Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] acct-*.eclass: Create sysusers.d files

2020-09-14 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia September 13, 2020 11:21:28 AM UTC, Andrew Savchenko napisał(a): >On Sat, 29 Aug 2020 21:53:45 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: >> Thanks to David Michael for the initial patch and upstream fixes. >> >> Signed-off-by: Michał Górny >> --- >> eclass/acct-group.eclass | 16 +++- >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: kubernetes packaging

2020-09-14 Thread Marc Schiffbauer
* William Hubbs schrieb am 14.09.20 um 00:39 Uhr: > All, > > I would like to get some thoughts on kubernetes packaging. > > When I started maintaining it in Gentoo, it was packaged as 7 ebuilds > (one per executable), and only one of them was marked stable. > > Since we normally do not split up

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] acct-*.eclass: Create sysusers.d files

2020-09-14 Thread David Seifert
On Sun, 2020-09-13 at 14:21 +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > On Sat, 29 Aug 2020 21:53:45 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > > Thanks to David Michael for the initial patch and upstream fixes. > > > > Signed-off-by: Michał Górny > > --- > > eclass/acct-group.eclass | 16 +++- > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Services and software which is critical for Gentoo should be developed/run in Gentoo namespace

2020-09-14 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 11:52 PM Kent Fredric wrote: > > But when you file a bug, you rely on bugzilla being maintained by > Gentoo Infra, not some 3rd party. > I think the Council will need to consider where it wants to draw the lines on something like this. Here is my sense of how these sorts