Re: [gentoo-dev] New acct-user/pgbouncer
> On Mon, 05 Oct 2020, Aaron W Swenson wrote: > On 2020-10-05 10:51, Aaron W. Swenson wrote: >> Currently we're just using -1 for pgbouncer. The user does own a >> couple things, but that's managed by checkpath in the init script. >> >> So, given that any UID will do, I'm proposing either 383 (I think >> someone else is asking for 384) or 463. >> >> Pgbouncer only needs a UID. It uses the postgres GID. >> >> Which UID should we use: 383 or 463? > And, I'm seeing my list was slightly out of date as 383 is now taken. > So, which UID should we use: 379 or 463? Either is fine. The guidelines recommend taking the next free one available which would be 463. Ulrich signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] New acct-user/pgbouncer
On 2020-10-05 10:51, Aaron W. Swenson wrote: > Currently we're just using -1 for pgbouncer. The user does own a couple > things, > but that's managed by checkpath in the init script. > > So, given that any UID will do, I'm proposing either 383 (I think someone > else > is asking for 384) or 463. > > Pgbouncer only needs a UID. It uses the postgres GID. > > Which UID should we use: 383 or 463? And, I'm seeing my list was slightly out of date as 383 is now taken. So, which UID should we use: 379 or 463? signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-dev] New acct-user/pgbouncer
Currently we're just using -1 for pgbouncer. The user does own a couple things, but that's managed by checkpath in the init script. So, given that any UID will do, I'm proposing either 383 (I think someone else is asking for 384) or 463. Pgbouncer only needs a UID. It uses the postgres GID. Which UID should we use: 383 or 463? signature.asc Description: PGP signature
