniu nie, 10.05.2020 o godzinie 14∶54 -0400, użytkownik Aisha Tammy napisał: > On 5/10/20 2:11 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > W dniu nie, 10.05.2020 o godzinie 07∶21 -0400, użytkownik Aisha > > Tammy > > napisał: > > > On 5/10/20 2:02 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > W dniu sob, 09.05.2020 o

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: LXDE

2020-05-11 Thread Joonas Niilola
On 5/11/20 10:00 AM, Joonas Niilola wrote: > > And here are packages that were co-maintained by lxqt project, or by > individual devs: > > > media-gfx/gpicview And this by graphics... signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: net-im/prosody

2020-05-11 Thread Tobias Klausmann
Hi! As per subject. I am not running any Jabber infrastructure anymore. Package is in decent shape. Lua 5.2 compatibility is not there, but I don't see 5.2 happening soon anyway. The rest of the bugs are nice-to-haves and cosmetic stuff. I'll keep myself in the maintainers file for another

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] remove EGO_VENDOR support from go-module.eclass

2020-05-11 Thread David Seifert
On Mon, 2020-05-11 at 09:51 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 5:16 PM William Hubbs > wrote: > > All, > > > > now that go 1.14.2 is stable, I want to remove the EGO_VENDOR > > support from > > go-module.eclass. > > > > This was kept when the EGO_SUM support was added on 4

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] remove EGO_VENDOR support from go-module.eclass

2020-05-11 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 5:16 PM William Hubbs wrote: > > All, > > now that go 1.14.2 is stable, I want to remove the EGO_VENDOR support from > go-module.eclass. > > This was kept when the EGO_SUM support was added on 4 Mar, with a qa > warning advising people to migrate their ebuilds to EGO_SUM.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] remove EGO_VENDOR support from go-module.eclass

2020-05-11 Thread William Hubbs
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 06:13:19PM +0200, David Seifert wrote: > On Mon, 2020-05-11 at 09:51 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 5:16 PM William Hubbs > > wrote: > > > All, > > > > > > now that go 1.14.2 is stable, I want to remove the EGO_VENDOR > > > support from > > >