Re: [gentoo-dev] Need ARM/AArch64 test data for cpuid2cpuflags

2019-09-12 Thread A Schenck
On 9/10/19 10:24 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Tue, 2019-09-10 at 22:44 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: >> Hi, everyone. >> >> I've recently (finally!) started adding tests to cpuid2cpuflags. Tests >> are based on mocked syscalls that return arch-specific data read from >> text files. So far I've got

Re: [gentoo-dev] Keywordreqs and slacking arch teams

2019-12-29 Thread A Schenck
On 12/28/19 3:14 AM, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: > On 28/12/19 11:05, Kent Fredric wrote: >> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 10:35:09 +0100 >> Fabian Groffen wrote: >> >>> Hmmm, interested to hear what kind of things you're thinking about here. >> A lot of the "Work" of filing a keyword request is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New Developer: Florian Schmaus (flow)

2021-06-22 Thread A Schenck
On 6/22/21 12:45 PM, Wolfgang E. Sanyer wrote: > Welcome flo! > > I think toralf made thin on-topic now: I quite enjoy Andechser > Doppelbock Dunkel, which I believe is brewed in Germany :) > We're lucky enough to occasionally get that even out here in San Francisco, I seek it out whenever it's

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] profiles/default/linux: Add USE="bzip2 lzma zstd" to defaults

2021-07-08 Thread A Schenck
On 7/8/21 11:15 AM, Matt Turner wrote: > On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 4:54 AM Michael Orlitzky wrote: >> On Wed, 2021-07-07 at 22:01 -0700, Matt Turner wrote: >>> Enable these flags by default, since they effectively add no additional >>> dependencies: >> Why? This list should be getting smaller, not

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new category for container related packages, instead of app-emulation

2021-08-07 Thread A Schenck
On 8/6/21 11:58 AM, A Schenck wrote: > On 8/5/21 5:57 PM, Alec Warner wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 2:44 PM Georgy Yakovlev wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> We've been collecting more and more container related packages in >>> app-emulation/* >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new category for container related packages, instead of app-emulation

2021-08-06 Thread A Schenck
On 8/5/21 5:57 PM, Alec Warner wrote: > On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 2:44 PM Georgy Yakovlev wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We've been collecting more and more container related packages in >> app-emulation/* >> >> What do you think about finally moving those packages to separate category? > As always my opinion

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Portage einfo, elog... output format change

2021-09-29 Thread A Schenck
On 9/28/21 8:36 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, everyone. > > I know I'm going to regret asking this... but I've prepared a change to > the Portage output format and I think it asks for a wider discussion > than internally in Portage team. > > The primary problem with the current output format is

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Portage einfo, elog... output format change

2021-10-02 Thread A Schenck
On 10/1/21 11:32 AM, Alec Warner wrote: > On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 11:30 AM A Schenck wrote: >> On 9/29/21 11:44 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >>> On Thu, 2021-09-30 at 08:40 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Would it be possible to hav

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Portage einfo, elog... output format change

2021-10-01 Thread A Schenck
On 9/29/21 3:58 PM, Francesco Riosa wrote: > Il giorno mer 29 set 2021 alle ore 23:52 A Schenck > mailto:lane_and...@hotmail.com>> ha scritto: > > On 9/28/21 8:36 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > Hi, everyone. > > > > I know I'm going to reg

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Portage einfo, elog... output format change

2021-10-01 Thread A Schenck
On 9/29/21 11:44 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Thu, 2021-09-30 at 08:40 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Would it be possible to have some switch (e.g. --style=legacy) that >> controls this new vs. the old behaviour? Would perhaps allow >> applications that parse the output to work via

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Portage einfo, elog... output format change

2021-10-05 Thread A Schenck
On 10/2/21 10:51 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 1:25 PM A Schenck wrote: >> Further discussion belongs on a different list, but the link provided by >> mgorny and repeated by you does not allow collaborating in compliance >> with the Gentoo Social Contrac

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: allow -1 for ACCT_USER_ID and ACCT_GROUP_ID in ::gentoo

2021-12-01 Thread A Schenck
On 11/30/21 17:32, William Hubbs wrote: > On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 12:59:18PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021, James Cloos wrote: >>> "UM" == Ulrich Mueller writes: >> UM> Also, why would one allocate UIDs in the 500..999 range (1000 is fine, >> UM> actually)? Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo LLVM project needs help!

2022-02-11 Thread A Schenck
On 2/10/22 15:36, Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, > > As you may have noticed, I'm practically maintaining LLVM all by myself. > This is a really tedious, time consuming and ungrateful task, and I'm > pretty close to burnout. I'd really appreciate some help. > > The problem with LLVM that it's a really

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-admin/gkrellm & plugins

2023-01-27 Thread A Schenck
On 1/27/23 09:36, Michał Górny wrote: # Michał Górny (2023-01-27) # GKrellM and a variety of plugins.  It's unmaintained for some time. # Upstream homepage is gone, and the whole suite is collecting dust # and patches. # Removal on 2023-02-26.  Bug #892251. [also eclass/gkrellm-plugin.eclass]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-admin/gkrellm & plugins

2023-02-16 Thread A Schenck
On 1/27/23 11:21, Michał Górny wrote: On Fri, 2023-01-27 at 10:51 -0800, A Schenck wrote: On 1/27/23 09:36, Michał Górny wrote: # Michał Górny (2023-01-27) # GKrellM and a variety of plugins.  It's unmaintained for some time. # Upstream homepage is gone, and the whole suite is collecting