[gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo Devmanual

2006-05-27 Thread Ryan Hill
Mark Loeser wrote: At long last the devmanual is official. You can find it at http://devmanual.gentoo.org. I would like to thank plasmaroo for helping me with converting it to XML (since he did all of the XSL work to add in the features we needed to make it easy to write and expand upon).

[gentoo-dev] Re: Addition of a USE_EXPAND-Variable LIRC_DRIVERS and general cleanup of app-misc/lirc

2006-06-03 Thread Ryan Hill
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matthias Schwarzott wrote: The --with-driver part will be moved to LIRC_DRIVERS. The name need not to be LIRC_DRIVERS, tell me if you have a better name for it (LIRC_RECEIVERS is another possibility). LIRC_DEVICE? most of the USE_EXPAND stuff

[gentoo-dev] Re: User Relations Co-lead

2006-06-03 Thread Ryan Hill
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: It is my pleasure to inform you that after much discussion I can announce that Joshua Jackson (tsunam) has come onboard to act as my co-lead in Userrel[1]. Uh-oh. - --de. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG

[gentoo-dev] Re: Addition of a USE_EXPAND-Variable LIRC_DRIVERS and general cleanup of app-misc/lirc

2006-06-04 Thread Ryan Hill
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 09:11:38PM -0600, Ryan Hill wrote: LIRC_DEVICE? most of the USE_EXPAND stuff seems to be named for the device rather than the driver. eg. ALSA_CARDS, VIDEO_CARDS, INPUT_DEVICES. The ones you

[gentoo-dev] Re: [ANNOUNCE] Project Sunrise - Gentoo User Overlay

2006-06-10 Thread Ryan Hill
Peter wrote: Chris, I am not familiar enough about gentoo's hierarchy, politics, or team responsibilities to question your sincerity or authority to say something like: Sorry, but if it isn't supported, it doesn't belong on Gentoo infrastructure. Then please trust that these people who are

[gentoo-dev] Re: Project Sunrise -- Proposal

2006-06-10 Thread Ryan Hill
Markus Ullmann wrote: Okay, so after figuring out open problems (thanks to kloeri and various other people for help here), we now have a resolution that should satisfy all involved parties here. This should adress dostrow's demands as well. Nice, I think this is a great improvement. 2.

[gentoo-dev] Re: Project Sunrise -- Proposal

2006-06-16 Thread Ryan Hill
Marius Mauch wrote: Functional changes, bugfixes, etc. Let people use common sense there. The intention is simply that people watching the bug don't have to track the overlay as well to get notifications of important changes (like a bugfix that prevented them from using the ebuild

[gentoo-dev] Re: Masking perl-core/ExtUtils-MakeMaker, eventual removal

2006-06-25 Thread Ryan Hill
Michael Cummings wrote: OK, I attempted this in November of 05 (then forgot?), but since no one responded to my last round, it has been removed. Happy gentoo'ing, *yay* --de. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Useflags: qt, qt3, qt4?

2006-06-25 Thread Ryan Hill
Harald van Dijk wrote: On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 05:20:47PM +0200, Carsten Lohrke wrote: On Wednesday 21 June 2006 15:44, Stefan Schweizer wrote: qt3 - enable optional qt3 support qt4 - enable optional qt4 support That will be a mess to support in the long run. Why? Ditto. Can anyone

[gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-dev-announce list

2006-07-01 Thread Ryan Hill
Donnie Berkholz wrote: My options are either missing important announcements or creating this list. I would prefer the list. What important announcements are you expecting to find at the bottom 50-100 posts of random relevance? The announcements are at the top, being the thing that triggered

[gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.1.1 testing/stablization and glibc 2.4

2006-07-01 Thread Ryan Hill
Chris Gianelloni wrote: OK, guys, I was speaking with vapier earlier about the possibility of getting gcc 4.1.1 stable for the 2006.1 release. We've managed to build some release media with it, and are planning on doing more testing with it. What we really need is for more people to test

[gentoo-dev] Re: Dying on some CFLAGS instead of filtering them.

2006-07-09 Thread Ryan Hill
Denis Dupeyron wrote: In bug #139412, I ask Paul de Vriese why he thinks python should die on --fast-math instead of just filtering it. Here's his answer : Denis, quite simple. -ffast-math is broken and short-sighted for a global flag. Filtering gives the shortsighted message that it works

[gentoo-dev] Re: Dying on some CFLAGS instead of filtering them.

2006-07-11 Thread Ryan Hill
Denis Dupeyron wrote: Correct me if I'm wrong, but this has nothing to do with being interactive or not. To me, an ebuild that dies (intentionally or due to a build error) isn't interactive at all. Their phrase, not mine. ;) I think the idea is you should be able to emerge -e world and walk

[gentoo-dev] Re: Dying on some CFLAGS instead of filtering them.

2006-07-15 Thread Ryan Hill
Denis Dupeyron wrote: Well yes, but an ebuild that dies, whatever the reason, hasn't much to do with interactivity. Fine. Call it the don't-kill-the-emerge-for-silly-reasons philosophy if you like. I personally don't prefer it, but a lot of people think it's a good idea. What will follow

[gentoo-dev] Re: Dying on some CFLAGS instead of filtering them.

2006-07-15 Thread Ryan Hill
Ryan Hill wrote: 2.95.3, 3.1.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3, 3.3.2, 3.3.5, 3.3.6, 3.4.1, 3.4.4, 3.4.5, 3.4.6, My bad, 3.2.2 is masked for everyone ATM. --de. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.1.1 testing/stablization and glibc 2.4

2006-07-16 Thread Ryan Hill
Chris Gianelloni wrote: On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 12:18 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote: Should arch testers start working with 4.1.1 then? And do you want bugs to block #117482? Arch testers should contact their architecture's leads or Release Engineering Architecture Coordinator. As for bug reports

[gentoo-dev] Re: Dying on some CFLAGS instead of filtering them.

2006-07-16 Thread Ryan Hill
Paul de Vrieze wrote: My argument is that we must not filter -ffast-math or any other dangerous cflags. The reason being that people will request more filters for all packages that don't work with it. Many users will either ignore or miss the warning messages. Filtering the flag basically

[gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.1.1 testing/stablization and glibc 2.4

2006-07-16 Thread Ryan Hill
Ryan Hill wrote: Just an update - I've finished most major desktop stuff for x86 without any problems. I'm moving onto stuff that's already on the tracker and is fixed in testing but not stable. Rather than open and track a ton of new bugs, I'd like to reopen the original ~arch bugs

[gentoo-dev] Re: making the firefox USE flag a global one

2006-07-21 Thread Ryan Hill
Simon Stelling wrote: Hi all, I just noticed that the USE flag 'firefox' is a local one. I think it should be global, though: If this happens, could you also close https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96473 :) --de. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: aging ebuilds with unstable keywords - how can we help?

2006-07-29 Thread Ryan Hill
Chris Gianelloni wrote: (stuff) Me too! Seriously, you nailed it on the head. How many times have you had this conversation: u: Why is it taking so *!#$!@ long to get KDE/Gnome/XFCE stabilized?! Fedora/Debian/Ubuntu got it a whole week ago! OMG!!1! d: It'll be stabilized once it's

[gentoo-dev] Re: proxy-dev (an alternative to sunrise?)

2006-07-29 Thread Ryan Hill
Luis Francisco Araujo wrote: The 'modus-operandi' would go like this: 1 - We setup a mailing list (yes, yet another one, but this one is gonna be useful!) , call it , [EMAIL PROTECTED] , or [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2 - Developers interested to serve as a proxy , subscribe to the list. 3 - Users ask

[gentoo-dev] Re: Stable Staleness (mostly toolchain)

2006-07-30 Thread Ryan Hill
Alec Warner wrote: Another class of packages I wish to discuss (not remove quite yet, just talking ;) ) are older packages with stable markings. By Stable I mean debian stable, IE we stabled it in 2004 and no one has touched it since. Do these packages still work with a current system (linux

[gentoo-dev] Re: Stable Staleness (mostly toolchain)

2006-07-30 Thread Ryan Hill
Alec Warner wrote: I'm not sure if I'm misreading here, I'm not advocating we dump older gcc versions. Moreso I'm advocating we dump code that doesn't compile with newer gcc/toolchain versions that no one is willing to fix. We have had devs in the past bring in far too many packages and then

[gentoo-dev] Re: Resignation

2006-07-30 Thread Ryan Hill
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 23:20:16 -0500 Alex Tarkovsky | This no QA accusation is a complete myth. QA led by actual Gentoo | developers is indeed in place at Sunrise [1]. Did you look at *which* actual Gentoo developers are on the list? You know, that was a completely

[gentoo-dev] Re: Resignation

2006-07-31 Thread Ryan Hill
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 23:22:33 -0600 Ryan Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | Did you look at *which* actual Gentoo developers are on the list? | | You know, that was a completely unnecessary personal attack. God | forbid anyone take the time to attempt

[gentoo-dev] Re: app-doc/chmlib - call for maintainer

2006-08-08 Thread Ryan Hill
Raphael Marichez wrote: app-doc/chmlib is without an active ebuild maintainer and has an open security bug [1] Anyone willing to take care of this package in the future, please update metadata.xml and CC yourself on the bug. [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143181 if no

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: AT emerge info cruft attachments to [STABLE] bugs

2006-08-11 Thread Ryan Hill
Chris Gianelloni wrote: No. It really should be inline. I'm sorry if you think that 5K seems like a lot of spam but having to open a browser just to look at emerge --info is a complete waste of time. *ding* it's also nice to have that information actually _in_ my mailbox and not of at the

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: AT emerge info cruft attachments on bugs.g.o

2006-08-12 Thread Ryan Hill
Duncan wrote: Matti Bickel [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu, 10 Aug 2006 23:59:51 +0200: Thomas Cort [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why do arch testers need to post `emerge --info` if everything works? Shouldn't we be able to trust that they have sane CFLAGS,

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: AT emerge info cruft attachments on bugs.g.o

2006-08-12 Thread Ryan Hill
Jeroen Roovers wrote: On a minor note, I'd also like to see bug reporters use canonical package names in bug descriptions, including the category (and preferably the specific version, not some =foo-3*!!!one, not to mention specifying no version at all). Including the category means arch devs

[gentoo-dev] GCC 4.1 Reminder and Update

2006-08-27 Thread Ryan Hill
Just a reminder that GCC 4.1 will be going stable on x86 and amd64 very shortly (according to GWN at least), and is already stable on PPC. If you have any bugs blocking bug #140707 [i] please have a look and CC the relevant arch teams for stabilization. I'll be pinging bugs that haven't seen

[gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 39 compliance

2006-09-01 Thread Ryan Hill
Wernfried Haas wrote: As far i am concerned, i find seperate sections quite good as it's a clear solution as it's easy to see who is an official Gentoo monkey who did all the quiz stuff etc. May be subject to personal taste though. Some of the unofficial monkeys have also done the quiz stuff

[gentoo-dev] Re: The Age of the Universe

2006-09-02 Thread Ryan Hill
Carsten Lohrke wrote: we're understaffed, partly - and this is my very personal opinion - the problem is that releasing with GCC 4.x has been rushed I'd have to agree with you on that. I understand the appeal of exciting press releases but there were over 75 GCC 4.1 bugs still open for

[gentoo-dev] Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for September

2006-09-03 Thread Ryan Hill
Alec Warner wrote: needs as far as QA. Last year Halcy0n petitioned for power for the QA team; it was quite like a ball crushing power (fix it or we will) and it seemed to have all kinds of frictional issues. This being a global issue I would like to hear thoughts on how this could be done

[gentoo-dev] Re: The Age of the Universe

2006-09-03 Thread Ryan Hill
Chris Gianelloni wrote: On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 23:11 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote: I'd have to agree with you on that. I understand the appeal of exciting press releases but there were over 75 GCC 4.1 bugs still open for problems in *~arch* when the decision was made to go stable. Even now

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Required Features for $package_manager to Aid... Development!

2006-09-08 Thread Ryan Hill
Elfyn McBratney wrote: I've been inspired by the local/global USE flag threads recently posted by Doug (Cardoe), and it got me to thinking... I've recently joined the pkgcore development effort, and was asked by Brian (ferringb) what I'd like to hack on/what my niggles with portage are. My

[gentoo-dev] Re: Paid support

2006-09-09 Thread Ryan Hill
Curtis Napier wrote: I know christel is consulting with an accountant about adpot-a-dev, Now there's a project we can get behind. QA might fall a bit though. --de. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Re: Why you use Gentoo

2006-09-10 Thread Ryan Hill
So, wondering why people use Gentoo. Put [dev] or something if you're an actual gentoo dev and [user] if you're a user. Doesn't need to be fancy, you can put community or something if that's all you want. All responses off list please. Thanks. I use Gentoo because of its intelligent user

[gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 52 - GLEP 23 revisited

2006-09-24 Thread Ryan Hill
Simon Stelling wrote: Hello all, I would like you to share your comments on the attached GLEP with me. Thanks in advance! I think I agree with the others. Excellent idea though; thanks for giving this issue your attention. --de. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: The Seed Project - Try 2

2006-09-24 Thread Ryan Hill
Lance Albertson wrote: From my point of view, it would have been nice to have at least been asked what infra could do to host these tarballs down the road. That way, we have a sound plan of doing a good release when they're ready. I don't like the idea of them springing a release and then

[gentoo-dev] Re: New dev: dev-zero

2006-09-27 Thread Ryan Hill
Simon Stelling wrote: Hi all, It is with great pleasure that I announce the devification of Tiziano 'dev-zero' M�ller. He writes us: I'm from Zurich, Switzerland. Born here and still living here :-) I'm studying physics at the University of Zurich and working in a small company as IT

[gentoo-dev] Re: New dev: dev-zero

2006-09-27 Thread Ryan Hill
Simon Stelling wrote: Hi all, It is with great pleasure that I announce the devification of Tiziano 'dev-zero' M�ller. He writes us: I'm from Zurich, Switzerland. Born here and still living here :-) I'm studying physics at the University of Zurich and working in a small company as IT

[gentoo-dev] Re: New Developer: Jim Ramsay (lack)

2006-09-27 Thread Ryan Hill
Christian Heim wrote: Its my pleasure to introduce to you lack, our recent addition joining us to take care of the rox-related ebuilds. He hails from Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada. When he's unplugged from his computer, he tries to play some guitar and write songs (he even plays in two

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] CFLAGS paragraph for the GWN

2006-09-30 Thread Ryan Hill
Lionel Bouton wrote: There are already good resources (http://gentoo-wiki.com/CFLAGS_matrix was mentioned to me by robbat2) but they may not be advertised enough. Most of the info on that page is wrong. I'd like to propose a paragraph to the GWN editor which presents some gotchas and good

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] CFLAGS paragraph for the GWN

2006-09-30 Thread Ryan Hill
Robin H. Johnson wrote: On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 03:48:53PM -0600, Ryan Hill wrote: Lionel Bouton wrote: There are already good resources (http://gentoo-wiki.com/CFLAGS_matrix was mentioned to me by robbat2) but they may not be advertised enough. Most of the info on that page is wrong

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] CFLAGS paragraph for the GWN

2006-09-30 Thread Ryan Hill
Lionel Bouton wrote: I'll wait and see if other devs are aware of common CFLAGS gotchas plaguing bugzilla. Flags such as -fforce-addr and -fweb that change the way registers are handled can often cause errors when compiling hand-optimised ASM on architectures with a very limited number of

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] CFLAGS paragraph for the GWN

2006-10-01 Thread Ryan Hill
Duncan wrote: Could you point me at some info on this one (-ftree-vectorize)? It came up on the amd64 list a week or so ago, when someone asked what I thought of it and why I didn't have it in my cflags (which I had just explained). I said I didn't know enough about it to make a case either

[gentoo-dev] GCC 4.6 stabilization

2013-01-06 Thread Ryan Hill
This is way past due so I'd like to get 4.6 into stable. There are hardly any blockers on bug #418383 which makes me go ?!, so if anyone knows of any issues please let us know. -- gcc-porting toolchain, wxwidgetslearn a language baby, it's that kind of place @ gentoo.org

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages with optional test dependencies

2013-01-06 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 11:38:42 +0100 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: a) depend on all optional test dependencies conditionally to USE=test, therefore always requesting the widest (and consistent) testing, We also need to be more strict about making sure testsuites pass and fixing them

[gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.6 stabilization

2013-01-08 Thread Ryan Hill
On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 10:50:32 +0100 viv...@gmail.com viv...@gmail.com wrote: We probably should not stabilize on ARM until the following is fixed: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401561 Other architectures are probably okay. What about jumping straight to 4.7.2 do you

[gentoo-dev] Re: Stable sys-devel/gcc USE flag changes WAS: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: ChangeLog toolchain.eclass

2013-01-15 Thread Ryan Hill
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 08:20:53 +0100 Michael Weber x...@gentoo.org wrote: Hi folks, this commit changes the set of USE flags on the just stabled gcc-4.6, running a huge number into an rebuild of an freshly updated package. (emerge --newuse recaclulates from go disabled to go missing) Eh? I

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in mail-client/claws-mail-rssyl: ChangeLog claws-mail-rssyl-0.34.ebuild

2013-01-20 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sun, 20 Jan 2013 21:56:35 + (UTC) Christian Faulhammer (fauli) fa...@gentoo.org wrote: fauli 13/01/20 21:56:35 Modified: ChangeLog Removed: claws-mail-rssyl-0.34.ebuild Log: clean up I'm guessing you meant to remove the old 0.33 ebuild, not

[gentoo-dev] Re: USE flags dri, cups, pppd

2013-01-21 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 00:02:05 + Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote: On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 23:58:22 + Aaron W. Swenson titanof...@gentoo.org wrote: ++ If the base profile is to become our server profile, it should not have graphics related USE flags enabled. ...but

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-doc/abs-guide: metadata.xml ChangeLog

2013-01-27 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 22:27:20 + (UTC) Tim Harder (radhermit) radher...@gentoo.org wrote: radhermit13/01/27 22:27:20 Modified: metadata.xml ChangeLog Log: Remove redundant maintainer from metadata. (Portage version: 2.2.0_alpha161/cvs/Linux x86_64, signed

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-doc/abs-guide: metadata.xml ChangeLog

2013-01-27 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 19:16:56 -0500 Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote: If you have some kind of problem with this, I suggest you change the default output of metagen. Seems to work just fine here. What options are you using? floppym@naomi ~ % metagen -H app-doc ?xml version=1.0

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-doc/abs-guide: metadata.xml ChangeLog

2013-01-28 Thread Ryan Hill
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:59:13 -0800 Tim Harder radher...@gentoo.org wrote: On 2013-01-27 Sun 15:06, Ryan Hill wrote: If you have some kind of problem with this, I suggest you change the default output of metagen. I just find it annoying to have duplicate info for herds under the maintainer

[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH eutils] Die if epunt_cxx is called unnecessarily.

2013-01-30 Thread Ryan Hill
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 22:36:53 +0100 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: Currently, epunt_cxx always succeeds. This results in some of the ebuilds keeping its use even though the C++ checks were removed upstream. Therefore, I'm suggesting to add a simple check to the function -- if none of

[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH eutils] Die if epunt_cxx is called unnecessarily.

2013-01-30 Thread Ryan Hill
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:53:06 +0100 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:57:20 -0600 Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 22:36:53 +0100 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: Currently, epunt_cxx always succeeds. This results in some

[gentoo-dev] Re: changes to tested bugzilla keyword proposal

2013-01-31 Thread Ryan Hill
://bugs.gentoo.org/213514 On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 09:24:36 -0600 Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote: On keywording/stabilizing, Bugzilla has a flags feature that might be used to track what has been tested where. Flags have three states: +, -, and ?. + and - are obvious, and ? is a request. So

[gentoo-dev] Re: changes to tested bugzilla keyword proposal

2013-02-02 Thread Ryan Hill
On Fri, 1 Feb 2013 06:15:32 -0500 Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote: If we added a Keyword/Stable Request component to the Gentoo Linux product we could also have it dependent on that, so only bugs in that component

[gentoo-dev] Re: bash-4 in ebuilds?

2013-02-02 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sat, 02 Feb 2013 12:06:39 +0100 hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: From a little discussion in this bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454600#c11 it seems that it's not entirely sure what bash version can be assumed. We have eclasses that require Bash 4 (eg.

[gentoo-dev] Re: Add test to IUSE_IMPLICIT

2013-02-02 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sat, 2 Feb 2013 23:33:26 + Aaron W. Swenson titanof...@gentoo.org wrote: After years of if use test ; then ... just working when FEATURES=test is declared, it isn't working with EAPI5. I would say that's a bug fix. If you're checking if a USE flag is set then it had better be in IUSE.

[gentoo-dev] Re: changes to tested bugzilla keyword proposal

2013-02-03 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 01:41:00 -0600 Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote: On Fri, 1 Feb 2013 06:15:32 -0500 Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: Are there any issues with changing the product/component on existing bugs? I could see things turn into keyword requests which didn't start out

[gentoo-dev] Re: About people willing to help with wxwidgets packages

2013-02-05 Thread Ryan Hill
On Tue, 05 Feb 2013 18:48:44 +0100 Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote: app-admin/eselect-wxwidgets dev-python/wxpython x11-libs/wxGTK dev-util/bakefile These are the core packages. Any help with these is welcome but we would ask people to join the team. app-dicts/opendict

[gentoo-dev] Re: !!! ERROR !!!

2013-02-09 Thread Ryan Hill
On Fri, 8 Feb 2013 10:40:00 + Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: Live a little. Send a funny email to a list once. I think you are on the wrong list then. Has anyone seen my stick? I left it right here... -- gcc-porting toolchain, wxwidgetslearn a language baby,

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs due lack of time

2013-02-17 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 18:40:10 +0100 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn chith...@gentoo.org wrote: Peter Stuge schrieb: linux-firmware is okey but not great. The high resolution is there, which was my main concern, but it's not so easy to know how to create a savedconfig without installing the

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs due lack of time

2013-02-17 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 12:42:11 +0100 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: I would justify it through keeping things split and bit-exact clean, instead of tightly integrated. Separate ebuilds mean that: - each firmware has proper license, - each firmware can be installed separately and

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Gentoo GPG key policies

2013-02-18 Thread Ryan Hill
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:36:08 +1300 Kent Fredric kentfred...@gmail.com wrote: It may be advantageous to have a gentoo wrapper script that calls GPG with recommended settings to make some tasks easier, gentoo-gpg-create --recommended EDITOR=vim gentoo-gpg-rotation --recommended

[gentoo-dev] Re: The status of the 'minor' arches in gentoo

2013-02-18 Thread Ryan Hill
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:31:41 +0100 Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote: I haven't seen many problems, except one point: that m68k seems to have much the same level of activity as mips, and it would be nice if we could drop it down in the little CC list on Bugzilla (to the unstable arches

[gentoo-dev] GCC 4.7 unmasking

2013-02-24 Thread Ryan Hill
I'm going to be unmasking 4.7.2 later this week. There are still 47 open bugs blocking the 4.7 tracker, so if any are yours now would be a good time to take a look at them. https://bugs.gentoo.org/390247 -- gcc-porting toolchain, wxwidgetslearn a language baby, it's that kind of

[gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.7 unmasking

2013-02-25 Thread Ryan Hill
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 21:58:08 +0100 Piotr Szymaniak szar...@grubelek.pl wrote: On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 11:03:01PM -0600, Ryan Hill wrote: I'm going to be unmasking 4.7.2 later this week. There are still 47 open bugs blocking the 4.7 tracker, so if any are yours now would be a good time

[gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.7 unmasking

2013-02-25 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 23:03:01 -0600 Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote: I'm going to be unmasking 4.7.2 later this week. There are still 47 open bugs blocking the 4.7 tracker, so if any are yours now would be a good time to take a look at them. https://bugs.gentoo.org/390247 Forgot

[gentoo-dev] Re: Evaluating a new malloc()

2013-02-26 Thread Ryan Hill
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 08:33:44 -0500 Richard Yao r...@gentoo.org wrote: With that said, what do people think? I think I see a lot of our upstream bug reports being closed as invalid/unsupported. I think that if upstreams wanted to use jemalloc they would just do so. If they don't then obviously

[gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.7 unmasking

2013-03-02 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 23:03:01 -0600 Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote: I'm going to be unmasking 4.7.2 later this week. There are still 47 open bugs blocking the 4.7 tracker, so if any are yours now would be a good time to take a look at them. https://bugs.gentoo.org/390247 4.7 is now

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers: nvidia-drivers-313.18.ebuild ChangeLog

2013-03-03 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 15:42:56 +0100 hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: What do we have useflags for in gentoo? Not for conditional patching, that's for sure. add a unsupported-kernels useflag, mask it, add a clear statement in the masking reason and be done If the description of the flag

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers: nvidia-drivers-313.18.ebuild ChangeLog

2013-03-03 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sat, 2 Mar 2013 23:11:44 -0800 Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote: I do not find their stance wholly unreasonable. They offered to point users at an overlay, if someone was willing to maintain the patches there (in lieu of user_patches.) The end result is that if users apply the patches,

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers: nvidia-drivers-313.18.ebuild ChangeLog

2013-03-03 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 23:05:28 +0100 hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/03/2013 06:24 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 15:42:56 +0100 hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: What do we have useflags for in gentoo

[gentoo-dev] Mask dev-util/dialogblocks, dev-util/helpblocks for removal.

2013-04-06 Thread Ryan Hill
# Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org (06 Apr 2013) # Restrictive licence, basically demo versions of paid software. 14 versions # have been released in the past 4 years and not one person has requested a # bump. Use dev-util/codeblocks for all your wxWidgets IDE needs. # Bug #464768. Removal May 5

[gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: toolchain-funcs: target-has-split-usr API?

2013-04-13 Thread Ryan Hill
On Fri, 12 Apr 2013 13:04:57 -0700 Gregory M. Turner g...@malth.us wrote: What do people think of something like this? Obviously the equivalent patch to prefix would need to include a test for PREFIX_DISABLE_GEN_USR_LDSCRIPT: Author: Gregory M. Turner gmturner...@ameritech.net Date:

[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCHES] kernel-2.eclass: Various changes requested by users. + [STABLEREQ?] sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-3.8.7: Any objections against stabilizing?

2013-04-13 Thread Ryan Hill
On Fri, 12 Apr 2013 23:41:05 +0200 Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote: - Make use of readme.gentoo.eclass to make the user aware of the Gentoo Linux Kernel Upgrade Guide only the first time he emerges the package. Fixes bug #457598. Call me crazy, but upgrade guides seem like something

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask

2013-04-22 Thread Ryan Hill
On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 19:56:49 +0800 Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote: I suppose you talked with Michal about this and couldn't reach an agreement, like him joining the fonts herd, or at least the mail alias to monitor ft/fc bugs. If you want I can join the fonts herd also, I already

[gentoo-dev] Re: GCC USE flag changes

2013-05-01 Thread Ryan Hill
On Wed, 01 May 2013 08:00:29 +0100 Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote: On 01/05/2013 06:29, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote: I don't mean to start a flamewar here but the test suite situation is so bad with circular deps (I'm looking at you ruby herd) and random failures that I

[gentoo-dev] Re: Handling of tests (was: GCC USE flag changes)

2013-05-01 Thread Ryan Hill
On Wed, 1 May 2013 10:14:02 +0200 Ralph Sennhauser s...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 21:25:40 -0600 Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote: I'm also going to rename the test flag to regression-test or something similar to get it out of FEATURES=test control. The testsuite

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation?

2013-05-01 Thread Ryan Hill
On Wed, 1 May 2013 08:57:35 +0200 Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, 30 Apr 2013, Ryan Hill wrote: Then the person implementing the code for Paludis is either a monkey or a robot*. Anyone capable of reasoning could puzzle out the implications of not allowing user-given options

[gentoo-dev] Packages using -Werror

2013-05-02 Thread Ryan Hill
Most of the bugs filed on the gcc 4.8 tracker so far have been caused by packages being built with -Werror. I just noticed one package where the Makefile was being patched to remove -g from CXXFLAGS but -Werror on the same line was left in. Just in case people weren't aware, building with

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages using -Werror

2013-05-03 Thread Ryan Hill
On Fri, 3 May 2013 15:46:41 +0200 Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote: On Fri, 3 May 2013 16:06:01 +0800 Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote: Personally I've always thought -Werror is a mistake in release code, but was accepted practice. I've almost never actively removed it from

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages using -Werror

2013-05-03 Thread Ryan Hill
On Fri, 3 May 2013 16:41:33 +0200 Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote: On Fri, 03 May 2013 16:15:35 +0200 hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: We already get QA warnings for severe compiler warnings with a note that it should be reported upstream. But not all of them. I'm not sure

[gentoo-dev] Re: GCC USE flag changes

2013-05-14 Thread Ryan Hill
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 21:25:40 -0600 Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote: [...] This is pushed out now. I also ended up dropping LTO support for 4.5. If you're using LTO as shipped in 4.5 you are braver than anyone deserves to be. -- gcc-porting toolchain, wxwidgets @ gentoo.org

[gentoo-dev] Re: CPU use flag detection

2013-05-17 Thread Ryan Hill
just handed through the -march setting. sys-apps/cpuid is awesome. MMX2/MMXEXT still confuses me. -- Ryan Hillpsn: dirtyepic_sk gcc-porting/toolchain/wxwidgets @ gentoo.org 47C3 6D62 4864 0E49 8E9E 7F92 ED38 BD49 957A 8463 signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: robo-stable bugs

2013-05-21 Thread Ryan Hill
have an automated request :P Yes my laziness won out against any objections too. :) -- Ryan Hillpsn: dirtyepic_sk gcc-porting/toolchain/wxwidgets @ gentoo.org 47C3 6D62 4864 0E49 8E9E 7F92 ED38 BD49 957A 8463 signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: robo-stable bugs

2013-05-21 Thread Ryan Hill
it themselves. You should just do it yourself or turn your script off. Did you read the message? The point is you're supposed to add that yourself. It's not a STABLEREQ until you add arches. -- Ryan Hillpsn: dirtyepic_sk gcc-porting/toolchain/wxwidgets @ gentoo.org

[gentoo-dev] Re: CPU use flag detection

2013-05-21 Thread Ryan Hill
an -m3dnowext flag (anymore?) anyway, so it's kind of a mess. Ah, that explains why I always thought they were Enh 3DNow options. Looks like I have them spread out between MMX and Enh 3DNow in analyze-x86. Oops. -- Ryan Hillpsn: dirtyepic_sk gcc-porting/toolchain/wxwidgets

[gentoo-dev] Re: robo-stable bugs

2013-05-23 Thread Ryan Hill
that but some people do and lumping these bugs in with the normal ones prevents them from doing so. -- Ryan Hillpsn: dirtyepic_sk gcc-porting/toolchain/wxwidgets @ gentoo.org 47C3 6D62 4864 0E49 8E9E 7F92 ED38 BD49 957A 8463 signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: robo-stable bugs

2013-05-23 Thread Ryan Hill
On Wed, 22 May 2013 10:58:26 +0200 Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, 21 May 2013 18:57:20 -0600 Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote: Also, your script does not set the STABLEREQ keyword. People are having to hunt down your robo-stabilisation requests and add it themselves

[gentoo-dev] Re: Usage of dev-utils/ninja in ebuilds

2013-05-25 Thread Ryan Hill
is warranted. -- Ryan Hillpsn: dirtyepic_sk gcc-porting/toolchain/wxwidgets @ gentoo.org 47C3 6D62 4864 0E49 8E9E 7F92 ED38 BD49 957A 8463 signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: Usage of dev-utils/ninja in ebuilds

2013-05-25 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sat, 25 May 2013 22:00:36 -0400 Alex Xu alex_y...@yahoo.ca wrote: On 25/05/13 09:53 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: Is NINJAOPTS a variable recognized by ninja or something that would be Gentoo specific? MAKEOPTS is Gentoo-specific anyways. MAKEFLAGS is parsed by at least GNU make. Yeah, so I'm

[gentoo-dev] Re: Last time touched bugs by year

2013-06-29 Thread Ryan Hill
Of course that would knock them off the list. :) Maybe we could have two lists for each year - one with and one without m-w bugs. -- Ryan Hillpsn: dirtyepic_sk gcc-porting/toolchain/wxwidgets @ gentoo.org 47C3 6D62 4864 0E49 8E9E 7F92 ED38 BD49 957A 8463 signature.asc

[gentoo-dev] Re: font.eclass add Xorg FontPath elements for non-standard paths

2013-07-04 Thread Ryan Hill
, and that adding your own fontpath entries is both trivial and documented everywhere. -- Ryan Hillpsn: dirtyepic_sk gcc-porting/toolchain/wxwidgets @ gentoo.org 47C3 6D62 4864 0E49 8E9E 7F92 ED38 BD49 957A 8463 signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: toolchain update was Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Questions for candidates for Gentoo Council 2013/2014

2013-07-05 Thread Ryan Hill
On Fri, 05 Jul 2013 21:27:46 -0700 Brian Dolbec dol...@gentoo.org wrote: On Fri, 2013-07-05 at 22:18 -0400, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote: On 07/05/2013 09:41 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: On Fri, 05 Jul 2013 15:47:08 -0400 Rick \Zero_Chaos\ Farina zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP

[gentoo-dev] Re: new category: games-adventure/

2013-07-15 Thread Ryan Hill
. games-action/solar2 any objections? Will commit in 1 week if no one replies. The only opinions that matters on this is the game team's. You will not commit this in 1 week if no one replies, only with express approval by them. -- Ryan Hillpsn: dirtyepic_sk gcc

[gentoo-dev] Re: new category: games-adventure/

2013-07-15 Thread Ryan Hill
2013 14:19:15 -0600 Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote: The only opinions that matters on this is the game team's. You will not commit this in 1 week if no one replies, only with express approval by them. Is that your opinion, or is it an actual rule? Other than serving as a team

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >