Re: [gentoo-dev] Need an x86 tester with =1GB RAM (and some time to spare)

2005-09-02 Thread Jeff Walter

Ok...

Linux oneill 2.6.13-gentoo-hugemem #3 Fri Sep 2 11:41:01 PDT 2005 i686 
AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2800+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux


Linux version 2.6.13-gentoo-hugemem ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 
3.3.5-20050130 (Gentoo 3.3.5.20050130-r1, ssp-3.3.5.20050130-1, 
pie-8.7.7.1)) #3 Fri Sep 2 11:41:01 PDT 2005


This is with:
# CONFIG_NOHIGHMEM is not set
# CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G is not set
CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G=y
CONFIG_HIGHMEM=y
CONFIG_X86_PAE=y
CONFIG_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL=y
CONFIG_FLATMEM_MANUAL=y
# CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM_MANUAL is not set
# CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_MANUAL is not set
CONFIG_FLATMEM=y
CONFIG_FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP=y

System boots just fine.  The only thing I didn't do was use genkernel. 
Guess I'll give that a whirl, see if my results differ.


--
Jeff Walter
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-dev] Need an x86 tester with =1GB RAM (and some time to spare)

2005-09-01 Thread Daniel Drake

Hi,

Theres a bug filed against gentoo-sources-2.6 which causes the system to be 
unreliable when running the 64GB highmem option. This bug isn't present in the 
vanilla kernels so it must be caused by one of the patches we apply, but I 
don't know which this might be.


To see this bug, you need to have _some_ highmem in the system (this means = 
1GB total physical RAM), be running on x86 (other arches dont have HIGHMEM 
option), and have the 64GB high memory support option enabled. (4gb is fine, 
as is lowmem)


I've had this bug reproduced by a few different people, but none of them with 
enough time to help me diagnose this. I only have 512mb myself so I can't help.


If anyone has the appropriate hardware and some time to spare slowly reverting 
out the Gentoo patches to help diagnose the problem, please take a look at 
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101359


Thanks!
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] Need an x86 tester with =1GB RAM (and some time to spare)

2005-09-01 Thread Jeff Walter

Daniel Drake wrote:
To see this bug, you need to have _some_ highmem in the system (this 
means = 1GB total physical RAM), be running on x86 (other arches dont 
have HIGHMEM option), and have the 64GB high memory support option 
enabled. (4gb is fine, as is lowmem)


I currently have 1GB of RAM with the 4GB HIMEM on 2.6.12-gentoo-r9.  I 
can play with it.


I've had this bug reproduced by a few different people, but none of them 
with enough time to help me diagnose this. I only have 512mb myself so I 
can't help.


Sounds like it's time to upgrade ;-)

If anyone has the appropriate hardware and some time to spare slowly 
reverting out the Gentoo patches to help diagnose the problem, please 
take a look at http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101359


I can definitely do that on one of my days off work (Mondays and 
Tuesdays).  Shouldn't be terribly difficult with the newer, smaller 
patchset.


--
Jeff Walter
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gentoo.org/~jeffw/
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list