Are there any objections against adding "as-is" to @GPL-COMPATIBLE? It is less restrictive than the X11 licence (which is included).
Otherwise, users accepting only GPL compatible software wouldn't even be able to install Emacs. ;-) Ulrich
Are there any objections against adding "as-is" to @GPL-COMPATIBLE? It is less restrictive than the X11 licence (which is included).
Otherwise, users accepting only GPL compatible software wouldn't even be able to install Emacs. ;-) Ulrich