Hello everybody,
SeJo wrote :
I think we should all bow and welcome Denis Dupeyron.
Thank you. Any relation with this other bending 'activity' you do with
plasmaroo ? I urgently need to re-read the fine prints.
He's a new addition to to the sci-electronics team. He'll be helping
plasmaroo
The repository for SDCC has recently moved from CVS to Subversion. From now on,
please use dev-embedded/sdcc-svn instead of dev-embedded/sdcc-cvs.
dev-embedded/sdcc-cvs will be masked right now, and then removed in a month or
so if nobody complains.
Denis.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing
On 5/6/06, Simon Stelling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Denis Dupeyron wrote:
dev-embedded/sdcc-cvs will be masked right now, and then removed in a month
or so if nobody complains.
A pkg move might be wise to do, no?
--
Kind Regards,
Simon Stelling
Gentoo/AMD64 Developer
--
gentoo
On 5/5/06, Daniel Goller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The following packages require a new maintainer, some might just be
absorbed into their herds w/o a direct maintainer leaving them to the
teams maintaining those herds, others might face
On 6/5/06, Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Go ahead and do it now. It really shouldn't break anything, as I can't
think of a single thing using make_desktop _entry with a space in the
executable name.
What about games-board/gnubg-0.14.3 ?
Denis.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing
Denis Dupeyron wrote:
dev-embedded/sdcc-cvs will be masked right now, and then removed in a month
or so if nobody complains.
dev-embedded/sdcc-cvs is now removed.
Denis.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Good news !The sci-electronics herd isn't one day old yet, but it is already diaper free (well, almost).In case you're interested to help, please drop us a message at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]. And don't forget to bring your own soldering iron.Denis.
On 7/7/06, Seemant Kulleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the Council idea is great. However, I think
the Council should be charged with a little bit of direction-setting and
leadership as well.
[...]
1. The council was (by design?) a reactive force, rather than a
pro-active force.
[...]
Dear devs,
In bug #139412, I ask Paul de Vriese why he thinks python should die
on --fast-math instead of just filtering it. Here's his answer :
Denis, quite simple. -ffast-math is broken and short-sighted for a global flag.
Filtering gives the shortsighted message that it works globally, while
On 7/10/06, Ryan Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ebuilds shouldn't die on anything according to the non-interactive portage
philosophy. I don't know how official that philosophy is though.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but this has nothing to do with being
interactive or not. To me, an ebuild that
On 7/9/06, Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Basically, if you're using daft CFLAGS you're on your own. Some ebuilds
might filter them, some ebuilds might die and some ebuilds might let
them through. Developers are under no obligation to add code to save
users from their own stupidity,
On 7/11/06, Ryan Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Their phrase, not mine. ;) I think the idea is you should be able to emerge -e
world and walk away and not have anything interrupt the process thus requiring
the user interact with the system.
Well yes, but an ebuild that dies, whatever the
On 7/30/06, Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another class of packages I wish to discuss (not remove quite yet, just
talking ;) ) are older packages with stable markings. By Stable I mean
debian stable, IE we stabled it in 2004 and no one has touched it since.
Do these packages still work
On 7/31/06, Joshua Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thirdly, I know one of the issues with one of the leaders of the
project, is the fact that they are not a ebuild developer. I'd like to
have them take the second quiz simply to prove that they have the
knowledge to be trusted to review the
On 8/1/06, Jeroen Roovers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# emerge --submit-info
* sys-apps/portage generates emerge --info output and uploads it
relatively tamper-proof to tickets.g.o, and
* returns a ticket to the user, a unique number that he or she can
communicate to developers and active users
On 8/2/06, Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The alternative to elitism is mediocrity. Would you like Gentoo to be a
mediocre distribution?
The real world isn't binary. So there's a whole range of alternatives
between elitism and mediocrity.
Denis.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On 9/2/06, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It might be worth putting together a list of folks interested in doing
this on the Gentoo website, under a Third-party Paid Support section. We
already have a Support link on the top of www.g.o, it could be on that page.
I was thinking about
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Aaron W. Swenson titanof...@gentoo.org wrote:
This information, by the way, has been blogged about thousands of
times.
There is a reason people write documentation. Contrary to blog posts,
documentation is thought out, reviewed, maintained and corrected when
2009/5/4 Sérgio Almeida meph...@gmail.com:
Please drop me a line here or at freenode if you have anything to add
All I have to add is thanks a lot. I wished other SoC students would
also introduce themselves and their project on their list.
Denis.
Joe !
How are you doing ? I've been meaning to call you but I've been busy
as hell due to the move. Do you want to have a beer or lunch sometime
?
Denis.
Oops, that was supposed to be sent to him directly. Sorry about that.
Denis.
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Denis Dupeyron calc...@gentoo.org wrote:
Joe !
How are you doing ? I've been meaning to call you but I've been busy
as hell due to the move. Do you want to have a beer or lunch
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
Because the way Gentoo works, any objection to a proposal, valid or not,
whether or not it's already been addressed, has to be answered before a
proposal gets anywhere. Thus, every time people post nonsense
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
Except that at the last Council meeting, there were complaints that
objections *had* been included and discussed in the GLEP, and claims
that including such material made the GLEP less clear.
As unfortunate
2009/5/17 Piotr Jaroszyński pe...@gentoo.org:
I have just updated GLEP 55 [1], hopefully making it a bit clearer.
Thanks a lot Piotr.
Just FYI, my order of preference of solutions is:
1. EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (obviously)
2. EAPI in the filename with one-time extension change
3. Easily
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Wernfried Haas a...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'd like to counter-nominate you
Aww... That must hurt.
Denis.
2009/6/1 Dawid Węgliński c...@gentoo.org:
I nominate:
[...]
Calchan
Thanks Dawid, and also Ferris. I accept. You can find my manifesto at
http://dev.gentoo.org/~calchan/manifesto09/manifesto.html
Denis.
Hi Doug,
I just got to this thread, so sorry for entering the debate a bit
late. I find your propositions very interesting. In my manifesto [1] I
have proposed something significantly different which simply consists
in spinning the long discussions off the council meetings using more
focused
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Doug Goldstein car...@gentoo.org wrote:
This is not a debate nor is this thread meant to be a launching point
for people to promote their own campaign for being on the council and
I chide you for taking it as such.
I was just trying to contribute to the debate,
Hi Jean-Marc,
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Jean-Marc Beaunejm.bea...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry to be a pain but I just wonder if I filled this bug correctly because
nothing happens: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=244436
I'm not putting any pressure in any way, I just want to know if I
[...]
This list is for technical discussions only. Also, public mailing-lists are
not for discussing your personal issues.
Denis.
probably belongs in -project.
Not even in -project, it simply wasn't public mailing-list material.
For those who haven't understood yet, the -dev and -project mailing
lists are not for keeping us informed of your random thought of the
day or lamenting about
Thanks for the reminder, Doug.
Make sure to also check everybody's manifesto here:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/elections/council-200906-nominees.xml
Denis.
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 6:46 AM, Ben de Grootyng...@gentoo.org wrote:
To appoint as proxy for a council meeting someone who has been booted
from Gentoo is a clear lapse of judgement, and would in my eyes
disqualify the involved council member from functioning in that position.
As Petteri noted
I'll have things to say about this but I'm still in the woods with
dialup until monday. So either I can get close to a fatter pipe later
today or tomorrow, or I'll do it on monday night from home.
Denis.
2009/7/3 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto jmbsvice...@gentoo.org:
Yes, that is another thing I was planning to do. The only reason I
haven't done it yet, is that older manifestos were stored as txt files
and this year the candidates mostly opted for html/xml files.
I'll probably just go ahead,
Hello Robson,
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 2:44 AM, Robson Roberto Souza
Peixotorobsonpeix...@gmail.com wrote:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=250853
On bugzilla has the patch to solve the problem
The people concerned by this already know about the bug and patch,
there is no need to remind us
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Ciaran
McCreeshciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
Perhaps you should consider that it's your behaviour that's the issue here.
It's both your behaviors, because they're extremely similar. Except
that you seem to have more time available than slong to express
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Ciaran
McCreeshciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
I contribute productively and usefully
This should have gone in private but I want it to be public because
you and others apparently do not get it. The fact that you're
contributing or not does not give you or
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 7:10 AM, Sebastian Pippingwebmas...@hartwork.org wrote:
I would love to see the GLEP on CPE names in metadata.xml discussed,
http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org/msg35155.html
Any guidance on what I need to do to make it happen is very welcome.
Please
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Diego E. Pettenòflamee...@gmail.com wrote:
# The rest are dependencies. The rest
# of dev-tinyos might be added if it doesn't make sense
# without these.
Please last rite the whole thing if you feel like it. All my attempts
at proxy-maintaining this have failed.
2009/10/21 Maciej Mrozowski reave...@gmail.com:
1. Proposition to split desktop profile to: KDE, Gnome, (and maybe some
others).
How about making a desktop profile with everything common and being
the parent of Gnome, KDE, XFCE, etc... sub-profiles with the specific
stuff?
Denis.
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 5:43 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'm seconds away from masking KDE 3.5.10, only fixing gentoo-x86 in a
shape it's possible.
So sorry everyone for not stopping on every single package and metadata.xml.
Just getting this done.
Quantity isn't a
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'm tempted to say otherwise it will be hardmasked with kde-base/arts
by the end of this week, but that might be too intimidating for some.
And completely unreasonable. Some of us have a life.
Denis, wondering why the
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Fabian Groffen grob...@gentoo.org wrote:
This is a formal apology for springing that onto you.
Thanks a lot. Not everybody can do such a thing as a public apology. I
will nonetheless ask the council to vote on the following during next
meeting:
Ask Fabian to
I'm going to try and sum up the situation of the thread started in
[1]. Feel free to correct me or add to the summary in replies.
There seems to be two main ideas. I have removed the authors' name in
quotes below in order to make sure we talk about the ideas and not who
proposed them.
1- All
A quick note to tell you that I have tried to look for examples of
breakage due to how mtime preservation is currently implemented in
portage. Unfortunately I didn't find anything, maybe because I'm not
knowledgeable enough or because I can't afford to spend any more time
on this. If any of you
The next council meeting will be on 7 Dec 2009 at 1900UTC. If you want
us to discuss things please let us know in reply to this email. What
is already known is we'll talk about mtime preservation and prefix.
You can find threads about those at:
Things seem to be progressing nicely on this front. We have answers to
the questions people had and they look satisfactory to me.
One thing that I think would be valuable is a document that explains
the average dev how to make his/her ebuilds prefix compliant with
links to more details when
It looks like this question is still unanswered:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Denis Dupeyron calc...@gentoo.org wrote:
How are dynamically linked set*id programs going to work?
Denis.
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
I will make it short, since i already requested it 3 times, did create a
thread at gentoo-dev ML:
agenda topic: Discussion and approval for following item:
Adding real multilib features from current multilib-portage to
2010/1/2 Pacho Ramos pa...@condmat1.ciencias.uniovi.es:
[...] I failed to see if, finally, an approval
from the council is needed for merging [multilib] to portage-2.2 or not
The only approval that's required to merge anything to an official
portage branch is Zac's (zmedico). He may have to
Brian,
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
The proposal is pretty simple; if code modifies the vdb in any
fashion, it needs to update the mtime on a file named
'.modification_time' in the root of the vdb.
For example-
1) ${PACKAGE_MANAGER} fires ups,
2010/1/12 Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org:
Dont be joking,
[...]
Mmmh? Take a deep breath, a long walk, a large beer, or whatever
works. Because you need it.
Denis.
(I'm resending this email as the original apparently did not make it
to the list, although Thomas probably received it)
Hi Thomas,
I'm replying to the original thread below to allow those who have
missed it to have the full context.
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 5:37 AM, Thomas Sachau
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically
the 3rd Thursday at 1800 UTC / 2000 CET / 1400 EST), same bat channel
(#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) !
Uh... no. The meeting is actually next Monday
You'll find below an email from solar to Robin about MetaManifest. I'm
adding it to this thread (with solar's authorization) as it seems
pertinent.
Denis.
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 6:51 PM, Ned Ludd so...@gentoo.org wrote:
Robin,
I recall you wanted me to mail you what we talked about last nite
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 12:20 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
I am starting this thread because I don't understand why people are
using sudo and su together. They are completely separate utilities that
do the same thing. AFAIK, it should be either sudo -i or su -, but
not sudo
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 6:18 AM, Robert Bradbury
robert.bradb...@gmail.com wrote:
It would appear that the pending (0321) mask of Qt3 will break
sci-misc/qcad, sci-chemistry/xdrawchem and x11-misc/glunarclock.
I'm not concerned but I feel sympathy for those who use these packages
and many
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 5:33 AM, Richard Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
I think the problem is that our recruitment process uses the ability to
answer complex technical and organizational questions as a way to assess
maturity. I think that maturity is far more important than technical skill
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Richard Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
What I was getting at is trying to identify what aspects of the whole
recruitment process added the most value and which added the least, and
adjusting accordingly. I think that assessing attitude and maturity, and
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 3:16 AM, Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org wrote:
I see no reason whatsoever to keep it open.
How about this one: preventing users from filing dupes.
If we
start doing that, we'll end up with tons of extra bugs on our hands.
What's the big deal? You know you'll be
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote:
I disagree. Resolved LATER is useful to some maintainers that want to
fix that bug, but don't have time or don't find the issue to be a
priority at the moment. By marking it LATER they're acknowledging the
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Jon Portnoy av...@eris.oppresses.us wrote:
Which is all well and good -- the you wrote some ebuilds so here's
your commit privs and @gentoo.org approach to recruitment worked great
when Gentoo had a few dozen developers.
Today QA is a bit more important, and
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Nathan Zachary
nathanzach...@gentoo.org wrote:
[...] but it
would be much more enlightening to me to work on creating ebuilds while
working one-on-one with a mentor.
The whole purpose of the training period between the ebuild quiz and
the end quiz (see [1]) is
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 7:28 AM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
But while I don't do IRC, from various hints I've seen here, that hasn't
necessarily been the case there. I'm not making a judgement of whether
that's good or bad and am only going on various asides I've seen here
because as I
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
1. reconsider metadata changepolicies proposal
==
[...]
Can council please decide to honor
the wish from developers to implement this?
The council will be glad to vote on a GLEP
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
So all I'm asking is to do your job and make decisions on issues that
affect all of Gentoo. The issues I brought up are wider than a single
individual project.
And almost 100% of the time this needs to run through a GLEP,
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Richard Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Sure, it is the best way to make big changes
Why then use anything else than the best tool when you can use the
best tool? I didn't say that he should work on a GLEP though, but that
he should feel free to do so, which is
Ben,
Petteri was proposing an idea. He is being creative and is trying to
help. The only way of knowing if his idea is good is to discuss it and
later try it if people are interested.
You, on the other hand, have lately been increasingly critical (which
is good) but not constructively. You
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 04/11/2010 12:37 AM, Ben de Groot wrote:
How about:
You have lately been increasingly critical but not constructively
at no point have you offered your contribution
You haven't offered to help
you haven't
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
I mean things like immature political rantings are not likely to evoke
the wanted response and it didn't happen here either.
I know it hurts the eyes a bit, but calling problems by their name is
part of fixing them.
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 7:16 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hello folks,
Hi Markos. A small detail first. You shouldn't cross post as it makes
things confusing and often results in threads splitting. I have no
problem with that because my email client merges threads but it's not
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
I think that the packages that currently depend on one icon theme, could
instead just depend on that virtual. For example, xfce works fine
without the xfce theme, provided some other theme (like gnome or tango)
is
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'd like to nominate betelgeuse, calchan, and ssuominen (no way you're getting
out of here that easy).
Thanks a lot for your confidence but I'll pass.
Denis.
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org wrote:
I was more or less told to fuck off if I don't like the tone.
Please watch your language, this is a public mailing-list.
Denis.
On 9/20/07, Bo Ørsted Andresen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 20 September 2007 19:54:16 Donnie Berkholz wrote:
econf has default econf failed die message.
The following would be sufficient:
econf \
--localstatedir=/var \
--sysconfdir=/etc/csync2
Is that so ... when did
# Denis Dupeyron [EMAIL PROTECTED] (23 Sep 2007)
# Masked for removal in 30 days as per bug #176962.
net-print/hpijs
Upstream decided to kill hpijs and replace it with hplip quite a good
while ago. The replacement is much better and much more usable.
So, net-print/hpijs has been masked
It's my pleasure to introduce Timo Gurr (tgurr) who will join us as a
new developer. He will work primarily on KDE and printing.
Timo lives in Neckarsulm, Germany, and works as an IT technician in a
local city administration near his home. He finds his job very
interesting and loves it, and even
It's my pleasure to introduce Mike Pagano (mpagano) who has been
wrangling kernel bugs for some time already, and will now do so as a
full Gentoo developer.
Mike lives in his native New Jersey with his wife and a large cat. He
currently works for a Pharmacy Benefits Management company where he
On 10/8/07, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cp /usr/share/gettext/config.rpath .
Shouldn't this respect ROOT != / ? I can see how that would be a bit of
an unusual use case for games, though.
While we're on that topic :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /tmp/gcompris-8.4 $ ./configure --help
On 10/10/07, Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it's OK to start using package.use now considering that
package.use has been supported since portage-2.1.2 and that's been
stable since February. There are already a couple of packages using
it in the tree now.
Is it a good idea for
On 10/10/07, Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eventually I'd like to add an option that
behaves similar to --resume but also recalculates dependencies.
Why not make that the default ? That would be safer IMO.
Plus, once we have this, it looks to me that nobody has to wait for
EAPI=1 in
It's with an unusual delay [1] but with the usual pleasure that I'm
re-introducing Dawid Węgliński who goes among us under the
much-easier-to-type nickname of cla. If it's a re-introduction it's
not because the second time is always better, but because he has
already been active as staff for some
It's my unusual pleasure to introduce Marion Agé who will go among us
under the nickname of titefleur, which can be literally translated
into lil' flower. Aint that charming ?
Marion will be the new translator follow-up for French. Her experience
is mainly in web development. her knowledge
It's my unusual pleasure to introduce Marion Agé who will go among us
under the nickname of titefleur, which can be literally translated
into lil' flower. Aint that charming ?
Marion will be the new translator follow-up for French. Her experience
is mainly in web development, with knowledge of
It's my pleasure to introduce Elias Piping (pipping) who is joining us
as staff. He will do general development and bug solving for the
Gentoo/alt project.
Elias is familiar with Tcl, Ruby, Python, Perl, Java, sed, awk and
bash. He admits having above average knowledge of regular expressions,
and
On Nov 9, 2007 11:28 AM, Ciaran McCreesh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like it's a silly hack
[...]
Which is rather perverse
Whoever it was, whatever it was, nobody deserves to have his/her work
to be qualified this way. All of us (including you) would benefit of a
more neutral language.
On Nov 10, 2007 2:58 PM, Daniel Pielmeier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gentoo is a worldwide project, so i guess many of the contributors are
not native speakers. See the gentoo-devs all over the world [1] as an
example. Okay english is the common language here, but is it that
difficult to
On Sep 23, 2007 12:48 PM, Denis Dupeyron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# Denis Dupeyron [EMAIL PROTECTED] (23 Sep 2007)
# Masked for removal in 30 days as per bug #176962.
net-print/hpijs
Upstream decided to kill hpijs and replace it with hplip quite a good
while ago. The replacement is much
Seemant,
On Nov 24, 2007 6:39 PM, Seemant Kulleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The time has finally come for me to resign from Gentoo. I've been
meaning to do it for many months now, but the logistics took a little
bit of time. Effective Monday, Nov. 26, I will no longer consider
myself an
On Dec 11, 2007 6:03 AM, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 10 December 2007, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
{
...
echo CONFIG_EAP_SAKE=y
...
} ${CONFIG}
cat -EOF ${CONFIG}
...
CONFIG_EAP_SAKE=y
...
EOF
-mike
Mike,
On Dec 20, 2007 1:38 AM, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's some other ideas for how to express EAPI. What if we:
[..]
Stuck ranges into metadata.xml for which EAPIs applied?
This is the easiest and most reasonable solution I've heard so far.
Denis.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing
On Dec 20, 2007 12:12 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm guessing there're lots of people moaning because they think they
understand filenames and can therefore comment. Unfortunately, most of
those people don't understand the metadata generation process, and
therefore can't
After a long and bumpy ride, concluded by a very BOFH-esque LDAP
replication failure, we're on it (thanks Robin, by the way), it's my
pleasure to announce that Richard Freeman (rich0) is a new Gentoo
developer. Richard has been an amd64 AT for some time already, and so
will join the amd64 team.
On Dec 25, 2007 7:19 PM, Christian Heim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- media-gfx/f-spot
I'll adopt this one if nobody wants it.
Denis.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Dec 30, 2007 6:50 PM, Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a script coming up that can remove virtual/libc dependencies from
ebuilds automatically but can this be done safely for all ebuilds are
are there ebuilds in system that really need this dep for stage building
etc?
FWIW:
I like the overall idea. I will comment the first proposed alternative
as this is the one that makes the most sense in my opinion.
Having one global use.xml where the default definitions are, and then using
metadata.xml for each package to override the USE flag definition.
With 's/default
On Dec 31, 2007 3:30 PM, Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What benefit does use.xml have over use.desc?
[...]
No need to change the format of use.desc
Anything that would enable us to document with more than a few words,
which is what we're practically limited to with the current format of
On Jan 4, 2008 1:30 PM, Sébastien Fabbro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sci-mathematics/ksimus-{boolean,datarecorder,floatingpoint}:
unmaintained upstream since 2003, see bug #157577
Replacements: unknown
Scilab's Scicos ? Not a direct replacement, but there are some similarities.
Denis.
On Jan 9, 2008 1:12 PM, Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Recruiters
About the stuff I'm involved:
Are we fine?
If Calchan agrees, we are fine.
I'm taking care of recruits as fast as I can. I figure any time I
spend for the recruiters project is worth a lot more than the same
time
1 - 100 of 188 matches
Mail list logo
