[gentoo-dev] net-p2p/nicotine+: No maintainer, depends on dev-python/pygtk

2020-06-07 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
Package has been slow to port away from pygtk [1] and python2 and is one of the last remaining blockers. [2] Meanwhile, upstream actually managed to port to gtk3 and recently merged that work to master. [3] A new release is imminent [4] so now is the time to start work on an ebuild. If you

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Concept of Projects - How to proceed?

2020-06-07 Thread Andreas K . Hüttel
> Project Graphics was now deleted Inofficially a graphics@ maintainership of a package meant "fix the bugs yourself" for quite some time already. So I doubt the current state got worse via the removal of the project. That said, this is actually for a subset of the packages one of the cases

Re: [gentoo-dev] Graphics Project disbanded [pkgs up for grabs]

2020-06-07 Thread Sam James
> On 8 Jun 2020, at 00:22, Philip Webb wrote: > > 200607 Pacho Ramos wrote: >> I think this is the list of completely unmaintained packages now, >> indeed most of them, around 100. > > -- extract from list -- > >> media-gfx/imagemagick : 200516 >> media-libs/giflib : 200312 >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Concept of Projects - How to proceed?

2020-06-07 Thread Jonas Stein
On 07/06/2020 03.43, Aaron Bauman wrote: > On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 01:49:28AM +0200, Jonas Stein wrote: > I will happily revert my change on the graphics project Wiki [..] Glad to read your offer. Yes, please do so. I think it would hurt the Gentoo project if single developers delete projects

[gentoo-dev] Thank you & Vote for the next Bugday (2020-07-04)

2020-06-07 Thread Jonas Stein
Hi, the Bugday had a nice revival on 2020-06-06. Over the time there were several people, who worked on the fine Bug selection. And we had good discussions about package testing and the bugs. Support was provided by experienced Gentoo users and developers. A big "thank you" to everyone who

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Concept of Projects - How to proceed?

2020-06-07 Thread Joonas Niilola
On 6/7/20 9:14 PM, Jonas Stein wrote: > > Glad to read your offer. Yes, please do so. > > I think it would hurt the Gentoo project if single developers delete > projects > > - without without informing the project members > - without prior discussion (on gentoo-dev for example), > - without

[gentoo-dev] Looking for a co-maintainer: games-fps/gzdoom

2020-06-07 Thread William Breathitt Gray
I am looking for a co-maintainer for the games-fps/gzdoom package. GZDoom version 4.4.0 was just released and GZDoom has been refactored to move its audio code to a new external library called ZMusic: https://bugs.gentoo.org/727448 A games-fps/gzdoom-4.4.0 version bump will require the

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Concept of Projects - How to proceed?

2020-06-07 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 2:14 PM Jonas Stein wrote: > > On 07/06/2020 03.43, Aaron Bauman wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 01:49:28AM +0200, Jonas Stein wrote: > > > I will happily revert my change on the graphics project Wiki [..] > > Glad to read your offer. Yes, please do so. > > I think it

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-cluster/polysh

2020-06-07 Thread Aaron Bauman
# Aaron Bauman (2020-06-07) # py2 only. dead upstream. m-n. rdep. # Masked for removal in 15 days sys-cluster/polysh -- Cheers, Aaron signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2020-06-07 23:59 UTC

2020-06-07 Thread Robin H. Johnson
fd92483d159 dev-libs/libucl20200426-16:09 bman effe59a4a91 dev-python/asteval 20200607-10:36 pacho d5712a4e760 dev-python/black 20200602-22:15 chutzpah 17e0e5f755f dev-python/klein 20200601-04:06

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Concept of Projects - How to proceed?

2020-06-07 Thread Andreas K . Hüttel
> Now for the future, I wouldn't mind having a "last rite: XYV Project" or > similar e-mail sent to gentoo-dev{-announce} before action to ebuilds is > taken, so the project members/lead has one final chance to stop it. Good plan. -- Andreas K. Hüttel dilfri...@gentoo.org Gentoo Linux developer

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-misc/charm

2020-06-07 Thread Aaron Bauman
# Aaron Bauman (2020-06-07) # py2 only. dead upstream. m-n. rdep. # Masked for removal in 15 days net-misc/charm -- Cheers, Aaron signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Graphics Project disbanded [pkgs up for grabs]

2020-06-07 Thread Philip Webb
200607 Pacho Ramos wrote: > I think this is the list of completely unmaintained packages now, > indeed most of them, around 100. -- extract from list -- > media-gfx/imagemagick : 200516 > media-libs/giflib : 200312 > media-libs/libjpeg-turbo : 200328 > media-libs/openjpeg : 200328 >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Graphics Project disbanded [pkgs up for grabs]

2020-06-07 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 7:22 PM Philip Webb wrote: > > 200607 Pacho Ramos wrote: > > I think this is the list of completely unmaintained packages now, > > indeed most of them, around 100. > > -- extract from list -- > > > media-gfx/imagemagick : 200516 > > media-libs/giflib : 200312 > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Concept of Projects - How to proceed?

2020-06-07 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 7:49 PM Jonas Stein wrote: > > our concept of "Projects" (Herds in the past) maintaining packages has > several problems. You might want to search the list archives as many of the issues you've raised have been discussed extensively. There was never a complete push to fix

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Concept of Projects - How to proceed?

2020-06-07 Thread Kent Fredric
On Sun, 7 Jun 2020 06:43:19 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote: > Historically a lot of projects worked more like "tags" as an > alternative way of grouping packages other than categories. While > tags are a great idea projects are a terrible way to implement them. I was thinking perhaps instead of

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: php-ext-source-r2.eclass

2020-06-07 Thread Joonas Niilola
No ebuilds in the tree use this eclass anymore, since php-ext-source-r3 exists. Removal in ~30 days. Bug #727472. -- juippis signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Graphics Project disbanded [pkgs up for grabs]

2020-06-07 Thread Aisha Tammy
On 6/7/20 2:28 AM, Joonas Niilola wrote: > > On 6/6/20 10:11 PM, Aisha Tammy wrote: >> On 6/6/20 2:50 PM, Aaron Bauman wrote: >>> All, the graphics project has now been disbanded. >>> >> Is it weird to ask what happened? >> >> It seems like a lot of the packages listed here should be and are >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Graphics Project disbanded [pkgs up for grabs]

2020-06-07 Thread Pacho Ramos
El sáb, 06-06-2020 a las 15:09 -0400, Aaron Bauman escribió: > On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 at 02:50:31PM -0400, Aaron Bauman wrote: > > All, the graphics project has now been disbanded. > > > > All packages have been reassigned to maintainer-needed. Bugs will be > > reassigned soon. > > > > Here are a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Graphics Project disbanded [pkgs up for grabs]

2020-06-07 Thread Alexey Sokolov
вс, 7 июн. 2020 г. в 09:10, Pacho Ramos : > > > I think this is the list of completely unmaintained packages now (indeed most > of > them, around 100) :) > > x11-misc/shutter I'm updating this one right now

Re: [gentoo-dev] Graphics Project disbanded [pkgs up for grabs]

2020-06-07 Thread Joonas Niilola
On 6/6/20 10:11 PM, Aisha Tammy wrote: > On 6/6/20 2:50 PM, Aaron Bauman wrote: >> All, the graphics project has now been disbanded. >> > Is it weird to ask what happened? > > It seems like a lot of the packages listed here should be and are > very popular :O > > Aisha > Hi, floppym's response