On 29/10/2022 18.22, Matt Turner wrote:
Have you seen these commits?
I did not, thanks. Seems like the solution. Is there a reason why llvm:N
do not pull in lld:N in that case?
-- Piotr.
On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 12:53 PM Piotr Karbowski wrote:
>
> On 29/10/2022 18.22, Matt Turner wrote:
> > Have you seen these commits?
>
> I did not, thanks. Seems like the solution. Is there a reason why llvm:N
> do not pull in lld:N in that case?
lld isn't a dependency of llvm; it's the same
# Arthur Zamarin (2022-10-29)
# Last upstream commit in 2016, no tests, implements functions
# which are implemented by pathlib Python module. No reverse
# dependencies in gentoo tree for a long time.
# Removal: 2022-11-28. Bug #878733.
dev-python/pathtools
OpenPGP_signature
Description:
Hi,
The state for this very moment is that we can have many versions of llvm
around, however we can at most have only one ld.lld installed. Usually
matching the lowest version of clang installed.
THis leads to build failures if one attempts to build some (but not all)
software, Linux kernel
On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 02:26:29AM -0400, kuzetsa CatSwarm wrote:
> hi, this is just a quick check to see if the updated wording still
> covers the discussion I had in -council on liberachat earlier this year.
>
> last version I had in git repo or patch format was from july:
>
>
On 29/10/2022 21.01, Matt Turner wrote:
lld isn't a dependency of llvm; it's the same reason why llvm:N
doesn't depend on clang:N.
That's fair. Still a bit of a bummer that we cannot guarantee a
frictionless support for clang-based kernels, in a sense that your
system could pull new update
On 29/10/2022 22.35, Piotr Karbowski wrote:
On 29/10/2022 21.01, Matt Turner wrote:
lld isn't a dependency of llvm; it's the same reason why llvm:N
doesn't depend on clang:N.
That's fair. Still a bit of a bummer that we cannot guarantee a
frictionless support for clang-based kernels, in a
On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 12:01 PM Piotr Karbowski wrote:
> The state for this very moment is that we can have many versions of llvm
> around, however we can at most have only one ld.lld installed. Usually
> matching the lowest version of clang installed.
Have you seen these commits?
commit
