Re: [gentoo-dev] Need an x86 tester with =1GB RAM (and some time to spare)
Ok... Linux oneill 2.6.13-gentoo-hugemem #3 Fri Sep 2 11:41:01 PDT 2005 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2800+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux Linux version 2.6.13-gentoo-hugemem ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.5-20050130 (Gentoo 3.3.5.20050130-r1, ssp-3.3.5.20050130-1, pie-8.7.7.1)) #3 Fri Sep 2 11:41:01 PDT 2005 This is with: # CONFIG_NOHIGHMEM is not set # CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G is not set CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G=y CONFIG_HIGHMEM=y CONFIG_X86_PAE=y CONFIG_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL=y CONFIG_FLATMEM_MANUAL=y # CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM_MANUAL is not set # CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_MANUAL is not set CONFIG_FLATMEM=y CONFIG_FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP=y System boots just fine. The only thing I didn't do was use genkernel. Guess I'll give that a whirl, see if my results differ. -- Jeff Walter -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Need an x86 tester with =1GB RAM (and some time to spare)
Hi, Theres a bug filed against gentoo-sources-2.6 which causes the system to be unreliable when running the 64GB highmem option. This bug isn't present in the vanilla kernels so it must be caused by one of the patches we apply, but I don't know which this might be. To see this bug, you need to have _some_ highmem in the system (this means = 1GB total physical RAM), be running on x86 (other arches dont have HIGHMEM option), and have the 64GB high memory support option enabled. (4gb is fine, as is lowmem) I've had this bug reproduced by a few different people, but none of them with enough time to help me diagnose this. I only have 512mb myself so I can't help. If anyone has the appropriate hardware and some time to spare slowly reverting out the Gentoo patches to help diagnose the problem, please take a look at http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101359 Thanks! Daniel -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Need an x86 tester with =1GB RAM (and some time to spare)
Daniel Drake wrote: To see this bug, you need to have _some_ highmem in the system (this means = 1GB total physical RAM), be running on x86 (other arches dont have HIGHMEM option), and have the 64GB high memory support option enabled. (4gb is fine, as is lowmem) I currently have 1GB of RAM with the 4GB HIMEM on 2.6.12-gentoo-r9. I can play with it. I've had this bug reproduced by a few different people, but none of them with enough time to help me diagnose this. I only have 512mb myself so I can't help. Sounds like it's time to upgrade ;-) If anyone has the appropriate hardware and some time to spare slowly reverting out the Gentoo patches to help diagnose the problem, please take a look at http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101359 I can definitely do that on one of my days off work (Mondays and Tuesdays). Shouldn't be terribly difficult with the newer, smaller patchset. -- Jeff Walter Gentoo Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gentoo.org/~jeffw/ -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list