[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] ruby-fakegem.eclass: drop support for old EAPIs

2019-07-20 Thread graaff
From: Hans de Graaff Drop support for EAPI 0, 1, 2, 3. Signed-off-by: Hans de Graaff --- eclass/ruby-fakegem.eclass | 16 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/ruby-fakegem.eclass b/eclass/ruby-fakegem.eclass index 915c10b986c3..1e8620c166d4

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/6] ruby-ng.eclass: add EAPI 7 support

2019-07-21 Thread graaff
From: Hans de Graaff Signed-off-by: Hans de Graaff --- eclass/ruby-ng.eclass | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass b/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass index 8dc3e1661252..c2a09585d8ef 100644 --- a/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass +++ b/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 5/6] ruby-ng.eclass: handle BDEPEND for EAPI 7

2019-07-21 Thread graaff
From: Hans de Graaff Add support for BDEPEND in EAPI 7. It is not clear how to handle test dependencies since the test framework will need to run on the CBUILD host but the code that needs to run is already cross-compiled for the CHOST. Most likely tests won't work at all in this case. Add test

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/6] ruby-ng.eclass: stop inheriting toolchain-funcs

2019-07-21 Thread graaff
From: Hans de Graaff Stop inheriting toolchain-funcs in EAPI 7. The eclass does not use this eclass and any ebuild that requires it should inherit it directly instead. Signed-off-by: Hans de Graaff --- eclass/ruby-ng.eclass | 7 +-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/6] ruby-ng.eclass: make presence of RUBY_PATCHES fatal

2019-07-21 Thread graaff
From: Hans de Graaff The eqawarn in EAPI 6 is easy to mis and may lead to patches "silently" not being applied. die on this in EAPI 7 to make this situation more explicit. Signed-off-by: Hans de Graaff --- eclass/ruby-ng.eclass | 7 ++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletio

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 4/6] ruby-ng.eclass: use ruby_rbconfig_value

2019-07-21 Thread graaff
From: Hans de Graaff Consistently use ruby_rbconfig_value to get ruby configuration information. Signed-off-by: Hans de Graaff --- eclass/ruby-ng.eclass | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass b/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass index 59d4450a9954

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 6/6] ruby-ng.eclass: remove 2-arg calling of depend methods in EAPI 7

2019-07-21 Thread graaff
From: Hans de Graaff No longer allow the deprecated 2 argument calls to the ruby*depend methods in EAPI 7. These are already deprecated for a long time. Signed-off-by: Hans de Graaff --- eclass/ruby-ng.eclass | 26 -- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/3] ruby-fakegem.eclass: remove obsolete jruby support

2019-07-20 Thread graaff
From: Hans de Graaff Signed-off-by: Hans de Graaff --- eclass/ruby-fakegem.eclass | 21 + 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/ruby-fakegem.eclass b/eclass/ruby-fakegem.eclass index e2c333a5e7f4..a6077a386b9d 100644 --- a/eclass/ruby

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/3] ruby-fakegem.eclass: List myself as author

2019-07-20 Thread graaff
From: Hans de Graaff Signed-off-by: Hans de Graaff --- eclass/ruby-fakegem.eclass | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/eclass/ruby-fakegem.eclass b/eclass/ruby-fakegem.eclass index a6077a386b9d..915c10b986c3 100644 --- a/eclass/ruby-fakegem.eclass +++ b/eclass/ruby

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] ruby-ng.eclass: drop support for jruby

2019-07-18 Thread graaff
From: Hans de Graaff jruby has been removed from the tree for quite some time and is not used at all anymore in ebuilds. This also drops an inherit of java-utils-2 which blocks updating to EAPI 7. --- eclass/ruby-ng.eclass | 12 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-) diff

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] ruby-ng.eclass: drop support for EAPI 2 and EAPI 3

2019-07-18 Thread graaff
From: Hans de Graaff Signed-off-by: Hans de Graaff --- eclass/ruby-ng.eclass | 43 ++- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass b/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass index 90c36cd86e40..facb0bea95d7 100644 --- a/eclass/ruby

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/2] ruby-ng.eclass: future proof EAPI checks

2019-07-18 Thread graaff
From: Hans de Graaff Explicitly list old EAPIs but use a wildcard for the latest EAPI, so that these changes will also be used by default in newer EAPIs. Signed-off-by: Hans de Graaff --- eclass/ruby-ng.eclass | 6 -- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-lang/ruby-enterprise

2013-01-20 Thread Hans de Graaff
# Hans de Graaff gra...@gentoo.org (20 Jan 2013) Mask # dev-lang/ruby-enterprise for removal, bug 453178. The current # versions have minor security issues, the latest versions are masked # and don't work, and upstream announced end-of-life almost a year # ago. Ruby 1.9 has almost all

Re: [gentoo-dev] USE flags dri, cups, pppd

2013-01-20 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Sun, 2013-01-20 at 18:03 +0100, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: We can either set it in the base profile, then there is no need for IUSE=+dri. Or we can set it in every single ebuild that has the dri flag. I prefer the former because it reduces our maintenance burden. You make it sound

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-ruby/rails:3.0

2013-02-11 Thread Hans de Graaff
# Hans de Graaff h...@degraaff.org (11 Feb 2013) # No longer supported upstream even for security bugs. # Port your application to another version of Rails. # The Rails 3.0 version in the tree has security issues # and no new 3.0 versions will be released anymore. dev-ruby/rails:3.0 dev-ruby

Re: Gentoo email address in VCS. Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-ruby/rails:3.0

2013-02-11 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 23:30 +0100, Michael Weber wrote: On 02/11/2013 09:39 PM, Hans de Graaff wrote: # Hans de Graaff h...@degraaff.org (11 Feb 2013) What about using your gentoo email address? One mapping less, please. Too much autopilot, it seems. Fixed. Hans

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GCC USE flag changes

2013-05-01 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 00:57 -0400, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote: On 05/01/2013 03:00 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: On 01/05/2013 06:29, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote: I don't mean to start a flamewar here but the test suite situation is so bad with circular deps (I'm looking at you ruby

[gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: dev-libs/fcgi

2013-05-14 Thread Hans de Graaff
Hi, I thought I already dropped maintainership of this package a long time ago, since I haven't been using fastcgi for ages, but a new bug today told me I forgot. I've done so now. Someone please pick this up if you still use fastcgi. dev-libs/fcgi https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469794

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Moving project pages to wiki.gentoo.org

2013-06-10 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Mon, 2013-06-10 at 17:15 +0200, Alex Legler wrote: The software is unmaintained, and the website template is next to unmaintainable. I could go on a bit more about this, but I think these two points *alone* justify moving away from it. I did have brief flurry of activity on gorg after last

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-ruby/fssm

2013-07-16 Thread Hans de Graaff
# Hans de Graaff gra...@gentoo.org (16 Jul 2013) # Mask for removal. Upstream dead, recommends no longer using # this. Nothing in the tree depends on it. dev-ruby/listen # can be used as an alternative. dev-ruby/fssm

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: ruby18-only packages in dev-ruby

2013-07-21 Thread Hans de Graaff
a bug with the details so we can mark it accordingly and remove it from the mask. If you maintain ruby packages please check that your package supports at least Ruby 1.9 (ruby19) and mark it accordingly. # Hans de Graaff gra...@gentoo.org (21 Jul 2013) # Mask ruby18-only packages in dev-ruby

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs (ruby applications)

2013-07-21 Thread Hans de Graaff
Over time a number of packages have ended up in the ruby herd due to maintainers leaving and being dropped from metadata. These packages really need dedicated maintainers who understand what these applications are meant to do and who can do proper testing for them. As such, I'll be adding

Re: [gentoo-dev] Marking of deprecated USE flags

2013-08-10 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 19:57 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: Also, please note that we're being specifically talking about things that are not 'deprecated' but 'removed'. We mark implementations 'deprecated' while still supporting them, 'removed' goes after we drop the support. This is also true

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: more ruby18-only packages

2013-08-11 Thread Hans de Graaff
# Hans de Graaff gra...@gentoo.org (11 Aug 2013) # These are all leaf packages marked for ruby18 and ree18. # ree18 is already removed from the tree, and ruby18 will # follow soon. These packages don't have dependencies in the # tree. Removal in 30 days. dev-ruby/cerberus dev-ruby/delocalize dev

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-dicts/fantasdic and its ruby-gnome2 components

2013-08-14 Thread Hans de Graaff
# Hans de Graaff gra...@gentoo.org (14 Aug 2013) # Last release in 2009. ruby18-only. Uses deprecated # ruby-gnome2 components that have been removed upstream # quite some time ago. No maintainer. # Also remove the deprecated ruby-gnome2 components. # Masked for removal in 30 days. app-dicts

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: stabilization policies

2013-08-30 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 16:12 -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote: # Redmine =dev-ruby/builder-3.1.4 ~amd64 =dev-ruby/rails-3.2.13 ~amd64 Ok, this one is ridiculous. The stable version of Rails is 2.3.18, and 3.0 was released almost exactly three years ago. Every time rails-3.x gets bumped, I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tcl/Tk multi-slot testing

2009-03-14 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 19:09 +0100, Federico Ferri wrote: potential issues: this could become troublesome if there is a tcl extension installed, and is needed both for tcl 8.5 and tcl 8.6. it should be reinstalled after each 'eselect tcltk set ...' We face similar issues with multiple

Re: [gentoo-dev] [undertakers] Packages with updated metadata.xml

2009-03-23 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 12:28 -0100, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: dev-ruby/coderay dev-ruby/exifr dev-ruby/png The ruby herd will take these. Kind regards, Hans signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Project summaries

2009-05-10 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 08:49 +0200, Christian Faulhammer wrote: any project lead/member can post an answer to this mail for a status report: XEmacs: graaff is the lone wolf here and because upstream development of XEmacs is not really on fire, he has not too much to do, I think. He

Re: [gentoo-dev] Project summaries

2009-05-10 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 08:49 +0200, Christian Faulhammer wrote: any project lead/member can post an answer to this mail for a status report: The Ruby project summary: We've had two new project members recently: a3li and gengor. In addition we also have a number of new people who help out on

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Files owned by multiple slots

2009-06-02 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 17:43 +, Sven wrote: (1) All gems should be installed from ebuilds only. (2) If an ebuild requires a gem, it has to be installed from the corresponding ebuild. For all other gems, Gentoo leaves the choice to the user and tries to work together as well as possible

[gentoo-dev] Last rites for dev-ruby/freeride

2009-06-13 Thread Hans de Graaff
dev-ruby/freeride ships broken elf shared objects that we cannot rebuild. See https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=251935 for all the details. To keep this package in the tree would require some way to recreate the broken elf shared objects. Will be removed in 30 days. Kind regards, Hans

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-ruby/misen, dev-ruby/dpklib

2009-07-13 Thread Hans de Graaff
# Will be removed in 60 days. No release since 2003, deprecation # of ruby features has caught up. If you want this to stay # then please fix bug 276980. dev-ruby/misen dev-ruby/dpklib signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[gentoo-dev] Last rites for dev-ruby/ruby-amazon

2009-08-22 Thread Hans de Graaff
# Hans de Graaff gra...@gentoo.org (22 Aug 2009) # ruby-amazon uses the obsolete v3 protocol which has been shut # down by Amazon on 2008-03-31, and upstream indicates that they # will not continue development on it. dev-ruby/ruby-amazon Given that it no longer works I'll remove it in 30 days

[gentoo-dev] Last rites for dev-ruby/cgi_multipart_eof_fix

2009-08-22 Thread Hans de Graaff
# Hans de Graaff gra...@gentoo.org (22 Aug 2009) # cgi_multipart_eof_fix is used to fix ruby versions up to 1.8.5. # We no longer ship these versions, and all versions in the tree # are unaffected, so this will be removed in 30 days. dev-ruby/cgi_multipart_eof_fix signature.asc Description

[gentoo-dev] Last rites for dev-ruby/devel-logger

2009-08-22 Thread Hans de Graaff
# Hans de Graaff gra...@gentoo.org (22 Aug 2009) # devel-logger is now bundled with ruby 1.8. The standalone version # is only suited for ruby 1.6, which has gone from our tree a long # time ago. devel-logger will follow in 30 days. dev-ruby/devel-logger signature.asc Description

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for dev-ruby/cgi_multipart_eof_fix

2009-08-24 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 23:46 +0200, Hans de Graaff wrote: # Hans de Graaff gra...@gentoo.org (22 Aug 2009) # cgi_multipart_eof_fix is used to fix ruby versions up to 1.8.5. # We no longer ship these versions, and all versions in the tree # are unaffected, so this will be removed in 30 days

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations

2009-11-06 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 23:52 +0100, Rémi Cardona wrote: I just don't see how noarch will help the portage tree. I would propose to use it for the 100+ app-xemacs packages, all of which run within the virtual machine that is xemacs. Obviously app-editors/xemacs, the editor itself, will still be

[gentoo-dev] RFC: ruby-ng.eclass - new eclass for ruby-based packages

2009-12-01 Thread Hans de Graaff
Hi, The ruby team is currently working on two new eclasses to better handle our ruby packages. This first one is intended to be a replacement for the current ruby.eclass. A second eclass is forthcoming and will provide support for handling gems. This new eclass has much better handling of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: ruby-ng.eclass - new eclass for ruby-based packages

2009-12-05 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 11:46 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote: I guess you better add a section for known eapis that are too old to your liking, and use the *) section for an oops message saying you don't know about ${EAPI} yet, and to please file a bug. Yes, good idea. We've gone with this

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: ruby-ng.eclass - new eclass for ruby-based packages

2009-12-05 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 09:57 +0100, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: Dne středa 02 Prosinec 2009 09:51:25 Christian Faulhammer napsal(a): At the moment I don't remember for what reason exactly, but we renamed the PATCHES variable to EBZR_PATCHES in bzr.eclass. You should do something similar. No

[gentoo-dev] RFC: ruby-fakegem.eclass - new eclass for ruby gems

2009-12-06 Thread Hans de Graaff
Hi, Hot on the heels of the new ruby-ng.eclass the ruby team presents our new eclass for dealing with ruby gems: ruby-fakegem.eclass. This eclass supersedes the current gems.eclass, which will be deprecated in due time. The new ruby-fakegem.eclass builds on the framework provided by

Re: [gentoo-dev] irregular metdata.xml check

2009-12-07 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 12:56 +0100, Thilo Bangert wrote: Welcome to this years edition of the metadata check. dev-util/cucumber herd missing Fixed, but this is really a bug in metadata.dtd, which specifies !ELEMENT pkgmetadata ( (herd|maintainer|longdescription|use|

[gentoo-dev] RFC: ruby-ng-gnome2.eclass

2010-01-11 Thread Hans de Graaff
# # Author: Hans de Graaff gra...@gentoo.org # # @BLURB: # This eclass simplifies installation of the various pieces of # ruby-gnome2 since they share a very common installation procedure. inherit ruby-ng multilib IUSE= subbinding=${PN#ruby-} ; subbinding=${subbinding%2} S=${WORKDIR}/ruby-gnome2

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-ruby/ruby-libgda

2010-01-15 Thread Hans de Graaff
# Hans de Graaff gra...@gentoo.org (16 Jan 2010) # Not supported anymore by upstream since several ruby-gnome2 # releases. Will be removed in 30 days. dev-ruby/ruby-libgda Support for ruby-libgda already got removed by upstream with the 0.16 release which was released at the end of 2006

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-ruby/activerecord-jdbc

2010-01-24 Thread Hans de Graaff
# Hans de Graaff gra...@gentoo.org (23 Jan 2010) # Installs only for ruby 1.8 but it actually a JRuby package # that installs .jar files. Deprecated. # Last rited: to be removed in 30 days. dev-ruby/activerecord-jdbc In its current state is does not install a working set of files. JRuby support

Re: [gentoo-dev] [git migration] The problem of ChangeLog generation

2010-04-07 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 09:06 -0400, Richard Freeman wrote: Why not just get rid of the in-tree Changelogs entirely? The scm logs already document this information, so why have it in a file? It seems like the main purpose for it is for end-users to have some idea what changed in an ebuild.

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Packages up for grabs -- xmerlin, yoswink, chtekk, omp, tantive, mueli, bluebird, hncaldwell, caleb

2010-06-02 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 09:18 +0200, Torsten Veller wrote: app-misc/sphinx I'll take this. dev-ruby/IceRuby I've added this to the ruby herd. Hans signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Actions of python team, especially Arfrever wrt python eclass and python-3*

2010-06-06 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Sun, 2010-06-06 at 12:40 +0200, Thomas Sachau wrote: Every package defines the language(s), where it could be installed for multiple slots, e.g.: MULTI_SLOT=python or MULTI_SLOT=python ruby Additionally, it should define the supported slots, something like this:

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-ruby/amrita

2010-06-12 Thread Hans de Graaff
# Hans de Graaff gra...@gentoo.org (12 Jun 2010) # Abandoned by upstream, no releases since 2003. Test suite fails and # generates many deprecation warnings. # Masked for removal in 30 days. dev-ruby/amrita signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] FYI: Rules for distro-friendly packages

2010-06-26 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 21:46 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote: BTW: if upstream has an proper VCS and an canonical tagging scheme, they don't actually have to create release tarballs, just hack up a little script which creates them on-the-fly from an canonical URL scheme (eg. oss-qm does exactly

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-ruby/bunny: metadata.xml ChangeLog bunny-0.6.0.ebuild

2010-07-04 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Sat, 2010-07-03 at 08:36 +, Benedikt Boehm (hollow) wrote: hollow 10/07/03 08:36:01 Added:metadata.xml ChangeLog bunny-0.6.0.ebuild Log: initial ebuild, thanks to Gábor Vészi (Portage version: 2.2_rc67/cvs/Linux i686) Does not install documentation. Does

Re: [gentoo-dev] [bugzilla-dae...@gentoo.org: [Bug 322157] [mail-filter/procmail] new ebuild + autocreate maildirs]

2010-07-11 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Sun, 2010-07-11 at 01:28 -0400, Jacob Godserv wrote: On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 12:13, Enrico Weigelt weig...@metux.de wrote: I've already explained the strategy behind the git repo (and not doing plaintext patches). Please refer to my paper, and my other mails posted recently on this list.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages of for grabs

2007-09-17 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 23:28 +0200, Christian Heim wrote: - dev-ruby/ruby-oci8 (mattm) Will most likely be proxy-maintained by me/ruby herd, see bug 183548 ruby: - dev-ruby/bluecloth (citizen428) - dev-ruby/cmdparse (citizen428) - dev-ruby/glue (citizen428) - dev-ruby/mega-modules

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Some new global USE-flags

2007-12-20 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 19:57 +0100, Markus Meier wrote: Potential candidates (flag-name, count): xemacs5 This count will very likely go up in the future as we enable more support for packages similar to the level of support for emacs. +1 on making this a global USE flag.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Projects and subproject status

2008-01-13 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 22:31 +0100, Luca Barbato wrote: Are we fine? Speaking for the ruby herd (which isn't a project and doesn't have a lead, but I'm sure Richard or Josh will correct any mistakes I make): No. Even though there are plenty of people in the herd only a few of us commit on a

Re: [gentoo-dev] New developer : Ingmar Vanhassel (ingmar)

2008-01-16 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 11:11 +0100, Denis Dupeyron wrote: It's my pleasure to introduce Ingmar Vanhassel (ingmar) as a new Gentoo developer. snip He has experience with bash and ruby. Welcome Ingmar, and if you tire of KDE or want to work on something different then there are plenty of open ruby

Re: [gentoo-dev] I want to steal your tools

2008-02-02 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Sat, 2008-02-02 at 22:54 -0800, Alec Warner wrote: So reply with a URL pointing at your tool*. For XEmacs there is the pebuild script which tracks upstreams packages and automatically bumps ebuilds for them when newer versions are available:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Unmasking db 4.6

2008-04-25 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 08:18 -0400, Caleb Tennis wrote: Does anyone have any objections to unmasking db 4.6.21? It's been in portage now for a long time, but was quickly masked when some packages had some issues with it. The only remaining package that has an issue that I'm aware of is

[gentoo-dev] Last rites for app-xemacs/xemacs-packages-sumo

2008-05-10 Thread Hans de Graaff
# Hans de Graaff [EMAIL PROTECTED] (10 May 2008) # xemacs-packages-sumo cannot be installed together with any of the separate # xemacs packages. Please use xemacs-packages-all instead to install all # xemacs packages. See bug 23949. app-xemacs/xemacs-packages-sumo I'm quite happy to close a bug

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: 0-day bump requests

2008-07-03 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 02:31 +0200, Marius Mauch wrote: On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 01:16:09 +0200 Jeroen Roovers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Disclaimer: I'm not really a package maintainer anymore. I am, and Marius said all the things that I would have said. :-) One of the reasons that it depends is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Jeeves IRC replacement now alive - Willikins

2008-08-06 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 14:18 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote: Getting the bot out there - If you would like to have the new bot in your #gentoo-* channel, would each channel founder/leader please respond to this thread, stating the channel name, and that they are the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Projects without a homepage, and valid contents of HOMEPAGE (per bug 239268)

2008-10-06 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 23:38 -0700, Josh Saddler wrote: Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Sun, 5 Oct 2008, Robin H Johnson wrote: HOMEPAGE=http://this-package-has-no-homepage.gentoo.org/; That would impose needless lookups on subdomains of gentoo.org for clients trying to load the homepage.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Moving HOMEPAGE out of ebuilds for the future

2008-11-30 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Sun, 2008-11-30 at 14:50 +0100, Tobias Scherbaum wrote: Jan Kundrát: Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: I have a very quick proposal: why don't we move the packages' homepage in metadata.xml (since it's usually unique for all the versions) I believe the reason was that HOMEPAGE

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of ruby 1.8.7?

2008-12-23 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 12:48 +0100, Hanno Böck wrote: Hi, We have ruby 1.8.7 in the tree masked since April. # Richard Brown rbr...@gentoo.org (16 Apr 2008) # Masked for test =dev-lang/ruby-1.8.7* There's no tracker bug or anything alike about the status of unmasking, so I wanted to

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2012-01-22 Thread Hans de Graaff
I no longer use the following packages myself and thus I won't be able to provide proper support for them anymore. I'll drop myself from metadata in a week or so. Please feel free to change maintainership before that time. app-office/mdbtools gnome-extra/gnome-do gnome-extra/gnome-do-plugins

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ruby keywording

2012-03-07 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 23:17 +0100, Thomas Kahle wrote: Ruby is an interpreted language, I don't see any point in having every arch team do the testing for every small package. Could the ruby team add ~x86 themselves after testing on ~amd64, or are there compelling reasons to not do this?

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ruby keywording

2012-03-07 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 08:00 +0100, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: It's trivial to set up x86 chroot on amd64 box, so I can't imagine what's preventing people from creating such chroot, doing the testing and keywording themselves. In my personal case what is preventing me is sheer and utter

[gentoo-dev] Ruby 1.9 stable request heads-up

2012-04-03 Thread Hans de Graaff
requires temporarily selecting ruby19 using eselect. When in doubt and out of time for testing you might want to change your dependency to refer to dev-lang/ruby:1.8 instead. If you have questions or concerns, please let us know. On behalf of the ruby team, Hans de Graaff signature.asc

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: several obsolete ruby-gnome2 components

2012-04-17 Thread Hans de Graaff
# Hans de Graaff h...@gentoo.org (17 Apr 2012) # ruby-gnome2 modules obsoleted by upstream. These are # no longer maintained and mostly depend on gnome # components that have been obsoleted themselves. # bug 408251 for ruby-gtkmozembed, no specific bug # for the other components, nothing

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: several obsolete ruby-gnome2 components

2012-04-18 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 23:24 +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote: On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 19:53:06 +0200 Hans de Graaff gra...@gentoo.org wrote: # Hans de Graaff h...@gentoo.org (17 Apr 2012) You need to set ECHANGELOG_USER and then browse the tree to fix your ChangeLog entries. No, this is from

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New third party mirrors

2012-04-24 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 15:10 +0200, Corentin Chary wrote: And here are some mirrors that can be deduced from that (except freebsd-jp which I found reading the linphone ebuild): xemacs http://ftp.xemacs.org/pub/ ftp://ftp.sa.xemacs.org/pub/ I only consider the first site to be a

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-ruby/facets

2012-04-28 Thread Hans de Graaff
# Hans de Graaff gra...@gentoo.org (28 Apr 2012) # History of broken code, new releases use a test system # that does not work itself and has many new dependencies. # Current stable version blocks rubygems stabilization. # No reverse dependencies. # Masked for removal in 30 days. =dev-ruby/facets

Re: [gentoo-dev] Adding PYTHON_TARGETS=python2_7 to base profile

2012-05-13 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Sun, 2012-05-13 at 16:27 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: To make ebuilds utilizing python-distutils-ng.eclass usable out-of-the-box, the python team would like to add the following to make.defaults in the base profile. PYTHON_TARGETS=python2_7 See also bug 415575 [1]. I think this should

Re: [gentoo-dev] Adding PYTHON_TARGETS=python2_7 to base profile

2012-05-21 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 21:50 -0500, Donnie Berkholz wrote: On 16:27 Sun 13 May , Mike Gilbert wrote: To make ebuilds utilizing python-distutils-ng.eclass usable I didn't read any farther because I couldn't stop laughing. What will the next version of this eclass be called, -ng-ng?

Re: [gentoo-dev] About what would be included in EAPI5

2012-06-17 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Sat, 2012-06-16 at 17:24 +0200, Peter Stuge wrote: Ciaran McCreesh wrote: Also, can we stop using the term ABI in reference to this please? It's misleading. Let's call them sub-slots instead. I think ABI fits well though? The situation is that A DEPENDs on B, and at some point B

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Dynamic SLOTs

2012-06-17 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 09:26 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: I'm attaching a reStructuredText version of the spec. You can view it rendered as a gist[1]. But please keep the replies on the list, rather than forking the gist. I don't like the approach taken in 6. I'd rather state that there should

Re: [gentoo-dev] About what would be included in EAPI5

2012-06-18 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 13:35 +0200, Peter Stuge wrote: Hans de Graaff wrote: I think ABI fits well though? The situation is that A DEPENDs on B, and at some point B changes in a way that A must be rebuilt in order to run - right? At least for dev-ruby/nokogiri this is not the case

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-ruby/Ruby-MemCache

2012-06-25 Thread Hans de Graaff
# Hans de Graaff gra...@gentoo.org (26 Jun 2012) # Dead upstream. QA problems in ebuild. Still uses old # ruby.eclass. Use dev-ruby/memcache-client instead. # Masked for removal in 30 days. dev-ruby/Ruby-MemCache signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: app-editors/xemacs and app-xemacs/*

2012-07-14 Thread Hans de Graaff
If you are looking to pick up ~130 packages in one quick move, then wait no longer and add yourself to the xemacs herd! You'll get app-editors/xemacs and all the packages in app-xemacs/* You will inherit a few open bugs, but nothing high priority. XEmacs editor and package release happen quite

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-ruby/spruz

2012-08-01 Thread Hans de Graaff
# Hans de Graaff h...@degraaff.org (1 Aug 3012) # spruz has been superseded by dev-ruby/tins. No packages # in the tree depend on spruz anymore. # Removal in 30 days. dev-ruby/spruz signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] EJOBS variable for EAPI 5?

2012-09-12 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 08:58 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: So essentially what you're saying here is that it might be worthwhile to look into parallelism as a whole and possibly come up with a solution that combines 'emerge --jobs' and build-system parallelism together to maximum benefit?

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP: gentoo sync based unified deps proposal

2012-09-18 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 11:47 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: Yes, and sometimes we're doing 'use test'. I simply don't see how adding a separate group of dependencies just for 'test' phase is going to help us. They fit just fine into build-time dependencies right now. It would enable us to consider

[gentoo-dev] Re: adopt an orphan

2006-12-09 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Sat, 09 Dec 2006 11:39:28 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote: media-gfx/pngtoico I'm using this on a regular basis at work, so I'd be happy to pick it up. There's even a new version out, so expect a version bump shortly. Hans -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Re: New developer: Marijn Schouten (hkBst)

2007-01-10 Thread Hans de Graaff
A fellow Dutchman, and he also likes cats! Gentoo keeps getting better all the time. :-) Welkom, Martijn! -- Hans de Graaff -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-lang/ruby-cvs

2007-04-13 Thread Hans de Graaff
dev-lang/ruby-cvs builds the latest Ruby 1.9.x version from CVS. Except... upstream has moved to SVN, so this ebuild no longer works. It's now masked and will be removed in 30 days. An initial ruby-svn ebuild can be found in https://bugs.gentoo.org/ show_bug.cgi?id=173817 and will hopefully be

[gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: dev-lang/ruby-cvs

2007-04-14 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 18:49:05 -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote: Hans de Graaff wrote: dev-lang/ruby-cvs builds the latest Ruby 1.9.x version from CVS. Except... upstream has moved to SVN, so this ebuild no longer works. It's now masked and will be removed in 30 days. Is there any point

[gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: dev-lang/ruby-cvs

2007-04-14 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 18:34:00 -0700, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: Yes ... upstream moved to SVN right around the first of the year. If you want, I'll file something in bugzilla to get the details for Ruby 1.9 into Portage as an enhancement. Most of my Rubyist friends go right to the source

Re: [gentoo-dev] New developer: Ulrich Müller (ulm)

2007-04-15 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Sun, 2007-04-15 at 19:46 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Sun, 15 Apr 2007, Petteri Räty wrote: Let's hope he realizes he's wasting his time at some point and moves to other areas of the tree (we all know that vim is way better). As for that: http://tinyurl.com/2dynv6 :-) Glad to see

[gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade

2007-05-06 Thread Hans de Graaff
it. Granted, for Radiant specifically this point is moot since there is only a version in testing, but the general point remains. Kind regards, Hans Title: Radiant upgrade from 0.5.2 to 0.6.* Author: Hans de Graaff [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Posted: 06-May-2007 Revision: 1 Display

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade

2007-05-06 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Sun, 2007-05-06 at 11:48 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote: Hans de Graaff kirjoitti: What I would like to happen is that the message is added to the tree once, shown to users who have dev-ruby/radiant in testing immediately, and only shown to other users of dev-ruby/radiant when they move

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade

2007-05-06 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Sun, 2007-05-06 at 16:33 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Sun, 06 May 2007 08:45:36 +0200 Hans de Graaff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I guess this is what the Display-If-Upgrading-From-To: that Ciaran mentioned would do, but I'm wondering if GLEP 42 makes any sense without it. Nope

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade

2007-05-06 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Sun, 2007-05-06 at 16:51 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: Will the news item be shown before or after the package gets merged? After. For before, use Display-If-Installed: on a lower version. Ok, so this is more like elog stuff. One benefit I can see with this version is that it makes it

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade

2007-05-06 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Sun, 2007-05-06 at 17:27 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: If either the news item is shown once, it is bad because the user might forget about if until that package actually hits the stable branch. The 'eselect news' module that ships with Paludis solves that problem. I'm not familiar

[gentoo-dev] 'stricter' FEATURE and poor programming practices notice

2007-05-17 Thread Hans de Graaff
Hi, I've had the 'stricter' FEATURE turned on for some time and found that many packages failed due to the QA notice regarding poor programming practices. I filed a few bugs for this but have not gotten a lot of response, or the suggestion to talk to upstream. Obviously the latter is always a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grab

2007-07-15 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 11:27 +0200, Christian Heim wrote: - media-libs/exiftool (Assigned to graphics and perl) I'll be happy to take this, I already said as much in the open bugs for it. Kind regards, Hans signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Some ideas on how to reduce territoriality

2007-08-17 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 18:43 +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: Also known as FEATURES=stricter. Unfortunately FEATURES=stricter stopped being really useful when it started to die on bad programming practices QA messages. These happen a lot and often are beyond our direct control because it may not

Re: [gentoo-dev] Some ideas on how to reduce territoriality

2007-08-17 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 13:40 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Friday 17 August 2007, Hans de Graaff wrote: Unfortunately FEATURES=stricter stopped being really useful when it started to die on bad programming practices QA messages. These happen a lot and often are beyond our direct control

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Python 2.5 unmasked

2007-08-25 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Sat, 2007-08-25 at 14:53 +0100, Luis Medinas wrote: Definitly the python herd seems understaffed even ruby (as a much less popular language) has more members. This was a good week for the python herd nice job! Obviously ruby is much more fun than python, so there should be more people in

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Staff Developer: Maarten Bressers (mbres)

2007-08-28 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 19:05 +0200, Christian Heim wrote: It's my pleasure to introduce to you Maarten Bresses (also known as mbres on IRC), our latest addition joining the kernel herd. Maarten is joining us from Boxtel (that should be located in the Netherlands), were he spent the last 2

  1   2   3   >