Hello,
On Fri, 05 Aug 2016, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Natanael Olaiz wrote:
>> I know that. But the patch should be applied *only* for versions of kernels
>> 4.7+. So, I'm asking how is the policy for that.
>
>If you're asking for policy: The Gentoo packaging policy is
Hello,
On Sat, 06 Aug 2016, Natanael Olaiz wrote:
>Thank you for your patch. It was a good example to answer my question.
>
>But about the patch itself, I see that you are commented the code for
>radix_tree_empty(...). In my patch I renamed it and it only usage instead,
>so I'm sure it's calling t
Hello,
On Tue, 20 Sep 2016, Lars Wendler wrote:
>This is a call for testers. If you feel brave enough, please give
>bash-4.4 a shot and report all problems you might have with it.
>
>Add the following to you package.unmask file/directory:
>
> =app-shells/bash-4.4*
> =sys-libs/readline-7.0*
with
Hello,
On Thu, 22 Sep 2016, David Haller wrote:
[..]
>I've found this that I guess has to do with the new readline:
>
>>From the build.log of
>emerge -1 dev-lisp/clisp
>
>
>[..]
> * Package:dev-lisp/clisp-2.49-r8
> * Repository: gentoo
> * Main
Hello,
On Wed, 11 Jan 2017, Bernard Cafarelli wrote:
>Le 11/01/2017 8:30, Ulrich Mueller a écrit :
[..]
>> Putting flag in arch/{amd64,x86}/package.use.stable.mask should solve
>> it.
>Indeed, I tested (and committed) this yesterday and repoman was happy again
gnustep-base/gnustep-make-2.6.8.ebui
Hello,
On Fri, 24 Aug 2018, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
[..]
>Suggested description for global gtk-doc USE:
>Build and install gtk-doc based developer documentation
Mentioning gtk-doc, what about:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/646850
Ready-made patch since 2018-02-07, and then what?
-dnh
--
If you don't s
Hello,
On Thu, 13 Sep 2018, Michal Górny wrote:
># Michal Górny (13 Sep 2018)
># Depends on old version of dev-libs/jsoncpp, blocking its pruning.
># Downstream maintainer is inactive to bump it. Removal in 30 days.
>dev-lang/solidity
As per the "no -Werror" policy, the following patch to the e
Michal, ...
On Wed, 29 Jan 2020, Michal Górny wrote:
># Michal Górny (2020-01-29)
># Abandoned in 2009. Python 2 only. No blockers left.
># Removal in 30 days. Bug #706218.
>dev-python/epydoc
... I think you're getting a liiittle bit trigger happy there ...
# equery d dev-python/epydoc
* Th
Hello,
On Mon, 28 Dec 2020, Michal Górny wrote:
>The only problem that I can think of are packages that depend
>on libressl specifically and do not support openssl. I don't think we
>have anything like that but I'll double check.
A naive check finds these:
Depends unconditionally on dev-libs/li
