Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 52 - GLEP 23 revisited

2006-09-20 Thread Vlastimil Babka
variable for allowed licenses and block based on that? +1 -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Notification about MD5 support

2006-09-21 Thread Vlastimil Babka
the mandatory ones because they're not directly in python. So if both MD5 and SHA1 are now insecure but one of them needs to be the mandatory one, the question is, is it still harder to crack SHA1 than MD5? If yes, then just forget MD5. -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -- gentoo-dev

Re: [gentoo-dev] Notification about MD5 support

2006-09-22 Thread Vlastimil Babka
distfile yourself, and compare that with upstream :) Of course, if you want to verify digests of random packages without wanting to actually download and use them, then you would miss MD5 in the manifest, but how likely is that? -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: default USE flags in profiles (oss)

2006-09-23 Thread Vlastimil Babka
this flag to aoss and making it new default instead of oss? mozilla-launcher already has an aoss flag. Or wait for per-package USE defaults and use it for oss in alsa-driver as an exception. -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-java/ant*-1.7.0* and whole dev-java/ant-tasks

2009-04-30 Thread Vlastimil Babka
dev-java/ant-tasks was a meta ebuild that is no longer used in 1.7.1 so it's going away completely # Vlastimil Babka cas...@gentoo.org (30 Apr 2009) # masked for removal, bug #261563 =dev-java/ant-core-1.7.0* =dev-java/ant-antlr-1.7.0* =dev-java/ant-apache-bcel-1.7.0* =dev-java/ant-apache-bsf

Re: [gentoo-dev] Retiring

2009-05-04 Thread Vlastimil Babka
Peter Faraday Weller wrote: On a more serious note, the problem seems to be the complete lack of management in the required places, Gentoo is fast becoming (or more likely, already is) an anarchic organisation, where it's becoming nigh-on impossible to keep track of things. I see a number of

[gentoo-dev] Illegal news item name

2009-06-20 Thread Vlastimil Babka
Hi, it was brought up by ulm that the news item '2009-04-18-java-config-wrapper-0.16' has an illegal name because it contains a dot. As it was me who named and commited it, I am sorry for this mistake. The file name in -dev review mail was called 'generation1-deprecation' and I probably

Re: [gentoo-dev] Illegal news item name

2009-08-09 Thread Vlastimil Babka
Zac Medico wrote: Vlastimil Babka wrote: The question is what to do now, rename it? Users will then see it again, and I don't know if there are even worse consequences. AFAIK, seeing it again is the worst that will happen. The cvs - rsync script will ensure that the incorrectly named new

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: QA: package.mask policies

2009-11-08 Thread Vlastimil Babka
Duncan wrote: In theory that's what those stupid version string thingys are for, but it's s much easier just to forget one! =:^[ Maybe something about this should go in the handbook -- a suggestion that if one is going to use a package.unmask entry, that they copy the package.mask entry

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-forensics/foremost: ChangeLog foremost-1.5.6.ebuild

2009-11-08 Thread Vlastimil Babka
Ben de Groot wrote: 2009/11/8 Mark Loeser halc...@gentoo.org: Also, please learn how to communicate in a manner that is constructive instead of acting like a dick at every opportunity. Looks to me this should be applied to some others in this thread first. Really, aren't there more

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml: changepolicies

2010-02-25 Thread Vlastimil Babka
On 02/25/2010 02:41 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: On Thursday 25 February 2010 08:22:17 Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Wed, 24 Feb 2010, Robin H Johnson wrote: Metadata.xml should allow use of achangepolicies element. Within the element, package maintainers should be able to describe how

Re: [gentoo-dev] The return of the old fart: Mark Loeser (halcy0n)

2007-12-14 Thread Vlastimil Babka
William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 18:00 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote: He doesn't have a family yet but perhaps that's why he's into photographing. What's that implying he is some photo perv or something. Taking pictures of others families? Taking photo's makes up for a lack

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI placement

2007-12-15 Thread Vlastimil Babka
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 23:14:24 +0100 Carsten Lohrke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I disagree here. It would be annoying and possibly even hindering in future not being able to use higher EAPI features in eclasses. Point is the eclass has to check, if the author of an ebuild

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Improving use.desc

2008-01-02 Thread Vlastimil Babka
Markus Ullmann wrote: -junit - Adds junit awareness -- useful for developers. +junit - Adds junit testframework awareness -- useful for developers junit - Adds junit test framework awareness -- useful for developers Actually, this flag should probably go away with gen-1 java ebuilds (gen-2

[gentoo-dev] app-text/jasperreports removed from the tree

2008-01-06 Thread Vlastimil Babka
and fixed, work in progres in java-overlay, bug #164129. Vlastimil Babka -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January

2008-01-09 Thread Vlastimil Babka
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: a) Drop all keywords but those of mips. Leaves mips and, more importantly, its users with a vulnerable and unmaintained set of packages. ...and break the tree spectacularly, causing huge amounts of pain for your fellow developers when they encounter horrible repoman

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclasses for KDE 4

2008-01-11 Thread Vlastimil Babka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wulf C. Krueger wrote: | We would welcome any comments, especially if accompanied by patches ;) | and, of course, your kind approval to commit it. :-) Hi, Checked only briefly, it's late :) but I miss a comment in the header that you need EAPI=1 in

Re: [gentoo-dev] USE flag documentation

2008-01-14 Thread Vlastimil Babka
Santiago M. Mola wrote: But stuff like aac needs encode and cdio conflicts with cdparanoia should be something separate from USE flag documentation. Well, at least until it's handled at ebuild level, local USE flag documentation can be used to explain the implications to the user beforehand

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: USE flag documentation

2008-01-14 Thread Vlastimil Babka
Ryan Hill wrote: What do people think of this? a) Keep use.desc as it is: a list of common flags and a short general description of their meaning. Good. b) Keep use.local.desc as it is: a list of per-package flags that are specific to one to a few ebuilds (i think 5 is the number though i

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Available hardware

2008-01-17 Thread Vlastimil Babka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ryan Hill wrote: | I think Jakub should get the Octane2. Then he can help with all those mips bugs. :) I thought removing keywords was easy even without the actual hardware :P Caster -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: removal of digest files from the tree

2008-01-28 Thread Vlastimil Babka
Chris Gianelloni wrote: On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 17:11 -0800, Zac Medico wrote: If there are no objections then I don't so any reason not to go ahead and add the manifest1_obsolete sometime in the near future. Thoughts? Let's do it. I look forward to a lot less inodes on my disks. Let's schedule

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: debianutils: system worthy ?

2008-01-28 Thread Vlastimil Babka
Duncan wrote: At minimum, I'd say make the usual BIG WARNING NOISES in the usual places, and probably still expect complaints. It may still be worth doing to cut down on system size... or not, depending on where the system size vs. inevitable complaints comes down. (FWIW, it's precisely this

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: removal of digest files from the tree

2008-01-30 Thread Vlastimil Babka
Chris Gianelloni wrote: I think throwing up an announcement today/tomorrow for Thursday/Friday should be sufficient for this sort of a change, as it won't affect any user who has a version of portage released in the past ~1.5 years. So, since it seems nobody objected it, time for the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Changes to some profiles

2008-02-01 Thread Vlastimil Babka
Duncan wrote: A GWN or similar announcement before it moves beyond the dev profiles would be nice, but if the affected devs (incl. bugwranglers) are willing to deal with the complaints and they seem to be, the leaner system and image is IMO a good thing, and announcement or not, people really

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Changes to some profiles

2008-02-02 Thread Vlastimil Babka
Chris Gianelloni wrote: Do we really need a front-page news item for this? I don't think the impact would be terribly great, as I suspect this affects a very small number of people whom are likely to be more advanced users. I think adding the info to GMN/gentoo-dev-announce/gentoo-user should

Re: [gentoo-dev] Best practices for package.mask removals

2008-02-03 Thread Vlastimil Babka
Mike Frysinger wrote: On Monday 28 January 2008, Ryan Hill wrote: In your package.mask entry, it would help to have the following info: it would help too if you add a comment like this to the top of the mask file -mike I've did it instead: Index: package.mask

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: I want to steal your tools

2008-02-04 Thread Vlastimil Babka
(YMMV) Mon Nov 19 22:26:38 2007 dev-lang/perl-5.8.8-r4 merge time: 6 minutes and 10 seconds. Wed Nov 7 12:46:01 2007 sys-apps/paludis-0.24.6 merge time: 16 minutes and 25 seconds. -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

Re: [gentoo-dev] new portage categories

2008-02-04 Thread Vlastimil Babka
), yuck :) -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] VDB access

2008-02-05 Thread Vlastimil Babka
would implement it, and portage need not care), or we would want to use the general metadata query also for other purposes. Anyway, restricting ebuilds from vdb access sounds like a good idea to me. -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: adding support for running eautoconf to base.eclass

2008-02-13 Thread Vlastimil Babka
Petteri Räty wrote: Attached is a patch that fixes this. Arrays? How non-POSIX1 Anyway, why don't we instead discuss what phases to add to next EAPI, so we can avoid these hacks :) -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

User patches (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-apps/iproute2: ChangeLog iproute2-2.6.24.20080108.ebuild)

2008-03-31 Thread Vlastimil Babka
Mark Loeser wrote: Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: On Sunday 30 March 2008, Mark Loeser wrote: Actually, I'd say this should just be removed. If a user wants to apply a patch, they can put their own ebuild into an overlay and do it themselves (presumably if they want to patch

Re: [gentoo-dev] Early stabilisation

2008-04-16 Thread Vlastimil Babka
Jeroen Roovers wrote: Dear ebuild maintainers, thirty days is the norm for the minimal period between an ebuilds last non-keywording change while in the tree and the usual call for stabilisation. If you cannot find a pressing reason to push stabilisation forward, then don't ask. In the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Early stabilisation

2008-04-17 Thread Vlastimil Babka
Samuli Suominen wrote: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:09:24 -0700 Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] kirjoitti: On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 11:49 +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: thirty days is the norm for the minimal period between an ebuilds last It is the norm. It is not a requirement. In fact

Re: [gentoo-dev] What are blocks used for?

2008-04-17 Thread Vlastimil Babka
Enrico Weigelt wrote: * Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Hi, Hi Enrico, long time no see! b) Marking that two related implementations are mutually incompatible at runtime because they both provide the same binary. Classical example: MTA's: Traditionally they tend to provide an

Re: [gentoo-dev] What are blocks used for?

2008-04-17 Thread Vlastimil Babka
should be completely separate, never conflicting each other. So some package kfoo either depends on kdelibfoo-3.x OR kdelibfoo-4.x. Of course I don't know whether the problems comes from ebuilds or upstream ;-o If you don't know why the blocks nned to be there then why comment on that? -- Vlastimil

Re: [gentoo-dev] What are blocks used for?

2008-04-18 Thread Vlastimil Babka
Enrico Weigelt wrote: * Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Hi, Hi Enrico, long time no see! b) Marking that two related implementations are mutually incompatible at runtime because they both provide the same binary. Classical example: MTA's: Traditionally they tend to provide an

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Default blank lines for error, elog, einfo, etc

2008-06-06 Thread Vlastimil Babka
. The question is how to name the switch :) -n could be confusing as echo -n has the opposite effect. Maybe -b for blank? -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP56] USE flag descriptions in metadata

2008-06-06 Thread Vlastimil Babka
domain is not the best thing durability-wise :) -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP56] USE flag descriptions in metadata

2008-06-06 Thread Vlastimil Babka
++ I suppose you want people to read the package-specific information and not e.g. fill bug reports caused by wrong assumptions about the flag's meaning. -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Default blank lines for error, elog, einfo, etc

2008-06-06 Thread Vlastimil Babka
that non-elog output is not tied too closely to ends of elog blocks. -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 55

2008-06-12 Thread Vlastimil Babka
Fernando J. Pereda wrote: On 10 Jun 2008, at 15:33, Joe Peterson wrote: Luca Barbato wrote: Check if exists a line EAPI=*$, if does and the rest of the string matches an understood eapi, go on sourcing, otherwise ignore/mask it... And placing it out-of-band (like # EAPI=...) avoids any

[gentoo-dev] Preventing $ARCH flags in USE

2008-09-15 Thread Vlastimil Babka
Apparently, setting USE=x86 in make.conf on amd64 arch can have funny consequences such as [1]. And I can imagine even more subtle and hard to detect errors due to this. I think it's better to prevent this rather than waste time with bug reports like that. I asked Zac on IRC whether portage could

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making built_with_use die by default with EAPI 2

2008-09-22 Thread Vlastimil Babka
David Leverton wrote: On Saturday 20 September 2008 18:15:27 Alexis Ballier wrote: I can think of checks like: - foo is a dep/rdep of bar - foo has a plugin like architecture - bar will work with minimal foo - most people will expect some features in bar that come with foo's plugins - we

Re: [gentoo-dev] Usage of econf with an additional || die

2008-09-28 Thread Vlastimil Babka
Thomas Sachau wrote: I see many ebuild that still use econf || die, also econf should die by itself. Are there any specific reasons for this? Some cases where econf does not die also it fails? Or some other reason for this? My guess is that due to the general lack of consistency in what

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Last Rites: games-puzzle/ksudoku

2009-02-01 Thread Vlastimil Babka
Richard Freeman wrote: Tobias Scherbaum wrote: Wouldn't it make much more sense to package move ksudoku then? I was thinking the same thing - this is a stable package, so ideally it shouldn't be replaced with an unstable one. Why not keep -0.4 in the tree for stable users? +1 Also the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Is it time for bash-3?

2006-10-13 Thread Vlastimil Babka
once got about OSX having only 2.59, not sure if that still holds. [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139899 - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP: RESTRICT=interactive

2006-10-13 Thread Vlastimil Babka
-interactive sounds weird too, and introducing new variable would be bloating. - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Developer retirement

2006-10-17 Thread Vlastimil Babka
to author, and there is a separate reply to list function which works on gentoo-core and gentoo-dev just the same. Well, there's no reply to list function in Thunderbird [1], and Can be, see https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151681 - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -BEGIN PGP

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Stricter --newuse settings

2006-11-29 Thread Vlastimil Babka
and you know the ebuild didn't actually need/use it, remove it from IUSE, and possibly USE) and --newuse won't trigger no more. It's a bit of hack, but works, for user it's the same amount of work as editing some newuse.mask file, for portage developers it's no work :) - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster

Re: [gentoo-dev] Big change ideea

2006-12-15 Thread Vlastimil Babka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Marijn Schouten wrote: Alexandru Mincu wrote: Okay :) flame away Please, not here. - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http

Re: [gentoo-dev] www-servers/axis - commercial dependencies

2006-12-24 Thread Vlastimil Babka
broken. the gentoo devs of course claim evrytings perfect ;-o Care to elaborate and give evidence? For both first and second part of this statement? Vlastimil Babka -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Marking GPL-incompatible linkage?

2006-12-24 Thread Vlastimil Babka
, for the unconditional violations? Vlastimil Babka -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] New developer: Miroslav Šulc (fo rdfrog)

2007-01-02 Thread Vlastimil Babka
guy from Czechoslovakia :). We should really meet and go out for a beer... Cheers, -jkt That's right. Too bad he's left Prague already... but Beroun is pretty close :) Welcome, fordfrog :) - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU

Re: [gentoo-core] Re: [gentoo-dev] bugstest.gentoo.org - public beta for the new Gentoo BugZilla - please test!

2007-01-03 Thread Vlastimil Babka
' and developers' complaints on IRC. It's wasting everyone's time. +1 please! - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFm

Re: [gentoo-dev] Adding a program to portage, powstatd to be exact.

2007-01-08 Thread Vlastimil Babka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Could you take this conversation off the list, please? Also, for requesting ebuilds there's http://bugs.gentoo.org Thanks, - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG

[gentoo-dev] new eclass: ant-tasks.eclass

2007-01-09 Thread Vlastimil Babka
[3] https://overlays.gentoo.org/svn/proj/java/split-ant-overlay/dev-java/ Regards, - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFo6xntbrAj05h3oQRAo

Re: [gentoo-dev] A Gentle Reminder

2007-02-11 Thread Vlastimil Babka
. - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFzw2vtbrAj05h3oQRAkYKAJ9OrSazZHmSjDiv9rDh5kXU3k+J5gCdGhcZ eV55R7A3HE633efoE+it1gM= =fOsh -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-dev

Re: [gentoo-dev] Introducing the Proctors - Draft Code of Conduct for Gentoo

2007-03-13 Thread Vlastimil Babka
archives? Note the subtle difference between receiving and reading in public archives. Some people may prefer their mail client. -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] It's just a bit of bash..

2007-03-14 Thread Vlastimil Babka
Steve Long wrote: snip I wonder if the CoC should also mention such things (remember also Enrico Weigelt's mails) as unacceptable behaviour. Or is it already covered by one of the descriptions although I don't see it? -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] {Guide,Project,Foo}XML too confusing for many devs?

2007-03-28 Thread Vlastimil Babka
, project overlays on overlays.g.o can use the wiki on trac there. And at least we (Java) use it to hash out new stuff (that's exactly content that is likely to change over a short period of time), that can be later converted to guidexml (FAQs etc). - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -BEGIN

Re: [gentoo-dev] {Guide,Project,Foo}XML too confusing for many devs?

2007-03-28 Thread Vlastimil Babka
. - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGCmCltbrAj05h3oQRAn7EAJ0SgRHTeU339uMt/zkH6EoifOjtdwCgktHH wo5WimRT1DoUC1FSLEbVWqo= =01NV -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-dev

Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis

2007-03-29 Thread Vlastimil Babka
can do $x and $y and $z, over and over again. Someone's little too early for an election campaign? - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for April

2007-04-05 Thread Vlastimil Babka
of trying to make one big bump that will bring all changes we can think of now, but will be implemented only in 2010... Now it may look like I contradict myself saying to bump ASAP but not without solving bug 4315 first. But I see slot deps without limits only half of a feature. - -- Vlastimil

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for April

2007-04-05 Thread Vlastimil Babka
it worth EAPI bump. Please have a look at the slot dep format proposal. AFAIK none of the P{aludis,kgcore,ortage} devs disagreed on that. Sorry, I thought it was only about what's already implemented in portage and that's AFAIK only =cat/package:slot . Fine then. - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Tears of unfathomable sorrow

2007-04-07 Thread Vlastimil Babka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alec Warner wrote: Much to the joy of many I am now retiring from Gentoo. This sucks. - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] [POLICY] Keywording/Stabilizing Bug Assignment Policy

2007-04-17 Thread Vlastimil Babka
be added to the respective bugs. Then you (the maintainer) can easily create (and save) an advanced search that will filter them out, while still being able to check them in a different search. Might be also useful for arch teams to separate stabling and keywording bugs? - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deskzilla license for Gentoo Bugzilla for everyone

2007-04-20 Thread Vlastimil Babka
this be the last mail that goes to both, and any further only to -dev. - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGKTFItbrAj05h3oQRAjdKAJ9kkxOFJKC411v7CdnVzFuZh7n0eQCfW6t5 5s

Re: [gentoo-dev] $Header:$ and ebuilds

2007-04-21 Thread Vlastimil Babka
destroy the beauty of atomic commits... -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-java/joscar

2007-04-28 Thread Vlastimil Babka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 +# Vlastimil Babka [EMAIL PROTECTED] (28 Apr 2007) +# Still generation 1 and stale upstream, library that +# nothing in tree uses so it's not needed. Will be +# removed around 28 May. Generation 2 revision is in +# the java-overlay. +dev-java/joscar

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-java/jmbus

2007-04-28 Thread Vlastimil Babka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 # Vlastimil Babka [EMAIL PROTECTED] (28 Apr 2007) # Stale upstream, library that nothing in tree uses # so it's not needed. Will be removed around 28 May. # Generation 2 revision is in the java-overlay. dev-java/jmbus - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-java/sun-{connector-bin,dsml-bin,ejb-spec}

2007-04-28 Thread Vlastimil Babka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 +# Vlastimil Babka [EMAIL PROTECTED] (28 Apr 2007) +# Unused generation-1 fetch restricted binary libraries. +# Will be moved to junkyard around 28 May. +dev-java/sun-connector-bin +dev-java/sun-dsml-bin +dev-java/sun-ejb-spec - -- Vlastimil Babka

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites media-gfx/opcion

2007-04-29 Thread Vlastimil Babka
this package, needs it, uses it, and/or is willing to updated it. Recalled and unmasked at user's request. - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

[gentoo-dev] Last rites for dev-java/dbconnectionbroker-bin

2007-04-30 Thread Vlastimil Babka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 +# Vlastimil Babka [EMAIL PROTECTED] (30 Apr 2007) +# Stale upstream (since 2002), -bin library that nothing in tree uses +# so it's not needed. Will be removed into java junkyard around 30 May. +dev-java/dbconnectionbroker-bin - -- Vlastimil Babka

[gentoo-dev] Last rites for dev-java/dbconnectionbroker-bin

2007-04-30 Thread Vlastimil Babka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 # Vlastimil Babka [EMAIL PROTECTED] (30 Apr 2007) +# Fetch-restricted binary library that nothing in tree uses, upstream +# unsupported (EOL). Will be removed into java junkyard around 30 May. +dev-java/infobus-bin - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster

Re: [gentoo-dev] tests

2007-05-01 Thread Vlastimil Babka
puts a new set of DEPENDS requirements on your system. Daniel And sometimes these extra deps can result in circular deps. - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] [news-item] Paludis 0.24

2007-05-04 Thread Vlastimil Babka
a replacement for elog? I thought news were supposed to be delivered before upgrading. Also You should update your configuration files after upgrading. sounds like something one would read before upgrade... - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU

Re: [gentoo-dev] [news-item] Paludis 0.24

2007-05-04 Thread Vlastimil Babka
upgrading from previous versions to =0.24. How likely is that someone has had such version previously, then uninstalled paludis completely leaving config files around, and now installs =0.24? So likely it's worth that future fresh installs of say 0.50 will display this news too? - -- Vlastimil Babka

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade

2007-05-06 Thread Vlastimil Babka
for new news messages should be displayed: * After an emerge sync * After an emerge --pretend * Before an emerge target (which may also include a red warning message) - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages with same name was - Conversion of Emacs virtual packages

2007-05-17 Thread Vlastimil Babka
to figure out how you justify calling Java a dead language. It's not C++ nor Ruby. Anyway, offtopic :) - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: stabilizing expat 2.0.0

2007-05-17 Thread Vlastimil Babka
changing the profiles right now? (I guess people on ~arch will need to unmask it to not downgrade). That can be avoided if you make an artifical revbump that won't change anything, just have stable keywords, and you mask that revision specifically. - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java

[gentoo-dev] STABLEREQ/KEYWORDREQ Keywords in bugzilla

2007-05-27 Thread Vlastimil Babka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jim Ramsay wrote: Chris Gianelloni wrote: On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 07:39 -0600, Jim Ramsay wrote: Vlastimil Babka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Or maybe implement new bugzilla keywords, like STABLEREQ and KEYWORDREQ which would be added to the respective

Re: [gentoo-dev] STABLEREQ/KEYWORDREQ Keywords in bugzilla

2007-05-27 Thread Vlastimil Babka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Robin H. Johnson wrote: On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 12:23:56PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: Bug was fixed yesterday, keywords added, so to let you know. I would of course love to go now and add these keywords to all my (java) current bugs

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deskzilla for Gentoo

2007-05-31 Thread Vlastimil Babka
such license for any FOSS project. - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGXn/1tbrAj05h3oQRApMDAKCZoGxaTEEhPQusvIuGvI23ZcSydwCfahcU iPUW0knA2ZZ76hT5mkv98Cs= =8Sbs

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new bugzilla resolution: NEEDPATCH

2007-05-31 Thread Vlastimil Babka
them open myself - if the user doesn't provide a patch, it's still something that I'd get around to doing eventually. I specifically want my bugs to stay open, and be easily visible as to why I've kept them open. +1 Keyword is a good idea. - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -BEGIN

Re: [gentoo-dev] New global use flag, xulrunner

2007-06-06 Thread Vlastimil Babka
by package AND enabled by user? Some of those local flag descriptions suggest that USE=firefox xulrunner results in using xulrunner (so it has higher priority). So is that recommended, and how about seamonkey? - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC]: gentoo-politics ML

2007-06-07 Thread Vlastimil Babka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kumba wrote: And maybe a dev who secretly dabbles in another OSlike Wind...err, Ubuntu! I thought this position has been already filled :) - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux

Re: [gentoo-dev] New global use flag, xulrunner

2007-06-08 Thread Vlastimil Babka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Raúl Porcel wrote: Vlastimil Babka wrote: Raúl Porcel wrote: Agreed from mozilla. firefox and seamonkey already have the global use-flag Is there any guideline from mozilla team about what to do when there are more than one of these flags

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-java/jdbc-informix

2007-06-09 Thread Vlastimil Babka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 +# Vlastimil Babka [EMAIL PROTECTED] (10 Jun 2007) +# Outdated version, proprietary binary package, library that nothing in tree +# uses. Still generation-1. Assuming nobody needs it as there was never a +# version bump request. Will be removed after

[gentoo-dev] [gentoo-java] Last rites: dev-java/jdbc-mssqlserver

2007-06-09 Thread Vlastimil Babka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 +# Vlastimil Babka [EMAIL PROTECTED] (10 Jun 2007) +# Outdated version, proprietary binary package, library that nothing in tree +# uses. Still generation-1. Assuming nobody needs it as there was never a +# version bump request. Will be removed after

Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoo-java] Last rites: dev-java/jdbc-mssqlserver

2007-06-11 Thread Vlastimil Babka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Vlastimil Babka wrote: +# Vlastimil Babka [EMAIL PROTECTED] (10 Jun 2007) +# Outdated version, proprietary binary package, library that nothing in tree +# uses. Still generation-1. Assuming nobody needs it as there was never a +# version bump

Re: [gentoo-dev] Do not modify ebuilds which are already in the tree... even if masked

2007-06-12 Thread Vlastimil Babka
for such packages as there are no guarantees while in p.mask. - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGboh4tbrAj05h3oQRAvv1AJ45RRl0kr1246ug5H1ZdSTZ5i5j5QCfaq25

[gentoo-dev] Re: OT: gentoo-kindergarten

2007-06-13 Thread Vlastimil Babka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thilo Bangert wrote: I want a gentoo-kindergarten list, where useless discussions like this (sub)thread can be directed to. kids, grow up! right s/gentoo-// - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG

Re: [gentoo-dev] QA issue: No stable skype in Tree

2007-06-13 Thread Vlastimil Babka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gustavo Felisberto wrote: Any alternatives? Drop it from stable completely, possibly package.mask or move to overlay. Why should this closed-source rootkit be in stable? - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE

Re: [gentoo-dev] QA issue: No stable skype in Tree

2007-06-13 Thread Vlastimil Babka
with google) or use the ~arch 1.4. This won't affect users that already have 1.4 installed, or just have the distfile. - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] QA issue: No stable skype in Tree

2007-06-13 Thread Vlastimil Babka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Abhay Kedia wrote: On Wednesday 13 Jun 2007 10:11:24 pm Vlastimil Babka wrote: Drop it from stable completely, possibly package.mask or move to overlay. Why should this closed-source rootkit be in stable? If closed source is the criteria

Re: [gentoo-dev] QA issue: No stable skype in Tree

2007-06-13 Thread Vlastimil Babka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kent Fredric wrote: On 6/14/07, Vlastimil Babka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also, ion3 was IIRC removed recently also for upstream trying to force new versions against our stable policy. And that was opensource. [U] x11-wm/ion3 Available

Re: [gentoo-dev] Are you guys for real?

2007-06-13 Thread Vlastimil Babka
and the bitching gets out. Just unsubscribe the list and you won't see it :) - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGcGTZtbrAj05h3oQRAj0SAJ0RLIx//xj8AsyLBs

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-1 (or 1, perhaps) Proposal: AND Dependencies

2007-06-14 Thread Vlastimil Babka
question is, does this make sense? Is something like this planned for some EAPI0? Would it be appropriate for me (a non-dev) to file a bug and link it to SpanKy's EAPI-1 tracker bug? There's been bug 4315 for ages, so maybe just reassign it to PMS? - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -BEGIN

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-1 (or 1, perhaps) Proposal: AND Dependencies

2007-06-15 Thread Vlastimil Babka
that. - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGcmHKtbrAj05h3oQRAjxQAJ9jYtK7aAAWBvYttCTLW1Kt7a/OzACeL2Oe aLZwTVOKohkRfcyyfRKpqMY= =gYLD -END PGP SIGNATURE

Re: [gentoo-dev] QA issue: No stable skype in Tree

2007-06-15 Thread Vlastimil Babka
that could have been avoided if Skype wasn't marked stable. It could be interesting to evaluate a new rule fetch/mirror restricted package can't be marked stable :). I believe common sense and per-package experience is better than such general rules :) - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java

  1   2   >