Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Global USE=gui

On Di, 2016-06-07 at 12:03 -0700, Brian Dolbec wrote: > On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 14:29:58 -0400 > Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > > > > On 06/07/2016 12:20 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > > > > > So many weird ideas... while the simplest one is a proper > > > REQUIRED_USE with gui

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: intel-sdp-r1.eclass

On Mi, 2016-02-17 at 10:53 +, Duncan wrote: > Michał Górny posted on Wed, 17 Feb 2016 07:47:06 +0100 as excerpted: > > > On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 22:48:08 -0600 Ryan Hill > > wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:35:12 +0100 Michał Górny > > g> > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] BOINC needs maintainer

On Do, 2016-02-18 at 09:29 +0100, Sven Eden wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 17. Februar 2016, 15:20:56 CET schrieb Justin Lecher > (jlec): > > currently BOINC supposed to be maintained by the science team, but > > we > > are not really carrying about it. Is there anyone around whole > > likes to > > take

[gentoo-dev] RFC: intel-sdp-r1.eclass, Take #2

ot; - rm -r opt/intel/"${INTEL_DPN}"*/uninstall || die + rm -r opt/intel/"${INTEL_DIST_NAME}"*/uninstall || die eend fi @@ -534,19 +528,29 @@ intel-sdp-r1_src_install() { eend fi - # remove eclipse + # remove eclipse unconditionally + ebegin "Cleaning out

[gentoo-dev] Last-rites: dev-libs/ptypes

# David Seifert <s...@gentoo.org> (05 Apr 2016) # No upstream release since 2007, no revdeps in tree, # version in tree outdated, bug #454702. # Masking for removal in 30 days dev-libs/ptypes

Re: [gentoo-dev][PATCH v1 ] sys-fs/hfsplusutils with gcc-5: blockiter.c:148:8: error: redefinition of blockiter_curr #580620

I generally prefer using -std=gnu89 instead of -fgnu89-inline, as GCC might change some C11 semantics later on. To me -std=gnu89 seems more robust. David > On 22 Apr 2016, at 23:39, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On 22 Apr 2016 03:57, Leno Hou wrote: >> +-extern inline UInt32

[gentoo-dev] Last-rites: sci-libs/torch

# David Seifert <s...@gentoo.org> (15 May 2016) # Masked for removal. Deprecated, relies on ancient CUDA APIs, # does not build with current CUDA releases. See bug #583068. sci-libs/torch

[gentoo-dev] Augmenting the CPU_FLAGS_X86 list and creating CPU_FLAGS_PPC + CPU_FLAGS_ARM

Dear friends, while version bumping sci-libs/fftw, I've noticed our CPU_FLAGS_X86 list could be expanded a bit: avx512 - introduced with Skylake and Knights Landing I also propose creating a CPU_FLAGS_PPC variable containing (at least): altivec - PowerPC's SSE vsx - PowerPC's AVX Finally, I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: leechcraft

On Mon, 2017-01-30 at 17:43 -0500, Georg Rudoy wrote: > 2017-01-30 13:35 GMT-05:00 David Seifert <s...@gentoo.org>: > > Please do not resurrect leechcraft unless you're willing to fix the > > bugs with GCC 5 (and GCC 6) and newer dependencies. Personally, I > > feel >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: leechcraft

On Tue, 2017-01-31 at 17:34 +0100, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 01/31/2017 03:50 PM, Georg Rudoy wrote: > > I'll make a new release of leechcraft itself and bump the version > > to > > that new one, so they'll naturally be dropped to unstable, 0.6.70 > > and > > earlier (if any) indeed could

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: leechcraft

Please do not resurrect leechcraft unless you're willing to fix the bugs with GCC 5 (and GCC 6) and newer dependencies. Personally, I feel leechcraft should probably live in an overlay instead of the tree. # David Seifert <s...@gentoo.org> (30 Jan 2017) # No maintainer activity sin

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: games-puzzle/kiki

# David Seifert <s...@gentoo.org> (18 Feb 2017) # Awful codebase, pointer-to-int-casts, SDL1 # Masked for removal in 30 days games-puzzle/kiki

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-ml/ocamlgsl

# David Seifert <s...@gentoo.org> (18 Jan 2017) # Dead upstream, spiritual successor is dev-ml/gsl-ocaml # Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug #574564, #593248, #601912. dev-ml/ocamlgsl

[gentoo-dev] Last rite dev-libs/dbxml

David Seifert <s...@gentoo.org> (18 Sep 2016) Masked for failing to build with GCC 6, still using ancient distutils.eclass, tightly coupled to dev-libs/xqilla-2.2*. Purged by Debian and Fedora more than 5 years ago. Mask for removal in 30 days. Bug #594236

[gentoo-dev] Last-rite net-libs/socket++

David Seifert <s...@gentoo.org> (01 Oct 2016) Masked for failing to build with C++11, ancient codebase, dead upstream, no updates in 5 years. No revdeps. Mask for removal in 30 days. Bug #595754

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrites: dev-ada/cbind, net-dialup/dtrace, net-nds/lat, app-pda/jpilot-mail, net-dialup/drdsl, dev-util/insight, app-laptop/configure-trackpoint, x11-misc/lxmed, dev-util/ketchup, m

On Sa, 2016-10-08 at 13:57 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote: > # Pacho Ramos (08 Oct 2016) > # Uses get_libdir at global scope (#593382). Dead for ages. Removal > in > a > # month. > app-cdr/nero I'd like to keep this package, hence fixed the issues, bumped to EAPI=6, took over

[gentoo-dev] Lastrites: net-libs/libkolab

# David Seifert <s...@gentoo.org> (29 Oct 2016) # Unmaintained, depends on ancient and broken C++ libraries # Removal in 30 days. net-libs/libkolab net-libs/libkolabxml

[gentoo-dev] Lastrites: dev-cpp/{libfrontend-elements,libbackend-elements,libcult}

# David Seifert <s...@gentoo.org> (29 Oct 2016) # Unmaintained, broken, do not work with GCC 6 # Bugs #594506, #597780, removal in 30 days.

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Ban dolib and libopts in EAPI 7

On Do, 2016-10-13 at 15:53 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > Hi all, > > I suggest that we ban the dolib and libopts commands in EAPI 7. > > Rationale: > 1. There are about 60 instances of dolib in the tree. At least one >    third of them appears to be wrong (e.g., should be replaced by >    

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] toolchain-funcs.eclass: Add tc-check-openmp() function

On Do, 2016-10-13 at 16:40 -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 10/13/2016 04:35 PM, David Seifert wrote: > > > > + ewarn "Your current compiler does not support > > OpenMP" > > + > > + ... > > + > > + die "

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] toolchain-funcs.eclass: Add tc-check-openmp() function

. It also makes extending the messages easier for new compilers. In most cases, this should obviate the direct use of tc-has-openmp. >From eaab3e443da8ee1970679b3d4016f12541d84344 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Seifert <s...@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 22:15:03 +0200 Subjec

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: games-emulation/visualboyadvance

# David Seifert <s...@gentoo.org> (29 Dec 2016) # Ancient codebase, maintenance nightmare, dead # upstream, games-emulation/vbam is spiritual successor # Removal in 30 days, #598607 games-emulation/visualboyadvance

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs due to retirement

On Sat, 2016-12-31 at 22:54 +0100, Thomas Kahle wrote: > Hi, > > I will retire, so here are my remaining packages.  Feel free to > e-mail me any questions re this.  sci-math is in CC because there > are quite a few math packages. > > app-emacs/undo-tree > app-misc/anki > app-portage/tatt >

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: toolchain.eclass prefix support

On Sun, 2017-01-08 at 00:25 +0900, Benda Xu wrote: > James Le Cuirot writes: > > > Why? All the ebuilds using this eclass that I can find are at least > > EAPI 4. > > Okay!  I will remove this. > > Benda https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/eapi-per-eclass/toolchain.eclass/S

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-analyzer/snips

# David Seifert <s...@gentoo.org> (20 Dec 2016) # Masked for being completely broken and unusable (bug 586356). # No reverse dependencies. Masked for removal in 30 days. net-analyzer/snips

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH] sys-devel/autoconf: Convert from eblits into an eclass, #586424

On Thu, 2017-03-23 at 22:42 +0100, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:20:59 -0400 > Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > > On 03/23/2017 04:22 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > > > > > > Indeed, according to pms.git commit log, the rule was laxed > > > because > > > it was clearly

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: sci-libs/acml

# David Seifert <s...@gentoo.org> (19 Mar 2017) # EOL'd upstream, fetch restricted, digests missing # Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug #612746. sci-libs/acml

[gentoo-dev] Review: aspell-dict-r1.eclass

Gentoo Foundation  # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2   -# @ECLASS: aspell-dict.eclass +# @ECLASS: aspell-dict-r1.eclass  # @MAINTAINER:  # maintainer-nee...@gentoo.org  # @AUTHOR:  # Original author: Seemant Kulleen +#  -r1 author: David Seifert  # @BLURB: An eclass

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New Manifest hashes and how to enable them

On Mon, 2017-04-03 at 19:09 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > Therefore, my proposal would be to use the following set once their > support reaches the stable version of Portage: > >   manifest-hashes = SHA512 SHA3-512 WHIRLPOOL > > > Your thoughts? > > > > [1]:https://bugs.gentoo.org/612716 >

[gentoo-dev] Review: xemacs-packages-r1.eclass

Hi, so one big swath of EAPI 0 ebuilds sits in app-xemacs/. The current eclass, xemacs-packages.eclass is from days gone by and does little in terms of modern eclass/ebuild best-practices. I have rewritten it, and with it will port all ebuilds to it and EAPI 6 (which can be automated, due to the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Review: aspell-dict-r1.eclass

On Sun, 2017-03-19 at 22:22 +0100, David Seifert wrote: > This is a revbump of aspell-dict.eclass, in order to bring it up to > EAPI 6 standards. > Comment here or on https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/4237 > > --- eclass/aspell-dict.eclass > +++ eclass/aspell-dict-r1.eclass Merged.

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-libs/STLport

If you need a non-copyleft alternative, use sys-libs/libcxx instead. # David Seifert <s...@gentoo.org> (05 Apr 2017) # Abandoned, no releases since 2008, only partially # compatible with C++11, multiple bugs, upstream dead # Masked for removal in 30 days. # Bugs #359247, #400547, #409119, #

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-i18n/x-unikey

# David Seifert <s...@gentoo.org> (12 Mar 2017) # Awful codebase, lots of widechars stored in chars, # invokes undefined behaviour, last release in 2004. # Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug #593976. app-i18n/x-unikey

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-plugins/nspluginwrapper

# David Seifert <s...@gentoo.org> (12 Mar 2017) # Bundles half of glibc, unmaintained upstream, # not really necessary anymore with 64-bit flash # Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug #609258. www-plugins/nspluginwrapper

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-text/uvconv

# David Seifert <s...@gentoo.org> (12 Mar 2017) # Awful codebase, lots of widechars stored in chars, # invokes undefined behaviour, last release in 2004. # Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug #593942, #593976. app-text/uvconv

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: aspell-dict.eclass

All ebuilds have been ported to aspell-dict-r1.eclass, with no consumers left in the tree. Overlays should either port to -r1 or copy the old eclass. commit 7a012b599b0b037bf56e3da6c690b7a7045810c5 Author: David Seifert <s...@gentoo.org> Date:   Sat Apr 1 19:34:04 2017 +0200

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Future of gentoo's stable and unstable trees: what are your thoughts?

On Sat, 2017-07-29 at 19:41 +0300, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > > why take away the stable choice? > > I think it is rather clear that stable keywords aren't going anywhere > for architectures like amd64. I suggest we drop all of the subthreads > on this topic and get back to other interesting thoughts

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Future of gentoo's stable and unstable trees: what are your thoughts?

On Mon, 2017-07-31 at 10:43 -0400, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > On Mon, 31 Jul 2017 14:59:25 +0200 > "Andreas K. Huettel" wrote: > > > Am Montag, 31. Juli 2017, 04:44:58 CEST schrieb William L. Thomson > > Jr.: > > > > > > How about no foundation. Not even a legal

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 02/12] dev-util/ccache: Convert to EAPI=6

On Thu, 2017-08-17 at 10:36 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > --- >  dev-util/ccache/ccache-3.3.4-r1.ebuild | 68 > ++ >  1 file changed, 68 insertions(+) >  create mode 100644 dev-util/ccache/ccache-3.3.4-r1.ebuild > > diff --git a/dev-util/ccache/ccache-3.3.4-r1.ebuild

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 02/12] dev-util/ccache: Convert to EAPI=6

On Thu, 2017-08-17 at 11:00 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > W dniu czw, 17.08.2017 o godzinie 10∶48 +0200, użytkownik David > Seifert > napisał: > > On Thu, 2017-08-17 at 10:36 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > > > --- > > >  dev-util/c

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Future of gentoo's stable and unstable trees: what are your thoughts?

On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 15:59 -0400, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 23:10:35 +1000 > "Sam Jorna (wraeth)" wrote: > > > On 28 July 2017 8:44:20 PM AEST, "Andreas K. Huettel" > > wrote: > > > > > That's not feasible. It would kill off

Re: [gentoo-dev] Dropping ia64/ppc/sparc profiles to dev/exp

On Sun, 2017-05-14 at 12:38 +0200, Michael Weber wrote: > On 05/08/2017 09:13 PM, David Seifert wrote: > > If all of this ends in one big bikeshedding fest again, I will > > start > > dekeywording packages. Fortunately for me, I won't get any > > complaints > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Dropping ia64/ppc/sparc profiles to dev/exp

On Wed, 2017-05-10 at 22:01 -0700, Yury German wrote: > > On 5/10/17 12:40 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > > On 5/10/17 3:29 PM, David Seifert wrote: > > So let's make sure we're on the same page -- here's my > > understanding. > > > > 1) For @system

Re: [gentoo-dev] Dropping ia64/ppc/sparc profiles to dev/exp

On Wed, 2017-05-10 at 22:24 +0300, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > Ühel kenal päeval, K, 10.05.2017 kell 15:01, kirjutas Anthony G. > Basile: > > On 5/10/17 11:08 AM, William Hubbs wrote: > > > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:04:54AM +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Anthony

Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla package list editing

On Wed, 2017-05-10 at 18:22 +0300, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > Ühel kenal päeval, T, 02.05.2017 kell 02:31, kirjutas Andreas K. > Huettel: > > Am Sonntag, 30. April 2017, 12:29:46 CEST schrieb Mart Raudsepp: > > > > > > Please stop editing package lists when you are not the maintainer > > > and > > >

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-fabric/libibvpp

# David Seifert <s...@gentoo.org> (14 May 2017) # Unmaintained upstream, awful codebase. No reverse # dependencies. See #594134. To be removed in 30 days. sys-fabric/libibvpp

Re: [gentoo-dev] Dropping ia64/ppc/sparc profiles to dev/exp

On Mon, 2017-05-15 at 15:33 -0400, Yury German wrote: > I would prefer PPC and for that matter arm (which are no longer > security > supported) going the Non-stable route. This would prevent the need > for > stabilization and everything but @system we can instruct the users to > use ~ppc. > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Dropping ia64/ppc/sparc profiles to dev/exp

On Wed, 2017-05-10 at 15:40 -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > On 5/10/17 3:29 PM, David Seifert wrote: > > On Wed, 2017-05-10 at 22:24 +0300, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > > > Ühel kenal päeval, K, 10.05.2017 kell 15:01, kirjutas Anthony G. > > > Basile: > > > > O

Re: [gentoo-dev] autotools.eclass: automatically move configure.in to configure.ac

On Sun, 2017-06-11 at 17:12 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 06/11/2017 05:07 PM, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > > Ühel kenal päeval, P, 11.06.2017 kell 10:00, kirjutas William > > Hubbs: > > > On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 01:04:06PM +0100, Sergei Trofimovich > > > wrote: > > > > On Sat, 10 Jun 2017

Re: [gentoo-dev] Dropping ia64/ppc/sparc profiles to dev/exp

On Sun, 2017-05-07 at 22:24 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > I'm against. Turning more arches into dev/exp only introduces hidden > depgraph breakages. I think it'd be better if we looked into > the arch.desc proposal and just disabled stable keywords for those > architectures. > This is probably

[gentoo-dev] Dropping ia64/ppc/sparc profiles to dev/exp

TL;DR ia64/ppc/sparc teams are pretty much dead. They have been for a long time and this won't change any time soon. Gentoo should focus its resources on archs that are important and has the manpower to support. Let us please drop these 3 archs to dev profiles to ease maintenance. Dear all, I'd

Re: [gentoo-dev] Dropping ia64/ppc/sparc profiles to dev/exp

On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 13:49 +0300, Mikle Kolyada wrote: > Against. Do not touch things you are not working on, council has > already > dropped m68k s390 and sh to exp few years ago. Now we have a big mess > there and only, while ia64 sparc and co have slow but progress and > mature enough stable

Re: [gentoo-dev] Dropping ia64/ppc/sparc profiles to dev/exp

On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 22:08 +0300, Mikle Kolyada wrote: > We have appropriate hardware if people wanna do the work, jut go & > make > things better :), I do not think someone from existing arch teams has > something against that Ok so let me get the logic right: 1) Arch teams can add their

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libunibreak/

On Thu, 2017-12-14 at 15:04 +0100, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: > Michał Górny schrieb: > > Breaking the dependency tree was a *honest* mistake on the person > > who > > reverted this commit. > > > > Andrey pretty clearly stated that he did this *on purpose*. > > The removal of the

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] out-of-source.eclass: A new eclass to help with out-of-source builds

On Thu, 2017-11-16 at 14:48 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > // NB: I'm not sure if I haven't submitted it already but that was > // a long time ago, so let's try again. Requested by soap. > > The out-of-source.eclass is a simple multilib-minimal-style wrapper > to perform out of source builds of

Re: [gentoo-dev] NEWS item for games destabling

Round 2 (with correct whitespace this time): Title: No stable KEYWORDS for Gentoo Games Author: David Seifert <s...@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain Posted: 2017-11-20 Revision: 1 News-Item-Format: 1.0 Display-If-Keyword: amd64 x86 As the Games team does not have enough manpower to kee

[gentoo-dev] NEWS item for games destabling

NEWS item for de-stabled games Title: No stable KEYWORDS for Gentoo Games Author: David Seifert <s...@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain Posted: 2017-11-19 Revision: 1 News-Item-Format: 1.0 Display-If-Keyword: amd64 x86 As the Games tea

Re: [gentoo-dev] Upcoming posting restrictions on the gentoo-dev mailing list

On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 08:55 +0100, Lars Wendler wrote: > On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 08:48:56 +0300 Eray Aslan wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 10:20:56PM +0100, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > > > * Posting to the list will only be possible to Gentoo developers > > > and > > > whitelisted additional

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2] vcs-snapshot.eclass: set -o (--no-same-owner) when unpacking, bug #645182

On Sun, 2018-01-21 at 00:26 +, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > Fixes build failures in unprivileged containers like bug #645182: > Package:dev-python/pycparser-2.14 > >>> Unpacking source... > tar: CHANGES: Cannot change ownership to uid 1000, gid 1000: > Invalid argument > > In such

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: x-modular.eclass

x-modular.eclass: Mark @DEAD for removal Last consumers have been removed, the eclass has been deprecated, still uses awful built_with_use constructs.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] preserve-libs.eclass: Split off preserve_old_lib from eutils.

On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 10:43 +, M. J. Everitt wrote: > On 04/01/18 10:23, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > El mié, 03-01-2018 a las 17:13 +0100, Ulrich Müller escribió: > > > Split off functions preserve_old_lib and preserve_old_lib_notify > > > from > > > eutils.eclass into a dedicated

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecation of virtual/libmysqlclient and virtual/mysql as providers for libmysqlclient.so

On Mon, 2018-07-23 at 14:18 -0400, Brian Evans wrote: > With the current state of the forks of MySQL diverging, the client > libraries are no longer compatible. > > Since virtual packages cannot handle rebuilds of subscribed packages > when a consumer changes, the following action is to be taken

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: What means bup?

On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 11:12 -0400, Matt Turner wrote: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 3:26 AM, Matthew Thode > wrote: > > On 18-07-18 09:16:07, Johannes Huber wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > english is not my mother language, so please clarify what bup > > > means, just > > > seen here: > > > > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Requiring gentoo.git committers to use their @gentoo.org address

On Mon, 2018-07-09 at 10:40 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, > > We currently don't enforce any particular standard for e-mail > addresses > for developers committing to gentoo.git. FWICS, the majority of > developers is using their @gentoo.org e-mail addresses. However, a > few > developers

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] cmake-utils.eclass: Override CMAKE_INSTALL_DOCDIR in EAPI 7

On Thu, 2018-03-29 at 21:14 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > Pass the correct docdir for GNUInstallDirs in EAPIs starting with 7. > We do not need add it retroactively to avoid breaking something > accidentally. > --- > eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 6 ++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-cdr/nero

# David Seifert (29 Nov 2018) # Uses ancient APIs, abandoned by upstream, unsalvageable. # Removal in 30 days. Bug #662142. app-cdr/nero

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] use.desc: Make USE=zstd global

>From bdb44cf710f268e8a82930a8bd8de76b5cca775a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Seifert Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 15:19:41 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] use.desc: Make USE=zstd global Signed-off-by: David Seifert --- app-arch/libarchive/metadata.xml| 3 --- app-arch/rpm/metadata.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] savedconfig.eclass: Remove old EAPI ED/EROOT workarounds

On Fri, 2019-05-24 at 11:00 +, Corentin “Nado” Pazdera wrote: > May 24, 2019 11:39 AM, "David Seifert" wrote: > > > +case ${EAPI} in > > + [4-7]) ;; > > + *) die "EAPI=${EAPI:-0} is not supported" ;; > > +esac > > + > > Hi, >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] darcs.eclass: use BDEPEND with EAPI >= 7

On Wed, 2019-05-29 at 11:00 +0200, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: > --- > eclass/darcs.eclass | 12 ++-- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/eclass/darcs.eclass b/eclass/darcs.eclass > index 489008a87f1..81003651680 100644 > --- a/eclass/darcs.eclass > +++

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: BLAS and LAPACK runtime switching

On Wed, 2019-05-29 at 22:33 +0800, Benda Xu wrote: > Hi Michał, > > Michał Górny writes: > > > On Tue, 2019-05-28 at 01:37 -0700, Mo Zhou wrote: > > > Different BLAS/LAPACK implementations are expected to be > > > compatible > > > to each other in both the API and ABI level. They can be used as

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] darcs.eclass: use BDEPEND with EAPI >= 7

On Wed, 2019-05-29 at 11:31 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 29 May 2019, David Seifert wrote: > > On Wed, 2019-05-29 at 11:00 +0200, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: > > > +case ${EAPI:-0} in > > > + [0-6]*) > > Why the *? Do

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: BLAS and LAPACK runtime switching

On Tue, 2019-05-28 at 01:37 -0700, Mo Zhou wrote: > Hi Gentoo devs, > > Classical numerical linear algebra libraries, BLAS[1] and LAPACK[2] > play important roles in the scientific computing field, as many > software such as Numpy, Scipy, Julia, Octave, R are built upon them. > > There is a

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-analyzer/sslsniff

# David Seifert (15 Jun 2019) # Abandoned upstream, last release 8 years ago, # multiple bugs, fails with boost 1.70 and # openssl 1.1, removal in 30 days # Bug #561314, #594894, #672090, #674606. net-analyzer/sslsniff Only revive if you can fix both boost 1.70 and openssl 1.1, as both

Re: [gentoo-dev] Introducing global USE=gui flag

On Mon, 2019-06-17 at 15:27 +0100, Andrey Utkin wrote: > On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 07:09:12PM +0200, David Seifert wrote: > > Dear fellow developers, > > as part of our effort in making Gentoo more pleasant to use, I am > > suggesting to add the global USE=gui flag. > &

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: sci-biology/allpathslg

# David Seifert (22 Jun 2019) # Abandoned upstream, last release 5 years ago, # extremely brittle codebase, requires constant # patching, removal in 30 days # Bug #664708, #685924 sci-biology/allpathslg

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: sci-biology/vaal

# David Seifert (22 Jun 2019) # Abandoned upstream, last release 5 years ago, # extremely brittle codebase, requires constant # patching, removal in 30 days # Bug #664700, #685980 sci-biology/vaal

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v3] glep-0081: User and group management via dedicated packages

On Fri, 2019-06-21 at 08:59 +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 16:32:56 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > > On Thu, 2019-06-20 at 09:53 -0400, Brian Evans wrote: > > > On 6/9/2019 7:39 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > +Tracking of user/group usage is done through dependencies. As > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v3] glep-0081: User and group management via dedicated packages

On Fri, 2019-06-21 at 15:02 +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 09:18:23 +0200 David Seifert wrote: > > On Fri, 2019-06-21 at 08:59 +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > > On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 16:32:56 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2019-06-

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: sci-mathematics/gwnum

# David Seifert (23 Jun 2019) # QA issues, fails tests, RWX sections, ignores CC/CFLAGS, # builds only static libs, fails with GCC 9. # Bug #452220, #461288, #623360, #685728 sci-mathematics/gwnum

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] savedconfig.eclass: clean up ED and EROOT usage

On Thu, 2019-05-23 at 11:15 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: > Avoid assigning these variables in EAPIs where they are already > defined. > Also make them local variables to avoid polluting the global > environment. > > Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/685382 > --- > eclass/savedconfig.eclass | 18

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] savedconfig.eclass: Remove old EAPI ED/EROOT workarounds

* Also limit to EAPIs that are in use at the moment. Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/685382 Signed-off-by: David Seifert --- eclass/savedconfig.eclass | 21 ++--- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/savedconfig.eclass b/eclass

[gentoo-dev] Re: Proposed last rites for sci-chemistry/coot and a bunch of reverse dependencies

On Mon, 2019-07-01 at 17:15 -0700, Matt Turner wrote: > I was investigating what needs to be done to drop guile-1.8 from the > tree (bug 590558, 587252). sci-chemistry/coot is one of the blocking > packages (bug 591410). It has a version bump request open for 18 > months (bug 639760) and hasn't

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: media-libs/jasper

# David Seifert (2019-07-14) # Unmaintained, removed from Debian and other distros, tons of CVEs, # unreachable upstream, removal in 30 days # Bug #601068, #614028, #614032, #614566, #619120, #624988, #629286, # #635552, #662160, #674154, #674214, #684826, #689784 media-libs/jasper

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-python/python-gtkmvc

# David Seifert (21 Apr 2019) # Ancient, last release over 8 years ago, GTK2, # broken USE=doc, multiple QA violations. # Removal in 30 days. Bug #636580, #683486. dev-python/python-gtkmvc signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[gentoo-dev] Introducing global USE=gui flag

Dear fellow developers, as part of our effort in making Gentoo more pleasant to use, I am suggesting to add the global USE=gui flag. This flag is the semantic analogue of USE=ssl, namely "Enable optional support for at least one GUI widget toolkit". Please notice: this is *NOT* about

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] use.desc: Make USE=zstd global

On Mon, 2019-04-15 at 15:45 +0200, David Seifert wrote: > From bdb44cf710f268e8a82930a8bd8de76b5cca775a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 > 2001 > From: David Seifert > Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 15:19:41 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] use.desc: Make USE=zstd global > > Signed-off-by: David Seife

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: Last rite sci-biology/{blossoc,snpfile}

# David Seifert (19 Apr 2019) # Fails to build with >=dev-libs/boost-1.70 due to Boost.Signals1 # removal. No development, no maintenance, no homepage. # Removal in 30 days. Bug #683762. sci-biology/blossoc sci-biology/snpfile

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: sci-biology/cufflinks

# David Seifert (20 Apr 2019) # Completely broken build system, massive maintenance # burden, no new release since 2014. # Removal in 30 days. Bug #671432. sci-biology/cufflinks

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] profiles/desc: Add L10N locales from www-client/vivaldi*

USE_EXPAND flags have to be defined globally by PMS. Sending this in because jer is unwilling to work with the QA team in improving QA violations.

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] profiles/desc: Add L10N locales from www-client/vivaldi*

Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/689482 Signed-off-by: David Seifert --- profiles/desc/l10n.desc | 4 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/profiles/desc/l10n.desc b/profiles/desc/l10n.desc index 3797fc41527..a21502a83c4 100644 --- a/profiles/desc/l10n.desc +++ b/profiles/desc/l10n.desc

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Mass last-riting of x86-but-not-amd64 packages

On Sat, 2019-08-31 at 22:20 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sat, 2019-08-31 at 13:14 -0700, Matt Turner wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 1:04 AM Michał Górny > > wrote: > > > sys-fs/hfsplusutils > > > > Your script should probably check for other keywords as well. This > > package is almost

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-cpp/threadpool

# David Seifert (2019-08-29) # Dead upstream, last release in 2008, no revdeps, removal in 30 days. dev-cpp/threadpool

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: sci-electronics/gplcver

# David Seifert (2019-08-29) # Dead upstream, last commit over 10 years ago, no revdeps, EAPI=0, # Removal in 30 days. sci-electronics/gplcver

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: eclass/

On Wed, 2019-09-04 at 20:59 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > On Wed, 2019-09-04 at 18:00 +, Alfredo Tupone wrote: > > commit: 63486fef43c2e0dee3b4128db18fd1a6b4bf9381 > > Author: Tupone Alfredo gentoo org> > > AuthorDate: Wed Sep 4 17:58:49 2019 + > > Commit: Alfredo Tupone

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-games/vamos

# David Seifert (2019-08-01) # Dead upstream, last release over 5 years ago, # broken build system, fails with boost 1.70, # removal in 30 days. Bug #646014, #691162 dev-games/vamos

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-python/pgmagick

# David Seifert (2019-08-01) # Last touched over 3 years ago, broken tests, # fails with boost 1.70, removal in 30 days. # Bug #655886, #690704

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: sgml-catalog.eclass

# @DEAD # All consumers are gone. Removal in 14 days

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: media-sound/mhwaveedit

On Tue, 2019-12-10 at 13:39 +0300, Alexey Mishustin wrote: > вт, 10 дек. 2019 г. в 03:47, David Seifert : > > # David Seifert (2019-12-10) > > # Build broken for over 3 years, GTK 2, quasi-abandoned upstream. > > # Bug #490574, #699914. Removal in 30 days. > > medi

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: bsdmk.eclass

# @DEAD # All consumers are gone. Removal in 14 days signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/3] python-any-r1.eclass: Constrain to EAPI >= 5

Signed-off-by: David Seifert --- eclass/python-any-r1.eclass | 7 +-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/python-any-r1.eclass b/eclass/python-any-r1.eclass index 3863ef6fa84..869ece64c65 100644 --- a/eclass/python-any-r1.eclass +++ b/eclass/python-any-r1

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >