On 13 December 2021 17:24:18 UTC, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
>Actually I kind of preferred a static name over straight mktemp,
>because emktemp supported other cases than a pure mktemp usage does.
>But I don't know if it could ever clash things in some weird
>situations.
That last part is the
"keyring" conveys the appropriate meaning, imho.
On Sat, Dec 25, 2021, 5:19 AM Marek Szuba wrote:
>
>
> On 24 December 2021 08:48:08 UTC, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>
> >> > I think “secret” may be too generic and “libsecret” is not ideal in
> case
> >> > an implemention comes along that is named
when dist-kernel gets uninstalled, /lib/modules/
is left behind on purpose. However, on some systems kernels also install
device-tree files to /boot/dtbs/
leaving /lib/modules, but removing device-tree file may leave system
unbootable, so let's treat dtbs directory similar to modules.
On Sun, 2021-12-26 at 09:44 +, Marek Szuba wrote:
>
> On 13 December 2021 17:24:18 UTC, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
>
> > Actually I kind of preferred a static name over straight mktemp,
> > because emktemp supported other cases than a pure mktemp usage does.
> > But I don't know if it could ever
Ühel kenal päeval, P, 26.12.2021 kell 10:50, kirjutas Michał Górny:
> On Sun, 2021-12-26 at 09:44 +, Marek Szuba wrote:
> >
> > On 13 December 2021 17:24:18 UTC, Mart Raudsepp
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Actually I kind of preferred a static name over straight mktemp,
> > > because emktemp
> On 27 Dec 2021, at 05:24, Georgy Yakovlev wrote:
>
> otherwise initial build may fail with:
> unknown long double size, cannot define BFP_FMT
If possible, would you mind filing a bug with the build log
of it failing (and brief steps on how to get it) just so
we can easily test if we can
otherwise initial build may fail with:
unknown long double size, cannot define BFP_FMT
Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev
---
eclass/toolchain.eclass | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/eclass/toolchain.eclass b/eclass/toolchain.eclass
index fd03ba176276..1102c4fc5d56 100644
