Re: [gentoo-dev] Find apps not ported to modular X

2006-03-12 Thread Bertrand Jacquin
On 2/24/06, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Latest list: http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_maintainers.txt.20060224 scilab depend on virtual/x11 and is not in this list. Is your tool broken ? Beber -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Find apps not ported to modular X

2006-03-13 Thread Bertrand Jacquin
On 3/13/06, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bertrand Jacquin wrote: On 2/24/06, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Latest list: http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_maintainers.txt.20060224 scilab depend on virtual/x11 and is not in this list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X: unmasking tonight, RFC

2006-04-19 Thread Bertrand Jacquin
On 3/23/06, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, There aren't really any remaining blockers to keep modular X out of ~arch, as far as I can see. If anyone's got one, please bring it up now. I'm planning to unmask later tonight. Is it planned to release some xserver ebuilds ?

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X: unmasking tonight, RFC

2006-04-20 Thread Bertrand Jacquin
On 4/19/06, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bertrand Jacquin wrote: Is it planned to release some xserver ebuilds ? Could you rephrase the question? I don't understand it. I can't any ebuild for xserver (http://www.jabber.no/ejabberd-1.0.0.tar.bz2) (X over vesa fb). Is it planned

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X: unmasking tonight, RFC

2006-04-21 Thread Bertrand Jacquin
On 4/20/06, Stephen P. Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bertrand Jacquin wrote: On 4/19/06, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bertrand Jacquin wrote: Is it planned to release some xserver ebuilds ? Could you rephrase the question? I don't understand it. I can't any ebuild

[gentoo-dev] New adresses

2006-05-30 Thread Bertrand Jacquin
Hi, My new IM (Jabber) adress is : [EMAIL PROTECTED] My new email is : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Beber -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] net-proxy herd is still looking for help (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] net-proxy herd is empty)

2013-09-06 Thread Bertrand Jacquin
On 2013-09-01 16:01, Tom Wijsman wrote: On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 21:00:19 +0200 Pavlos Ratis daster...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 17:00:57 +0100 Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote: As wschlich no longer has enough

Re: [gentoo-dev] Building custom package for multi-arch/system

2010-01-30 Thread Bertrand Jacquin
D'ar yaou 28 a viz Genver 2010 e 23 eur 31, « Robin H. Johnson » he deus skrivet : On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 04:17:41PM +0100, Beber wrote: So, I did a wrapper to emerge --buildpkg to create tbz2 with SHA1 in names function of USE, like : CHOST=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Building custom package for multi-arch/system

2010-01-30 Thread Bertrand Jacquin
D'ar gwener 29 a viz Genver 2010 e 00 eur 23, « Philipp Riegger » he deus skrivet : On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:17:41 +0100 Beber be...@meleeweb.net wrote: So, I did a wrapper to emerge --buildpkg to create tbz2 with SHA1 in names function of USE, like : CHOST=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X plans

2005-08-04 Thread Bertrand Jacquin
that's great :) Thanks for doing that. That's exactly what I done with XCB ebuilds. Maybe some of you don't know xcb, it a remplacement for Xlib. Currently it only available on cvs. I think it couldn't have to be ignore it. Some ebuilds for : http://guybrush.ath.cx/svn/public/portage/x11-libs/

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCHES] multilib-build.eclass: getting 'long' ABI value deprecating multilib_for_best_abi()

2014-05-23 Thread Bertrand Jacquin
On 2014-05-23 09:55, Michał Górny wrote: Dnia 2014-05-05, o godz. 10:29:12 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org napisał(a): 2. adds ${MULTILIB_ABI} variable to foreach loops that contains the flag matching currently iterated ABI. e.g.: ${ABI} == amd64 ${MULTILIB_ABI} == abi_x86_64 Committed

Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings

2014-08-11 Thread Bertrand Jacquin
Hi, On 2014-08-10 14:22, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: The script does not handle case of multiline description: DESCRIPTION=You have to clean that yourself. You could handle this by reading metadata/md5-cache/*/* instead of ebuild itself But is multiline DESCRIPTION something

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] bash-completion-r1: support for aliasing completions for commands

2014-08-27 Thread Bertrand Jacquin
Hi Michał, On 2014-08-27 17:06, Michał Górny wrote: Please review. +bashcomp_alias() { + debug-print-function ${FUNCNAME} ${@} + + [[ ${#} -lt 2 ]] die Usage: ${FUNCNAME} basename alias... + local base=${1} f + shift + + for f; do is there a missing 'in $@

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCHv3 1/2] MEDIUM: misc-functions: Be more quiet when removing non existing INSTALL_MASK

2015-04-22 Thread Bertrand Jacquin
On 21/04/2015 01:37, Zac Medico wrote: On 04/20/2015 05:31 PM, Bertrand Jacquin wrote: On 21/04/2015 00:39, Zac Medico wrote: These are in the master branch now: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?id=5a1b870fe54ac06f864a648c3ea5cc118f6ce911 https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-hosted code review

2015-11-01 Thread Bertrand Jacquin
You might be interested in a few ebuild I made for it for Enlightenment: http://git.meleeweb.net/gentoo/portage.git/tree/dev-php/libphutil http://git.meleeweb.net/gentoo/portage.git/tree/www-client/arcanist http://git.meleeweb.net/gentoo/portage.git/tree/www-apps/phabricator Cheers On

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] eclass/enlightenment.eclass: Move HOMEPAGE to https://

2017-09-30 Thread Bertrand Jacquin
Update DESCRIPTION while at there since DR17 is from the past. --- eclass/enlightenment.eclass | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/enlightenment.eclass b/eclass/enlightenment.eclass index c374af34cb1d..8e4cc5a7a241 100644 ---

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/3] eclass/enlightenment.eclass: Use https:// git URI

2017-09-30 Thread Bertrand Jacquin
git:// are now prohibited on git.enlightenment.org --- eclass/enlightenment.eclass | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/eclass/enlightenment.eclass b/eclass/enlightenment.eclass index ae7bb396590c..23b6ffcc9f54 100644 --- a/eclass/enlightenment.eclass +++

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/3] eclass/enlightenment.eclass: Remove svn references

2017-09-30 Thread Bertrand Jacquin
SVN for E is long gone. --- eclass/enlightenment.eclass | 16 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/enlightenment.eclass b/eclass/enlightenment.eclass index 23b6ffcc9f54..c374af34cb1d 100644 --- a/eclass/enlightenment.eclass +++

Re: [gentoo-dev] user.eclass ignores ROOT/SYSROOT

2020-05-05 Thread Bertrand Jacquin
On 2020-05-05 21:22, Peter Stuge wrote: Hi, I'm trying something out over here and I'm surprised to find that acct-group/* do not work with ROOT+SYSROOT != "/". Should I file yet another bug about this Correct, https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=541406 is tracking this and has some