On 8/26/21 5:43 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 7:40 AM Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Thu, 26 Aug 2021, Stephan Hartmann wrote:
--- a/eclass/unpacker.eclass
+++ b/eclass/unpacker.eclass
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
# @ECLASS: unpacker.eclass
# @MAINTAINER:
# base-sys...@gentoo.org
Hi all,
In the past, stabilization for security bugs would be handled directly
in that security bug. After some discussion on the gentoo-dev mailing
list [1], there was some consensus on modifying this workflow to
separate stabilization from security bugs. Going forward, separate bugs
should be
\o/
> On Thu, 26 Aug 2021, Alice Ferrazzi wrote:
> As we are moving out to deprecate EAPI=6 from kernel-2.eclass
> start removing it from deblob function. Also clean code linked to old
> kernel versions. kernel sources that use deblob are already updated to
> EAPI=8
Somewhat unrelated, since I
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller
---
eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/eclass/kernel-2.eclass b/eclass/kernel-2.eclass
index 1913942a679b..4597da4c96bc 100644
--- a/eclass/kernel-2.eclass
+++ b/eclass/kernel-2.eclass
@@ -558,7 +558,6 @@ kernel_is() {
There are kernel versions like 4.9.280, therefore shifting version
components by 8 bits in kernel_is() may fail.
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller
---
eclass/linux-info.eclass | 9 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/linux-info.eclass
There are kernel versions like 4.9.280, therefore shifting version
components by 8 bits in kernel_is() may fail.
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller
---
eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 9 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/kernel-2.eclass b/eclass/kernel-2.eclass
Signed-off-by: Stephan Hartmann
---
eclass/unpacker.eclass | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/unpacker.eclass b/eclass/unpacker.eclass
index c9dab4345c9..424975ba8ba 100644
--- a/eclass/unpacker.eclass
+++ b/eclass/unpacker.eclass
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
#
> On Thu, 26 Aug 2021, Stephan Hartmann wrote:
> --- a/eclass/unpacker.eclass
> +++ b/eclass/unpacker.eclass
> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
> # @ECLASS: unpacker.eclass
> # @MAINTAINER:
> # base-sys...@gentoo.org
> -# @SUPPORTED_EAPIS: 5 6 7
> +# @SUPPORTED_EAPIS: 5 6 7 8
> # @BLURB: helpers for
Hi All
Consider this a tentative first email to test the water, but I have started to
look at performance
of particularly the install phase of the emerge utility and I could use some
guidance on where to go
next
Firstly, to define the "problem": I have found gentoo to be a great base for
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 7:40 AM Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 26 Aug 2021, Stephan Hartmann wrote:
>
> > --- a/eclass/unpacker.eclass
> > +++ b/eclass/unpacker.eclass
> > @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
> > # @ECLASS: unpacker.eclass
> > # @MAINTAINER:
> > # base-sys...@gentoo.org
> > -#
On 8/26/21 6:40 PM, Ulrich Müller wrote:
There are kernel versions like 4.9.280, therefore shifting version
components by 8 bits in kernel_is() may fail.
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller
---
eclass/linux-info.eclass | 9 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git
On 8/26/21 10:41 PM, Alice wrote:
On 8/26/21 6:40 PM, Ulrich Müller wrote:
There are kernel versions like 4.9.280, therefore shifting version
components by 8 bits in kernel_is() may fail.
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller
---
eclass/linux-info.eclass | 9 +
1 file changed, 5
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 11:16:40AM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 10:27:54AM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> > - Remove extraneous whitespace.
>
> This will be removed from the commit message before I add the patch to
> the tree, and a sign-off will be added.
This is in the
Hi Ed,
I've taken a dabble at trying to track down portage's bottlenecks (and have
stopped for the time being at solving them :/ )
> Can anyone give me a leg up on how I could benchmark this further and look
> for the hotspot? Perhaps someone understand the architecture of this point
> more
15 matches
Mail list logo
