First of all, please don't send HTML mail.
On Sat, 2020-05-16 at 20:08 +0200, lssndrbarbi...@gmail.com wrote:
> Was it necessary to mass close my PR on GitHub? I’ve lost quite some time to
> make them and I’m a bit upset.
I'm sorry but if you start mass-filing pull requests without consulting
Was it necessary to mass close my PR on GitHub? I’ve lost quite some time to make them and I’m a bit upset.How much we have to wait to get rid of python2? The earlier the better because portage want to pull in python2 stuff if available even when I don’t want.
Was it necessary to mass close my PR on GitHub? I’ve lost quite some time to make them and I’m a bit upset.How much we have to wait to get rid of python2? The earlier the better because portage want to pull in python2 stuff if available even when I don’t want.
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 2:08 PM wrote:
>
> Was it necessary to mass close my PR on GitHub? I’ve lost quite some time to
> make them and I’m a bit upset.
Most of us have no idea what you are talking about. Perhaps you should
direct this message to whoever closed your pull request, or provide
Hey all,
here's a small list of packages dropped to maintainer-needed. Some are
from retired proxied maintainers, and some are from me, ie packages I
don't use anymore and see no reason to hoard ownership.
(b) = open bugs,
(v) = new version is available.
app-backup/rsnapshot (b,v)
On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 4:36 PM Andreas Sturmlechner wrote:
>
> # Andreas Sturmlechner (2020-05-01)
> # Last release in 2018, wip/gtk3 branch untouched since 2017. Bug #598906
> # Stuck on Python 2 and pygtk. Masked for removal in 30 days.
> app-office/pybliographer
I added