Re: [gentoo-dev] Should this be considered a gcc bug?

2015-04-21 Thread William Hubbs
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 09:57:16AM +0600, gro...@gentoo.org wrote: Hello *, There was a bug #526194 - dev-lisp/sbcl does not respect CFLAGS. It was fixed by Mark Wright gie...@gentoo.org on Jan 31 - Feb 1. However, after this fix the upstream CFLAGS were appended to the user-supplyed

[gentoo-dev] Should this be considered a gcc bug?

2015-04-20 Thread grozin
Hello *, There was a bug #526194 - dev-lisp/sbcl does not respect CFLAGS. It was fixed by Mark Wright gie...@gentoo.org on Jan 31 - Feb 1. However, after this fix the upstream CFLAGS were appended to the user-supplyed ${CFLAGS}. And the upstream CFLAGS contain -O3. So, is a user has, e.g.,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Should this be considered a gcc bug?

2015-04-20 Thread Andrew Savchenko
Hi, On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 09:57:16 +0600 (NOVT) gro...@gentoo.org wrote: Hello *, There was a bug #526194 - dev-lisp/sbcl does not respect CFLAGS. It was fixed by Mark Wright gie...@gentoo.org on Jan 31 - Feb 1. However, after this fix the upstream CFLAGS were appended to the user-supplyed

Re: [gentoo-dev] Should this be considered a gcc bug?

2015-04-20 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 09:57:16 +0600 (NOVT) gro...@gentoo.org wrote: However, after this fix the upstream CFLAGS were appended to the user-supplyed ${CFLAGS}. And the upstream CFLAGS contain -O3. There is your problem. We filter out those compiler flags that affect the output, so -O3 should go