[gentoo-dev] GLEP 55 updated

2009-05-17 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
and innovative stuff that makes working on Gentoo fun. [1] - http://dev.gentoo.org/~peper/glep-0055.html (http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0055.html once it synces) -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Allow bash-4.0 features in EAPI=3 ebuilds

2009-05-17 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
2009/5/17 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfrever@gmail.com: I would like to suggest to include possibility of using of features of bash-4.0 (and older versions) in local scope of EAPI=3 ebuilds. This is glep 55 material. I will update it to reflect that. -- Best Regards, Piotr

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Allow bash-4.0 features in EAPI=3 ebuilds

2009-05-17 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
think that it is a global scope change? I have updated the glep, see how it breaks [1]. [1] - http://dev.gentoo.org/~peper/glep-0055.html#use-newer-bash-features -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 55 updated

2009-05-17 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
2009/5/17 Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org: On Sun, 17 May 2009 17:56:06 +0200 Piotr Jaroszyński pe...@gentoo.org wrote: Hello, I have just updated GLEP 55 [1], hopefully making it a bit clearer. Just FYI, my order of preference of solutions is: 1. EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (obviously) 2

[gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 55 updated

2009-05-17 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
Just a heads up that I wrote a more detailed description of the peformance hit that EAPI in the ebuild introduces. Might come up with some numbers later too. [1] - http://dev.gentoo.org/~peper/glep-0055.html#easily-fetchable-eapi-inside-the-ebuild -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Allow bash-4.0 features in EAPI=3 ebuilds

2009-05-17 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
do you think that it is a global scope change? Because he wants to push GLEP 55. Would you care to look at [1] and see how it breaks first before posting BS like that? Better yet test it youtself. [1] - http://dev.gentoo.org/~peper/glep-0055.html#use-newer-bash-features -- Best Regards, Piotr

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 55 updated

2009-05-17 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
2009/5/17 Robert Buchholz r...@gentoo.org: On Sunday 17 May 2009, Piotr Jaroszyński wrote: Hello, I have just updated GLEP 55 [1], hopefully making it a bit clearer. Just FYI, my order of preference of solutions is: 1. EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (obviously) 2. EAPI in the filename with one

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP54 vs. package.mask (was: Council meeting summary for meeting on May 14, 2009)

2009-05-17 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
in profiles with it you can use profile eapis. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Allow bash-4.0 features in EAPI=3 ebuilds

2009-05-20 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
2009/5/20 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org: 2009-05-17 19:02:02 Piotr Jaroszyński napisał(a): 2009/5/17 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfrever@gmail.com: 2009-05-17 18:37:32 Ciaran McCreesh napisał(a): On Sun, 17 May 2009 18:20:21 +0200 Arfrever Frehtes

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for May 28

2009-05-27 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
the last sane upgrade position (...) And bugs and security vulnerabilities too. Or do you propose maintaining multiple trees at the same time? I think one of the main points of EAPI was to avoid doing exactly that. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for May 28

2009-05-27 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
2009/5/28 Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org: On Thursday 28 May 2009 00:12:56 Piotr Jaroszyński wrote: 2009/5/27 Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org: On Wednesday 27 May 2009 22:57:25 Joe Peterson wrote: Gentoo should not repeat the VHS vs Betamax war. For those who do not remember, VHS

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 54 and hyphens in PV

2009-05-28 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
be avoided with another restriction in PMS. Buut we might as well go all the way and change the version separator to -- or something, which would be the most flexible. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 54 and hyphens in PV

2009-05-28 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
2009/5/28 Marijn Schouten (hkBst) hk...@gentoo.org: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Piotr Jaroszyński wrote: 2009/5/28 Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org: On Thu, 28 May 2009, Tiziano Müller wrote: ${PORTDIR}/app-misc/foo/foo-1a_live.ebuild ${PORTDIR}/app-misc/foo-1a/foo-1a

Re: [gentoo-dev] How not to discuss

2009-05-28 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
. The former is clearly subjective and the latter is already done ($PN-$PV) and doesn't seem to cause any problems. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council 2009/2010 - Nominations are now open

2009-06-03 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
2009/6/1 Dawid Węgliński c...@gentoo.org: On Monday 01 of June 2009 06:25:06 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: Hello fellow developers and users. I nominate: peper Thank you, I accept. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński

Re: [gentoo-dev] Jun 11th, 2009 Council Meeting Format

2009-06-03 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
us now. Do your research PRIOR to the meeting, not during. 4c) is the most important imho. Also, I think meetings shouldn't be limited to 1 hour. I would move the limit to at least 2 hours. Even if the process is improved, 1 hour is just not enough. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC:sys-apps/portage @overlay atoms postfix support

2009-06-03 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
conclude with little delay that it /could/ be the escaping even if they aren't sure, and a quick suitably escaped trial will confirm it. Where/when does :: need escaping? -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-council] pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative

2010-03-31 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
early before. And failing in the middle of 300 packages upgrade because some useflags are in conflict wasn't reasonable. -- Best Regards Piotr Jaroszyński

Re: [gentoo-dev] are hardened-sources maintained?

2010-04-03 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
On 1 April 2010 15:43, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote: Of course that would mean getting included in hardened-ker...@gentoo.org, but I guess it's the easiest part. Yes, you can do it yourself: woodpecker ~ $ echo $USER /var/mail/alias/misc/hardened-kernel -- Best Regards Piotr

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sci-mathematics/coq: ChangeLog coq-8.1_p1.ebuild

2007-09-29 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
On Saturday 29 of September 2007 17:40:35 Markus Dittrich (markusle) wrote: - 02 Jul 2007; Piotr Jaroszyński [EMAIL PROTECTED] coq-8.0-r1.ebuild, + 02 Jul 2007; Piotr Jaroszyński [EMAIL PROTECTED] coq-8.0-r1.ebuild, coq-8.0_p3.ebuild: (QA) RESTRICT clean up. Please use UTF-8 friendly

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-x86 commit in x11-wm/awesome: awesome-1.2.ebuild Manifest metadata.xml ChangeLog

2007-09-29 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
On Sunday 30 of September 2007 00:54:29 Torsten Veller wrote: This fails if tc-getCC returns the path to the compiler It doesn't, see toolchain-funcs.eclass. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-x86 commit in x11-wm/awesome: awesome-1.2.ebuild Manifest metadata.xml ChangeLog

2007-09-29 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
On Sunday 30 of September 2007 02:53:47 Mike Frysinger wrote: On Saturday 29 September 2007, Piotr Jaroszyński wrote: On Sunday 30 of September 2007 00:54:29 Torsten Veller wrote: This fails if tc-getCC returns the path to the compiler It doesn't, see toolchain-funcs.eclass. it may

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-plugins/vdr-extrecmenu: ChangeLog vdr-extrecmenu-1.0.ebuild

2007-10-08 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
headers located under /usr/include. And that's the way to go. When you build with ROOT=/foo DEPEND is installed into / and only {R,P}DEPEND into /foo. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-apps/paludis: ChangeLog paludis-0.26.0_alpha3.ebuild

2007-11-06 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
On 05/11/2007, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Shouldn't need to create a user twice, and that quoting makes this a bit harder to read than it needs to be. Since which version of portage it's handled correctly? P.S. my $EDITOR shows quoted strings nicely. -- Best regards, Piotr

Re: [gentoo-dev] Phase invariancy and exclusivity requirements

2007-11-12 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
in first situation. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass: emul-linux-x86.eclass

2007-11-14 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
On Wednesday 14 of November 2007 11:31:13 Torsten Rehn wrote: On Wednesday 14 November 2007, Mike Doty wrote: S=${WORKDIR} Shouldn't ${WORKDIR} be quoted here, too? No need to quote in assignments. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] X drivers up for grabs

2007-12-03 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
On Tuesday 04 of December 2007 02:29:20 Donnie Berkholz wrote: evdev input driver I can take it unless someone else wants it more :) -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] X drivers up for grabs

2007-12-06 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
. mmm fun. I will look into all that during the weekend and at least I know who to harass :) -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

[gentoo-dev] [GLEP] scm package version suffix

2007-12-09 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
Hello, Attaching the GLEP source. Current html version available here: http://dev.gentoo.org/~peper/glep-0054.html -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński GLEP: 54 Title: scm package version suffix Version: $Revision: $ Last-Modified: $Date: $ Author: Piotr Jaroszyński [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] scm package version suffix

2007-12-09 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
On Sunday 09 of December 2007 17:18:08 Josh Sled wrote: Piotr Jaroszyński [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Current html version available here: http://dev.gentoo.org/~peper/glep-0054.html Until reading the abstract, I thought this was Scheme related. I'd suggest -vc (version controlled) or -vcs

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] scm package version suffix

2007-12-09 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
On Sunday 09 of December 2007 18:52:22 Petteri Räty wrote: Portage versions prior to 2.1.2.12 (included in 2007.0) doesn't handle arbitrary version suffixes doesn't -- don't thanks, fixed. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI placement

2007-12-12 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
indeed. Let's change it... -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

[gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI)

2007-12-17 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
Hello, attaching the GLEP. most current version: http://dev.gentoo.org/~peper/glep-0055.html http://dev.gentoo.org/~peper/glep-0055.txt -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński GLEP: 55 Title: Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI) Version: $Revision: $ Last-Modified: $Date: $ Author: Piotr

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI)

2007-12-18 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
ciaranm's message) and may even contain blanks (see grobian's message), we would have ebuilds with very strange filenames. I think you misunderstood grobian's mail, which is how we do it in prefix anyway. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI)

2007-12-18 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
? Nowhere that I am aware of, but [A-Za-z0-9-_] sounds reasonable to me. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI)

2007-12-18 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
On Tuesday 18 of December 2007 20:45:44 Duncan wrote: How about when we have a dozen or so EAPIs active, several of which apply to a specific ebuild? Where is this idea of mixing EAPIs coming from? It really doesn't make much sense. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI)

2007-12-18 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
On Tuesday 18 of December 2007 22:08:52 Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote: extensions for that. A single one is enough: just call files which use the rule i've proposed foo.gbuild instead of foo.ebuild, or .ebuild-ng. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI)

2007-12-19 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
, Piotr Jaroszyński -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI)

2007-12-19 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
unambiguity. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP 55] EAPI subdirectories instead of file name suffixes

2007-12-21 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
On Saturday 22 of December 2007 02:41:02 Petteri Räty wrote: Piotr Jaroszyński kirjoitti: This GLEP proposes usage of EAPI-suffixed file extensions for ebuilds (for example, foo-1.2.3.ebuild-1). It seems many people don't like the idea of having it in the filename Seems you are counting

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI)

2007-12-22 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
On Saturday 22 of December 2007 09:09:27 Zhang Le wrote: Piotr Jaroszyński wrote: On Thursday 20 of December 2007 19:29:22 Zhang Le wrote: So please make those people understand, so they can comment usefully. Are we in the elementary school or something? This is really getting

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI)

2007-12-22 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
a rather clever reply to the innuendo, making the point delicately, while avoiding the loss of face challenge asking for an apology presents. How is it fair that some people do their own research and some ask to be educated and for the discussion to be delayed? -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP 55] EAPI subdirectories instead of file name suffixes

2007-12-22 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
On Saturday 22 of December 2007 10:50:40 Jan Kundrát wrote: Piotr Jaroszyński wrote: The package manger would have to look for ebuilds in the main dir and all the subdirs in case it doesn't have/can't use the cache. No, it would have to check only for subdirectories named after known

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI) [2]

2007-12-22 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
not clear to me why your proposal isn't exactly that. That's the goal, yes. The Specification part shows how to do that in a backward compatible way and the Application part says how is the new format supposed to be used. But seeing it's not clear enough I will look into it. -- Best Regards, Piotr

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI) [2]

2007-12-22 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
from the ebuild format applies and what does not. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI) [2]

2007-12-31 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
on the whole tree. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] USE flag documentation

2008-01-02 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
for each package for which its meaning differs from that described in use.desc. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Reducing the size of the system package set

2008-01-07 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] A few questions to our nominees

2008-06-08 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
-- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: A few questions to our nominees

2008-06-09 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: A few questions to our nominees

2008-06-09 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
breaking the sourcing of the ebuild need an increment of X to avoid that pm's not being able to even source such an ebuild still can mask it properly (or just ignore it). What's the point of sourcing an ebuild that cannot be used anyway? -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: GLEP 55

2008-06-10 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
The simplest way is to change the syncpoint in the new package manager and leave the previous uri with a compatibility repo for the older ones. So we add a new repo each time a new EAPI comes out? Sounds like a big mess. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński ���^�X�����(��j)b�b�

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: A few questions to our nominees

2008-06-14 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
Using live templates is something more ^^; For now it looks to me like it is only more work. Could you please clarify what new functionality they provide? -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński

[gentoo-dev] langs.eclass - reborn ;]

2006-10-15 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
app-doc/gimp-help app-editors/kile app-office/openoffice app-office/openoffice-bin app-text/acroread mail-client/mozilla-thunderbird media-gfx/digikam net-dialup/pppconfig net-ftp/kftpgrabber net-p2p/ktorrent www-client/mozilla-firefox www-client/mozilla-firefox-bin x11-plugins/enigmail -- Piotr

[gentoo-dev] langs.eclass again

2006-10-23 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
/pppconfig net-ftp/kftpgrabber net-p2p/ktorrent www-client/mozilla-firefox www-client/mozilla-firefox-bin x11-plugins/enigmail -- Piotr Jaroszyński Gentoo Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] langs.eclass again

2006-10-23 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
I said it before and I'll repeat. I'm not going to use it for KDE, we have enough eclass complexity without adding this. Still haven't lost hope to convince you :D And to help my hope a little made a patch for digikam: http://www.gentoo-sunrise.org/svndump/peper/eclass/patches/ -- Piotr

Re: [gentoo-dev] langs.eclass again

2006-10-23 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
, your call. I was just hopeful :] -- Piotr Jaroszyński Gentoo Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: langs.eclass again

2006-10-24 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
It worked quite good, saves at least some space to work through the LINGUAS. Implementation looks ok to me, although am not an expert. Thanks for trying it, you seem to be the first one to do it :] -- Piotr Jaroszyński Gentoo Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] qadeps(?) - useful(?) tool for deps qa

2006-10-28 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
: http://dev.gentoo.org/~betelgeuse/scripts/deputils/* app-portage/portage-utils Comments are welcome! -- Piotr Jaroszyński Gentoo Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] qadeps(?) - useful(?) tool for deps qa

2006-10-29 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
www.gentoo-sunrise.org seems to be down so I have put qadeps here: http://dev.gentooexperimental.org/~peper/scripts/ -- Piotr Jaroszyński Gentoo Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] qadeps(?) - useful(?) tool for deps qa

2006-10-30 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
) or creates circular deps (shadow). IMHO this should be fixed in portage. If not why would we have system packages at all? Comming back to my script - I will be rewriting it in python anyway to learn this nice lang and how portage really works. -- Piotr Jaroszyński Gentoo Developer -- gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ignoring/overwriting IUSE from an eclass

2006-10-30 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
=${E_IUSE//X} But that's a dirty portage-specific hack ;] -- Piotr Jaroszyński Gentoo Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ignoring/overwriting IUSE from an eclass

2006-10-30 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
And it doesn't work. Wanna bet? Of course you must put it in the x-modular.eclass, but I thought that's quite obvious as spyderous was talking about adding IUSE= to that eclass. -- Piotr Jaroszyński Gentoo Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ignoring/overwriting IUSE from an eclass

2006-10-30 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
and see why that doesn't work - only better. Why there is always *someone* who wants to win a pink elephant in the last word contest? -- Piotr Jaroszyński Gentoo Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ignoring/overwriting IUSE from an eclass

2006-10-30 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
about, but now I have no doubts that you don't: E_IUSE=${E_IUSE// X } - deletes every X with whitespace around it. E_IUSE=${E_IUSE#X } - deletes X if there is one at the beginning E_IUSE=${E_IUSE% X} - deletes X if there is one at the end No more X left. -- Piotr Jaroszyński Gentoo Developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ignoring/overwriting IUSE from an eclass

2006-10-30 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
E_IUSE=${E_IUSE// X } - deletes every X with whitespace around it. This should be E_IUSE=${E_IUSE// X / }. -- Piotr Jaroszyński Gentoo Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ignoring/overwriting IUSE from an eclass

2006-10-30 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
tho, but the goal is reached), is not enough. You wouldn't like to read such bug reports about paludis, would you? -- Piotr Jaroszyński Gentoo Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ignoring/overwriting IUSE from an eclass

2006-10-30 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
if you for example don't have time to give the details. -- Piotr Jaroszyński Gentoo Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ignoring/overwriting IUSE from an eclass

2006-10-30 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
on this list. -- Piotr Jaroszyński Gentoo Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.13 going into ~ARCH soon

2006-11-06 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
So if you're concerned about any of the above features breaking your precious Gentoo, now is a very good time to test :) Mon Oct 2 22:24:05 2006 sys-apps/baselayout-1.13.0_alpha1-r1 ^^ Using 1.13* for over a month and no problems whatsover. -- Piotr Jaroszyński Gentoo Developer -- gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies on system packages

2006-12-09 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] bugstest.gentoo.org - public beta for the new Gentoo BugZilla - please test!

2006-12-24 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
If everyone's Login ID is their email address, may I suggest changing 'Login:' to 'E-mail:'? I usually try 2 or 3 wrong ID's before recalling that my ID is my email address. Although I save my passwords in kde wallet it sounds good for me. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- gentoo-dev

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Wrong dependencies to postgresql

2006-12-25 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
We never banned him, actually. Is there something wrong with the spamfilter then? -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] deprecating /etc/make.profile

2007-01-10 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
from make.conf would override make.profile link and small info would be displayed about future complete deprecation? If so I am fully with it. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] Some sync control

2007-01-11 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
the file we could have smth like user - why - until timedate. What do you think? -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Topic for Feb council meeting

2007-01-29 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] New emul-libs.eclass

2007-02-19 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
are not escaping a . in your regex ) -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages not yet converted to Manifest2

2007-02-21 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
pcheck -r $PORTDIR '*' -c Manifest2Transition I am trying to finish the transition: - cvs up a category - try(some of them are unfetchable) to fix all pkgs that pcheck reports Hope it goes smoothly. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Manifest2 Transition -- remaining packages

2007-02-22 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
I have fixed some more packages today and made a cron(run every hour) to generate transition status: http://dev.gentooexperimental.org/~peper/mf2/mf2-status.txt -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Dev Laptop Broken @ FOSDEM

2007-02-26 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
Some evil person broke my laptop screen at FOSDEM. What about the FOSDEM insurance? Hope you get needed cash and fix it fast. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] forwarding a video

2007-03-04 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
a video sent to out by a good mate http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4216011961522818645 ++ I think recruiters should keep this link in mind. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] forwarding a video

2007-03-04 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
And do what? And hand it to the new devs. That's all I meant ;] -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Unused global useflags

2007-03-05 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
for Ingres database msession - Adds support for msession daemon Any reason to keep them? -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] gs use flag local - global

2007-03-17 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
On Saturday 17 of March 2007 12:28:42 Steve Dibb wrote: Any objections to globalizing the 'gs' use flag on support for ghostscript? I have heard about the magic limit of 5, but whatever... -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] About testing applications

2007-03-18 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
On Sunday 18 of March 2007 13:37:55 Jeff Rollin wrote: Also, if you have a .config directory to put all these files in, ~ becomes less cluttered but ~/.config becomes VERY cluttered! Nothing prevents from making appdirs in .config too. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- gentoo-dev

[gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis

2007-03-23 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
: http://dev.gentoo.org/~peper/soc/application.txt P.S. I am aware of my imperfect English so will appreciate any grammar comments, preferably on irc. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] It seems our ChangeLogs are quite borked

2007-03-23 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
It appears to be a problem with gentoolkit-dev-0.2.6.3. 0.2.6.2 produces proper changelogs. Same here. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis

2007-03-24 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
community than the organizations' copyright in the header and imho that's a good thing. Gentoo is supposed to be a _mentoring_ organization, so the only question is whether Gentoo mentors are capable of mentoring a project or not. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis

2007-03-24 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
... ;] 2. hardly technical issue 3. see ciaran's post -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis

2007-03-25 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/46648 -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] ANN: PMS public release

2007-03-25 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
Looks like a good job to me. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis

2007-03-25 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
for the next year already to not look so miserable in comparison with other orgs? -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] $Header:$ and ebuilds

2007-04-20 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
?) and our commit system which must regenerate the Manifest only after commit so let's kill it. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86

2007-04-24 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
to update to this version? Wouldn't that prevent portage from enforcing update to _rc3 when it's delivered? Of course I might be wrong and if this is the case then excuse me for the whole fuss ;) foo-0.1_rc2 foo-0.1_rc000220070313 foo-0.1_rc3 -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- [EMAIL

Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86

2007-04-24 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
On Tuesday 24 of April 2007 23:20:05 Piotr Jaroszyński wrote: foo-0.1_rc2 foo-0.1_rc000220070313 foo-0.1_rc3 err. foo-0.1_rc2 foo-0.1_rc000220070313 foo-0.1_rc000320070512 What I was trying to say is that once you change to the long versions you must stay with them. -- Best Regards, Piotr

[gentoo-dev] tests

2007-05-01 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
, is that list comprehensive? Please don't post solutions unless we figure out which options we really want to deliver. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] tests

2007-05-01 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
as current boolean choice seems to be not enough. I'd say, let the user decide based on the properties, fex: It seems to be too early for that. Firstly we should figure out the properties and then we can think how to deliver them for end-users. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- [EMAIL

Re: [gentoo-dev] tests

2007-05-01 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
as things that can be wanted by users/devs and asked whether I missed something. How we will end up distinguishing them is another story... - run all tests - run only reasonable tests - run only necessary tests - don't run tests at all -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing

[gentoo-dev] Re: tests

2007-05-01 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
need to figure out is the categories we want to distinguish between in ebuilds and *then* how to implement that sanely. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] tests

2007-05-01 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
out a compromise between the current state and force all, because neither of them is good. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

  1   2   >