Re: [gentoo-dev] devfs is dead, let's move on

2005-07-08 Thread Michiel de Bruijne
On Saturday 09 July 2005 00:25, Greg KH wrote: I.o.w. is it still necessary to have RC_DEVICE_TARBALL=yes as a default or can we move to a pure udev system and change the default to no. I've been running my boxes successfully with no since the option showed up just fine :) Same over here

Re: [gentoo-dev] New MySQL doc

2005-07-12 Thread Michiel de Bruijne
On Tuesday 12 July 2005 06:38, Chris White wrote: Here's the initial devspace draft of the new MySQL draft I've been working on: http://dev.gentoo.org/~chriswhite/mysql.html Comments, etc are welcome. This is a very good guide! Thanks a lot!! -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Devconference archives

2005-08-15 Thread Michiel de Bruijne
On Monday 15 August 2005 05:25, Corey Shields wrote: Archive links for the complete morning and afternoon sessions are at http://devconference.gentoo.org -Corey Hi Corey (and IU), Thanks a lot! Is it possible to download the media-files instead of streaming? This makes it a lot easier to

Re: [gentoo-dev] dts useflag

2005-08-18 Thread Michiel de Bruijne
On Thursday 18 August 2005 05:29, Georgi Georgiev wrote: maillog: 18/08/2005-03:03:40(+0200): Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò types media-video/mplayer:dts - Enables libdts (5.1 surround sound audio) support I'll commit this tomorrow, when I'll be sure it's ok after an awake check. If nobody

Re: [gentoo-dev] ${PORTDIR}/profiles/package.use

2005-10-21 Thread Michiel de Bruijne
On Friday 21 October 2005 04:56, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Thursday 20 October 2005 10:49 pm, Dan Meltzer wrote: Why single out this one? ones system will not break irreperbly without a cxx compiler, it'll just cause a another recompile to get it to work after breakage if the person is

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP ??: Critical News Reporting

2005-11-02 Thread Michiel de Bruijne
On Wednesday 02 November 2005 02:29, Brian Harring wrote: On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 10:16:35PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | How will it handle GLSAs then? [1] gentoolkit != portage. Correct. Course, also incorrect. A plan for handling GLSA's from portage (emerge --security) was

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 42 (Was: Getting Important Updates To Users)

2005-11-05 Thread Michiel de Bruijne
On Saturday 05 November 2005 06:08, Jason Stubbs wrote: Why does `emerge --changelog` not suffice for package-specific news? From a user/sys.admin point of view let me give you an example; I maintain quite a lot Gentoo-systems. For me it's impossible to read _every_ changelog for minor release

Re: [gentoo-dev] Stepping aside...

2005-12-23 Thread Michiel de Bruijne
On Friday 23 December 2005 16:44, Sven Vermeulen wrote: Hi all It is with deep regret that I want to inform you about my decision to step down from the position of Gentoo Documentation lead. I just want to say thank you very much for the outstanding work you (and the rest of the GDP-team)

Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2006-12-24 23:59 UTC

2006-12-26 Thread Michiel de Bruijne
On Tuesday 26 December 2006 02:04, Robin H. Johnson wrote: The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2006-12-24 23h59 UTC. Removals: x11-misc/emerald-themes 2006-12-20 01:00:59 tsunam Additions:

Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-2 stablisation plans

2007-07-23 Thread Michiel de Bruijne
On Saturday 21 July 2007 16:36:03 Roy Marples wrote: This is just a heads up for getting baselayout-2 stable. Next week I plan to put baselayout-2.0.0_rc1 into the tree without any keywords and it will be removed from package.mask (keeping the current alphas masked though). Arch teams will

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Downgrading glibc?

2011-02-11 Thread Michiel de Bruijne
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@gmail.com wrote: Il giorno ven, 11/02/2011 alle 13.06 +0100, Sebastian Pipping ha scritto: If anyone considers masking glibc 2.13 for now: please take my vote. It should have been masked _beforehand_, masking it now is going to

[gentoo-portage-dev] generating ._cfg0000_foo multiple times between --sync

2006-04-15 Thread Michiel de Bruijne
Hi guys, I wonder why the default behaviour of portage is to generate ._cfg_foo files only one time after a --sync. For example I have done the following; - emerge --sync - emerge baselayout --oneshot -v ._cfg_foo files are created so I can use dispatch-conf to select which one I want

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: generating ._cfg0000_foo multiple times between --sync

2006-04-15 Thread Michiel de Bruijne
On Saturday 15 April 2006 18:51, Duncan wrote: man emerge, search on --noconfmem, or emerge --help. Both the usual places one looks for documentation on command line options for a Unix command cover it. That seems decent documentation to me, as I didn't remember what the option was either

[gentoo-portage-dev] globally disable use expand

2006-09-30 Thread Michiel de Bruijne
Hi guys, If I'm not mistaken, behaviour in portage changed recently. USE=-* in make.conf disabled use expand as well. Now use expand stays enabled. What is the proper way to disable it globally? I couldn't find anything in the documentation. Thanks! Regards, Michiel. --

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] globally disable use expand

2006-10-01 Thread Michiel de Bruijne
On Sunday 01 October 2006 16:24, Marius Mauch wrote: USE=-* never disabled USE_EXPAND by default (such behavior would have led to interesting problems). What is the proper way to disable it globally? I couldn't find anything in the documentation. Thanks! If your really want to do that you