Re: [gentoo-dev] devs on IRC (was :Regen2 ( was QA Overlay Layout support ))

2009-03-13 Thread Michael Higgins
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:09:04 -0700 Donnie Berkholz dberkh...@gentoo.org wrote: On 19:06 Wed 11 Mar , Thilo Bangert wrote: the presumption seems to be, that as a dev one has to be available via IRC. it has long been my feeling that Gentoo as a project could realize more of its

Re: [gentoo-dev] A Little Council Reform Anyone?

2009-07-02 Thread Michael Higgins
On Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:33:52 -0700 Ned Ludd so...@gentoo.org wrote: My only intention was to help offset dev-zero being able force the will of outside forces upon us. Well that has been accomplished for now (w00t). What is this all about? Did I miss something? Was Gentoo threatened with

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [rfc] layman storage location (again)

2010-01-16 Thread Michael Higgins
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 19:57:39 +0100 Peter Hjalmarsson x...@rymdraket.net wrote: lör 2010-01-16 klockan 19:31 +0100 skrev Jörg Schaible: dev-ran...@mail.ru wrote: On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 01:57:38PM +0100, Ben de Groot wrote: 2010/1/16 Peter Volkov p...@gentoo.org: layman cache is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass

2010-04-04 Thread Michael Higgins
On Sat, 3 Apr 2010 12:33:48 +0200 Torsten Veller ml...@veller.net wrote: perl people use `perldoc` anyway. Yep. Why have a man page for a perl module? OTOH, if there is something that goes in /usr/bin, it should get a man page if there is one. But not for the modules themselves -- that's not