Rob Cakebread wrote:
Samuli Suominen wrote:
I don't know about you, but when a package can't be stabled because
it's depending on Python 2.5 and current stable is broken I'd like
to start reverting stable keywords back to ~arch as noone wants to
maintain broken junk. Latest being
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Tiziano Müller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob Cakebread wrote:
Samuli Suominen wrote:
I don't know about you, but when a package can't be stabled because
it's depending on Python 2.5 and current stable is broken I'd like
to start reverting stable keywords back
Hi,
Santiago M. Mola [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There are a few things which need some kind of action before/during
python 2.5 stabilization:
We have bug 178800, too. Either mark individual stabilisation bugs
blocking it or add them to 178800 when ccing arches.
And I don't think one or two packages
Samuli Suominen yazmış:
Perhaps it should be a council agenda?
I think we can get it stable before the next council meeting ;)
--
Regards,
Ali Polatel
pgpNUct0SMpL2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
