Re: [gentoo-dev] New Gentoo doc developer: Josh Saddler (nightmorph)

2006-03-09 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Yup. Chalk up one more for the SoCal conspiracy. ^_^ Peter Gordon wrote: Another Southern Californian, it would seem. Excellent. If you're ever in the Anaheim/Orange County Area give me a jingle. We could go for some Starbucks and head to Fry's or

Re: [gentoo-dev] IMPORTANT: OSL outage

2006-03-13 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The mail server is not hosted by OSL. That server is somewhere in Italy, iirc. I'm still receiving -dev mail just fine. George Prowse wrote: I cant pick up my -dev emails because of this outage George On 13/03/06, Lars Weiler [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [gentoo-dev] IMPORTANT: OSL outage

2006-03-13 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 whoops. don't know where i read that, then. :) Simon Stelling wrote: Josh Saddler wrote: The mail server is not hosted by OSL. That server is somewhere in Italy, iirc. I'm still receiving -dev mail just fine. George Prowse wrote: I cant

Re: [gentoo-dev] IMPORTANT: OSL outage

2006-03-13 Thread Josh Saddler
: On Monday 13 March 2006 18:37, Josh Saddler wrote: whoops. don't know where i read that, then. :) Actually, you're right.. robin (which handles the mailing lists) is in Trieste, but of course you need toucan to access the @gentoo.org mails... Still, toucan is in Indiana, so not related to OSU's

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo theming during bootup

2006-04-10 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Olivier Crete wrote: i'll miss him :( Yea we have to keep him, he is one of the most important members of our community. Agreed! I like the lil' alien. (In some obscure way, he reminds me of Earthbound . . .) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Developer: bangert

2006-04-25 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 2002? Vintage! Welcome back. Daniel wrote: Thilo Bangert has decided to return after an extended vacation (previously with Gentoo in 2002). The fun life of studying all over the world has finally caught up with him and really needs some bug

Re: [gentoo-dev] GuideXML editor, tidyGuide and Google SoC

2006-05-08 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (snipped) Templates seem a bit . . . hackish. Mostly we also need documentation writers to be/who are comfortable with working with the XML code itself, tags and all. WYSIWYG editors just don't strike me as a good idea for

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Forums Staff : NeddySeagoon

2006-05-28 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Shyam Mani wrote: Please take a moment to welcome our latest addition to the Forums gang, Roy Bamford aka NeddySeagoon. Welcome to the team! Wow, you've some credentials. I've certainly seen your unfailingly polite, helpful presence around the

Re: [gentoo-dev] QA subproject, TreeCleaners

2006-06-05 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alec Warner wrote: [...] Gets my vote. Good idea. :) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEhFG6rsJQqN81j74RAsO1AKCybk+IHs6Bta0Jj/ZCoo2UP3YqZACeNLms bJowAD/7a9ukWOzX+qPVcAo= =a6gy -END PGP SIGNATURE- --

Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANNOUNCE] Project Sunrise - Gentoo User Overlay

2006-06-08 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Carsten Lohrke wrote: On Thursday 08 June 2006 02:42, Stefan Schweizer wrote: Initially jokey and myself will be working on this. The current focus is to migrate ebuilds from bugzilla into the overlay and to get contributors to commit their

Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage-2.1 released

2006-06-09 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alec Warner wrote: Portage-2.1 final is released, Thanks for the hard work, Portage team. 2.1 is fabulous. Really, really good job! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

Re: [gentoo-dev] What is official?

2006-06-09 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 To me, official means it's found anywhere within the gentoo.org/ webspace. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEif8drsJQqN81j74RApMAAJ9/e3txjQTIz1RHmpRAkbVc5DV4ggCfRhn1 T1D2O5hZMuUIouwc1iHYQhw= =A7/n -END PGP

Re: [gentoo-dev] July Council Meeting: Requested Agenda Item

2006-06-11 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Marius Mauch wrote: On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 01:00:43 +0200 Patrick Lauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 11:37 -0400, Alec Warner wrote: Have the GWN posted to -core in a sane time period prior to it's release. I seriously doubt

Re: [gentoo-dev] Project Sunrise thread -- a try of clarification

2006-06-11 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chris Gianelloni wrote: [. . .] Right on! :) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEi/j4rsJQqN81j74RAsRHAKCJsN09KKGlLq5CD4Bh/7r9QYJ12QCgnFx1 lRWrDI1euePCP0MrwoP/Emg= =G9qu -END PGP SIGNATURE- --

Re: [gentoo-dev] GWN Comments

2006-06-20 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 With all the talk about forums and comments, that got me thinking: Heck, why not just have it posted to the forums? That way it and the comments can be viewed by the general public, but if you want to comment, you can just use your existing forum

Re: [gentoo-dev] 1/2 OT: Comprehensive Source Database

2006-06-20 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: On Tuesday 20 June 2006 04:02, Andrew Cowie wrote: I'm not sure if any other distros besides Ubuntu are using it yet, but certainly things will improve geometrically as they start to. Considering it's not Free

Re: [gentoo-dev] GWN Comments

2006-06-20 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Donnie Berkholz wrote: Josh Saddler wrote: With all the talk about forums and comments, that got me thinking: Heck, why not just have it posted to the forums? That way it and the comments can be viewed by the general public, but if you want

Re: [gentoo-dev] Mobile Computing herd severely understaffed

2006-07-04 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: Hi all, The mobile herd, a group of laptop and mobile-computing related ebuilds, desperately needs more maintainers. We are severely understaffed with only 8 maintainers (several which are not active in the herd)

Re: [gentoo-dev] IMPORTANT: bugs performance issues

2006-07-06 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Lance Albertson wrote: All- Just thought I'd update you on some of issue's we've been having with bugzilla.g.o lately. Yes, its been slow in the last few months, but today has been even slower than normal. The primary reason being another large

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage: missing pieces

2006-07-09 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 22:10:48 +0200 Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Not true. According to the 2006.0 x86 profile, for example, you're | required to have =sys-devel/gcc-3.3.4-r1. There is no requirement | that 3.4 be

Re: [gentoo-dev] New virtuals: virtual/jre and virtual/jdk

2006-07-11 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Joshua Nichols wrote: Krzysiek Pawlik wrote: Two new new-style virtuals have been added today to the tree: - virtual/jdk - virtual/jre This allows migration to generation 2 of Java build system to advance. All virtual/{jdk,jre} have been

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making procfs mount as nosuid,noexec by default

2006-07-16 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Daniel Drake wrote: Hi, The local root exploit-of-the-week would have been unable to run if our users systems had /proc mounted with nosuid and/or noexec It would be worthwhile considering making this a default. What are people's thoughts?

Re: [gentoo-dev] Yet Another Victim

2006-07-16 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael Cummings wrote: I'm happy to announce a new addition to the perl team (no, not that kind of addition - Dr. says that's in September folks;). You may know him from such bugzilla favorites as libeperl dies on `awk` and libwww-perl has

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Treecleaners - More Cowbell]

2006-07-17 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alec Warner wrote: [. . .] You win the Thread Title of the Month award! There's no such thing as too much cowbell. :p -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEvCkDrsJQqN81j74RAhIiAJ9qX2Eh5qM8/4BHACsm+7GpjnsJWwCfVQWx

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo/Java staffing needs

2006-07-26 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Joshua Nichols wrote: * JBoss maintainer JBoss is a pretty important app in the enterprise world of Java. It has been pretty unmaintained for some time now, and could use some love. Because of the nature of this beast, I would want someone that

Re: [gentoo-dev] Xmms needs to die.

2006-08-26 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul de Vrieze wrote: Who cares. It works (mostly), it is lightweight, and there are enough people using it to keep it in the tree. As long as things don't break beyond repair I see no reason whatsoever to remove xmms (or any other largely

Re: [gentoo-dev] council voting reminder

2006-08-28 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike Frysinger wrote: On Monday 28 August 2006 14:50, Tuan Van wrote: where do I get I voted sticker? http://www.cafepress.com/spankgentoo.13531918 -mike I'm _so_ voting for the Rice Party next election. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version:

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Bugzilla access for contributors

2006-09-03 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stefan Schweizer wrote: [. . .] Define contributors -- is this a special status? If it is, how does one *become* a contributor to get these rights? This is potentially a big problem, the way I see it. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [GLEP] Bugzilla access for contributors

2006-09-04 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stefan Schweizer wrote: Josh Saddler wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stefan Schweizer wrote: [. . .] Define contributors -- is this a special status? If it is, how does one *become* a contributor to get these rights

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [GLEP] Bugzilla access for contributors

2006-09-04 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stefan Schweizer wrote: they are not defined by their status. I wonder why this word is causing problems .. The status is maybe being an arch tester. This GLEP is not about status, only about giving some people bugzilla access when needed.

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 52 - GLEP 23 revisited

2006-09-20 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Simon Stelling wrote: Hello all, I would like you to share your comments on the attached GLEP with me. Thanks in advance! While this has a novel approach to the problem (at least, I haven't seen anything else that tries to solve the LICENSE

Re: [gentoo-dev] New project: Gentoo Seeds

2006-09-20 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andrew Gaffney wrote: That's not the issue. The issue is that there should *already* be a releng liason, but nobody from releng seems to know anything about this project. I dunno . . . does releng really need to be involved, except if these

Re: [gentoo-dev] New project: Gentoo Seeds

2006-09-20 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stuart Herbert wrote: On 9/20/06, Danny van Dyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As long as we have no package sets support in portage, I do indeed think that this is the best way to go. Didn't realize that you mentioned it, too. @Stuart: What do you

Re: [gentoo-dev] New project: Gentoo Seeds

2006-09-20 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 20:00:59 +0100 Stuart Herbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | I've created a new project, called Gentoo Seeds [1]. The aim of the | project is to create stage4 tarballs which can be used to 'seed' new |

Re: [gentoo-dev] New project: Gentoo Seeds

2006-09-20 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 23:42:02 +0200 Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Not that bugging people w/ pointless paperwork would contribute | anything useful to this new project or get any work done... What | exactly is there to

Re: [gentoo-dev] New project: Gentoo Seeds

2006-09-20 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Oh look, we just got Slashdotted by someone doing their level best to create a smear campaign, or at least to spread FUD: http://linux.slashdot.org/linux/06/09/20/2246231.shtml As I said on IRC, new project, new whiteboard. why don't we leave it up

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Delay in approval of new developers

2006-09-22 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Seemant Kulleen wrote: (well, it's run more like a commune, but anyway). I *knew* someone else was using my soap!!! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFE+t8rsJQqN81j74RAuYUAJ4qa9GuyISG5PdVHq3Nuo58lBmmFgCgk4z/

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] CFLAGS paragraph for the GWN

2006-10-03 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Lionel Bouton wrote: Here's an updated draft. I included most of your remarks and added some notes on append-flags/filter-flags. I'll probably submit it to Ulrich around the end of the week. --- Draft BEGIN --- section titleCFLAGS/title body

Re: [gentoo-dev] Linking to Gentoo-wiki from www.gentoo.org

2006-10-03 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andrew Ross wrote: Daniel Ostrow wrote: Gentoo-wiki does not now nor will it ever get linked to from official Gentoo media, documentation, or anything else within the www.gentoo.org namespace... Really?

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in Developer Relations and log of devrel meeting

2006-10-04 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 06:29:14 -0400 Michael Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 11:08 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | You mean devrel still hold secret meetings behind people's backs, | and say things

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo World Domination. a 10 step guide

2006-10-04 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thomas Cort wrote: [. . ] My, that's an awful lot of work on top of everything else we have to do. D'you plan on getting us all paid, as well? That'd be motivation to stay and be even more productive. Also, it's not necessary for every dev to also

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo World Domination. a 10 step guide

2006-10-04 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chris Gianelloni wrote: - Project status reports once a month for every project Totally agree on this one! OK. I'll give you Release Engineering's status reports for September, October, and November: September: taking a well-deserved break

Re: [gentoo-dev] Collecting opinions about GLEP 55 and alternatives

2009-02-25 Thread Josh Saddler
Petteri Räty wrote: Let's try something new. I would like to get opinions from as many people as possible about GLEP 55 and alternatives listed here in order to get some idea what the general developer pool thinks. Everyone is only allowed to post a single reply to this thread in order to make

Re: [gentoo-dev] How to speed up maintenance and other Gentoo work?

2009-03-03 Thread Josh Saddler
Olivier Crête wrote: Maybe we could use the dev wiki for that kind of stuff? Having a wiki.gentoo.org would be even better... There is, but it's uber-sekrit. Or so I was told some years ago. It may or may not (still) exist. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ideas for a (fast) EAPI=3

2009-03-08 Thread Josh Saddler
Tiziano Müller wrote: Hi everyone With eapis 1 and 2 we introduced nice features but also a couple of new problems. One of them are the use dependencies when the package you depend on doesn't have the use flag anymore (see [1] for an example). So I think it's time for a short eapi bump

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: LC_ALL=C Set by default for portage

2009-03-08 Thread Josh Saddler
Dawid Węgliński wrote: On Sunday 08 of March 2009 23:50:08 Ryan Hill wrote: You do realize that many people don't speak any English, and therefore wouldn't be filing bugs anyways? They just want to use their computer. I'm not sure they will appreciate you forcing a language they don't

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-soc] Gsoc Idea: EeePC Script/Build

2009-03-25 Thread Josh Saddler
Aaron Lebahn wrote: On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Andrey Falko afa...@gmail.com wrote: Would it be possible to integrate these scripts into Gentoo current graphical installer, as well as included on one of the minimal install CDs? Yes, That would be a good idea. I could add to the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Upcoming Willikins downtime

2009-04-14 Thread Josh Saddler
Robin H. Johnson wrote: Hi folks, just a quick note, since the Willikins bot is widely used now. Due to the datacentre where the bot is hosted moving physical premises, there will be a downtime of 4-16 hours, starting Apr 15 04:00:00. 4 hours is the timeframe I've been told, but I think

Re: [gentoo-dev] RfC: News item for Baselayout 2 stabilisation

2009-05-20 Thread Josh Saddler
Jeremy Olexa wrote: I hope it goes without saying that bug 213988 (http://bugs.gentoo.org/213988) should be resolved before either stabilization or news posting. The doc is somewhat out of date now. I assume you mean the baselayout-2/openrc migration guide? Not as far as we know. And what we,

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo Support Everywhere

2009-05-20 Thread Josh Saddler
Jesús Guerrero wrote: Hello, This is a request for comments on a new project, namely Gentoo Support Everywhere. http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/gse/ The web page doesn't really explain all the background needed to understand why would anyone want to start such a project. However this

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC:sys-apps/portage @overlay atoms postfix support

2009-05-25 Thread Josh Saddler
lx...@sabayonlinux.org wrote: Adding @overlay atoms/deps postfix support could really make life easier, especially because forcing specific atoms in *DEPEND hoping that these will be always pulled in from the same overlay is not something reliable, as you already know. No. This is a terrible

Re: [gentoo-dev] New app-eselect category?

2009-05-26 Thread Josh Saddler
AllenJB wrote: I'd favor tags over increasing the category levels, tho I'm not convinced either is necessary at the current time (tho tags might make searching easier, in some ways). Heck yes! Tags are a good idea. The idea's been raised on -dev a few times. I suppose they're not (yet)

Re: [gentoo-dev] Detecting Baselayout2/OpenRC from init.d scripts (summary of debate and plans from bug 270646)

2009-06-07 Thread Josh Saddler
Samuli Suominen wrote: Robin H. Johnson wrote: GDP team: (I didn't hear from you in the bug) Could you please update: - handbook section Writing Init scripts - OpenRC migration guide ACK on this one, we are already overwhelmed by openrc changes wrt init scripts at media teams. Or at

Re: [gentoo-dev] Detecting Baselayout2/OpenRC from init.d scripts (summary of debate and plans from bug 270646)

2009-06-07 Thread Josh Saddler
Robin H. Johnson wrote: [stuff] Thanks, will take a look. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] About time to unify cdda and cdaudio USE flags and make the remaining one global?

2009-07-06 Thread Josh Saddler
Sebastian Pipping wrote: Rémi Cardona wrote: And now for some bikeshedding fun, which flag are we going to keep? ;) My vote would be for cdaudio as that - is more general (including analog playback) - is more user friendly but let those decide who implement it. I'm also in favor of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About time to unify 'cdda' and 'cdaudio' USE flags and make the remaining one global?

2009-07-22 Thread Josh Saddler
Lars Wendler wrote: Let's finally move on regarding this topic. As I'm also in favour of the cdda USE flag I'd like to know if there's any objection against the decision to unify/convert the cdaudio USE flag into cdda. If there's no good reason against this conversion I will proceed with

Re: [gentoo-dev] Qt3 deprecation

2009-07-27 Thread Josh Saddler
Ben de Groot wrote: Dear fellow devs, We would like to draw your attention to the fact that the Gentoo Qt team now officially discourages further usage of Qt3. Version 3 is no longer being developed or supported upstream. All users are strongly encouraged to use Qt version 4 where

Re: [gentoo-dev] New 10.0 profiles are in repository

2009-08-06 Thread Josh Saddler
Mart Raudsepp wrote: I wanted to work at some point on splitting out gnome and kde profiles to separate ones. Perhaps desktop profile could be a generic universal one with USE flags enabled that rox/lxde/fluxbox and so on would like as well, and then gnome adds its stuff, and kde adds its own

Re: [gentoo-dev] Multimedia overlay

2009-08-10 Thread Josh Saddler
Ben de Groot wrote: Hi, The qting-edge overlay (the official overlay for the Gentoo Qt team) is a great success as a place to develop new ebuilds, packages, eclasses, to prepare new releases, to maintain bleeding edge stuff like live ebuilds and especially as a training ground for new

Re: [gentoo-dev] Multimedia overlay

2009-08-11 Thread Josh Saddler
Jeremy Olexa wrote: Josh Saddler wrote: Why isn't this on git.overlays.gentoo.org? If it's not on Gentoo infrastructure, it's not official. Q: Are All Official Overlays Hosted On overlays.gentoo.org? A: No. Gentoo developers are free to put their overlay wherever suits them best

Re: [gentoo-dev] New 10.0 LiveDVD release enhancements

2009-08-22 Thread Josh Saddler
Samuli Suominen wrote: 2. Enable HybridISO for the images What's this? Explain! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2009.0 profiles

2009-08-28 Thread Josh Saddler
Sebastian Pipping wrote: Samuli Suominen wrote: You do realize all this discussion is now pointless as 10.0 profiles are in place already? :-p So what do we do? Sebastian http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-upgrading.xml signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] About XFCE, renames, eclass, etc

2009-09-03 Thread Josh Saddler
Jeremy Olexa wrote: [. . .] Thanks for the message, Jeremy; it's informative and appreciated! - xfce-config.xml: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/xfce-config.xml Josh (nightmorph) updated this, basically an after thought by us so thanks Josh! - xfce4-meta : former name xfce-base/xfce4. Renamed

Re: [gentoo-dev] New developer : Mike Pagano (mpagano)

2007-10-04 Thread Josh Saddler
Andrew Gaffney wrote: Denis Dupeyron wrote: Yes people, Mike is older than Uncle Seemant, and even older than me. But is he older than nerdboy? Do we have competition for the Crotchety Old Man title? Are we going to hear lots of stories that start with when I was your age? Welcome Mike!

Re: [gentoo-dev] Upcoming masking of dev-lang/php-4* and packages depending on it

2007-10-10 Thread Josh Saddler
Christian Hoffmann wrote: Heya, I'm going to p.mask =dev-lang/php-4* and all packages explicitly depending on this version of php (i.e. the whole dev-php4/ category (36 packages) and one webapp, www-apps/knowledgetree, bug 194894 [1]) next weekend (around Oct 14th). This step is necessary

Re: [gentoo-dev] Upcoming masking of dev-lang/php-4* and packages depending on it

2007-10-11 Thread Josh Saddler
Christian Hoffmann wrote: On 2007-10-10 at 22:44 -0700, Josh Saddler wrote: Since you're doing the masking, can you please help out the GDP by reviewing a few of our documents for any potential changes that must be made? Grepping for php4 shows that there are references in the following

Re: [gentoo-dev] Upcoming masking of dev-lang/php-4* and packages depending on it

2007-10-11 Thread Josh Saddler
Josh Saddler wrote: Christian Hoffmann wrote: On 2007-10-10 at 22:44 -0700, Josh Saddler wrote: Since you're doing the masking, can you please help out the GDP by reviewing a few of our documents for any potential changes that must be made? Grepping for php4 shows that there are references

Re: [gentoo-dev] New developer : Dawid Węgliński (cla)

2007-10-16 Thread Josh Saddler
Denis Dupeyron wrote: He will now be a full developer and work with the net-irc and x86 arch teams. Point of clarification: He already *was* a full developer before; he's just now *also* an ebuild developer. You make it sound like non-ebuild devs with different kinds of commit access aren't

Re: [gentoo-dev] Slapd calls nss_ldap before opening its ports

2007-10-29 Thread Josh Saddler
Chris Gianelloni wrote: I may venture to assume that repetitive error messages of that plenty could be seen at least as a documentation bug. Which should be filed as a bug report or sent to the gentoo-doc list. It's not a Gentoo documentation bug, so don't bother to file one, nor mention it

Re: [gentoo-dev] New global USE flag: modplug

2007-11-01 Thread Josh Saddler
Samuli Suominen wrote: I'd like to add USE modplug to use.desc. I'll do it tomorrow, unless someone objects. -- snip -- local use flags (searching: modplug) [-] modplug (gnustep-apps/cynthiune): Build with modplug support

Re: [gentoo-dev] death to mailer-config/mailwrapper

2007-11-02 Thread Josh Saddler
Robin H. Johnson wrote: A bit over two years ago, some developers set out to get debian's concept of mailerwrapper ('alternatives' for mail). Ever since then, there have been a number of package.masks for various MTAs, and the need to carry them forward. mailer-config/mailwrapper have not

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Place of EAPI variable in ebuild

2007-11-13 Thread Josh Saddler
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: ...which is just as good as broken when it happens to a new user first installing Gentoo and wondering why he can't even follow the directions in the Handbook. ...so you just ensure that the handbook tells the user to upgrade the package manager as quickly as

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: packages.gentoo.org lives!

2007-11-13 Thread Josh Saddler
Robin H. Johnson wrote: There isn't meant to be the big black area at the top like, the main gentoo.org site. But shouldn't there be some sort of area at the top with links to the other parts of the site, as the other pages do (the navstrip across the top)? Right now there's zero integration

Re: [gentoo-dev] packages.gentoo.org lives!

2007-11-14 Thread Josh Saddler
Robin H. Johnson wrote: I've been asking and looking, but have not yet found, a version of the logo without the spotlight effect on the background. What about http://www.gentoo.org/images/gentoo-logo.svg ? It's just the G, without any attached background or halo effect. Convert it to a png or

Re: [gentoo-dev] Add USE_EXPAND for apache

2007-11-24 Thread Josh Saddler
Benedikt Böhm wrote: Hi all, the current behaviour of the apache ebuild -- chosing built-in modules based on /etc/apache2/apache-builtin-mods -- is very aweful, especially for binary packages. Therefore, i would like to add APACHE2_MODULES and APACHE2_MPMS to USE_EXPAND. I have

Re: [gentoo-dev] Add USE_EXPAND for apache

2007-11-29 Thread Josh Saddler
Josh Saddler wrote: Benedikt Böhm wrote: If this goes through, please look over our existing apache-related documentation and file a bug with any necessary changes. I updated our documentation, thanks to the massive patch sent my way by hollow. (Thanks, Benedikt!) As mentioned in an email

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for December

2007-12-01 Thread Josh Saddler
Jose Luis Rivero wrote: I would suggest this kind of question based on the different ideas shown by the developers comunity: - What is proper way to make changes to ebuild related information (metadata.dtd)? Do we need a GLEP? It only need to be discussed in -dev first? Gentoo-doc is

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI)

2007-12-20 Thread Josh Saddler
Petteri Räty wrote: Donnie Berkholz kirjoitti: Unportable to filesystems that don't support extended attributes isn't very interesting to me, unless they're common. Out of curiosity, do you know which ones that would be? Looking at my kernel config, ext3 and reiser explicitly support

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI)

2007-12-20 Thread Josh Saddler
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 03:17:12 +0100 Luca Barbato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Putting a tag in the file name or at the to of the file as comment (maybe using a #! line) is the same ... * It's a format restriction. Some formats have to start with something that's not #!.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Reducing the size of the system package set

2008-01-09 Thread Josh Saddler
Mike Frysinger wrote: Well, openssh has always been questionable. Sure, *I* think it should be on any Gentoo system I'd want to touch, but it really isn't necessary for a lot of people. Moving this to, say, the server profiles only would be acceptable to me, but then again, so is leaving it

Re: [gentoo-dev] Projects and subproject status

2008-01-09 Thread Josh Saddler
Luca Barbato wrote: Here is a list of interesting questions: Are we fine? What are we going to do? Documentation (Note: I'm not the project lead, but neysx isn't on the list, nor does he send status updates, so I hope he and the rest of the project won't mind. Are we fine? Sure, why not.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last Rites: sys-devel/distcc-config

2008-01-10 Thread Josh Saddler
Ryan Hill wrote: # Ryan Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] (10 Jan 2008) # Duplicates functionality already in sys-devel/distcc # Masked for removal (treecleaner) # Bug #192741 sys-devel/distcc-config Given that this is being removed, can you or someone in charge of distcc packages please provide a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last Rites: sys-devel/distcc-config

2008-01-10 Thread Josh Saddler
Petteri Räty wrote: Josh Saddler kirjoitti: Ryan Hill wrote: # Ryan Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] (10 Jan 2008) # Duplicates functionality already in sys-devel/distcc # Masked for removal (treecleaner) # Bug #192741 sys-devel/distcc-config Given that this is being removed, can you or someone

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: removal of digest files from the tree

2008-01-26 Thread Josh Saddler
Zac Medico wrote: (shtuff) This sounds like something that might require extensive documentation changes. If so, please review the Portage Handbooks for anything that will need updating, as well as the Gentoo Upgrading Guide[1]. This latter document is where we keep the instructions for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Adding two USE flags to 2008.0's profiles

2008-02-02 Thread Josh Saddler
Petteri Räty wrote: Actually bluetooth support is in quite a good shape. The thing was there was a urgent need to get bluez-utils-3* stable for which I need some doc updates etc before it can go stable. (Yes I am a slacker there) Doc updates? GDP hasn't heard anything about this, as far as I

Re: [gentoo-dev] I want to steal your tools

2008-02-02 Thread Josh Saddler
Alec Warner wrote: s/writtten/written s/aggregrate/aggregate s/genitellia/genitalia app-doc/nightmorph, your spellchecking tool. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Keyword amd64 - x86_64

2008-02-21 Thread Josh Saddler
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: Beside, does it really changes stuff for anybody beside Intel fanboys? In fairness, not just for Intel fanboys. Drop by the forums some time and just try to count up all the threads asking are the amd64 stages/media appropriate for my computer? i have a core

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for March

2008-03-05 Thread Josh Saddler
Anant Narayanan wrote: [stuff] So basically, what you're looking for is something like Arch Linux's Trusted User (TU) concept[1]. That works for Arch, because they have 5 repositories (including a community repo), but I'm not sure how well that would fit Gentoo, where there's just one. We'd

Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenRC baselayout-2 meets Gentoo

2008-03-20 Thread Josh Saddler
Doug Goldstein wrote: All, This is a formal notice to everyone that OpenRC will be hitting the Gentoo tree sooner rather then later. I would like to see *ALL* arch teams give the current code a whirl on their systems, which is available via the layman module openrc. I would also like to

Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenRC baselayout-2 meets Gentoo

2008-03-24 Thread Josh Saddler
Doug Goldstein wrote: It appears my migration plan was not good enough for Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he went ahead and wrote his own version of the OpenRC ebuild, differing from the one in the OpenRC layman repo, and committed it to the tree this weekend. Since my offer to work on

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?)

2008-05-30 Thread Josh Saddler
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Fri, 30 May 2008 15:07:43 -0700 Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see that a number of packages in the tree explicitly filter -ffast-math. That's mostly from the bad old days when users were encouraged to use silly CFLAGS... 1. _When_ was this? 2. _Who_

Re: [gentoo-dev] Nominations for council

2008-06-03 Thread Josh Saddler
Denis Dupeyron wrote: Alright. Then I'll nominate all members of the current council. In alphabetical order: amne betelgeuse dberkholz flameeyes jokey lu_zero vapier Seconded. (Also...it's voting time already? Can't believe it's already been a year.) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP

Re: [gentoo-dev] Nominations open for the Gentoo Council 2008/2009

2008-06-05 Thread Josh Saddler
Łukasz Damentko wrote: Hi guys, Nominations for the Gentoo Council 2008/2009 are open now and will be open for the next two weeks (until 23:59 UTC, 18/06/2008). Now that nominations are officially open, I nominate the current council members (again): amne betelgeuse dberkholz flameeyes

Re: [gentoo-dev] Council Idea

2008-06-06 Thread Josh Saddler
George Prowse wrote: [stuff] Take it to gentoo-project, please. This list is s'posed to be for technical discussion. gentoo-project is more appropriate for this kind of query. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] A few questions to our nominees

2008-06-09 Thread Josh Saddler
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 11:49:35 +0200 Luca Barbato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 10:50:11 +0200 Luca Barbato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So how, specifically, is PMS wrongly written, and why hasn't anyone who thinks so bothered to

Re: [gentoo-dev] MP4 global use flag

2008-06-26 Thread Josh Saddler
Steve Dibb wrote: Any objections to moving MP4 from a local to a global USE flag. For the record, MP4 is a multimedia container to store multiple audio/video formats in. Currently we have 4 ebuilds using it, all for the same description. 4 doesn't sound quite worthy of global, yet.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tags vs. categories (was: sci-libs/scipy - dev-python/scip)

2008-07-08 Thread Josh Saddler
Alec Warner wrote: On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Joe Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Donnie Berkholz wrote: I actually object to having crap in dev-python, because things should be categorized functionally instead of by the language they're implemented in. 90% of the time you don't care

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tags vs. categories

2008-07-08 Thread Josh Saddler
Tags . . . I like the idea. I like it a lot. Thoughts? Exciting? Or is it an old issue, and I'm 5 years late to the party. :) Probably more than 5... Well, that's not very helpful. Got any links? My archives.g.o-fu has failed me. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] LDFLAGS=-Wl,--hash-style=gnu

2008-07-15 Thread Josh Saddler
Fabian Groffen wrote: I'm just wondering... unless it has changed since last time I installed Gentoo Linux, but isn't the installation manual on purpose conservative with CFLAGS? make.conf.example also does not much more than -march -O2 -pipe. -O1 to the linker feels conservative to me.

Re: [gentoo-dev] IBM article of interest ?

2008-07-16 Thread Josh Saddler
Philip Webb wrote: I'm not sure whether anyone among Gentoo officials cares about this, but IBM has an article http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-awk1.html whose byline is very misleading may infringe on Gentoo's IP. I have submitted a comment to IBM via their form at the

  1   2   >