Re: [gentoo-dev] call for testers: udev predictable network interface names

2013-01-09 Thread Christopher Head
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 16:13:10 -0600 William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/PredictableNetworkInterfaceNames This seems like a good thing for some systems. Will there be a news item when 197 (or greater) goes stable informing people that the

Re: [gentoo-dev] call for testers: udev predictable network interface names

2013-01-09 Thread Christopher Head
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 18:13:21 -0600 William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: There is a way for users to opt out if we default this to on, but I think the new naming scheme has advantages over the traditional eth* wlan* etc names. I think it should be taken with a grain of salt. The page

Re: [gentoo-dev] removing the server profiles...

2013-01-17 Thread Christopher Head
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 22:17:26 -0500 Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: Oh, and keep in mind that flags really only have an effect if the corresponding packages are actually installed. For example, the cups flag doesn't really have an effect unless you install apps that do printing, so it

Re: [gentoo-dev] removing the server profiles...

2013-01-17 Thread Christopher Head
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 14:32:01 -0500 Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: Sure, I can think of reasons why I would want chromium with -cups, but the whole point is to target the TYPICAL user. And the context here is servers - how many servers would have chromium installed with -cups? If

Re: [gentoo-dev] removing the server profiles...

2013-01-18 Thread Christopher Head
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 15:02:48 -0500 Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: We might be talking past each other. Sane but minimal is the target. Bottom line is that the question isn't whether a minimal system should have CUPS installed (that would be an argument for putting it in @system -

Re: [gentoo-dev] news item for udev 197-r3 upgrade (yes, I know, it's late)

2013-01-23 Thread Christopher Head
Are you sure? I have CONFIG_DEVTMPFS_MOUNT disabled, latest stable udev (197-r3) and openrc (0.11.8), and no /dev line in my fstab, yet my /dev is still a devtmpfs with a proper set of device nodes. Chris On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 17:03:15 +0100 Michael Weber x...@gentoo.org wrote: Hi, On

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: CONFIG_CHECK_FATAL, making CONFIG_CHECKS fatal by default

2013-01-25 Thread Christopher Head
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:47:05 -0500 Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: Very problematic. What is built in for the currently running kernel can be fairly reliably determined by grepping /proc/config.gz - IF support for that was enabled in the kernel. But, there is no guarantee that this

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Please stop useless removals

2013-02-01 Thread Christopher Head
On Fri, 1 Feb 2013 09:45:07 -0500 Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: That seems rather speculative. I'm sure that people look for vulnerabilities in unmaintained software - if they didn't then nobody would be able to exploit them in the first place (you have to find a vulnerability to

Re: RFC: install linux-firmware with kernel sources (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: Firmware cleanup, part #1)

2013-02-12 Thread Christopher Head
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 20:43:02 +0100 Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote: +1 from me; I've had a few machines break on kernel upgrades because I didn't have the proper firmware installed (I guess older kernel sources

Re: RFC: install linux-firmware with kernel sources (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: Firmware cleanup, part #1)

2013-02-12 Thread Christopher Head
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 14:49:03 -0800 Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote: Most external firmware is not needed to boot. If you need it to boot, you will have to stow it in the initramfs. For those of us who prefer monolithic kernels, virtually all firmware is needed to boot. Even if a network

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: install linux-firmware with kernel sources (was Re: Lastrite: Firmware cleanup, part #1)

2013-02-12 Thread Christopher Head
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 20:51:15 + (UTC) Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote: Christopher Head posted on Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:38:14 -0800 as excerpted: On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 20:43:02 +0100 Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Fabio Erculiani lx

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: renaming gentoo-oldnet

2013-08-04 Thread Christopher Head
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 05:20:32 + (UTC) Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote: Exactly. That's why I like it. netrc is generic enough to be used elsewhere, yet descriptive enough of what it actually does, that from my perspective anyway, it's

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving more arches to dev profiles

2013-08-23 Thread Christopher Head
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:28:24 +0100 Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: Wow! That is something we actively encourage people to avoid. Mixed systems are totally unsupported and I am sure quite a few bugs are closed as invalid when a mixed system is detected. It may work on regular

