[gentoo-dev] revdep-rebuild

2005-08-13 Thread Stefan Jones
LD_?? env variables I would need to consider? Also anyone have any opinions or caveats I should take into account? Thanks, Stefan -- Stefan Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] revdep-rebuild

2005-08-14 Thread Stefan Jones
the libraries, put them in a hash table and then use scanelf. All seems good, Stefan -- Stefan Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] revdep-rebuild

2005-08-14 Thread Stefan Jones
. Will think a bit more. Stefan -- Stefan Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] revdep-rebuild

2005-08-15 Thread Stefan Jones
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 17:18 +0900, Georgi Georgiev wrote: On x86-64 the native ELFs do not use ld-linux.so.2, but ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 instead. Okey, thanks, using /usr/include/gnu/lib-names.h would soon sort out that problem at compile time! Stefan -- Stefan Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [gentoo-dev] revdep-rebuild

2005-08-15 Thread Stefan Jones
both dynamic linkers and sees which one works. This could be done for amd64 I suppose. But first I have an idea to only use scanelf (but that may have issues with 32/64 combined userspaces) which I would want to implement. -- Stefan Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] revdep-rebuild

2005-08-15 Thread Stefan Jones
you need to keep track of which type they are. Anyway, the -i flag to scanelf fixes that and other issues, just group all the data from scanelf by interpreter (so have multiple hashes, one for each interp). Stefan -- Stefan Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] New category for xmingw cross compile toolchain

2005-10-13 Thread Stefan Jones
Hi all, I am just wondering about people's option about making a new category, called something like dev-xmingw or similar. At the moment we have in portage: dev-util/xmingw-binutils dev-util/xmingw-runtime dev-util/xmingw-gcc dev-util/xmingw-w32api Which gives a usable W32 toolchain

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New category for xmingw cross compile toolchain

2005-10-13 Thread Stefan Jones
Mike Frysinger wrote: On Thursday 13 October 2005 12:25 pm, Stefan Jones wrote: dev-util/xmingw-binutils dev-util/xmingw-runtime dev-util/xmingw-gcc dev-util/xmingw-w32api i'd prefer to see these moved into the normal binutils/gcc ebuilds myself I do not think that would

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New category for xmingw cross compile toolchain

2005-10-13 Thread Stefan Jones
Mike Frysinger wrote: glanced in the ebuilds and they dont look too bad to me ... this is how we do avr after all ... we punted the avr gcc/binutils ebuilds and now people have to `emerge crossdev crossdev avr` Ok, many thanks Mike for the input. I guess I better get on with it! Stefan