Hi,
yesterday I've noticed, that some mappings in /dev/discs are missing on
my machine.
Actually I have an additional ATA controller with some discs attached.
So I have /dev/hda through /dev/hdl which are ok. But the mappings to
/dev/discs/discX with X > 7 are missing.
Whose fault would that be i
Richard Fish wrote:
On 2/21/06, Christian Bricart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
So I have /dev/hda through /dev/hdl which are ok. But the mappings to
/dev/discs/discX with X > 7 are missing.
I wanted to file a bug report, but I'm not certain if it's actually
udev
Mike Frysinger schrieb:
> On Tuesday 21 February 2006 17:56, Richard Fish wrote:
>> On 2/21/06, Christian Bricart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> And hdparm iterates through /dev/ide/* if found...
>> I assume you are talking about the init script? Because my hd
Hi all,
from time to time, I need to make (and maintain) modifications to an
ebuild from the main tree in my local overlay.
So basically, I create the directory structure from
/usr/portage/// under
/usr/local/portage///, copy over the ebuild and do my
modifications in the ebuild.
So far how an ove
Am 13.07.23 um 09:10 schrieb Jaco Kroon:
Hi Alarig,
On 2023/07/12 15:18, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
Hello Jakov,
On Wed 12 Jul 2023 10:54:47 GMT, Jakov Smolić wrote:
Hi all,
I was recently left as the sole maintainer of net-misc/frr and given I'm
not actively using the package anymore it would be g
Am 28.01.24 um 17:25 schrieb Mike Gilbert:
[…]
+On upgrades, it is common for users to mismatch the grub-install options
+they used for the current and previous versions of grub. This will cause
+a stale core image to exist. For example:
+
+/boot/efi/EFI/BOOT/BOOTX64.EFI (grub 2.06 core image)
+/
Am 26.06.24 um 09:38 schrieb Florian Schmaus:
Hi Arthur,
thanks for taking the time to write this mail.
On 25/06/2024 19.33, Arthur Zamarin wrote:
x86
Stable 32-bit arch. I'll be honest, I don't believe at all this should
be stable arch anymore.
I have the impression as we
just my 2¢ here and sorry if I might have overlookt a rationale earlier
why moving nginx's temp dir to "generic purpose" /var/tmp/… and not
keeping it at /var/lib/nginx/tmp/* ?
Especially, when there even is/would be a tmpfiles entry taking care of
it's existence and ownership.
Christian
Am
Tupone Alfredo schrieb:
> games-rpg has been masked on 18 jul 2006 and there is a pending bug
> #167547 Broken dependancies in "games-rpg/planeshift-0.3.011"
> Removing is planned for this end of week: 17 Mar 2007.
>
0.3.011 is wy t old and not compatible with current server versions.
BUT
Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> Hey Dan,
>
> You don't happen to have IRIX discs for the Octane2 do you? I have an
> O2, and I wanted to install IRIX on it to test some stuff out, but I
> lost the disks and SGI wants $450 to send me new ones (yikes!).
That's odd.. I asked SGI about two years ago abou
Mounir Lamouri schrieb:
> # Mounir Lamouri (30 Jul 2009)
> # Masked for removal in 60 days.
> # Upstream's unactive since 2005. Do not support asterisk versions in tree.
> # bug 279383
> net-misc/asterisk-chan_bluetooth
>
>
may be replaced by (unpackaged) "chan_mobile"?
--> http://www.chan-mob
Joshua Saddler schrieb:
> On Thu, 3 Dec 2009 02:44:47 +
> Sylvain Alain wrote:
>> Hi everyone, I think that the best should be to release a migration guide
>> just before the official release and also a news on the first page of
>> Gentoo.org
>
> You really should have checked our doc repo b
Dear devs,
i've just hit the constraint CHECKREQS_MEMORY=3G in
>=www-client/chromium-44.* on a 2 GiB RAM machine.. (having additionally
5G Swap on SSD..)
I personally doubt that check-reqs_memory() in the eclass should only
check for *physical* rather than *virtual* RAM to fulfill this
constraint
Am 03.06.2015 um 22:32 schrieb Ciaran McCreesh:
> On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 22:22:39 +0200
>> i've just hit the constraint CHECKREQS_MEMORY=3G in
>>> =www-client/chromium-44.* on a 2 GiB RAM machine.. (having
>>> additionally
>> 5G Swap on SSD..)
>>
>> I personally doubt that check-reqs_memory() in the e
14 matches
Mail list logo
