Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages needing manitainer
В Вск, 08/03/2009 в 22:54 +0100, Rémi Cardona пишет: Le 08/03/2009 21:38, Tomáš Chvátal a écrit : net-misc/mDNSResponder How about dropping this one in favor of avahi? Or am I missing something obvious? Are they completely interchangeable? Last time (well, the only time) I built samba 3.3.0 it linked against dns_sd and it have no provisions to be built against avahi as I see... -- Peter. signature.asc Description: Эта часть сообщения подписана цифровой подписью
[gentoo-dev] Packages needing manitainer
We (kde team) have some packages that we are not interested much/are so popular that we cant handle their bugload/releases/etc. So here they are: media-sound/amarok for both kde3 and kde4 version net-misc/mDNSResponder Is there around some brave soul that would became maintainer for this two (or at least one :P)? Regard Tomas Chvatal Gentoo KDE Herd Testers Lead signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages needing manitainer
Le 08/03/2009 21:38, Tomáš Chvátal a écrit : net-misc/mDNSResponder How about dropping this one in favor of avahi? Or am I missing something obvious? Cheers :) Rémi
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages needing manitainer
Dne neděle 08 Březen 2009 22:54:23 Rémi Cardona napsal(a): How about dropping this one in favor of avahi? Or am I missing something obvious? Well we can do it, but first i would love to see if somebody is interested. Dont you think? Tomas signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages needing manitainer
On Sunday 08 March 2009 22:38:47 Tomáš Chvátal wrote: We (kde team) have some packages that we are not interested much/are so popular that we cant handle their bugload/releases/etc. So here they are: media-sound/amarok for both kde3 and kde4 version net-misc/mDNSResponder Is there around some brave soul that would became maintainer for this two (or at least one :P)? Regard Tomas Chvatal Gentoo KDE Herd Testers Lead What will happen to amarok if nobody maintains it ? In my opinion, amarok is a quite complicated package so It should not be assigned just to one developer. We ( as kde team ) can take care of amaroks' several bugs. For example, I can take care of [1] and somebody else can take care of another bug as well. Nobody else from kde team is interested on amarok? [1]: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=258861 -- Markos Chandras (hwoarang) Gentoo Linux Developer Qt/KDE/Sound/Sunrise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