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: locations of binaries and separate /usr

2012-01-11 Thread Christopher Head
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 08:41:04 +0100 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: Remind me of a single good reason. Last time I heard those were mostly hacks and laziness. Here's one: ability to share disk space automatically between /usr and /home (implication: must be same filesystem; useful because

Re: [gentoo-dev] Opinion against /usr merge

2012-07-19 Thread Christopher Head
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 07:05:39 -0400 Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: As others have mentioned, coreutils doesn't impact the initramfs much anyway, though other tools like mdadm/lvm/etc are more likely to. I think the more practical issue is that it isn't straightforward to do in an

Re: [gentoo-dev] pid 1 design

2012-08-09 Thread Christopher Head
On Thu, 9 Aug 2012 12:30:54 -0500 William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: Ok folks, I hit the wrong key; this was meant to go to the list. On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 05:59:39PM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote: Yet I'm not used to have to reboot after issuing emerge -u world and most of the times

Re: [gentoo-dev] Questions about SystemD and OpenRC

2012-08-13 Thread Christopher Head
On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 11:03:01 +0300 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: 2. I saw on some lists that Gnome/Kde and Xfce plan to use some SystemD API, so does it means that we will need to install SystemD aside of OpenRC ? For Xfce it only means that xfce4-session will try to query

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: netplugd and ifplugd support in OpenRc

2012-09-10 Thread Christopher Head
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 09:48:32 -0500 William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: Does anyone have any thoughts about whether we should keep OpenRC support for one or both of these? As a user… yes? I use a laptop, so I don’t much care which one is maintained but I’d be quite annoyed if both went

Proxy maintainership of app-misc/pwsafe, was Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/PyZilla: PyZilla-0.1.0.ebuild ChangeLog metadata.xml

2011-03-27 Thread Christopher Head
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 08:30:16 -0500 Jeremy Olexa darks...@gentoo.org wrote: The tree has 679 m-n packages. http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/treecleaners/maintainer-needed.xml I want to proxy-maintain app-misc/pwsafe. It hasn't been updated in six

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Do we still want group based permissions for storage and power devices in light of ConsoleKit and Policykit?

2011-05-16 Thread Christopher Head
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 17 May 2011 01:13:15 + (UTC) Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote: User perspective... If it's at all possible to continue to have a consolekit/polkit-less system, making them USE-based dependencies of kde, gnome, etc, relying

[gentoo-dev] Virtual default changes for old users, was: Heads up: libjpeg-turbo stabilization, becoming the default

2011-06-01 Thread Christopher Head
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 11:33:03 +0300 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: libjpeg-turbo stabilization is happening for amd64/x86 at http://bugs.gentoo.org/360715 - the gentoo-x86 has been converted to virtual/jpeg to support this. - we

Re: [gentoo-dev] Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper initramfs in the handbook?

2011-07-31 Thread Christopher Head
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 04:40:33 +0300 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: Can we discuss both options? If there's any option that allows the use of a separate /usr partition without an initramfs, then let's explore it. I don't feel like

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy

2014-01-15 Thread Christopher Head
a month, a year, or three years old. -- Christopher Head signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy

2014-01-19 Thread Christopher Head
to submit reports of working packages, or where we let platform-agnostic packages be stabilized after one arch has tested, or various of the other suggestions in this thread. Just not no stable tree at all. -- Christopher Head signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Hosting daily gx86 squashfs images and deltas

2014-01-19 Thread Christopher Head
'. And that's why the deltas are so big -- I recall three big cache updates this week. I would absolutely use this on my machines. -- Christopher Head signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: openrc service script dependency checker

2014-12-04 Thread Christopher Head
(maybe not even a loop including $insecure_service, but some other loop entirely), and it’s the randomly chosen victim? Is it still good to boot as many services as possible? I think not. -- Christopher Head

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving CPU flags into USE_EXPAND

2015-01-20 Thread Christopher Head
place (I forget what the file was called—cpu.flags.use.desc or something?), then I can just open that file to see the list, hence why case 2 is better IMO—put all the entries in that file for users to look at, even if no package uses them yet. -- Christopher Head signature.asc Description: PGP

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving CPU flags into USE_EXPAND

2015-01-19 Thread Christopher Head
saying, add flags for feature sets that *are* announced but that no package actually uses yet. -- Christopher Head signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving CPU flags into USE_EXPAND

2015-01-20 Thread Christopher Head
, can use it to check if this has changed in a postsync hook ? I see having a script to select flag values as orthogonal to when the flag values need to be looked at. I also agree that having a script would be a good thing. -- Christopher Head

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Moving CPU flags into USE_EXPAND

2015-01-21 Thread Christopher Head
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 01:13:08 + (UTC) Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote: (a lot) Thank you, Duncan. You explained by position perfectly. -- Christopher Head signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving CPU flags into USE_EXPAND

2015-01-14 Thread Christopher Head
is knowing the names, though; it would be fine if no package actually uses the feature yet. -- Christopher Head

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: vmware team needs help

2015-02-14 Thread Christopher Head
packages, in favour of having a much smaller number of developers who have to handle more packages—which is fine, but it excludes people like me from participating as full developers. -- Christopher Head signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: vmware team needs help

2015-02-20 Thread Christopher Head
of packages and spend a lot of time. Good to know that’s not the case. -- Christopher Head signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] About reducing or even removing stable tree for some arches

2015-02-20 Thread Christopher Head
and no idea where to start looking. Also, from a more pragmatic point of view, I don’t particularly want to have to *compile* a year’s worth of new packages at one moment in time—better to spend an hour here, an hour there, spread out over the weeks. -- Christopher Head signature.asc Description: PGP

Re: [gentoo-dev] LFS QA warnings coming soon to a build near you

2015-06-01 Thread Christopher Head
on this list yet. -- Christopher Head

Re: [gentoo-dev] Need design help/input for eclean-kernel

2016-07-02 Thread Christopher Head
of these contains a file kernel.efi and another file initramfs. This is FAT, so no symlinks. The script deletes gentoo-old, copies gentoo to gentoo-old, and finally puts the new files in gentoo. I have EFI boot records pointing to both, using initrd=\gentoo\initramfs syntax. -- Christopher Head

Re: [gentoo-dev] REQUIRED_USE, global USE flags, user-friendliness...

2017-02-03 Thread Christopher Head
ny other packages I have installed, Portage should just rebuild dev-libs/bar with USE=+baz. If I eventually uninstall app-cat/foo, something like depclean should reinstall dev-libs/bar with USE=-baz. Just like all the other dependencies, if I don’t care to make a manual choice, it sho

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Requirements for UID/GID management

2017-02-04 Thread Christopher Head
ll users how to use it to fix their UIDs. The draft that I wrote up > was for the "fixed UID with random fallback" model, but said utility > could still be useful for people who want to change their running > systems to use the same UIDs that would have been chosen by default. Are you sure t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs post disbanding Ada: dev-lang/gnat-gcc and metastuff

2017-02-22 Thread Christopher Head
y after sending my reply noting that I used ghdl, my situation changed and I no longer need it. It also sounded like there was at least one other person who was actually interested in and knowledgeable about Ada as a language rather than just one consuming package. So I think I shouldn’t be

Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update

2016-11-04 Thread Christopher Head
generally see it as a udev attribute and use it to set up meaningful persistent names for multiple otherwise-identical devices. -- Christopher Head pgphi7PNcCbPu.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Cross Post due to technical component - Thanks for all the fish

2016-12-09 Thread Christopher Head
erge dev-embedded/thingy. When I want to do some math, I just emerge sci-mathematics/octave. Most things that most people care about in the main tree. Breaking things up into overlays or different OSs or whatever just means adding more hoops that I have to jump through before I can start working on a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ada project needs your help!

2016-12-14 Thread Christopher Head
lastrite it > all. > > Is anyone interested in Ada? Any comments? > I notice sci-electronics/ghdl is not in this list. Is it considered part of this? It depends on gnat-gcc. I guess it would also be lost if the above were given last rites? -- Christopher Head pgpXcBNpo99EH.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ada project needs your help!

2016-12-15 Thread Christopher Head
On December 15, 2016 12:19:05 AM PST, "Michał Górny" <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: >Would it be fine with you if we kept gnat-gcc and ghdl? (but lastrited >dev-ada/*) I personally have no use for the others. -- Christopher Head

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Cross Post due to technical component - Thanks for all the fish

2016-12-13 Thread Christopher Head
cute” (the OS), not in the sense of “manage” (the organization). If forks are a way to develop work destined for upstream, they’re great. It’s when they become a tool for fragmenting the community (of both users and developers) without any hope of work being recombined that they become a problem. -- Christopher Head

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ada project needs your help!

2016-12-14 Thread Christopher Head
orks, but if I’m left with no other choice, then I possibly might look into it. I won’t bother though if there’s some reason why it wouldn’t be accepted anyway, because people don’t want Gnat or GHDL in the tree. -- Christopher Head pgpz_Xk5oibPC.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ada project needs your help!

2016-12-18 Thread Christopher Head
uming the patch were sensible and clean)? -- Christopher Head pgpRbYgNQQBxF.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reverse use of Python/Ruby versions

2017-04-10 Thread Christopher Head
3.5 will get installed and 3.4 will go away. Just like every other package. I won’t need to do any config file editing, just a revdep-rebuild run perhaps. So regardless of the situation for maintainers, as a user, I don’t see this pain. -- Christopher Head signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reverse use of Python/Ruby versions

2017-04-20 Thread Christopher Head
t;to use a specific one. I’m not trying to invalidate the pain that some people experience, just pointing out that I think it may be inaccurate to call that the “ordinary user” use case. -- Christopher Head signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Future of gentoo's stable and unstable trees: what are your thoughts?

2017-07-29 Thread Christopher Head
eed to be a flag that maintainers could add to specific ebuilds to indicate whether or not they’re stabilization candidates (though I wonder if it would be better to flag the ones that *aren’t* candidates, rather than the ones that *are*). -- Christopher Head pgpnLOp9yoUTL.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2017-05-10 Thread Christopher Head
On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 23:02:40 +0200 Manuel Rüger <mr...@gentoo.org> wrote: > www-servers/spawn-fcgi I’ll file for proxied maintainership of this one, since it looks like nobody else has taken it yet. -- Christopher Head pgpGqPRsTEBZz.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] NEWS item for games destabling

2017-11-27 Thread Christopher Head
is unstable. What I really want to install is, “the latest version of the package that doesn’t pull in any deps that aren’t available (stable or accepted),” but I don’t know any way to tell Portage that. Am I missing something, or is that indeed impossible? -- Christopher Head signature.asc

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Splitting developer-oriented and expert user mailing lists

2017-12-04 Thread Christopher Head
the set of packages to follow myself, probably missing a few in the process, and (2) filter out the unimportant bug mail which currently never reaches this list at all. -- Christopher Head signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] The problem of unmaintained packages in Gentoo

2017-12-20 Thread Christopher Head
s and other dependencies whose names I don’t even really recognize but I have installed. -- Christopher Head signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: moving default location of portage tree (was: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2018-07-29)

2018-07-18 Thread Christopher Head
back today’s tree rather than last week’s is not a negative impact), not something that can be restored to exactly its prior state automatically. -- Christopher Head signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] GLEP 63 update

2018-07-06 Thread Christopher Head
)'. “The expiry date of the key shall never be more than two years in the future”? -- Christopher Head signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Requiring gentoo.git committers to use their @gentoo.org address

2018-07-11 Thread Christopher Head
ng to a fast-forward merge. Well, unless you consider “git rebase --no-ff” to be standard git tools, I guess… it’s not like you need to do anything *that* obscure to fix it. -- Christopher Head signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item for Radicale upgrade

2018-03-30 Thread Christopher Head
d date in this news item and add it to the news repo when accepting the PR. Thanks! Title: Radicale 2 requires pre-install migration Author: Christopher Head <ch...@chead.ca> Posted: 2018-03-30 Revision: 2 News-Item-Format: 2.0 Display-If-Installed: http://radicale.org/1to2/ If you do a cust

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item for Radicale upgrade

2018-04-03 Thread Christopher Head
One more try, this time with the proper revision number. Title: Radicale 2 requires pre-install migration Author: Christopher Head <ch...@chead.ca> Posted: 2018-04-02 Revision: 1 News-Item-Format: 2.0 Display-If-Installed: http://radicale.org/1to2/ If you do a custom migration, please

[gentoo-dev] News item for Radicale upgrade

2018-03-01 Thread Christopher Head
Posted date to today, as I can’t predict when it will actually be posted; I ask that the committer please revise the date accordingly. Thank you! Title: Radicale 2 requires pre-install migration Author: Christopher Head <ch...@chead.ca> Posted: 2018-03-01 Revision: 1 News-Item-Format:

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: hwclock service in OpenRC

2018-12-15 Thread Christopher Head
sing hwclock would be appropriate (if any migration is even needed—I’m unclear on whether hwclock would be removed from the boot runlevel on existing installs or only not added on new installs). -- Christopher Head pgp9kI8u8utDp.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New QA policy: Packages must not disable installing manpages via USE flags

2019-07-21 Thread Christopher Head
ser really improved if a package I use is dropped because its maintainer no longer has time to maintain it because they now have to spend their N available hours per month building man pages for one package rather than maintaining two? -- Christopher Head signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] metadata/install-qa-check.d/60appdata-path: new check

2020-02-13 Thread Christopher Head
On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 23:39:11 -0800 Georgy Yakovlev wrote: > + eqawarn "For more details, please see the > freedesktop Upstrem Metadate guidelines" Couple of typos here: s/Upstrem/Upstream/, s/Metadate/Metadata/. -- Christopher Head pgp6oJDIFyQwY.pgp Description:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes made by acct-* ebuilds

2020-02-13 Thread Christopher Head
output—most of my machines run emerge -jN where it isn’t shown at all, and even on the serial ones, there’s so much build output from a few dozen packages that I’m not going to scroll up looking for specific things which may have been lost from scrollback anyway. -- Christopher Head pgpRLsOnQ3l

[gentoo-dev] Changes made by acct-* ebuilds

2020-02-12 Thread Christopher Head
already exists, to ease migration from the old world where sysadmins are easily able to do anything we want with our users and groups to the new world where we’re expected to leave them alone as the ebuilds make them, or worst case make out changes in an overlay. Thoughts? -- Christopher Head

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes made by acct-* ebuilds

2020-02-15 Thread Christopher Head
On Thu, 13 Feb 2020 08:09:13 -0800 Christopher Head wrote: > On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 19:14:45 +0100 > Michał Górny wrote: > > > I'm pretty sure user.eclass does print whatever changes it is doing. > > It isn't elog-ged though, I admit. This is probably worth fixing.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes made by acct-* ebuilds

2020-02-12 Thread Christopher Head
H. Thinking about it more, this feels a lot like “configuration”, and we have a well-established tool for handling sysadmins customizing configuration while packages land new changes: CONFIG_PROTECT. Is that possibly relevant here? -- Christopher Head signature.asc Description: PGP

Re: [gentoo-dev] Vanilla sources

2020-01-04 Thread Christopher Head
gging behind upstream significantly, and it’s a much better argument for packages that come with expectations of security team support than those that don’t, but it is something to consider. -- Christopher Head signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2020-05-27 Thread Christopher Head
a PR[1] open for the version bump and Python 3.7 support. I’m happy for you to take over if you like; mine is waiting for review. Just thought you ought to know in case you get merge conflicts later on, or want to take any bits of my changes. [1] https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/15783 -- Chri

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-cdr/sync2d

2020-06-05 Thread Christopher Head
ific case, but isn’t the 30-day time period also meant as a nice long warning time for people *using* the package to give them time to migrate to something else before it starts to be unsupported, potentially break the depgraph, no longer be installable on additional systems, and so on? -- Christo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-cdr/sync2d

2020-06-06 Thread Christopher Head
lso start getting removed, which makes it ever harder and harder to install $P if you need it. I wasn’t talking about things that depend on $P. -- Christopher Head pgppPDza5h85T.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature