Hi,
On 29-06-2020 21:13:43 -0500, Sid Spry wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have some runnable pseudocode outlining a faster tree verification
> algorithm.
> Before I create patches I'd like to see if there is any guidance on making the
> changes as unobtrusive as possible. If the radical change in
Dnia June 30, 2020 6:20:37 AM UTC, Fabian Groffen
napisał(a):
>Hi,
>
>On 29-06-2020 21:13:43 -0500, Sid Spry wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have some runnable pseudocode outlining a faster tree verification
>algorithm.
>> Before I create patches I'd like to see if there is any guidance on
>making the
Dnia June 30, 2020 2:13:43 AM UTC, Sid Spry napisał(a):
>Hello,
>
>I have some runnable pseudocode outlining a faster tree verification
>algorithm.
>Before I create patches I'd like to see if there is any guidance on
>making the
>changes as unobtrusive as possible. If the radical change in
El mar, 30-06-2020 a las 08:20 +0200, Fabian Groffen escribió:
> Hi,
>
> On 29-06-2020 21:13:43 -0500, Sid Spry wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have some runnable pseudocode outlining a faster tree verification
> > algorithm.
> > Before I create patches I'd like to see if there is any guidance on
Hi Aaron,
Thanks for your suggestion.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 1:16 AM Aaron Bauman wrote:
> Hi, Max. A couple thoughts... Just let me know if they are too crazy.
>
> 1. Could you enable the backend to ping devs/projects via email when a new
> release is available for their respective
Hi,
On 2020/06/30 16:19, Max Magorsch wrote:
> Hi Aaron,
>
> Thanks for your suggestion.
>
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 1:16 AM Aaron Bauman wrote:
>> Hi, Max. A couple thoughts... Just let me know if they are too crazy.
>>
>> 1. Could you enable the backend to ping devs/projects via email when a
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020, at 1:20 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 29-06-2020 21:13:43 -0500, Sid Spry wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have some runnable pseudocode outlining a faster tree verification
> > algorithm.
> > Before I create patches I'd like to see if there is any guidance on making
On Tue, 2020-06-30 at 12:50 -0500, Sid Spry wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020, at 2:28 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Dnia June 30, 2020 2:13:43 AM UTC, Sid Spry napisał(a):
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I have some runnable pseudocode outlining a faster tree verification
> > > algorithm.
> > > Before I
On 6/30/20 10:29 AM, Sid Spry wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020, at 9:34 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
>> On 6/29/20 7:15 PM, Sid Spry wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020, at 9:13 PM, Sid Spry wrote:
Hello,
I have some runnable pseudocode outlining a faster tree verification
algorithm.
>>>
On 6/30/20 1:28 AM, Max Magorsch wrote:
> 1. Would you prefer this information to be displayed in packages.g.o
> using a 'developer mode' or would you prefer a separate application
> similar to the idea of project Grumpy?
I'd prefer not to scatter tools around anymore. 'Developer' mode sounds
On 20-06-28 08:18:23, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> As many of you probably know, ago@ has been expanding the scope of our
> CFLAGS/CC support to include some other common build variables:
>
> * CC
> * CXX
> * AR
> * CPP
> * NM
> * RANLIB
> * AS
> * LD
>
> Some of those are POSIX
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020, at 9:34 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 6/29/20 7:15 PM, Sid Spry wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020, at 9:13 PM, Sid Spry wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I have some runnable pseudocode outlining a faster tree verification
> >> algorithm.
> >
> > Ah, right. It's worth noting that
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020, at 2:28 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia June 30, 2020 2:13:43 AM UTC, Sid Spry napisał(a):
> >Hello,
> >
> >I have some runnable pseudocode outlining a faster tree verification
> >algorithm.
> >Before I create patches I'd like to see if there is any guidance on
> >making the
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020, at 2:29 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-06-30 at 12:50 -0500, Sid Spry wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020, at 2:28 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > Dnia June 30, 2020 2:13:43 AM UTC, Sid Spry napisał(a):
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I have some runnable pseudocode
14 matches
Mail list logo
