Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: fox.eclass update
On Thursday, September 16, 2010 23:51:21 Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 18:34:17 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Thursday, September 16, 2010 15:41:27 Peter Volkov wrote:
> > > В Чтв, 16/09/2010 в 15:29 -0400, Mike Frysinger пишет:
> > > > > FOX_PV="${FOX_PV:-${PV}}"
> > > >
> > > > while you're here, i'd change to:
> > > > : ${FOX_PV:=${PV}}
> > >
> > > Why? This looks less readable...
> >
> > only because your eyes arent tuned to it
>
> What exactly is the advantage though? Is it something to do with command
> vs assignment?
i guess if you like typing the same variable name twice, then the old style is
for you. i do not like.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: fox.eclass update
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 18:34:17 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday, September 16, 2010 15:41:27 Peter Volkov wrote:
> > В Чтв, 16/09/2010 в 15:29 -0400, Mike Frysinger пишет:
> > > > FOX_PV="${FOX_PV:-${PV}}"
> > >
> > > while you're here, i'd change to:
> > > : ${FOX_PV:=${PV}}
> >
> > Why? This looks less readable...
>
> only because your eyes arent tuned to it
What exactly is the advantage though? Is it something to do with command vs
assignment?
--
fonts, gcc-porting, we hold our breath, we spin around the world
toolchain, wxwidgetsyou and me cling to the outside of the earth
@ gentoo.orgEFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
