Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] glep-0075: Update for reference implementation

2019-10-25 Thread Michał Górny
On Thu, 2019-10-24 at 22:39 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 24 Oct 2019, Michał Górny wrote: > > +in 2⁴ = 16 directories), and each of this directories would have > > s/this/these/ (This was there before, but can be corrected while at it.) > > > +The implementations are only

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] glep-0075: Update for reference implementation

2019-10-24 Thread Hanno Böck
On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 22:39:06 +0200 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > In the rationale section, one reason given for the choice of the hash > algorithm (BLAKE2B) was to "avoid code duplication". Isn't that > argument moot, if all hashes supported by Portage are implemented? > (Or in other words, couldn't a

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] glep-0075: Update for reference implementation

2019-10-24 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Thu, 24 Oct 2019, Michał Górny wrote: > +in 2⁴ = 16 directories), and each of this directories would have s/this/these/ (This was there before, but can be corrected while at it.) > +The implementations are only required to support cutoffs being multiples s/The

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] glep-0075: Update for reference implementation

2019-10-24 Thread Michał Górny
Fill in the reference implementation section. Reduce the requirements for cutoffs to support only multiples of 4, as there is no point in making the implementation more complex for something we aren't using anyway. Fix a typo. Signed-off-by: Michał Górny --- glep-0075.rst | 38