# John Helmert III (2021-07-14)
# Dead upstream, unfixed security issue.
# Removal on 2021-08-13. Bugs #755896, #781467.
net-proxy/polipo
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Signed-off-by: Marek Szuba
---
eclass/cuda.eclass | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/cuda.eclass b/eclass/cuda.eclass
index b1da77c69dd..08d2302d55b 100644
--- a/eclass/cuda.eclass
+++ b/eclass/cuda.eclass
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
-# Copyright 1999-2020
Like fortran-2 adding support for EAPI 8 appears to be trivial, unlike
fortran-2 we have no longer got any deprecated-EAPI ebuilds in the tree
inheriting it.
> On Thu, 15 Jul 2021, Marek Szuba wrote:
> case "${EAPI:-0}" in
> - 0|1|2|3|4)
> + [0-6])
> die "Unsupported EAPI=${EAPI:-0} (too old) for ${ECLASS}"
> ;;
> - 5|6|7)
> + 7|8)
> ;;
> *)
> die "Unsupported
On 2021-07-14 13:02, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
Shouldn't virtual/fortran go into BDEPEND in EAPIs 7 and 8?
Good point! I've created https://bugs.gentoo.org/802153 so that we do
not lose track of this, that said it is beyond the scope of the issue at
hand (the eclass will not behave any
> >
> > 1) either the severity assignment of this bug by the Security project as B1
> > wrong (i.e. it should have been classified "harmless")
> >
>
> The Gentoo model is not perfect and should be overhauled. However, it
> works for most things and sometimes bugs fall between the cracks.
>
>
Signed-off-by: Marek Szuba
---
eclass/fortran-2.eclass | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/fortran-2.eclass b/eclass/fortran-2.eclass
index 0bb00f475a2..9d0c71703e4 100644
--- a/eclass/fortran-2.eclass
+++ b/eclass/fortran-2.eclass
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
#
> On Wed, 14 Jul 2021, Marek Szuba wrote:
> On the plus side, nothing in here that requires changing to work with
> the new EAPI. On the minus side, we still got many EAPI-5 and 6
> consumers of this eclass in the tree so no chance of dropping support
> for these two at this time.
Shouldn't
On the plus side, nothing in here that requires changing to work with
the new EAPI. On the minus side, we still got many EAPI-5 and 6
consumers of this eclass in the tree so no chance of dropping support
for these two at this time.
On 2021-07-13 18:35, William Hubbs wrote:
>> are there any non-cosmetic reasons for doing this?
Consistency with the rest of the tree. If you do a "git grep _R0" on the
eclass directory, the lua eclasses are the only ones that have this in
the names of the guard variables, and the eclasses
On 2021-07-13 18:54, Michał Górny wrote:
+media-sound/easyeffects is already available in the tree, and the
+remaining PipeWire-dependent ebuilds of media-sound/pulseeffects will
s/ebuilds/versions/.
Changed locally.
+be removed in 7 days.
Probably better to use an explicit date here.
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 10:49:34AM +0200, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> > >
> > > 1) either the severity assignment of this bug by the Security project as
> > > B1 wrong (i.e. it should have been classified "harmless")
> Well, over the last year or so every 2-3 months the (uninformed)
12 matches
Mail list logo
