Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-devel/gcc::mgorny up for testing

2014-12-09 Thread Tomas Mozes
On 2014-12-07 11:37, Michał Górny wrote: Hello, developers and users. As some of you know, the toolchain packages in Gentoo suffer from lack-of-sanity issues and their maintainers are completely unwilling to improve things. I have finally decided to start working on a fork of the sys-devel/gcc

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: www-apps/egroupware

2016-07-07 Thread Tomas Mozes
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 8:50 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote: > On Thursday, July 07, 2016 06:37:09 AM Duncan wrote: > > J. Roeleveld posted on Wed, 06 Jul 2016 20:22:57 +0200 as excerpted: > > > On Thursday, June 30, 2016 10:30:07 PM Aaron Bauman wrote: > > >> # Aaron Bauman

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2016-12-21 Thread Tomas Mozes
These packages are now up for grabs: dev-python/httmock dev-python/jenkins-autojobs dev-python/jenkins-webapi dev-python/jenkinsapi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: stable gcc 5.4.0 ??

2017-04-18 Thread Tomas Mozes
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Jörg Schaible < joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com> wrote: > Hi Tomas, > > Tomas Mozes wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Jörg Schaible < > > joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi, &

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: stable gcc 5.4.0 ??

2017-04-19 Thread Tomas Mozes
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Walter Dnes wrote: > > It is stable. Even there are open bugs, arches started stabilizing it. > > Is gcc-5.4.0 built "--with-default-libstdcxx-abi=gcc4-compatible"? > On the Pale Moon linux sub-forum, there were crashing issues with the >

Re: [gentoo-dev] stable gcc 5.4.0 ??

2017-04-18 Thread Tomas Mozes
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Jörg Schaible < joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com> wrote: > Hi, > > according the logs, gcc 4.5.0-r3 is stable for amd64: > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/log/sys-devel/gcc?showmsg=1 > > However, after synching the tree, this version is still unstable for

Re: [gentoo-dev] stable gcc 5.4.0 ??

2017-04-18 Thread Tomas Mozes
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Jörg Schaible < joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com> wrote: > Hi, > > according the logs, gcc 4.5.0-r3 is stable for amd64: > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/log/sys-devel/gcc?showmsg=1 > > However, after synching the tree, this version is still unstable for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: stable gcc 5.4.0 ??

2017-04-18 Thread Tomas Mozes
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 3:12 PM, Jörg Schaible < joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com> wrote: > Tomas Mozes wrote: > > [snip] > > > As mentioned by others, bugs on packages.gentoo.org will not affect your > > portage tree. I've just installed gcc 5.4.0-r3 on amd64, so try

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: stable gcc 5.4.0 ??

2017-04-19 Thread Tomas Mozes
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Jörg Schaible < joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com> wrote: > Tomas Mozes wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Jörg Schaible < > > joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fixing elasticsearch maintainer

2017-05-20 Thread Tomas Mozes
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > I tried removing proxy-maint from metadata after multiple discussions > failed. Extra happiness towards monsieurp "but the GH PR is over 3 days > old, I have to commit" and gokturk "Yes I understand. I commit anyway" > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fixing elasticsearch maintainer

2017-05-20 Thread Tomas Mozes
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > > I "was" package maintainer and relied on these versions. > > If I as maintainer have no control over such things, why am I maintainer, > and why do I need an overlay? > > > ... that sounds exquisitely confused, I have

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fixing elasticsearch maintainer

2017-05-20 Thread Tomas Mozes
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > For some strange reason I was listed there as maintainer, but since no one > wanted to listen to my ideas I guess I wasn't. So now last person who > touched it gets stuck with it. > For elasticsearch, you added

[gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: dev-util/yuicompressor

2018-03-29 Thread Tomas Mozes
The following package is up for grabs: dev-util/yuicompressor It's a js/css minifier written in Java

Re: [gentoo-dev] Is there any way I can help with pull requests?

2018-10-13 Thread Tomas Mozes
You can review the PRs and try to remove common errors before the devs check it. Then they don't have to correct the same mistakes again. I don't mean you do the corrections, you just suggest them to the PR authors so they probably won't repeat them again. Common stuff like: - using latest eapi

[gentoo-dev] RFC: UID/GID assignment for logstash (270)

2019-08-08 Thread Tomas Mozes
I would like to reserve UID/GID 270 for logstash (app-admin/logstash-bin). I haven't found the ID in other databases. Pending PR: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/12375 Thanks, Tomas

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: UID/GID assignment for logstash (270)

2019-08-09 Thread Tomas Mozes
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 3:31 PM Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 8/8/19 3:37 AM, Tomas Mozes wrote: > > > > Pending PR: > > https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/12375 > > > > Is the group-writability really needed here? > > > ACCT_USER_HOME_PERMS=0770 >

[gentoo-dev] RFC: UID/GID assignment for kibana (269)

2019-09-20 Thread Tomas Mozes
I would like to reserve UID/GID 269 for kibana (www-apps/kibana-bin). The uid/gid used in Arch for kibana is taken by qmail in Gentoo. Pending PR: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/12984 Thanks, Tomas

[gentoo-dev] RFC: UID/GID assignment for elasticsearch (183)

2019-09-20 Thread Tomas Mozes
I would like to reserve UID/GID 183 for elasticsearch (app-misc/elasticsearch). It's the same as in Fedora. Pending PR: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/12983 Thanks, Tomas

[gentoo-dev] RFC: UID/GID assignment for mongodb (481)

2019-11-02 Thread Tomas Mozes
Hello, I'd like to reserve UID/GID 481 for dev-db/mongodb. UID/GID from fedora is already taken, so allocating the next free. Pending PR: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/13529 Thanks, Tomas

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-mail/pflogsumm

2019-11-06 Thread Tomas Mozes
On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 11:22 AM Michał Górny wrote: > # Michał Górny (2019-11-06) > # Unmaintained. EAPI 0. Last revdep gone. > # Removal in 30 days. Bug #699438. > net-mail/pflogsumm > > -- > Best regards, > Michał Górny > > I'll take it: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/13567

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Last rites: net-analyzer/zabbix

2019-11-07 Thread Tomas Mozes
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 11:13 AM Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote: > I'm using zabbix, but I can't sign up as the single active maintainer, > although, I'd be happy to co-maintain it with somebody else. > > BTW, @mgorny, as I see, Patrick already fixed the issue, so can we talk > about > unmasking

[gentoo-dev] RFC: UID/GID assignment for redis (75)

2019-11-12 Thread Tomas Mozes
Hello, Redis allocated UID/GID 75 via the user eclass, converting to acct-user/group in PR: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/13619 Tomas

Re: [gentoo-dev] acct-{group,user}/minetest request for ID 481

2019-11-03 Thread Tomas Mozes
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 4:50 AM Joonas Niilola wrote: > > On 11/4/19 1:37 AM, William Breathitt Gray wrote: > > Hello, > > > > `games-action/minetest` creates a "minetest" user and group with random > > respective IDs, used for running the Minetest server daemon. The latest > > version bump PR

[gentoo-dev] RFC: UID/GID assignment for graylog (478)

2019-11-21 Thread Tomas Mozes
Hello, I'd like to reserve gid/uid 478 for graylog. Haven't found in other databases, this seems like the next free id. https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/13727 Thanks, Tomas

Re: [gentoo-dev] UID/GID assignment for kibana

2019-09-20 Thread Tomas Mozes
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 6:36 PM Joonas Niilola wrote: > Hey, > > > On 9/20/19 7:12 PM, Tomas Mozes wrote: > > Hi there, > > while trying to implement glep 81 for kibana I found out that Arch > > Linux uses uid 183 for it, but it's taken by qmail.eclass. Should a &g

[gentoo-dev] UID/GID assignment for kibana

2019-09-20 Thread Tomas Mozes
Hi there, while trying to implement glep 81 for kibana I found out that Arch Linux uses uid 183 for it, but it's taken by qmail.eclass. Should a new uid/gid be taken or it's safe to assume no one will mix kibana with qmail? Thanks, Tomas

Re: [gentoo-dev] automated build failure bugs

2020-02-24 Thread Tomas Mozes
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 9:46 AM Jaco Kroon wrote: > Hi All, > > Example: https://bugs.gentoo.org/710484 > > Relates to the dropping of my_bool from mysql-connector-c. > > This has been addressed upstream and a ~ ebuild has been pushed. > > My question is simple: Is that good enough to close

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-admin/ngxtop

2020-04-20 Thread Tomas Mozes
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 2:04 PM Michał Górny wrote: > # Michał Górny (2020-04-19) > # Unmaintained. Stuck on Python 3.6. Last upstream activity in 2015. > # Removal in 30 days. Bug #718184. > app-admin/ngxtop > > -- > Best regards, > Michał Górny > > I know it's old, but it works with python

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Anti-spam for goose

2020-05-21 Thread Tomas Mozes
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 10:47 AM Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, > > TL;DR: I'm looking for opinions on how to protect goose from spam, > i.e. mass fake submissions. > > > Problem > === > Goose currently lacks proper limiting of submitted data. The only > limiter currently in place is based on

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Anti-spam for goose

2020-05-21 Thread Tomas Mozes
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 12:10 PM Michał Górny wrote: > On Thu, 2020-05-21 at 11:48 +0200, Tomas Mozes wrote: > > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 10:47 AM Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > TL;DR: I'm looking for opinions on how to protect goose f

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Bootloader use in eclean-kernel

2020-05-23 Thread Tomas Mozes
On Friday, May 22, 2020, Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, everyone. > > I've finally found some time to revive eclean-kernel, and I'm having > some doubts about the way bootloaders are used (in ek1). I'd like to > hear your opinion on whether the old behavior should be kept or removed > in favor of

Re: [gentoo-dev] nginx: slot mainline

2020-05-23 Thread Tomas Mozes
On Friday, May 22, 2020, Samuel Bernardo wrote: > Hi, > > I realize today that nginx ebuild have a new slot mainline. The current > ebuild stable version 1.17 came from mainline. Anyone knows if this > means that is not the stable version of nginx? > > After reading the following blog post I

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: switching default udev provider for new systems to udev

2020-08-12 Thread Tomas Mozes
On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 8:51 PM William Hubbs wrote: > All, > > I would like to propose that we switch the default udev provider on new > systems from eudev to udev. > > This is not a lastrites, and it will not affect current systems since > they have to migrate manually. Also, this change can be

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: dev-python/elasticsearch-curator and dev-python/elasticsearch-py

2020-12-10 Thread Tomas Mozes
Hello, seems like elasticsearch-curator is lacking behind as it went from a full-time job project to a hobby weekend project. https://bugs.gentoo.org/714860 There is a new release, however it still depends on an older click version. I've replaced it with a simple bash script. Tomas

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: app-benchmarks/sysbench

2020-11-21 Thread Tomas Mozes
Hello, dropping myself as maintainer on these packages: app-benchmarks/sysbench (https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/18350) dev-db/percona-xtrabackup (https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/18349) sysbench is dropping to m-n. Tomas