Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Default BINPKG_COMPRESSION to zstd (bug 715108)

2020-05-12 Thread Francesco Riosa
Il 11/05/20 22:21, Brian Dolbec ha scritto: On Sun, 10 May 2020 19:29:34 -0700 Zac Medico wrote: This includes a _compat_upgrade.binpkg_compression script that the ebuild can call in pkg_preinst in order to maintain a backward-compatible bzip2 default when appropriate, ensuring that binary

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Enable FEATURES=parallel-install by default (bug 715110)

2020-05-12 Thread Zac Medico
On 5/11/20 10:54 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > W dniu nie, 10.05.2020 o godzinie 21∶32 -0700, użytkownik Zac Medico > napisał: >> The feature enables finer grained locks for install operations, and >> everyone agrees that it's safe to enable by default. > > Who's 'everyone' and where's their analysis

Re: [gentoo-dev] unverifiable GPG keys for @gentoo.org members

2020-05-12 Thread desultory
On 05/12/20 01:24, Michał Górny wrote: > W dniu pon, 11.05.2020 o godzinie 20∶20 -0400, użytkownik Aisha Tammy > napisał: >> Hi devs@, >> Seems like for some reason the gentoo.org does not publish the >> gpg public keys of the senders, even though it is signed correctly. > > Why do you claim

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo clang team

2020-05-12 Thread Sam James
> On 12 May 2020, at 14:48, Alexander Bilyak wrote: > > Hello everyone in this mailing list. > > I apologize for myself as I am not sure if it is the right place to write, > but anyway... > I am the (only) maintainer of gentoo-clang > overlay. >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo clang team

2020-05-12 Thread Alexander Bilyak
Hi Sam, Thanks for your reply I've seen project LLVM but I was concerned it is about porting LLVM to Gentoo, not about making Gentoo LLVM/Clang - compatible. There even was no such thing in their TODO list. Anyway, thanks. I'll try reach them. вт, 12 мая 2020 г. в 15:51, Sam James : > > On 12

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo clang team

2020-05-12 Thread Alexander Bilyak
Hello everyone in this mailing list. I apologize for myself as I am not sure if it is the right place to write, but anyway... I am the (only) maintainer of gentoo-clang overlay. Recently I've found this bug (#408963) . So I

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] remove EGO_VENDOR support from go-module.eclass

2020-05-12 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 6:58 PM William Hubbs wrote: > > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 09:51:45AM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 5:16 PM William Hubbs wrote: > > > > > > All, > > > > > > now that go 1.14.2 is stable, I want to remove the EGO_VENDOR support from > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] unverifiable GPG keys for @gentoo.org members

2020-05-12 Thread Jimi Huotari
On Tue, 12 May 2020 06:20:40 -0400 Aisha Tammy wrote: > Oh, very sorry if I came out that way. I wasn't being passive aggressive. > Sometimes I write things the wrong way. I should have definitely written > it better :( For what it is worth, I didn't read your message in that way at all, and

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] remove EGO_VENDOR support from go-module.eclass

2020-05-12 Thread Samuel Bernardo
Hi William, How about overlays using the eclass, will this changes only apply to EAPI 8? Thanks, Samuel On 5/10/20 10:16 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > All, > > now that go 1.14.2 is stable, I want to remove the EGO_VENDOR support from > go-module.eclass. > > This was kept when the EGO_SUM support

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Enable FEATURES=parallel-install by default (bug 715110)

2020-05-12 Thread Michał Górny
W dniu wto, 12.05.2020 o godzinie 01∶40 -0700, użytkownik Zac Medico napisał: > On 5/11/20 10:54 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > W dniu nie, 10.05.2020 o godzinie 21∶32 -0700, użytkownik Zac > > Medico > > napisał: > > > The feature enables finer grained locks for install operations, > > > and > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] unverifiable GPG keys for @gentoo.org members

2020-05-12 Thread Aisha Tammy
On 5/12/20 1:24 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > W dniu pon, 11.05.2020 o godzinie 20∶20 -0400, użytkownik Aisha Tammy > napisał: >> Hi devs@, >> Seems like for some reason the gentoo.org does not publish the >> gpg public keys of the senders, even though it is signed correctly. > Oh, very sorry if I

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] remove EGO_VENDOR support from go-module.eclass

2020-05-12 Thread William Hubbs
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 10:47:23PM -0700, Matt Turner wrote: > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 4:00 PM William Hubbs wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 01:45:45AM +0300, Andreas K. Hüttel wrote: > > > > This patch makes migrating mandatory by forcing ebuilds to die if they > > > > have EGO_VENDOR set

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] remove EGO_VENDOR support from go-module.eclass

2020-05-12 Thread William Hubbs
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 11:41:45AM +0100, Samuel Bernardo wrote: > Hi William, > > How about overlays using the eclass, will this changes only apply to EAPI 8? Hi Samuel, this change will apply to all users of the eclass. Overlays are not considered blockers for in-tree eclass work. Also,

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Enable FEATURES=parallel-install by default (bug 715110)

2020-05-12 Thread Zac Medico
On 5/12/20 3:39 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > W dniu wto, 12.05.2020 o godzinie 01∶40 -0700, użytkownik Zac Medico > napisał: >> On 5/11/20 10:54 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >>> W dniu nie, 10.05.2020 o godzinie 21∶32 -0700, użytkownik Zac >>> Medico >>> napisał: The feature enables finer grained

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] remove EGO_VENDOR support from go-module.eclass

2020-05-12 Thread Joonas Niilola
On 5/12/20 8:36 PM, Samuel Bernardo wrote: > > My concern was about the others, for instance go-overlay that I have > enabled. > > Should it be possible to run a QA check to create a bug request to > remember the update of those ebuilds in the overlays? > > This would reduce the bug management

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] remove EGO_VENDOR support from go-module.eclass

2020-05-12 Thread Samuel Bernardo
Hi William, On 5/12/20 4:38 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > Hi Samuel, > > this change will apply to all users of the eclass. > > Overlays are not considered blockers for in-tree eclass work. > > Also, keepin mind that there was a qa warning in place for this issue > for 3 months, so overlay owners

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Enable FEATURES=parallel-install by default (bug 715110)

2020-05-12 Thread Michał Górny
W dniu wto, 12.05.2020 o godzinie 10∶05 -0700, użytkownik Zac Medico napisał: > On 5/12/20 3:39 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > I'm sorry but I was asking of a more high-level implications. > > > > I presume that this means that more than files of more than one > > package > > can be merged

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] remove EGO_VENDOR support from go-module.eclass

2020-05-12 Thread Samuel Bernardo
Hi, On 5/12/20 6:40 PM, Joonas Niilola wrote: > On 5/12/20 8:36 PM, Samuel Bernardo wrote: >> My concern was about the others, for instance go-overlay that I have >> enabled. >> >> Should it be possible to run a QA check to create a bug request to >> remember the update of those ebuilds in the

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Enable FEATURES=parallel-install by default (bug 715110)

2020-05-12 Thread Zac Medico
On 5/12/20 12:28 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > W dniu wto, 12.05.2020 o godzinie 10∶05 -0700, użytkownik Zac Medico > napisał: >> On 5/12/20 3:39 AM, Michał Górny wrote: >>> I'm sorry but I was asking of a more high-level implications. >>> >>> I presume that this means that more than files of more