Re: [gentoo-dev] netmount and glusterfs (fuse) dependency management

2024-04-11 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 5:51 AM Jaco Kroon wrote: > > Hi All, > > I was hoping for some advise regarding how I could improve the glusterfs > package for users (and myself). At least those using openrc, but I > suspect similar may be applicable to systemd, but I have no idea how > systemd handles

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Update on the 23.0 profiles

2024-04-11 Thread Madhu
* "Andreas K. Huettel" <2862978.mvXUDI8C0e @pinacolada> : Wrote on Sun, 07 Apr 2024 15:27:42 +0200: >> I see no way of migrating to 23.0 profile because of not-recompilable >> packages that are installed (over 4 years) which block --emptytree, >> and do not wish to be forced to migrate to

Re: [gentoo-dev] netmount and glusterfs (fuse) dependency management

2024-04-11 Thread Jaco Kroon
Hi Joonas, Thanks for the below.  Further comments there. On 2024/04/11 07:11, Joonas Niilola wrote: On 8.4.2024 12.51, Jaco Kroon wrote: In order for glusterfs to mount successfully the fuse module needs to be available when mount.glusterfs is invoked.  This can be achieved in one of two

Re: [gentoo-dev] netmount and glusterfs (fuse) dependency management

2024-04-11 Thread Joonas Niilola
Hey, On 11.4.2024 9.14, Jaco Kroon wrote: > > The latter can certainly be done and makes sense (only required if > you're using the fuse mount, so if USE=fuse at least). > > The former doesn't make sense to do blindly in /etc/init.d/netmount > (which belongs to sys-apps/openrc, not glusterfs).

Re: [gentoo-dev] netmount and glusterfs (fuse) dependency management

2024-04-11 Thread Jaco Kroon
Hi Joonas, On 2024/04/11 12:02, Joonas Niilola wrote: Hey, On 11.4.2024 9.14, Jaco Kroon wrote: The latter can certainly be done and makes sense (only required if you're using the fuse mount, so if USE=fuse at least). The former doesn't make sense to do blindly in /etc/init.d/netmount (which