[gentoo-dev] please stop using foo-${PV}-bar.patch in other ebuild versions than ${PV}

2009-03-22 Thread Alin Năstac
Please do not apply patches that have ${P} prefix in other ebuild versions than ${PV}. Is that hard to create a new patch with a proper name? Cheers, Alin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: please stop using foo-${PV}-bar.patch in other ebuild versions than ${PV}

2009-03-22 Thread Alin Năstac
On 3/22/09 11:47 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:50:26 +0100 Alin Năstac mrn...@gentoo.org wrote: Please do not apply patches that have ${P} prefix in other ebuild versions than ${PV}. Is that hard to create a new patch with a proper name? Um, why? I'm not having

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: please stop using foo-${PV}-bar.patch in other ebuild versions than ${PV}

2009-03-23 Thread Alin Năstac
On 3/23/09 1:42 AM, Ryan Hill wrote: On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 01:19:26 +0100 Alin Năstac mrn...@gentoo.org wrote: Fine, then remove $PV from patch name and use it in any ebuild version you want. Or just decouple the patch version from the ebuild version (foo-bar-r1.patch sounds OK to me

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: please stop using foo-${PV}-bar.patch in other ebuild versions than ${PV}

2009-03-23 Thread Alin Năstac
On 3/23/09 1:44 AM, Jeremy Olexa wrote: Alin Năstac wrote: snip Fine, then remove $PV from patch name and use it in any ebuild version you want. Or just decouple the patch version from the ebuild version (foo-bar-r1.patch sounds OK to me). What exactly is your problem that you are trying

Re: [gentoo-dev] Baselayout 2 stabilisation todo

2009-05-23 Thread Alin Năstac
Doug Goldstein wrote: The only reason why OpenRC has not come up for stabilization by it's maintainers is the fact that everytime there's a new version readied for release, on the horizon there's new incompatible changes being planned for the next version. The OpenRC maintainers in Gentoo have

[gentoo-dev] ISDN packages need some love

2009-08-15 Thread Alin Năstac
ISDN packages from net-dialup herd were neglected for more than a year. Stefan Briesenick is our current ISDN developer but he apparently lost interest in them. If you're interested in maintaining these packages and you're already a developer, feel free to join net-dialup team and handle their

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.5.1 arrived in the tree

2009-10-10 Thread Alin Năstac
On 10/9/09 7:57 PM, Matthias Schwarzott wrote: * does new scripts already can do all that was possible with net.* ? No. PPP is not compatible with the new scripts. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why isn't /root/.bash_profile in the stage tarballs?

2007-09-20 Thread Alin Năstac
John R. Graham wrote: Why can't the simple little default .bash_profile from /etc/skel be put into /root as well? $HOME directories shouldn't be touched by emerge. This is the user's turf. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] meaning of sqlite/sqlite3 use flag

2007-09-24 Thread Alin Năstac
Mike Frysinger wrote: how about 'sqlite' means you want sqlite irregardless of version ... then sqlite-2 either gets punted from apr-util or it gets a local USE flag 'sqlite-old' for older cruft Wouldn't be better to determine what version of sqlite should be used based on the version of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-proxy/squidguard: ChangeLog squidguard-1.2.1-r2.ebuild squidguard-1.2.1-r1.ebuild

2007-09-25 Thread Alin Năstac
Christian Faulhammer wrote: Alin Nastac (mrness) [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Added:squidguard-1.2.1-r2.ebuild Removed: squidguard-1.2.1-r1.ebuild Log: Fix regular expresion matching (#193712). [...] unpack ${A} || die unpack problem

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/openswan: ChangeLog openswan-2.4.9-r1.ebuild openswan-2.4.9.ebuild

2007-09-26 Thread Alin Năstac
Mike Frysinger wrote: On Wednesday 26 September 2007, Donnie Berkholz wrote: On 08:14 Wed 26 Sep , Alin Nastac (mrness) wrote: mrness 07/09/26 08:14:22 Modified: ChangeLog Added:openswan-2.4.9-r1.ebuild Removed:

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in mail-filter/dspam: ChangeLog dspam-3.8.0-r7.ebuild

2007-10-01 Thread Alin Năstac
Donnie Berkholz wrote: On 11:30 Sun 30 Sep , Alin Nastac (mrness) wrote: 1.1 mail-filter/dspam/dspam-3.8.0-r7.ebuild file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/mail-filter/dspam/dspam-3.8.0-r7.ebuild?rev=1.1view=markup plain:

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in mail-filter/dspam: ChangeLog dspam-3.8.0-r7.ebuild

2007-10-01 Thread Alin Năstac
Donnie Berkholz wrote: On 08:58 Mon 01 Oct , Alin Năstac wrote: According to bash manual, has a greater precedence than ||. That would translate in: Where'd you see that? Here's my man page: A list is a sequence of one or more pipelines separated by one

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in mail-filter/dspam: ChangeLog dspam-3.8.0-r7.ebuild

2007-10-01 Thread Alin Năstac
Donnie Berkholz wrote: On 10:11 Mon 01 Oct , Alin Năstac wrote: In this case, $(use mysql || use postgres use_enable virtual-users) will result in use_enable virtual-users being executed if and only if USE=-mysql postgres. See this pseudocode: No if use mysql succeeds

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in mail-filter/dspam: ChangeLog dspam-3.8.0-r7.ebuild

2007-10-01 Thread Alin Năstac
Donnie Berkholz wrote: On 10:43 Mon 01 Oct , Alin Năstac wrote: Donnie Berkholz wrote: It's better to do something smart than to force interactivity. In this case, you as the maintainer would decide whether this USE combo meant the user wanted virtual-users (if so, forcibly

[gentoo-dev] new syslog global USE flag

2007-10-01 Thread Alin Năstac
How about promoting syslog to global USE flag? In addition to the list below, I would need it in mail-filter/dspam. global use flags (searching: syslog) no matching entries found local use flags (searching: syslog)

Re: [gentoo-dev] new syslog global USE flag

2007-10-01 Thread Alin Năstac
Global syslog use-flag has been added. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: controlling src_test

2007-10-04 Thread Alin Năstac
Ryan Hill wrote: NEWFEATURES= for f in ${FEATURES}; do if [[ ! $f == test ]]; then NEWFEATURES=${NEWFEATURES} $f fi done FEATURES=${NEWFEATURES} There is a simpler way to remove a word from an environment variable: FEATURES= ${FEATURES} # make sure every word is

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-proxy/polipo: ChangeLog polipo-1.0.3.ebuild polipo-1.0.1.ebuild polipo-1.0.0.ebuild polipo-0.9.12-r1.ebuild

2007-11-03 Thread Alin Năstac
Donnie Berkholz wrote: On 15:38 Fri 02 Nov , Alin Nastac (mrness) wrote: 1.1 net-proxy/polipo/polipo-1.0.3.ebuild file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/net-proxy/polipo/polipo-1.0.3.ebuild?rev=1.1view=markup plain:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-proxy/polipo: ChangeLog polipo-1.0.3.ebuild polipo-1.0.1.ebuild polipo-1.0.0.ebuild polipo-0.9.12-r1.ebuild

2007-11-03 Thread Alin Năstac
Donnie Berkholz wrote: On 10:37 Sat 03 Nov , Alin Năstac wrote: You have to create users and groups in both pkg_ functions: - pkg_setup : when installation is performed the usual way, through compilation - pkg_preinst: when installed from binary package (-k) You shouldn't

Re: [gentoo-dev] Good-bye

2007-11-24 Thread Alin Năstac
Seemant Kulleen wrote: The time has finally come for me to resign from Gentoo. A sad day for Gentoo :-( May the Force be with you! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Of Mips and Devs [Was: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January]

2008-01-10 Thread Alin Năstac
Mike Frysinger wrote: 3. Should Gentoo even continue to support mips? i see dropping keywords as a very last resort. getting a port *back* into the tree is a *tremendous* amount of work (i went through it and it was hell), while keeping ~arch alive is a sliver of effort and

Re: [gentoo-dev] sqlite/sqlite3 useflag inconsistency

2008-01-14 Thread Alin Năstac
Petteri Räty wrote: Benedikt Morbach kirjoitti: In my humble opinion it would be nice to have a greater degree of control by separating this into two useflags, sqlite2 and sqlite3, just like e.g. qt3 and qt4 Probably. Even better would be to get rid of sqlite2 but that probably doesn't

Re: [gentoo-dev] sqlite/sqlite3 useflag inconsistency

2008-01-16 Thread Alin Năstac
Petteri Räty wrote: Alin Năstac kirjoitti: Petteri Räty wrote: Benedikt Morbach kirjoitti: In my humble opinion it would be nice to have a greater degree of control by separating this into two useflags, sqlite2 and sqlite3, just like e.g. qt3 and qt4 Probably. Even better would be to get

[gentoo-dev] detecting if a file is used or not

2008-01-24 Thread Alin Năstac
How could I detect in a init script if a socket file is used or not? I need to be sure I can delete it before starting the service. I would hate to add sys-process/psmisc to RDEPEND just for this (fuser seems to be the only way of doing that). signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

[gentoo-dev] last rites for net-dialup/{mclient,mserver,linesrv,xlc}

2008-05-15 Thread Alin Năstac
Packages in $subj will be removed in 30 days because: - upstream is dead (for years in the case of the first 2 packages) - I don't think they have even one gentoo user (who would be crazy enough to install gentoo while using a dialup connection?) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

Re: [gentoo-dev] lastrite: dev-cpp/libherdstat and app-portage/herdstat

2008-06-07 Thread Alin Năstac
Tiziano Müller wrote: # Tiziano Müller [EMAIL PROTECTED] (07 Jun 2008) # Various bugs and dead upstream # herdstat: 164254, 184035, 222887 # libherdstat: 119589, 206876 # Masked for removal in 30 days app-portage/herdstat dev-cpp/libherdstat Sorry people, but we (Halcy0n and I) really don't

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: lastrite: dev-cpp/libherdstat and app-portage/herdstat

2008-06-08 Thread Alin Năstac
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The tree's small enough that grep -r gives enough performance. Even better grep */*/metadata.xml the tree is not big enough that it exceeds the maximum arguments from bash. According to my

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask

2008-06-22 Thread Alin Năstac
Peter Volkov wrote: В Сбт, 21/06/2008 в 10:56 +0200, Albert Zeyer пишет: Perhaps install a script which automatically takes the CVS comment when some of these files is changed and adds this comment automatically to the ChangeLog? Some days ago Diego (flameeyes) suggested to write

[gentoo-dev] strange portage behaviour

2008-07-18 Thread Alin Năstac
Portage no longer install ._cfg_* files for the CONFIG_PROTECTed files touched by the user. Even if I remove the package and reinstall it again, the protected file will remain like it is. Can someone enlighten me? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] strange portage behaviour

2008-07-19 Thread Alin Năstac
Zac Medico wrote: It's common for people get get confused like this by the confmem behavior that's built into portage's merge process. You can use --noconfmem to disable it. Ah, I didn't knew we had this option, thanks for the info. However, a user complained in [1] that net-dialup/ppp failed

[gentoo-dev] unwanted CVS keyword substitution on patch files

2008-08-16 Thread Alin Năstac
Every once in a while, I get bitten by the $Id keyword replacement done on patches in $FILESDIR. Can we do something to fix this annoyance? If repoman cannot add -kb for *.patch and *.diff files, at least it should verify you have added those files with this options. signature.asc Description:

Re: [gentoo-dev] net-firewall/ipp2p maintainer needed

2006-12-04 Thread Alin Năstac
Jakub Moc wrote: net-firewall/ipp2p ebuild is outdated and useless w/ 2.6.17+ kernels (Bug 141700). It needs a bump to 0.8.2 and some active maintainer, eradicator apparently doesn't care. I've tooked this one. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] net-misc/openswan needs a maintainer

2006-12-06 Thread Alin Năstac
Jakub Moc wrote: This thing has been neglected for ages, needs a version bump and has lots of stale open bugs: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62970 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105272 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124272

Re: [gentoo-dev] net-misc/openswan needs a maintainer

2006-12-06 Thread Alin Năstac
Lars Weiler wrote: Will look into it during the next days for sure ;-) (I already hit that kernel version bug on one machine.) I think strongswan's ebuild should be simplified. I will bump openswan to 2.4.7 in a couple of days. Please use it as starting point for your bump.

Re: [gentoo-dev] (open|strong)swan ipsec-config-path

2006-12-07 Thread Alin Năstac
Lars Weiler wrote: * Alin Năstac [EMAIL PROTECTED] [06/12/07 08:37 +0200]: I think strongswan's ebuild should be simplified. I will bump openswan to 2.4.7 in a couple of days. Please use it as starting point for your bump. While we are at it: Should we keep installing the config

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] punt mingw ebuilds out of the tree and into a mingw overlay

2006-12-20 Thread Alin Năstac
Mike Frysinger wrote: however, i think it's a lovely idea to open a mingw overlay and populate the sucker until it's stuffed full of crap for people to use I kinda need dev-util/nsis, but moving mingw stuff to an overlay would be fine by me as long as the overlay is *official*.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] punt mingw ebuilds out of the tree and into a mingw overlay

2006-12-20 Thread Alin Năstac
Mike Frysinger wrote: why do you feel the need to label crap as official ? Because I consider it should be maintained by Gentoo devs. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] punt mingw ebuilds out of the tree and into a mingw overlay

2006-12-20 Thread Alin Năstac
Mike Frysinger wrote: On Wednesday 20 December 2006 03:59, Alin Năstac wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: why do you feel the need to label crap as official ? Because I consider it should be maintained by Gentoo devs. as i said, that's up to you and other devs to decide

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] punt mingw ebuilds out of the tree and into a mingw overlay

2006-12-20 Thread Alin Năstac
Mike Frysinger wrote: none of this belongs in the tree as we do not have a windows port But dev-util/nsis installs a native application - makensis - which creates win32 setups. I think this excludes nsis from your list. I find it useful because I can automatize updates of my win32 setups on

Re: [gentoo-dev] new herd suggestion: religion

2007-02-02 Thread Alin Năstac
Steve Dibb wrote: @devs, I'd like to propose a new herd: religion. The herd would take care of the Bible and religious software along with any genealogy programs in the tree, which there actually are a few of. Sword, gnomesword, sword modules, bibletime, gramps would all fall under the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Network configuration and bash

2007-02-07 Thread Alin Năstac
Roy Marples wrote: This email is about network configuration. Before I joined Gentoo, network configuration was done in bash arrays like so (note, that the variable name was changed in baselayout-1.11) ifconfig_eth0=( 10.1.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 10.1.1.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 )

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Distrowatch

2007-03-14 Thread Alin Năstac
Caleb Cushing wrote: Perhaps they're more interested in generating ad revenue from whipped-up scandals... or maybe they have a point. distrowatch hpd ranking show's us down from a few years ago we were 7 in '04 9 '05 10 '06 11-12 '07 Yeah, the good old days when Gentoo was

Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion: INVALID - NOCHANGE in bugzilla

2007-03-24 Thread Alin Năstac
Kevin F. Quinn wrote: The problem I have with NOTABUG is pretty much the same problem I have with INVALID - it's not as severe, but it still does the same thing to the user (i.e. slaps him with a wet fish rather than a frozen one). Maybe, just maybe, the problem is not with the resolution

Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion: INVALID - NOCHANGE in bugzilla

2007-03-24 Thread Alin Năstac
Christopher Sawtell wrote: On Sun, 25 Mar 2007, Jakub Moc wrote: Kevin F. Quinn napsal(a): [snip] See, I don't really care how the reporter feels, if something's not a bug, then it's not a bug. In which case it must be a feature, so why not use the keyword FEATURE? Why would

[gentoo-dev] net-dialup/slirp removal

2007-04-15 Thread Alin Năstac
Anyone have a good reason to keep net-dialup/slirp in the tree? The package installation generates numerous QA notices and most keywords are -arch. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] net-dialup/pppoed pending for removal

2007-04-15 Thread Alin Năstac
pppoed is a user space implementation of PPPoE, needed only for kernel versions 2.4. Since we don't have such kernel versions in our tree anymore, I've hard masked it and I intend to remove it on May the 15th. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] net-dialup/slirp pending for removal

2007-04-17 Thread Alin Năstac
# Alin Năstac [EMAIL PROTECTED] (17 Apr 2007) # Pending for removal on 17 May 2007 # Reasons: #- all keywords are -arch (except for x86) #- source has numerous QA violations #- unmaintained for years net-dialup/slirp signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [POLICY] Keywording/Stabilizing Bug Assignment Policy

2007-04-17 Thread Alin Năstac
Stefan Schweizer wrote: In my opinion the last architecture should also remove the old ebuild they have just made obsolete by stabling/keywording the new version, since they commit to the directory anyway. This might be good, but also bad. I usually let the older stable version linger in our

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: File collisions

2007-04-20 Thread Alin Năstac
Rob C wrote: On 19/04/07, *Christian Faulhammer* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: On the issue of QA, I think enabling FEATURES=collision-detect by default would do a lot more good at this stage

Re: [gentoo-dev] Bye Gentoo!

2007-05-30 Thread Alin Năstac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bryan Østergaard wrote: It's with a bit of sadness but also a bit of relief that I'm finally retiring from Gentoo. I'm sorry to see another key developer leaving Gentoo. :( I hope you'll come back someday... ;) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version:

Re: [gentoo-dev] New (old) Developer: Deedra Waters (dmwaters)

2007-06-05 Thread Alin Năstac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andrej Kacian wrote: Hah, yet another proof that Gentoo is addictive. I wonder when we will be forced to put stickers like Gentoo may affect your social life on our media :-) Welcome back, Deedra! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG

Re: [gentoo-dev] Smoother moderation scheme?

2007-07-13 Thread Alin Năstac
Ken wrote: I may just be a lowly Arch Tester, but I don't necessarily see why individual dev's who are bothered by the noise can't just set up their own killfiles and filters. Do you have a solution to filter flamefests out of a ml? If you do, please share it with the list. signature.asc

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ML changes

2007-07-16 Thread Alin Năstac
Steve Long wrote: Donnie Berkholz wrote: Matthias Langer wrote: no offense, but this is one of the worst proposals i've ever read on this list; why? because, one of gentoo's major problems is that it is becoming more and more a toy exclusively for its own developers.

[gentoo-dev] RFC : New ebuild function pkg_create for creating corespondent sorce tarball

2007-07-16 Thread Alin Năstac
I was asked to discuss here a portage enhancement proposed by me [1]. Basically I need a pkg_create() that will be executed only in the context of the upcoming ebuild ${PF}.ebuild create command. The package where I need it is app-mobilephone/bitpim. The upstream doesn't offer a source tarball,

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC : New ebuild function pkg_create for creating corespondent sorce tarball

2007-07-16 Thread Alin Năstac
Marius Mauch wrote: Two questions: - are there more packages that could benefit from this? None that I know of. However, there might be other similar packages without a source tarball (slim chance, but quite possible). At first, I asked upstream to provide such tarball, but I got refused

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC : New ebuild function pkg_create for creating corespondent sorce tarball

2007-07-17 Thread Alin Năstac
Jan Kundrát wrote: Alin Năstac wrote: The upstream doesn't offer a source tarball, so I need to construct it myself from their svn repository. If you're creating a live ebuild, there are already existing eclasses that works from the user's POV. I'm not speaking about live

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC : New ebuild function pkg_create for creating corespondent sorce tarball

2007-07-17 Thread Alin Năstac
Luca Barbato wrote: I'm not sure how many special cases/option would be necessary for such script, like exclude dir, one tar per dir and so on. The process of creating the tarball is quite specific to the package in question, therefore you cannot make an universal function that does that.

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC : New ebuild function pkg_create for creating corespondent sorce tarball

2007-07-17 Thread Alin Năstac
Luca Barbato wrote: My idea is to have your overlay with live ebuilds and a tool to make a release out of it. All the messy stuff remains in pkg_setup/src_unpack all you need to do then is to iterate the workdir and make tarballs of what you find there. Sounds good enough? Basically you

[gentoo-dev] Last rites for net-dialup/l2tpd

2007-07-19 Thread Alin Năstac
# Alin Năstac [EMAIL PROTECTED] (19 Jul 2007) # Dead upstream, forked in net-dialup/xl2tpd. # Pending removal 19 Sep 2007 net-dialup/l2tpd signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Some ideas on how to reduce territoriality

2007-08-10 Thread Alin Năstac
Duncan wrote: If the user sees it, it means the maintainer failed to do his job. The tarball couldn't have even been changed upstream without notice, since it'd then fail the sanity/security/signing checks. I think that's the suggestion, that it be mandatory for maintainers to deal with,

[gentoo-dev] last rites for net-dialup/l2tpd

2007-08-25 Thread Alin Năstac
# Alin Năstac [EMAIL PROTECTED] (25 Aug 2007) # Has been inactive for several years; scheduled for removal in 60 days. # Please use net-dialup/xl2tpd (fork actively maintained by Xelerance) # or use net-dialup/rp-l2tp. net-dialup/l2tpd signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] /etc/ppp/(ip-up.d,ip-down.d} directories

2007-08-26 Thread Alin Năstac
A gentoo user requested in bug 190143 [1] to change the way pppd deals with interface up/down events. He requested to break current ip-up/ip-down functionality into different scripts contained in /etc/ppp/(ip-up.d,ip-down.d}. What do you think about? Is it worth it? Personally I think it is a

Re: [gentoo-dev] /etc/ppp/(ip-up.d,ip-down.d} directories

2007-08-26 Thread Alin Năstac
Thomas Anderson wrote: I do have one question though, how will this affect programs like pppconfig? Programs such as these may not look at these scripts and break. Pretty much my one worry is about breaking compatibility with other programs in the tree. pppconfig do not care what the

Re: [gentoo-dev] /etc/ppp/(ip-up.d,ip-down.d} directories

2007-08-26 Thread Alin Năstac
W.Kenworthy wrote: From a users point of view - dont do it. Stay simple and standard (i.e., equal to upstream as per the gentoo philosophy). I don't see it: a) The current ip-up ip-down scripts are provided by us, not by upstream. b) If this is going to be implemented, it will be done by

[gentoo-dev] Re: net-proxy/squid needs your love

2010-08-04 Thread Alin Năstac
Hi Markos, I'm very busy in real life, but I'll try to solve all squid issues this week. Btw, [2] and [3] were solved from net-proxy's perspective and [1] wasn't fixed by upstream AFAIK. Cheers, Alin On 04/08/2010 13:50, Markos Chandras wrote: Hi there net-proxy/squid needs your love. Bug

[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: net-mail/vmailmgr and vmailmgr-tools

2011-11-13 Thread Alin Năstac
# Alin Năstac mrn...@gentoo.org (13 Nov 2011) # Dead project, masked for removal in 30 days net-mail/vmailmgr net-mail/vmailmgr-tools signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature