Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrites: net-proxy/paros, net-misc/ups-monitor, app-emulation/mol, net-wireless/fsam7400, net-wireless/acx, net-wireless/acx-firmware, net-wireless/linux-wlan-ng-modules, net-wirele

2012-12-11 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 24-11-2012 22:12:17 +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote: # Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org (24 Nov 2012) # Fails to build (#205047, #425680), segfaults (#415787). # Removal in a month. app-emulation/e-uae All bugs fixed. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level signature.asc Description

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-16 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 16-12-2012 11:57:35 -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote: 3. Get off CVS for Christ's sake. Nobody wants to work with that. I don't know how this fits into my bullet list, but it's important. It doesn't, and it's not. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level signature.asc

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-16 Thread Fabian Groffen
attract new developers. But it's sufficiently easy to learn (significantly easier than git) that any person who is not capable of doing so would unlikely be a good candiate to become a Gentoo developer. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...)

2012-12-16 Thread Fabian Groffen
was suggesting. By eliminating the disincentive, you potentially attract more developers. You know just as good as me that this is being worked on. I see no need to reiterate on the topic. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Should portage tree CVS impose a commit moratorium during snapshot creation?

2013-01-09 Thread Fabian Groffen
. Weren't we planning to drop the CVS keywords for the git migration, anyway? Yeah, but I'd really appreciate it if they could stay for as long as we're on CVS, so my scripts that use the version number to retrieve diffs and apply them to the Prefix' tree versions keep on working. Fabian -- Fabian

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Should portage tree CVS impose a commit moratorium during snapshot creation?

2013-01-09 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 09-01-2013 10:14:21 +0100, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: On 09/01/2013 10:09, Fabian Groffen wrote: Yeah, but I'd really appreciate it if they could stay for as long as we're on CVS, so my scripts that use the version number to retrieve diffs and apply them to the Prefix' tree versions keep

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Should portage tree CVS impose a commit moratorium during snapshot creation?

2013-01-09 Thread Fabian Groffen
/gentoo-x86.git;a=summary This is if stuff. If it wasn't if, we'd already done it, of course. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] lastrites in gentoo-dev-announce only

2013-01-27 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 27-01-2013 10:43:47 +0100, Theo Chatzimichos wrote: Hello, how about sending the lastrites announcements in gentoo-dev-announce only? +1 -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] please sign your manifests

2013-02-13 Thread Fabian Groffen
on to do commits from that system. It's not like I set FEATURES=-sign on purpose. :) I wouldn't mind a mild warning from repoman if you're on the gentoo-x86 tree and try to commit without FEATURES=sign. So, +1 -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level signature.asc Description: Digital

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] gentoo-openstack project

2013-03-11 Thread Fabian Groffen
you need it, I can introduce you to e.g. Cor. Fabian -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] font.eclass add Xorg FontPath elements for non-standard paths

2013-07-04 Thread Fabian Groffen
? -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Patches on bug reports: thanks but no thanks for the credit

2013-07-04 Thread Fabian Groffen
for them at all. Sorry! I guess your efforts (which are really appreciated!) just mean bug reports should be read more thoroughly ... mea culpa. Thanks again for the effort anyway, Fabian -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] gnome2-utils.eclass add support for gdk-pixbuf cache update

2013-09-10 Thread Fabian Groffen
} ]]; then + cp ${ROOT}${cache} ${D}/${cache} || die + else + touch ${D}/${cache} || die + fi } pkg_postinst() { shouldn't that be EROOT ? and ED in that case too -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] gnome2-utils.eclass add support for gdk-pixbuf cache update

2013-09-11 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 11-09-2013 10:51:22 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: shouldn't that be EROOT ? and ED in that case too Do we still use that in EAPI 3 ? EROOT = ROOT + EPREFIX ED = D + EPREFIX Unless I misunderstand your question, that means yes, we do to me. Fabian -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] devs on IRC (was :Regen2 ( was QA Overlay Layout support ))

2009-03-10 Thread Fabian Groffen
. the presumption seems to be, that as a dev one has to be available via IRC. it has long been my feeling that Gentoo as a project could realize more of its potential by better integrating people who dont do IRC. +1 -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] [amd64-fbsd] remove charset.alias

2009-03-11 Thread Fabian Groffen
this rm code in place... :( -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: please stop using foo-${PV}-bar.patch in other ebuild versions than ${PV}

2009-03-23 Thread Fabian Groffen
the will respect and remember your agreement - Add a related local comment (*documenting*) to ebuilds and expect other developers to act accordingly on a bump probably best solution - Making a GLEP *enforcing* on of these and make people vote on which very bad one. -- Fabian

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 3 PMS Draft

2009-03-27 Thread Fabian Groffen
}${EPREFIX}. - The variable EROOT, available in pkg_*[1], set to ${ROOT}${EPREFIX}. [1] this is copied from PMS, Table 11.1, in general, EROOT needs to be available where currently ROOT is. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: portability.eclass

2009-03-27 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 27-03-2009 01:34:36 +0100, Donnie Berkholz wrote: + # - Linux needs -ldl + if [[ ${CHOST} == *-linux-gnu ]]; then echo -ldl How about uclibc? Good catch, thanks for pointing out. And thanks drizzt for fixing it before I could ;) -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo

[gentoo-dev] Please review: prefix.eclass

2009-03-27 Thread Fabian Groffen
to gentoo-x86 ebuilds. Please review. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level # Copyright 1999-2009 Gentoo Foundation # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2 # $Id: prefix.eclass 40407 2009-03-27 11:51:37Z grobian $ # @ECLASS: prefix.eclass # @MAINTAINER

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please review: prefix.eclass

2009-03-27 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 27-03-2009 13:08:46 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Fabian Groffen wrote: Please review. r=$? eend ${r} [[ ${r} != 0 ]] die failed to eprefixify ${x} Here you could save a variable, since eend returns the status: it wasn't

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: best way to introduce USE=prefix

2009-04-04 Thread Fabian Groffen
behaviour. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: best way to introduce USE=prefix

2009-04-04 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 04-04-2009 14:54:20 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote: Fabian Groffen wrote: On 04-04-2009 14:31:20 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote: If prefix is in USERLAND then you have a userland_prefix use flag to use that can be hidden. It is not. But can be added. I think we talk about different things

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: best way to introduce USE=prefix

2009-04-04 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 04-04-2009 14:31:20 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote: If prefix is in USERLAND then you have a userland_prefix use flag to use that can be hidden. It is not. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: best way to introduce USE=prefix

2009-04-04 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 04-04-2009 15:21:23 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote: You can set USERLAND=GNU PREFIX Prefix is not a userland, please understand that. It's like pizza not being an elibc, or beer not being a kernel. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: best way to introduce USE=prefix

2009-04-04 Thread Fabian Groffen
upgrade Linux to FreeBSD or x86 to ppc. While this would be great, it doesn't work. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: best way to introduce USE=prefix

2009-04-04 Thread Fabian Groffen
, define it in whatever special variable it needs to be added to according to the specs then. IUSE_IMPLICIT -- assuming it can be defined in the profiles -- seems like a good way to prepare for that, since it makes explicit it is implicit, IMO. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: flag-o-matic.eclass

2009-04-05 Thread Fabian Groffen
to succeed in the past, but it just can't in the current eclass, so it's bogus, and I will remove it again. Thanks for the check, much appreciated! -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: toolchain-funcs.eclass

2009-04-05 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 04-04-2009 23:53:29 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Saturday 04 April 2009 13:17:56 Fabian Groffen (grobian) wrote: grobian 09/04/04 17:17:56 Modified: toolchain-funcs.eclass Log: Add support for all Prefix arches, in particular for gen_usr_ld_script, and add

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for April

2009-04-06 Thread Fabian Groffen
Ciaran, On 02-04-2009 15:47:05 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 11:53:47 +0200 Fabian Groffen grob...@gentoo.org wrote: While the first variable (EPREFIX) can be set using an eclass, the latter two need to be set by the package manager. In particular ED, because the value

[gentoo-dev] An Introduction to Gentoo Prefix

2009-05-05 Thread Fabian Groffen
[2] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/gentoo-alt/prefix/usecases.xml [3] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/gentoo-alt/prefix/bootstrap-solaris.xml [4] http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/alt/browser/trunk/prefix-overlay [5] http://stats.prefix.freens.org/rsync-usage.png -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-cdr/cdrdao: ChangeLog cdrdao-1.2.2-r3.ebuild

2009-05-11 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 11-05-2009 11:26:46 +0200, Thilo Bangert wrote: FEATURE-misuse.txt was generated by $ find -name '*.ebuild' | xargs grep -nH FEATURES FEATURES-misuse.txt and sifting through the false positives. Have you checked if eclasses use it as well? -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] An Introduction to Gentoo Prefix

2009-05-12 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 12-05-2009 08:28:15 +0200, Mounir Lamouri wrote: Fabian Groffen wrote: Therefore, we plan to focus on merging back the many patches and extensions from our Prefix overlay into the Gentoo mainline tree. For us, this roadmap looks as follows: [snip] I used Gentoo on MacOS X (which

Re: [gentoo-dev] New app-eselect category?

2009-05-26 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 26-05-2009 09:04:46 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: As of today, app-admin contains 179 packages. We could move the 27 eselect-* packages to a new app-eselect category (eselect itself would stay in app-admin). Opinions? I hate package moves, so is it really *really* necessary? -- Fabian

Re: [gentoo-dev] [amd64-fbsd] remove charset.alias

2009-05-28 Thread Fabian Groffen
. That makes them sort of stackable, hence I added this snippet in the prefix top-level profile and it works for all sub-profiles as far as I can see. Thanks. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Overlays and Metadata Cache

2009-06-20 Thread Fabian Groffen
is generated sort of like you described, doing some extra voodoo of inserting news and glsas. An update takes about 2 minutes, most time spent in running cvs update and svn update. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please use eselect news items!

2009-06-26 Thread Fabian Groffen
... just my 2 cents why I am avoiding adding news messages these days -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Elections Results for term 2009/2010

2009-07-02 Thread Fabian Groffen
(ulm) Mart Raudsepp (leio) Luca Barbato (lu_zero) A big surprise! (is it a birthday present?) Congratulations to all of you! -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] Exim and Sendmail need a maintainer

2009-07-02 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 24-06-2009 13:51:37 +, Torsten Veller wrote: | mail-mta/exim. I'm looking for users that want to help maintaining Exim. Especially if you feel like becoming a Gentoo developer at some time, contact me directly. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] Exim and Sendmail need a maintainer

2009-07-03 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 02-07-2009 22:06:33 +0100, AllenJB wrote: Fabian Groffen wrote: On 24-06-2009 13:51:37 +, Torsten Veller wrote: | mail-mta/exim. I'm looking for users that want to help maintaining Exim. Especially if you feel like becoming a Gentoo developer at some time, contact me directly

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] xfconf.eclass - codename: keep it simple, stupid

2009-08-01 Thread Fabian Groffen
have no trouble in reusing the var, but it's ugly. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposal for flag-o-matic.eclass (append-ldflags)

2009-08-29 Thread Fabian Groffen
matches with known configurations then, handling the obvious cases (--{no-,}as-needed etc.) i.e. something like: append-ldflags() { use userland_GNU || set -- $(test-flag-LD $@) .. } thanks -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

[gentoo-dev] On shebangs of scripts

2009-09-23 Thread Fabian Groffen
, and they merely become examples/documentation. Should we start filing bugs on these issues? In the end, they are broken scripts on the system. Is there interest for porting the Prefix shebang QA check to normal Portage? -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman-global.txt, repositories.xml, layman, overlays.gentoo.org

2009-09-30 Thread Fabian Groffen
? It's XML, so it may be extremely annoying to parse/use. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: LD_AS_NEEDED=1 in profiles/targets/developer/make.defaults?

2009-10-03 Thread Fabian Groffen
, then I'm not getting happy as that breaks my builds. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: LD_AS_NEEDED=1 in profiles/targets/developer/make.defaults?

2009-10-03 Thread Fabian Groffen
either a CHOST check, or call ld to see if it's GNU for all packages that hardcode -Wl,--{,no-}as-needed usage. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: LD_AS_NEEDED=1 in profiles/targets/developer/make.defaults?

2009-10-03 Thread Fabian Groffen
about, no-as-needed() { case $($(tc-getLD) -v 21 /dev/null) in *GNU*) # GNU ld echo -Wl,--no-as-needed ;; esac } usage: append-ldflags $(no-as-needed) that would work fine for me, and all possible future cases I can think of -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: LD_AS_NEEDED=1 in profiles/targets/developer/make.defaults?

2009-10-04 Thread Fabian Groffen
;; + esac +} It's committed. To avoid the already caused trouble for you (prefix), these should be converted: thanks! -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: python-wrapper breaks init scripts

2009-10-05 Thread Fabian Groffen
startup to determine its own prefix, pythonpath etc. We might be able to just patch our python to behave. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-x86 commit in net-mail/getmail: ChangeLog getmail-4.9.2.ebuild

2009-10-13 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 11-10-2009 17:14:29 +0200, Torsten Veller wrote: * Fabian Groffen (grobian) grob...@gentoo.org: grobian 09/10/11 15:04:33 Modified: ChangeLog getmail-4.9.2.ebuild Log: Use ED for Prefix compatability, marked ~ppc-macos and ~x64-solaris [snip] Can you please

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo Prefix: on EPREFIX, ED and EROOT inside ebuilds

2009-10-18 Thread Fabian Groffen
. Examples are fixing and porting packages and getting the Prefix Portage branch merged with regular Portage some day. At that point, the variables EPREFIX, ED and EROOT can become available in a next EAPI as well. [1] http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/portage/main/branches/prefix/ -- Fabian

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Prefix: on EPREFIX, ED and EROOT inside ebuilds

2009-10-18 Thread Fabian Groffen
would like to do that, but that was rejected for EAPI=3, so it will at least take until EAPI=4 is implemented, which is not the forseeable future, given that EAPI=3 isn't a fact yet either. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Prefix: on EPREFIX, ED and EROOT inside ebuilds

2009-10-19 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 18-10-2009 14:31:15 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: On 18-10-2009 13:57:10 +0200, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: Hi, You know i am totaly supporting prefix but i have one point. Why on earth portage simply does not detect the prefix enviroment is being run and then INTERNALY switch D-ED

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Prefix: on EPREFIX, ED and EROOT inside ebuilds

2009-10-24 Thread Fabian Groffen
stuff in the last meeting if zac is starting to implement new EAPIs this could go into EAPI 3 too. Yes, this was implicit, the next EAPI should contain the same support too. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations

2009-11-08 Thread Fabian Groffen
stardict dictionary and display the reason why it's masked (stardict doesn't compile, not yet looked into keywording: please try, etc.) -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-forensics/foremost: ChangeLog foremost-1.5.6.ebuild

2009-11-08 Thread Fabian Groffen
alive, which noone else seems to do. thanks -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Prefix: on EPREFIX, ED and EROOT inside ebuilds

2009-11-20 Thread Fabian Groffen
/eapify [4] http://stats.prefix.freens.org/keywords-packages.png -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Prefix: on EPREFIX, ED and EROOT inside ebuilds

2009-11-20 Thread Fabian Groffen
installs, as opposed to just supporting installs to / with prefix-aware ebuilds? (The PMS patch should answer that) Agreed -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Prefix: on EPREFIX, ED and EROOT inside ebuilds

2009-11-26 Thread Fabian Groffen
and not under Portage's control. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Prefix: on EPREFIX, ED and EROOT inside ebuilds

2009-11-26 Thread Fabian Groffen
without having properly initialised the Prefix environment. While this is not what we advise people to do, it can work fine for applications like subversion. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo Prefix: on EPREFIX, ED and EROOT inside ebuilds

2009-11-26 Thread Fabian Groffen
absolutely necessary, such as for e.g. /lib/libc.so. If Gentoo Prefix would not do this, Portage's dependencies would become useless, and many uncontrollable and unpredictable errors may arise both at compile time as well as at run time. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo Prefix: on EPREFIX, ED and EROOT inside ebuilds

2009-11-26 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 26-11-2009 10:37:10 +, Duncan wrote: Fabian Groffen posted on Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:10:09 +0100 as excerpted: Gentoo Prefix tries to be as much self-sufficient as possible, and hence applications *must* not reference the host system, unless absolutely necessary, such as for e.g. /lib

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Prefix: on EPREFIX, ED and EROOT inside ebuilds

2009-11-26 Thread Fabian Groffen
on it that will be even better. If you need help don't hesitate to contact me. I'll try and look for the right people to help you depending on what you need. Here is the patch. I tried to cover all places. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level diff --git a/eapi-differences.tex b/eapi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo Prefix: on EPREFIX, ED and EROOT inside ebuilds

2009-11-26 Thread Fabian Groffen
}. --with-apr=${EPREFIX}/usr/bin/apr-1-config When this variable is empty, there's obviously no change to the behaviour of the ebuild. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: ruby-ng.eclass - new eclass for ruby-based packages

2009-12-02 Thread Fabian Groffen
saying you don't know about ${EAPI} yet, and to please file a bug. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] EAPI={3,4} offset-prefix semantics mandatory?

2009-12-15 Thread Fabian Groffen
at a later stage, which may not entirely be understood/noticed by (their maintaining) devs Please voice your opinion and share your insights, if any. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] EAPI={3,4} offset-prefix semantics mandatory?

2009-12-16 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 16-12-2009 09:29:07 +0300, Peter Volkov wrote: В Втр, 15/12/2009 в 19:59 +0100, Fabian Groffen пишет: Should an ebuild using an EAPI that has offset-prefix support make the use of that support mandatory or optional? I think no. Without real testing that package works in prefix

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo Prefix Lite Quiz

2009-12-18 Thread Fabian Groffen
to dynamic libraries in Prefix are sort of fixed to find the Prefix libraries. Why is this done? -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Election for the Gentoo Council empty seat

2009-12-20 Thread Fabian Groffen
for and vote in the election. I nominate (in no particular order): lu_zero patrick scarabeus -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] January 2010 meeting date

2009-12-20 Thread Fabian Groffen
-- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] January 2010 meeting date

2009-12-20 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 20-12-2009 15:01:30 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Sunday 20 December 2009 09:49:09 Fabian Groffen wrote: On 15-12-2009 09:54:36 -0700, Denis Dupeyron wrote: I will be following up discussions on various mailing lists to prepare the agenda. If you already want to suggest topics feel

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] January 2010 meeting date

2009-12-21 Thread Fabian Groffen
-dev-announce, and archives.g.o would also have the original January 2010 meeting date mail in the thread on -dev. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] January 2010 meeting date

2009-12-21 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 21-12-2009 06:30:23 -0500, Richard Freeman wrote: On 12/21/2009 02:54 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote: If all mail that would go to -dev-announce would guaranteed be sent to -dev as well, I didn't have to check -dev-announce, and archives.g.o would also have the original January 2010 meeting

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] January 2010 meeting date

2009-12-26 Thread Fabian Groffen
to spec it. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] PYTHON_DEPEND - Suggested replacement for NEED_PYTHON

2010-01-10 Thread Fabian Groffen
are accepted. (Eventually PYTHON_DEPEND variable will have to be set only in ebuilds of packages not supporting installation for multiple versions of Python.) Can you explain the intended use of this variable, and why normal DEPEND is not sufficient? -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different

Re: [gentoo-dev] PYTHON_DEPEND - Suggested replacement for NEED_PYTHON

2010-01-11 Thread Fabian Groffen
... 2.5. Maybe the language isn't as intuitive then as Sebastian pointed out. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: PYTHON_DEPEND - Suggested replacement for NEED_PYTHON

2010-01-11 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 11-01-2010 08:29:32 +, Duncan wrote: Fabian Groffen posted on Mon, 11 Jan 2010 08:50:30 +0100 as excerpted: On 11-01-2010 01:25:45 +0100, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: Can you explain the intended use of this variable, and why normal DEPEND is not sufficient

Re: [gentoo-dev] bash version in ebuilds/eclasses...non-compliance and what to do?

2010-01-15 Thread Fabian Groffen
this instead of requiring bash-3.2 which just doesn't work. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again)

2010-01-16 Thread Fabian Groffen
opinions. Thanks! How about storing it in DISTDIR (like metadata.xml)? Or storing it somewhere in the rsync image? That would maybe make sense when Portage takes over layman's functionality in the future. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Font eclass EAPI update and design

2010-02-02 Thread Fabian Groffen
already enough? You cannot set EROOT and ED (reliably) from prefix.eclass, unless you wrap them in phase funcs for which ROOT and D are guaranteed to be defined. OIW: The logic can be moved but a simple inherit prefix won't be enough to use EROOT and ED. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different

[gentoo-dev] Build system output verbosity, e.g. cmake

2010-02-21 Thread Fabian Groffen
to look at it all the time. So what do you think? Pros, cons? -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml: changepolicies

2010-02-25 Thread Fabian Groffen
of developer ranks where the inner circle is QA or something? The more you are on the outside, the less you are allowed to touch by policy. As learning process, making the thin line of the Gentoo quizes too access all or nothing more fine-grained and hopefully community controlled? -- Fabian

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Lastrite: app-antivirus/f-prot

2010-03-07 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 07-03-2010 01:19:49 -0600, Dale wrote: Fabian Groffen wrote: # Fabian Groffengrob...@gentoo.org (06 Mar 2010) # Masked for security issues and discontinued interest from upstream to # support non-Windows platforms. Bug #233928 # Pending removal on April 6, 2010 app-antivirus/f-prot

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving packages to dev-vcs

2010-03-08 Thread Fabian Groffen
} ^ - Remove any traces of dev-util/${PN} in profiles/ Please take masks for packages you move into account for /all/ profiles. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] Qt3 mask breaks significant science packages

2010-03-12 Thread Fabian Groffen
. If removal of stuff would mean it's dumped in there it can be easily used by users and more easily readded later afterwards, if need arises. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages pulling in python-3*, also they dont require it

2010-03-18 Thread Fabian Groffen
with a python slot and to not require other slots. Since the last option will take time in any case, I guess the first option is the best to achieve the desired goal: make sure Python 3 stays as far away as possible from any system that doesn't need it. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: turn on udev use flag by default

2010-03-19 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 19-03-2010 15:59:07 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote: Any objections to turning on the udev use flag by default in the base profile? Yeah, can we just do it in the Linux profiles only somewhere? -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-x86 commit in media-gfx/graphicsmagick: ChangeLog graphicsmagick-1.3.12.ebuild

2010-03-21 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 21-03-2010 10:35:29 +0100, Torsten Veller wrote: -EAPI=2 +EAPI=3 inherit eutils toolchain-funcs flag-o-matic perl-module perl-module.eclass currently does not support EAPI=3. ohw, I see, that's unfortunate. I'll open a bug. Thanks. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] More reliable hiding preserved libraries

2010-04-03 Thread Fabian Groffen
they shouldn't. Maybe patching GNU ld if it turns out being too smart may solve problems in a nicer way. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] More reliable hiding preserved libraries

2010-04-03 Thread Fabian Groffen
that already calls the linker with added rpath arguments. Afterwards you can use chrpath to set it to the correct location. Will get messy with the vdb though, but if Portage's doing it, it can probably be dealt with. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] [git migration] The problem of ChangeLog generation

2010-04-06 Thread Fabian Groffen
of it. Conclusion, if you can, try hard to keep your changes minimal, and preferably zero compared to the origin, gentoo-x86. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] [git migration] The problem of ChangeLog generation

2010-04-06 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 06-04-2010 12:31:51 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Fabian Groffen grob...@gentoo.org wrote: On 06-04-2010 07:43:02 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: * It makes zero sense to manually manage ChangeLogs in git[1]   - Irritating conflicts while merging branches

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass

2010-04-12 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 12-04-2010 10:07:54 +0200, Christian Faulhammer wrote: if [[ -d ${D}/${VENDOR_LIB} ]] ; then Haven't checked, but quotes not needed? it's within [[ ]], so no. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] A policy to support random superuser account names

2010-04-30 Thread Fabian Groffen
for their groups. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] Does anyone use the VERIFIED status in bugzilla?

2010-05-14 Thread Fabian Groffen
. I'm all for removing it from the workflow. I take a opportunistic approach, assuming that the reporter (or someone else with the same problem) will reopen the bug if it turns out a fix wasn't good enough or something. [1] - http://www.bugzilla.org/docs/3.4/en/html/lifecycle.html -- Fabian

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-fs/samba/files: samba-init

2010-05-20 Thread Fabian Groffen
/run/samba during src_install? http://www.pathname.com/fhs/2.2/fhs-5.13.html -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council 2010/2011 - Nominations are now open

2010-06-05 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 05-06-2010 02:00:02 +0200, Torsten Veller wrote: All nominations must be sent to the gentoo-dev mailing list. If you were nominated and want to run, you have to accept your nomination on the same mailing list. I nominate ulm. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/traits: traits-3.4.0.ebuild

2010-06-10 Thread Fabian Groffen
that you consider masqueraded EAPI bumps as homepage updates as trivial changes too? (traitsbackendwx) -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in x11-libs/gtk+: gtk+-2.20.1-r1.ebuild ChangeLog

2010-07-05 Thread Fabian Groffen
necessary (fixed upstream), I made the new patch conditional, since it is possibly causing trouble for Darwin 9 and up. I will bring the issue upstream once I get to the right computer. It probably requires some autoconf help. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Re: [gentoo-dev] stripping out the DO NOT REPLY from bugzie emails

2007-09-29 Thread Fabian Groffen
empty lines for normal comment mails that were added. You *must* scroll down now to just read the contents. Just removing those from the template (like it used to be, and is for the other kind of mails) would already help a lot. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level -- [EMAIL

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >