Re: [gentoo-dev] Next council meeting on 7 Dec 2009 at 1900UTC

2009-11-30 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Denis Dupeyron dixit (2009-11-25, 14:50): The next council meeting will be on 7 Dec 2009 at 1900UTC. If you want us to discuss things please let us know in reply to this email. What is already known is we'll talk about mtime preservation and prefix. You can find threads about those at:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Next council meeting on 7 Dec 2009 at 1900UTC

2009-11-30 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Antoni Grzymala dixit (2009-11-30, 12:30): Denis Dupeyron dixit (2009-11-25, 14:50): The next council meeting will be on 7 Dec 2009 at 1900UTC. If you want us to discuss things please let us know in reply to this email. What is already known is we'll talk about mtime preservation

Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again)

2010-01-16 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Mike Frysinger dixit (2010-01-15, 20:45): On Friday 15 January 2010 20:24:38 Sebastian Pipping wrote: On 01/16/10 00:33, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: - From the alternatives, /var/lib/layman doesn't sound right. If /var/cache/layman doesn't work, what about /var/spool/layman

Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again)

2010-01-16 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Ben de Groot dixit (2010-01-16, 00:41): 2010/1/15 Dawid Węgliński c...@gentoo.org: On Friday 15 January 2010 20:44:43 Alex Legler wrote:   /var/lib/layman do well? +1 -1, /usr/local/layman? /usr/local/ is a location the system should avoid. Somewhere in /var/ seems to be

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [rfc] layman storage location (again)

2010-01-18 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Alex Alexander dixit (2010-01-18, 11:07): On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 09:05:58AM +0100, Peter Hjalmarsson wrote: I sometimes think the main problem is the tree itself. Portage really should had a directory of its own, but maybe with anoher structure, like /var/portage, /var/portage/tree (the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Building custom package for multi-arch/system

2010-01-29 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Max Arnold dixit (2010-01-29, 12:24): On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 04:17:41PM +0100, Beber wrote: So, do you guys plan to implement a such thing ? That's one of the features that is mostly missing imho. The principal miss in on client side as I have tools to manage packages but would like to

Re: [gentoo-dev] New category for version control

2010-03-04 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Ulrich Mueller dixit (2010-03-04, 10:32): On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Christian Faulhammer wrote: My proposal would be to call it dev-scm and put all version controls, direct frontends, plugins and the like into that. Better call it dev-vcs to avoid confusion with both the Scheme language and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-08 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Matti Bickel dixit (2010-03-08, 10:39): A stable user who doesn't want python 3 installed shouldn't have it forced on them. If something is pulling in python-3 then that package needs to have its dependencies fixed. IIRC Portage isn't greedy wrt. SLOTs like it was before (unless you use

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Gentoo Phoenix] an official Gentoo wiki

2010-04-04 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Joshua Saddler dixit (2010-04-04, 00:31): Show me a wiki that has the flexibility of our handbook, which can be a huge printer-friendly all-in-one doc, or an as-you-need-it doc with one page per chapter. Show me a wiki that has built-in intradoc linking to every paragraph, chapter,

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Gentoo Phoenix] an official Gentoo wiki

2010-04-04 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Ben de Groot dixit (2010-04-04, 14:31): On 4 April 2010 10:48, Antoni Grzymala awa...@chopin.edu.pl wrote: Has anyone considered the immensely powerful twiki? No. So tell us why we should. Specifically, how does it compare to MediaWiki in terms of features and performance? I don't have

Re: [gentoo-dev] QA last rites for dev-lisp/cl-smtp; dev-lisp/cl-pop

2010-05-26 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Diego E. Pettenò dixit (2010-05-26, 14:54): # Diego E. Pettenò flamee...@gentoo.org (26 May 2010) # on behalf of QA team # # cl-smtp fails to fetch since at least September 2007 # (bug #193627); cl-pop needs the former. # # Removal on 2010-07-25 dev-lisp/cl-smtp dev-lisp/cl-pop

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc: oldnet vs newnet

2010-09-20 Thread Antoni Grzymala
William Hubbs dixit (2010-09-20, 11:16): I want to start a new thread since the discussion on openrc is centering on whether we should use oldnet, newnet, or keep both. The drawback I see for newnet is that it does not allow the user to control each interface separately, so if you want to

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc stabilization update

2010-09-20 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Tobias Klausmann dixit (2010-09-20, 20:34): On Mon, 20 Sep 2010, Benedikt Böhm wrote: On Mon, Sep 20, 2010, Tobias Klausmann klaus...@gentoo.org wrote: who runs servers: DHCP is uncommon there, WLAN is very unusual, as a result, they would not only have to switch the way they

Re: [gentoo-dev] Message could not be delivered

2010-10-29 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Patrick Nagel dixit (2010-10-29, 15:26): On 2010-10-29 18:05 UTC cl...@jhcloos.com wrote: [garbage, malware attached] Wow, that's a first, I think ;) Mydoom worm sent to the gentoo-dev list. I only got information from spamassassin on my server. Was actually quite surprised to see the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Adding postfix-2.8 experimental releases to the tree

2010-12-09 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Tim Harder dixit (2010-12-09, 15:26): For those of you running postfix, I was wondering if there is any interest in having the 2.8 experimental releases added to the tree. According to upstream [1] they are production quality so they should run as expected but the config setup may change a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Rail Model font for coders

2011-01-20 Thread Antoni Grzymala
hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_h...@lavabit.com dixit (2011-01-20, 15:06): please fix your stupid e-mail Meeku: Very good email address. Since we're onto hares why not shorten it to: tea_party@mad_hatter.uk? -- [a]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: lince and slmodem

2011-02-01 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Samuli Suominen dixit (2011-02-01, 21:09): # Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (01 Feb 2011) # Masked for QA because the package has not been installable for an year now. # See http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302456 # Removal in 30 days net-dialup/slmodem “Thanks Lech, works

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Installer (text-based)

2011-02-10 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Fabian Groffen dixit (2011-02-10, 10:39): On 10-02-2011 07:54:16 +0100, Fabio Erculiani wrote: The only way to avoid epic failures is to keep the whole thing simple, without trying to fit everybody. An installer that would cover a standard install, newbie-oriented scenario would be

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Installer (text-based)

2011-02-10 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Konstantin Tokarev dixit (2011-02-10, 13:01): 10.02.2011, 12:56, Antoni Grzymala awa...@chopin.edu.pl: Fabian Groffen dixit (2011-02-10, 10:39):  On 10-02-2011 07:54:16 +0100, Fabio Erculiani wrote:  The only way to avoid epic failures is to keep the whole thing simple,  without

Re: [gentoo-dev] Pending removal(?) of media-libs/pdflib

2011-02-22 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Tomáš Chvátal dixit (2011-02-22, 19:39): On Tue, 22 Feb 2011, Francesco R wrote: Build gnuplot with USE=cairo and you can get PDF output with the pdfcairo terminal. Last time (many moons ago) I've checked cairo did not generated pdf it did generated raster images and wrapped them in a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-client/chromium-bin

2011-03-04 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Alex Alexander dixit (2011-03-05, 01:46): On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 12:32:15AM +0100, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dne 4.3.2011 10:35, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. napsal(a): # Pawel Hajdan jr phajdan...@gentoo.org (04 Mar 2011) # Masked for removal in 90

Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits

2011-03-24 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Jeroen Roovers dixit (2011-03-25, 00:50): On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:59:45 -0400 Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: is there any reason we should allow people to commit unsigned Manifest's anymore ? Funny that. I only started doing that Yesterday. It had been on my TODO for a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rejecting unsigned commits

2011-03-25 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Andreas K. Huettel dixit (2011-03-25, 09:53): Do you want to reject signed commits if - keys are not publicly available [1] Yes, since that defies the purpose of the signature. - signatures are from expired keys [2] Yes if the signature was made after expiration. (Dont know if that

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rejecting unsigned commits

2011-03-25 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Torsten Veller dixit (2011-03-25, 08:15): * Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org: On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Antoni Grzymala wrote: [Manifest signing] Does that get us any closer to GLEPs 57, 58, 59 (or generally approaching the tree-signing/verifying group of problems)? yes I

Re: [gentoo-dev] validity of manifest signing key

2011-03-25 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Thomas Kahle dixit (2011-03-25, 10:47): it says here http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gnupg-user.xml#doc_chap2 that the validity should be 6 month. What is the protocol when the expiry date is approaching? “After size comes the expiration date. Here smaller is better, but most users can go for a